Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

General Rugby Discussion 3

1192193195197198202

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,342 ✭✭✭✭aloooof


    Wayne Pivac in 2021 6 Nations? They were jammy that year.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 398 ✭✭Bart97


    Farrell didn’t cap anyone because he was with the Lions…

    True but again, only one team is getting called out for their age profile…and it’s not SA which is ironic given they actually have the older squad.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,780 ✭✭✭TheRona


    SA probably get a bit of leeway based on the fact that they're back-to-back World Cup and Rugby Championship champions.

    Ireland are a team that seems to be past their peak, without a clear vision of what's coming through to replace their aging players.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,342 ✭✭✭✭aloooof


    Farrell was away with the Lions but equally I highly doubt Easterby had complete free reign to make his own selections.

    But I don’t really care whether SA are getting called out on their age profile or not tbh. I care about whether Ireland are being too conservative, and I believe they are.



  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 5,043 Mod ✭✭✭✭Lost Ormond


    I dont think Easterby had free reign at all. It would be madness to go away from what Farrell is building…

    And i agree about South Africa. Theyre entitled to do what they see fit and as double reigning world champions they can do what they want but think we have to look at things differently than we have in past.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 398 ✭✭Bart97


    Well, unless you’ve inside information that states otherwise then that is all we have to go on.


    It’s fine that you don’t care. What annoys me he the level coverage we get in rugby is appalling and it’s nonsense like this that is partially to blame. Total double standards in how both teams are covered.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 398 ✭✭Bart97


    I don’t see how being double world champions plays into it or should give them any sort of leeway, having an aging squad is having an aging squad.


    There is a pretty clear vision, 50% of the squad is between the ages of 25-30…the vast majority of the squad, not to mention the additional squad players along with those that will be named in the A squad this week. Thats great but what you are saying about Ireland is exactly word for word what you can say about SA judging from the two squad selection. Ireland’s squad is 1 year younger, less aging players and to address the point of being past their peak it’s worth remembering…have the 2nd best win record of any nation in the top 10 behind only SA by 3% (81% vs 78%) over the World Cup cycle so far.

    I get you want to buy into the media narrative, but it needs to be pointed out that it doesn’t stand up to any sort of scrutiny whatsoever. Surely the way the SA & Irish squads were covered despite being identical in terms of age and squad breakdown should tell you all you need to know about the credibility of the sources covering the squads.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 398 ✭✭Bart97


    He likely didn’t have free reign but at the same time with Farrell away the objective was probably keeping momentum going as opposed to capping loads of players.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,342 ✭✭✭✭aloooof


    I don't think "Farrell picked the team entirely" or "Easterby picked the team entirely" are quite the only 2 options available tho…



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 398 ✭✭Bart97


    Well, Esterby picked the team…but I’d say he was hardly going to distrupt things too much given the circumstances.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,342 ✭✭✭✭aloooof


    You keep saying "media narrative".

    Even if we grant you what you are saying (i.e. it's being covered in the media for Ireland but not for SA) doesn't change the facts behind that i.e. that Ireland are picking conservatively.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 398 ✭✭Bart97


    I noticed it after the RWC in 2023 that this narrative has been pushed and there seems to be this weird obsession of making it a reality, even thought it doesn’t stand up to any scrutiny.

    Ireland are picking conservatively…the issue here is making it out to be a bad thing, Ireland & SA have been the two best teams in the world this WC cycle, coincidence? Or would we like to scrap everything and end up like England or Wales? Thanks but no thanks!

    The exception I take is what is the difference between what Ireland are doing and what SA are doing that leads to the two being covered differently? As I’ve pointed out, all the evidence suggests there’s little difference. The only point being thrown out is “SA won the RWC”…which actually only further justifies Ireland doing what they are currently as opposed to what other nations are doing.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 26,592 ✭✭✭✭phog


    Can you link any or all of these double standards



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 398 ✭✭Bart97


    I won’t, but they are readily available on YouTube and Google if you are interested in looking!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 26,592 ✭✭✭✭phog


    So, you want people here to comment on something that annoys you but you won't link it for others to review and comment.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 398 ✭✭Bart97


    Because it’s not my job to do so. I don’t care if people on here comment or not, I’m just stating my opinion on the hypocrisy shown. If you are interested in reviewing and commenting then check on Google/YouTube yourself and get back to me. If you aren’t willing to do that then the topic obviously doesn’t interest you, in which case why would I waste my time compiling evidence anyway?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,142 ✭✭✭randomname2005


    Agree with this, depth is really important. Having a few players in their mid 30s isn't necessarily the end of a world cup campaign, if their backups are experienced and trusted. If there is no trusted replacement then it can be.

