Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
If we do not hit our goal we will be forced to close the site.

Current status: https://keepboardsalive.com/

Annual subs are best for most impact. If you are still undecided on going Ad Free - you can also donate using the Paypal Donate option. All contribution helps. Thank you.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

Immigration and Ireland - MEGATHREAD *Mod Note Added 02/09/25*

1368369371373374389

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,268 ✭✭✭PokeHerKing


    All the more annoying that Maria Steen was essentially blocked by FGs decision. We would have had a really good race of far left, centrish and far right then.

    For a ceremonial position that wouldn't affect the voters pocket. Would have been a great pulse check of the countries opinion when theres nothing at stake imo.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,177 ✭✭✭ledwithhedwith


    The last election was less than 12 months ago, how did the far right do?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,268 ✭✭✭PokeHerKing


    The government is not a ceremonial position and it absolutely affects peoples pocket. So will never hinge on one issue.

    Did you read my post or did you just see your trigger words?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,374 ✭✭✭Sudden Valley


    she could have got signatures from other Oireachtas members that were not FG , so that is not an accurate representation of what happened. Realistically, FG or any party is not obligated to assist an opponent in any election.

    Maybe the rules need to changed for who is nominated but it is poor player that blames the established rules.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,268 ✭✭✭PokeHerKing


    I mean removing a huge amount of options from her options was obviously going to affect her options.

    Im not blaming established rules. Im merely pointing out my disappointment in the outcome.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,374 ✭✭✭Sudden Valley


    She could have got votes from other parties, independents. Blame all parties then. At the end of the day , Maria Steen just didnt meet the entry requirements.

    You may not be blaming established rules but I think both Steen and McGregor were.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,268 ✭✭✭PokeHerKing


    She did get votes from other parties/independents, where do you think the 18 votes she got came from?

    FG removed 30+ potential votes. Im not sure why you have an issue with this fact.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,374 ✭✭✭Sudden Valley


    I dont have an issue with what FG did just pointing but she could have got the two votes from non FG sources. Blaming FG over nay other party just makes no sense. Might as well blame SF for not supplying the two votes



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,595 ✭✭✭ShagNastii


    The whole false or "no documentation" thing really gets me (and I believe a huge amount of the general public). What's the story with it? Is it a plot to advertently throw a massive spanner into an asylum claim or is there an real reason to it?

    I know we can be very cynical towards any asylum claim but I'd imagine if I told the country I arrived in-who I was, where I was from and why I am seeking asylum I'd be off on the right foot.

    From what little I know I'd imagine the above approach is a cloak and dagger approach of buying time to come up with a the correct yarn to let me in?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,268 ✭✭✭PokeHerKing


    FG policy removed it though, no other party did that. So only natural to single them out on this issue imo.



  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Computer Games Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators Posts: 19,012 Mod ✭✭✭✭Kimbot


    Because if their documentation was checked here it would show that the people travelled through multiple other european countries, once that is established then they can be returned to one of those countries to have the asylum claim heard. If they dont have documents then they get to come here and live on us.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,873 ✭✭✭pah


    Given that there are only a handful of routes to Ireland from Africa and a lot of other places, maybe the policy should change - send them back to their last outgoing port if they arrive with no docs



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,268 ✭✭✭PokeHerKing


    Update SOPs based off new information, evolving trends and changing landscapes??

    I dont think thats how things work man.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 1,759 ✭✭✭Dr Robert


    They were rejected out the gate.

    Most people are too busy getting on with their lives to wallow in self pity with some of those clowns. Whingers. They are as bad as PBP ffs.

    Save boards.ie by subscribing:



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 22,803 ✭✭✭✭Ash.J.Williams


    All the people whinging about the ballot had 7-14 years to get their act together and left it to the last minute



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 331 ✭✭Tommysocks11


    If migration is so great then why have Poland and Hungary refused to take any, the answer is their people dont want them as they have seen the imported problems that Sweden is now experiencing, I have no problem with genuine refugees who have documents etc or even families coming but putting groups of men into IPAS centers together is a pure disaster and due to nature they will crave intimacy and have no respect for women or god forbid kids in the city west attack a few days ago and they will act out their urges



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,302 ✭✭✭Patrick2010


    Can you point where in this 74 year old treaty Ireland is obliged to accept asylum seekers for years and make endless appeals until they are eventually accepted here?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 17,616 ✭✭✭✭cj maxx


    The more I hear about Ireland's immigration policy the more I understand why Nigel Farage gets votes in the uk .



