Who actually wants the Dublin Airport passenger cap abolished?

Ok, if you want to keep replying about this pedantic nothing-burger then its on you.

You can absolutely say what I responded to you with. Infer being a synonym of conclude, deduce. Go back and try again, just use 'deduce'.

I have great posts on this thread. The best posts. I have the best posts. They all say it. Everyones saying it.

rage or speed. frustrated drivers do tend to speed. and congestion is most prevalent during rush hour. it would be most irresponsible to add more traffic to an already overburdened motorway, the country's busiest, and id guess most accident prone already.

Good man. Looks like you deduced how in the wrong you are in mid-sentence and have decided to do a runner instead of admitting it.

More indications that you are not a poster to be taken seriously.

You didn't jumble anything. You used the wrong verb, then threw your toys out of the pram when it was politely pointed out to you and you refused to accept it.

You're still refusing to do so. It ain't me that needs to come to terms with it.

It's clear what he meant.

He's blue in the face pretending that he meant something else entirely, because Mellor pulled him up on it, instead of just admitting that he picked the wrong word when he tried to sound smart[er] earlier.

Instead of acknowledging this, we've been on the merry go-round for two pages.

Like I said earlier, someone who is so entrenched and who refuses to yield an inch when they are so clearly and plainly in the wrong is not someone who should be held in high regard and everything they say, on any subject, should be treated accordingly.

That has nothing to do with Occam's Razor. That's not what it means, even remotely.

If you're gonna keep butchering words and phrases we'll be here all night.

I mean, if you want to keep digging instead of climbing out of this hole you've ended up in, you could spell out what you meant, exactly, in simple unambiguous terms, to prove us all wrong. Couldn't you? Yes, of course you could. Will you, though?

I'm depending on your words, and what you're saying. I don't have anything else to go on.

Your first hand knowledge of what you're trying to say is in direct contradiction of what you did actually say and are continuing to say, even up to this point.

Either you mixed up two words that are a) easily confused and b) commonly used by people who are pretending to be smarter than they really are…………or you used the word 'infer' correctly and the entire rest of your sentence was the mistake.

Either one word is wrong (infer), or every other word in that sentence is wrong and needs to be replaced, and instead of admitting that, you're doubling and trebling down, pretending that words have meanings different to what everyone else thinks they mean, which just so happens to be the exact same meaning as another word that would fit in the context.

I know which is more likely……….

My prediction came true, btw, which makes it even more likely.

I'd bet serious money I'm right and you're just too pigheaded to admit that you effed up.

1. I'm not wound up in the slightest over a typo. I'm not wound up at all. That's you, pretending I am, to cheapen my argument. "Playing the man, not the ball", is a common tactic across Boards from people who are losing the argument.
2. You are so desperate to distract from the fact that you made such a balls of it, you're now feigning outrage, going back through posts to find something that you can ping me on. Another sad attempt at attacking the poster, not the post. "Look everyone, he's making disparaging comments about the differently-abled, let's all ignore the fact that he's right about me"
3. And, just to confirm all of the above, you're now pretending that you want to get back on topic and get away from all this nasty stuff where you made a holy show of both yourself and your tenuous grasp on the English language.

actually i, like many others, enjoy not having pssheads roaming around the local village offie in the wee hours. which they would given the chance. so yes, the greater good was served whatever the benefits to the pubs.

re; the goal. clearly the original concept was to have a successful intl airport which facilitated the air transport needs of the country, so as not to leave us half stranded. And we have that. That has been achieved and then some.

If that wasnt the original goal then what was? Was it 99.99% of air traffic and limitless flights 24/7 over the most populous county perhaps? Would you like that result, or would you think maybe thats a bit much?

That should still be imply. You do not infer your own statements, or infer another meaning. You imply. Switch it to conclude doesn't work either.
Unless you are trying to say you didn't know what you meant and only inferred your only meaning multiple posts later when you re-read it.

It's was a throwaway comment about a garbled point, but the fact you digging on this, and doing so while insulting others is pretty ironic.

And have it all done in advance of increased arrivals. (unlikely to happen on schedule).

The upgrades, as part of the planning application would have to be increased before the cap is raised. You are demonstrating a lack of understanding of the planning process.

Our ~35m (~90% air traffic) share is more than sufficient.

35m represents the stage one increase that you are arguing against. You position is more aligned to reducing DUB traffic back to the cap, as there is no capacity for those arrivals - which is disproven by the fact that we've exceed the cap and Dublin hasn't imploded.

Then move on and do the same again for the underdeveloped airports.

Where are these underdeveloped airports?

Shannon has capacity for A 150% increase in flights. Based on its demand, it is significantly over-developed.
Cork's demand surpassed capacity, and is being further developed.
Knock and Kerry have plenty of capacity.

You keep saying that Dublin's share of 90% of flights is enough. Dublin's airport infrastructure is only 72% of the capacity of those 5 airports.

Saying just increase flights to Knock and Kerry is hilariously myopic.