    Some kind of age and cap combination might be a better metric.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,552 ✭✭✭leakyboots


    That young lad who scored five tries for Sarries has gotten the call up for England



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,780 ✭✭✭TheRona


    I wouldn't know anything about the media narrative. I'm basing my opinion purely on being a non-Irish person living in Ireland and watching their national side.

    Most of Ireland's best players are aging and/or past their peak. I guess the AI series will give us a bit of an insight into where they are right now, but my concern would be that I can't see them being better in 2 years than they are now, and that's undoubtedly what they need to be.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 398 ✭✭Bart97


    Is it, or this the excuse given when the hypocrisy shown in regards to the age profile of the Irish squad is exposed?

    What you said in regards to players in their mid 30s is 100% correct…it’s just hilarious how this literally never said in regards to Ireland though, I’m still yet to see what exactly is the difference though, the only difference I can see is the name of the nation in question.

    Like you said an age/cap metric is the right way to go, you normally want the age profile to be as close to 28-28.5 as possible as that seems to be the average of RWC winning sides, generally speaking the age range tends to be between 28-30. Cap wise you want the squad to be around 35-40 caps and the XV 55-60 caps.


    Generally Ireland and SA are the two who are the closest to this metric which probably explains why they have been the two best sides this RWC cycle.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 398 ✭✭Bart97


    Cool story, Whats you’re opinion of SA and their aging squad?

    Who are these players? Furlong, Beirne, VDF, JGP, Henshaw/Aki, Lowe? Conveniently forgetting Porter, Sheehan, McCarthy, Ryan, Doris, Crowley, Ringrose, Hansen, Keenan, are they all aging? All the players mentioned are coming into their prime/will be in their prime in 2 years, that’s also excluding the up and coming players that will likely step up. Most of Ireland’s best players are between 25-30 years old, this narrative doesn’t step up to even the slightest bit of scrutiny.

    I mean that’s fair if you want to believe that, but what you’ve done is describe SA in a nutshell also, wonder wil you admit the same thing in their regard, have even less young players, less players 25-30 and more players who are +30.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,780 ✭✭✭TheRona


    I honestly don't know why you're so hung up on this. SA are currently the best in the world, and have about 5 full squads of players to choose from, so there's aleady another player ready to step into the fold. They're in a very different situation to Ireland.

    Either way, NZ is who I'd compare Ireland to. They have been shaky, but I can see clear signs of player development. I don't know that I see this with Ireland. There are a good few issues in the Irish squad where the drop down from a first choice to second choice player in multiple positions results in a significant drop off. I don't think NZ or SA suffer as much in this regard.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 398 ✭✭Bart97


    No they don’t, they have one squad and, like I broke down, their age profile is a full year older than the Irish squad you claim has aged and passed their peak. This sort of comment just makes me more convinced that this is just you reading what the media has to say rather than just being your opinion as if it was based on what you’ve been seeing you’d have also pointed out the SA squad’s age profile just as much which you didn’t. And like I pointed out, no they ARENT in a very different position, I’ve already broken down in detail.

    What signs of player development have you seen with NZL so, which players specifically and how does it contrast with what Ireland have done?

    Also where is this significant drop off, Ireland have the 2nd best win record this cycle so far, only slightly worse than SA and significantly higher than NZL while using 51 players…


    You are making a lot of claim and precisely zilch stand up to any scrutiny.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 9,887 ✭✭✭blackwhite


    Most of Ireland's best players are aging

    I'd be very impressed if you managed to find a player, anywhere, who isn't aging!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,426 ✭✭✭Yeah_Right


    Ireland have the 2nd best win record this cycle. That's good. For context, of their 19 matches; 6 of them were against Italy, Scotland and Wales, 1 was Fiji at home and 3 of them were a tour of Georgia and Portugal.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 398 ✭✭Bart97


    And SA’s case, the one side ahead of them, their 18 wins include Italy x2, Georgia, Portugal, Wales x2, Scotland. So if you want to exclude all the weaker nations and compare Ireland actually have a higher win record than SA with 76% compared to SA’s 73%!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,426 ✭✭✭Yeah_Right


    How do you get 76% from the other 9 matches? 4 losses in those means a 55% win percentage.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 398 ✭✭Bart97


    Mod Edit

    Warning issued.

    Post edited by ShamoBuc on


  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 5,043 Mod ✭✭✭✭Lost Ormond


    Brazil to replace Paraguay in world cup repechage after Paraguay found to have fielded an ineligible player

    so its Brazil, Namibia, Samoa and Belgium to play in Dubai in few weeks time to decide final world cup spot



  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Sports Moderators, Paid Member Posts: 31,772 Mod ✭✭✭✭Podge_irl


    You would assume Samoa should heavily fancy that right?



Advertisement