Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

Presidential Election 2025

1489490492494495517

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,992 ✭✭✭For Petes Sake


    I can say with a high degree of confidence that a large portion of those who spoiled their votes will vote for parties to keep the left out of the next government.

    Everyone said the same about the referendums in Family and Care last year. Remind me again how much of a difference it made to the status quo? Nothing. We still elected the same two parties to lead the current government in a General Election only 9 months later and they even got closer to a majority by themselves than they had in those referendums.

    The next General Election is 4 years away. I personally think it's 'naive' to think that all of those voters will stay the course again when that comes around. A portion of them will vote for fringe right-wing parties, but that's it.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,781 ✭✭✭✭Loafing Oaf


    If you think this will lead to a ground swell of changes, then you've been duped, I'm afraid.

    The idea (or pipe dream might be more accurate) is that fear of a looming backlash will prompt a 'lurch to the right' on the part of FF and FG. But we heard the same talk after last year's referendums, FF & FG kept on trucking and they were returned to government with a proprtionately near-identical seat total…



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,992 ✭✭✭For Petes Sake


    Percentage of seats for FFG after 2020: 45.6%. 8 seats from a majority

    Percentage of seats for FFG after 2024: 49.4%. 3 seats from a majority

    They got a hell of a lot closer to a majority in 2024 than they had after 2020. So the OP is absolutely bang on the money.

    Also, they hold every single senior ministry, which they did not have after 2020.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,781 ✭✭✭✭Loafing Oaf


    What's the old saying? Great minds post near-simultaneously…



  • Registered Users, Subscribers, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,803 ✭✭✭hometruths


    Why do we want our president doing that? pissing off people, or pissing off any percentage of the population?

    Isn't that just an unavoidable outcome of democracy, irrespective of the candidate or the election?

    Every democratically elected government in history in every democracy has managed to piss off a percentage of the population at some point.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 8,443 ✭✭✭MrMusician18


    You can only vote for whats put in front of you. It feels as if theres a gentlepersons agreement that no party should wade in and claim this cohort as it is a road to polarisation. I have long thought that FF in particular would try and take this social centre right ground but Martin has very much resisted this. That said, this election is clearly the beginning of the end for MM and a new leader may seek to find growth in the social centre right. There are no real other avenues to go to grow, the left is pretty well covered.

    I could be wrong and this fizzles away after a week or two, dismissed by the political establishment as a riotous right fired up by events that will settle back down, just as Peter Caseys vote ultimately materialised to naught. IIRC an unnamed minister stated in the aftermath of that one that the public always rallies around a protest cause in presidential elections.

    That said, this feels different. There was a lot of anger expressed on more than a few spoiled ballots. Thats completely new.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,992 ✭✭✭For Petes Sake


    I also find it very funny that someone is trying to argue that the number of spoiled votes is relevent but the number of actual valid votes for Catherine Connolly (the highest by any candidate in the history of the State) is irrelevent.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,028 ✭✭✭Caquas


    I agree that the problem is not the requirement for 20 Oireachtas members or 4 local authorities. There must be a substantial level of democratic support to put any candidate on the ballot. Otherwise, we'll have Conor McGregor or Boaty MacBoatface making a farce of things and even winning votes on a surge of public anger or cynicism.

    The problem is not that the bar is too high. It's that the main parties have lost their leadership role. How many people really look to any party for political guidance and leadership? Not for the two referendums, and not for the Presidential election.

    The three largest parties each messed this up in their own particular way. Micheál made a terrible mistake backing Jim Gavin who lacked any vision for the Presidency (but at least he had no prior association with FF😂). Simon was sure he had a winner in Mairéad but she just vanished (anyone?) so he dragged exhausted Heather out of retirement to apologise for everything and to block Sean Kelly. SF wanted MLMD but she wouldn't run and so, like Labour, they had no choice but to back CC who never had a good word to say for them. SF may feel smug this evening but in their hearts they know that they were late to the CC party.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,617 ✭✭✭jmcc


    They did not win in 2020. They did not win in 2024. It is basic maths. They could not form a government on their own after either GE.