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,318 ✭✭✭✭Quantum Erasure


    Steen would have picked up a fair chunk of those that voted SF (even though they've endorsed Connolly) and the independent vote as well. She wouldn't have won but it would have made it interesting,



  • Moderators, Entertainment Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators, Paid Member Posts: 21,940 Mod ✭✭✭✭Leg End Reject


    Mod - final on thread reminder that ongoing court cases cannot be discussed, thread bans will be issued as per the mod note in the OP.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,943 ✭✭✭Markus Antonius


    An IPAS centre was earmarked for 90 migrant men in my (very rural) village (a stone's throw from my family home). No consultation, a warning issued to local councillors 24 hours before security teams were instructed to move in. Naturally it sparked fear and panic from the locals and drove the unthinkable to happen to the facility overnight.

    But this is effectively the choice the government are giving to people - 90 unknown migrant men in your village or a pile of smouldering ash?

    There must be a lot of "far right" in the area. Funny how the demand and price of housing skyrocketed since?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,000 ✭✭✭donaghs


    They can’t get on a plane with no documents. Even though they arrive here claiming they’ve no documents.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,000 ✭✭✭donaghs


    Looks like the multinational private sector have stepped in to help with free legal advice on how get settled here and get your benefits:

    https://www.lawsociety.ie/gazette/top-stories/2025/august/dla-piper-launches-2025-refugees-course/



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,469 ✭✭✭RoyalCelt


    I'd make a small adjustment to your post. I've no problem with a very small number of genuine refugees coming here.

    Other countries to analysis are Denmark and especially Estonia who somehow haven't collapsed by not making 40% of their country foreigners or imported thousands of health professionals to prevent a health care collapse.

    I guess when you import so many foreigners you also need to import extra health care workers.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,730 ✭✭✭✭Galwayguy35


    Everyone knows why they arrive with no documents.

    Its been going on a long time and has proved successful for them.

    Could the clowns running this country not look at how other countries like Poland are handling immigration and try it here.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,964 ✭✭✭almostover


    If I hear the argument of Ireland's population pre-famine again as a justification for unfettered immigration I'll scream.

    Yes, there were 8.5 million people living on this island in the early 1840s. Most of whom were destitute paupers living in hovels of cottages with their animals, living in a state of near constant starvation, riddled by easily treatable disease and ultimately who were reliant on growing a single crop on tiny rented plots where the threat of eviction constantly loomed. It was existence, not living, and a miserable existence at that.

    How people ignore that context when presenting such a facile argument is beyond me.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,779 ✭✭✭✭Geuze


    Then how did the person travel from Syria to here?

    Please explain to me how people without documents board commercial aircraft.

    Whereas the truth, which has been stated over and over, is that they deliberately discard their travel documents.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,779 ✭✭✭✭Geuze


    I am not defending the 1951 Treaty.

    I am simply stating that it is what politicans are referring to when they mention "international obligations".

    I would deport bogus AS within 24hrs of arrival, even if it goes against this Treaty.

    It was written in a different age.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 182 ✭✭BandyMandy


    They got offferd €30,000 to leave Sweden, then they arrived here, and only offered 10,000 to leave.


    I heard again on the radio today someone say how.. " these people are in the health services, etc" etc "... I'm sick of the line!



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,322 ✭✭✭Ozymandius2011


    It was written when many future source countries were part of European colonial empires, which did restrict migration to Europe. It does not reflect todays world.

    The British Nationality Act 1948 did on paper allow freedom of movement, but in practice few migrated from Africa as they couldn't afford to and at first it was mostly applied in Asia rather than Africa.

    And India, Pakistan, Bangladesh and the British and French Mandates were only recently independent since 1949 and some places like Aden still weren't until the 1960s.

    I think many countries in the Global South support the convention in part because down the road it leads to remittances being sent home.

    A second reason is to influence in our elections. I mean their governments. Erdogan campaigned in Germany for votes in the Turkish election. Also historically Turkey encouraged Turks in Germany to vote for the SPD due to its support for EU membership. We saw with the Al Halawa case how we are being dragged into other countries (Egypt) politics sometimes too.



Advertisement