    Regards…jmcc



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 950 ✭✭✭gk5000


    Fine for a government, but not for a president within our constitution who is supposed to be above politics.

    i.e. she needs to stick to her figurehead/ceremonial role and not opinions or politics like some advocate.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,992 ✭✭✭For Petes Sake


    If the point you're making is that they didn't get a majority, well done.

    However, the actual point is that their proportion of the vote only got bigger, the proportion of seats they won got bigger, and they now hold every senior ministry in the government.

    9 months out from overwhelming referendum defeats, they had a bigger mandate than they went into those elections with.

    What part of that are you struggling to understand?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,781 ✭✭✭✭Loafing Oaf


    a new leader may seek to find growth in the social centre right. There are no real other avenues to go to grow, the left is pretty well covered.

    The soft left is where the floating voters are. FF & FG's calculation has always been that social conservatives are diehard cradle-to-grave supporters of one or other of them.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 854 ✭✭✭kazamo


    or it could be FFG voters who were unimpressed with the prospect of voting for HH and spoiled their votes rather than give approval for the last minute candidate after Mairead MCGuinness dropped out for health reasons.



  • Registered Users, Subscribers, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,803 ✭✭✭hometruths


    There's been a homeless vote crying out for new political party for a good few years now.

    Unfortunately the biggest barrier to any new party is funding, the current laws around political party funding overwhelmingly favour established parties, so I suspect they are unlikely to change anytime soon.



  • Registered Users, Subscribers, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,803 ✭✭✭hometruths


    Well i guess we should give her the benefit of the doubt until she does actually piss people off.

    And if she does, maybe she'll get a pass on it, like Michael D. Or maybe not, time will tell.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 33,362 ✭✭✭✭breezy1985


    The election before they done a deal with the Greens.

    So how was it different ?

    The little referendum that the culture war people were obsessed with was quickly forgotten. Or more accurately most people never knew it existed.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,617 ✭✭✭jmcc


    In some respects, that Spoil The Vote campaign launch looked like the start of a new party. If it got off the ground, it could take support from FFG as well as floating voters. Funding is a major problem. Awareness is a larger one. Social Media does provide a better way of getting its policies known than the legacy media.

    Regards…jmcc



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,226 ✭✭✭greenfield21


    Has any world leaders congratulated Catherine?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,015 ✭✭✭✭MJohnston


    People who talk about FF or FG lurching to the right just fundamentally do not understand Irish politics, and are viewing the whole thing through an American or a British lens of FPTP voting and two-party politics. They also try to peg Ireland to the exact same left-right political spectrum of other countries, where that's also something that's foundationally different about Ireland.

    That's not how Ireland works, thankfully, and those people would do well to read up on the composition of Irish governments, specifically the fact that we haven't had a single-party majority government since 1981.

    Major Irish political parties don't need to lurch anywhere, coalition governments mean they can adapt more deliberately and carefully.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,617 ✭✭✭jmcc


    There is a conservative element in FFG that could provide some opportunities. Those refernda were not universally popular in FFG. Analysing the breakdown on the spoiled votes will not easy because the intentions of the voters may be missing from the ballot papers. The Steen voters might be easy to group if they wrote Steen's name on the ballot.

    Regards…jmcc



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 624 ✭✭✭Coolcormack1979


    Deliberately missing the point.if in normal elections the spoilt vote is 0.5 to 0.8% then you can ignore it.but when it skyrockets to around 13% then it’s a major problem

    Good luck to our new president.i don’t care for her Marxist ideology



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,701 ✭✭✭rolling boh


    Any sign of Wallace and Daly yet ? hardly still confined to barracks now that the election is over .



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,382 ✭✭✭patnor1011


    This result is overwhelming rejection of FFG candidate and policies. Nevermind spoiled votes, a lot of people who voted for Catherine did so only because they wanted to stick it to the FFG. Besides the choice was to vote for bad or worse and more than half the people didn't bother to go anyway.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 8,443 ✭✭✭MrMusician18


    I think the soft left is well covered. You have the Greens, Soc Dems and Labour all chasing that pool of votes, as well as the Garrett Fitzgerald FG'ers its completely crowded. The Christian Right is largely empty - maybe you'd consider Aontu there, and the secular centre right and right is completely vacant.

    Up to now at least, there has been zero appetite on behalf of a mainstream party to court this cohort - maybe because it would impact their vote with the left/progressives which they see as more valuable, or that they could be spun as a new irish Orban, or maybe because they thought who else are these people going to vote for.

    They've now found out that while no one else may get that vote, they might be on the verge of losing it. Ireland has always lagged behind global political trends, but the global trend is rightward and it is a matter of time before someone capable makes a move here.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,617 ✭✭✭jmcc


    The point is that FFG did not get enough seats to form a government in 2020 or 2024. The referenda showed that the electorate doesn't like liars. The government was defeated in the referenda. It was also defeated in 2024 with the Greens losing all but one seat. The FFG/Lowry government was defeated in this presidential election.

    Regards…jmcc



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 22,386 ✭✭✭✭Strazdas


    Definitely a large protest vote, but I have feeling she might have won no matter who she was up against (assuming that SF didn't have a candidate).



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,992 ✭✭✭For Petes Sake


    FFG won a higher share of the vote and a higher proportion of the seats in 2024 than they had after 2020

    Bang on about majorities all you want, but the referendums made not one jot of a difference to FFG, and I feel like you are deliberately ignoring this point because you feel you have to.

    They hold every senior office in government now. How on Earth can you ignore that while you make your pedantic point? The referendums defeat had no impact on them whatsoever.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,015 ✭✭✭✭MJohnston


    Aontu definitely fits the socially conservative mould and how easily we forget about Renua, which sank quickly without a trace.

    There's a vanishingly small appetite for an American or British-style right-wing party in Ireland, beyond the sole issue of immigration



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 9,412 ✭✭✭corkie


    @Arghus Nominations is not the only reason, but combined with whip been imposed (Gareth Sheridan was campaigning for a year?). What is wrong with having more candidates even if they are no hopers, just so they can be eliminated early in counting and their transfers put into effect. Most of the campaigners said if there was more candidates, spoil the vote, would never have taken hold or got traction. Their still be voters doing it for what ever reason they deemed it required but wouldn't have trended in the last few days.

    I have state even if 'Ave' Maria was on the ballot, I would have still spoiled. But I would be only one in selected few of people to do so.

    For me personally spoiling the vote was not about effecting change to this election, but for future elections.

    The results of this election, will have a ripple effect on the status of government in the coming days in unforeseen ways. It won't change what parties are in, but the leaders of FF&FG have their party members to deal with.

    Their is apathy towards Presidential Election in general, and feeling that it doesn't have any great effect in what is a ceremonial role. Maybe CC can continue to redefine what the role means.

    I don't see that myself from that group of characters, they may have found a common goal for this campaign, but there is too many hot heads in it with their own issues and problems, that they themselves have acknowledge they don't agree with each other on a lot of things. They may each have their own popular social media circles, but a good bit of people online don't like many of them. Or might like 1 or 2 but not the others. Don't see a party been formed by them. But I could be wrong and just basing it on false opinions shared on 'Xitter'! Reason why I started saying 'I DO NOT endorse them.

    "Those who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it." ~ George Santayana
    "But that's balanced out by the fact that it's a mandate not to do very much." ~ Prof. Eoin O'Malley



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,617 ✭✭✭jmcc


    FFG did not get elected to government in 2020 or 2024. They did not win enough seats to form a government. In each case, they had to do deals to get the required number of seats. They were also defeated in the referenda. And most recently, they lost the presidential election.

    Regards…jmcc



Advertisement
Advertisement