Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

Manchester United Thread 25/26 - Teamtalk/Transfers/Gossip Mod Note in OP 26.09.24

1122512261228123012311308

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 48,935 ✭✭✭✭Mitch Connor


    I'll never see the Grimsby game as a him issue - no tactical issues can excuse a loss like that - fully on the players imo.

    But I am still far more retisent on him today than I would have been previously - because I thought we did well vs Arsenal and then looked back to the bad ways of last season vs Fulham. I thought we looked good vs Chelsea tbh, and then back to the bad ways of last season vs Brentford.

    I thought I have seen us turn a corner before or have a performance that we could build on, only to see us look as bad as ever the next match. I thought I saw tactical tweaks that worked previously (442 OOP for example) only to see us go back to 325 the next match.

    I'm too worried about yesterday being good because it was liverpool and easy for the players to hype themselves for - and we will see them be as lackluster vs Brighton as we saw vs Brentford. We need to start putting in consistent performances, if not results, before I will start seeing hope in our play again tbh.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,603 ✭✭✭randd1


    Exactly. I'm as delighted as anyone in beating Liverpool yesterday. And if Amorim gets grief for the repeated defeats, he gets credit for the good results too. And he deserves credit yesterday, the subs, the staring line-up, the spot-on attitude, he got it right yesterday.

    Personally, I think Amorim's a busted flush, that the coaching and tactics has been so poor that it's likely he's not going to improve, and that soon enough his time will be up. The results agree with that, he's been a desperately poor manager of United thus far, with little hope and even less evidence that that is going to change. I think he should have been let go at the end of last season as it was that poor and the Europa League run covered a lot of cracks, but I was willing to give him the benefit of the doubt, let him have his pre-season and a few signings, and see from there.

    It's overall been a poor season so far, so the doubts have only become louder, and even yesterday, despite earning the win through sheer hard work, the reality is while we deserved what we got due to our performance, we got away with one because Liverpool are so off form, and even at that they were hammering at us. There's nothing really cohesive about us, we rely heavily on individual brilliance (and we got plenty of that yesterday in fairness), and still have no grasp on retaining possession. We're still in the main poorly coached and prepared, and tactically all over the place.

    But that doesn't mean I don't want him to succeed, of course I want to see a manager of United that's successful and has us competing for the top honours. Now, he's finally after 11 months got two wins on the bounce. If United go on a run of form and pick up 23/24 points in the next ten games, and we end up top 5 by the end of the year, then I'll be more than happy to say Amorim has turned it around, and fair play and well done to him for it after a chronically crap start at the helm, and that he'll deserve to continue on and be given more of a chance if he has us playing to that level.

    But all we've had under him is moments like beating Liverpool. It's whether these moments become regular enough is the question. I have no faith in Amorim that they will, not on his tenure so far anyway, he has no credit left in my bank, and I'd doubt I'm the only supporter that feels that way.

    But that doesn't mean we can't celebrate a great result, and they really don't come much better than beating Liverpool at Anfield. It's well worthy enough to enjoy the moment, and enjoy the moment we will. And I'm happy to say, work has been great this morning, for once it's lovely to be dishing it out.

    But has it changed anything? Time will tell I suppose, but I'd have no hope in Amorim that it has, so I'll enjoy this moment and hope it translates into something more, while being realistic that this might be a once off, or might even be the last hurrah of a poor managerial term.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,710 ✭✭✭Caustic


    Well if you bring xg into a one game result people are going to point out the more reliable longer term xg numbers. We lost to arsenal and Brentford but had higher xg then both of them.

    We scored early in the game and Liverpool where chasing all game so naturally we are going to be more defensive and them more attacking, in the second half they were all out attack.

    We rode our luck yesterday at times for sure but when the game leveled up we stared to create more until we scored again.

    The 2nd half performance was poor no doubt we were under serious pressure all half a lot of it our own making by just kicking the ball away constantly but yesterday was all about getting that result by hook or by crook which we managed against the former favorites for the league.

    The manger certainly won't want us playing like we did in the second half all the time and I don't think anyone thinks we will so there isn't much point in over thinking it, we got the win and it is huge for the players and the manger and gives them a chance to build some momentum and hopefully they take it



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,441 ✭✭✭The Big Easy


    It's a good day for United fans and for Amorim and we haven't had a lot of those.

    Pretty much the first word out of Amorim's mouth in the post match interview was Brighton. He knows how important that match is now and this result will mean very little if we don't turn up in the same way next week at Old Trafford.

    How many games in a row would he need to win however before those with the long knives would not come out at the next loss/draw?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 17,868 ✭✭✭✭keane2097


    I think it's slightly harsh to say at this stage that it has been a bad start to the season. I don't think it would be unreasonable to have gotten one point from Arsenal, City, Chelsea, Liverpool games and to have won the others. Funnily enough that would give you 13 points. Would it still be a bad start if the points had been accumulated that way? It's not a great team, new players, young players, so inconsistency is a given.

    We're approaching a point now where both beating promoted teams and playing well against Top 6 teams are both almost being interpreted as negatives, which is a bit weird. I think getting chinned against Brentford is skewing the perception heavily (maybe rightly, IDK). I suspect if they played out a boring 1-1 draw in that game the feeling would be a lot different than the one extra point would account for, and it was a pretty even if slightly weird game. In fact if they had beaten Brentford and lost to Liverpool I think the current 13 points would be seen as a pretty clear success.

    Having missed two penalties that probably would have affected negative match outcomes and having conceded quite a lot of goals through goalkeeping blunders in the first several weeks I don't think it would be true to say the team are lucky to have accumulated the points tally they have so far, so I think this is a pretty much level par place to be after 8 games.

    There's the argument going on where people either think the greatly improved data/statistics this season are clear signs of improvement or people who don't buy what the data is selling or believe it with the evidence of their eyes. I think the resolution of that argument will have to wait for the outcome of the softer run of games through to January. But after 8 games overall I'm uncomfortable with the idea that it's a bad start.

    Maybe a couple of points behind where you would have been if you took advantage of all the positive little bits of luck and didn't succumb to any of the negative little bits, but that's pretty unrealistic.

    Caveat I don't think people should care very much about the Grimsby game, so if you do care a lot about that YMMV.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,180 ✭✭✭✭Sand


    There is 9 PL games left before Christmas. 6 of them are against teams which are currently below us in the table, and all of them should be winnable in their own right. If we get to Christmas and the team has picked up 18+ points from those fixtures, and we're still in the conversation for top 4/5 then we can talk about there being a turning point reached.

    Amorim isn't getting questioned because of a few bad one-off results. Its because of a 35 PL game record which is overall horrendous (40 points won). If he builds up a better record over the next 9-10 games, then people will start writing off the 27 PL games last season and put more weight on record this season, which is better even when front loaded with all of last seasons top 4.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,598 ✭✭✭Ninthlife




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,299 ✭✭✭Charlie69


    I’m well aware that one swallow doesn’t make a summer… I was talking about posters still having a go at the manager about yesterday’s line up even after a victory at Anfield. Some of these posters got it completely wrong about the line up before the game which is fine… we all do it, but at least be big enough to say they were wrong and the manager got it right ( as you say yourself in this post quoted) instead of still trying to say the manager got it wrong and United were lucky to win.

    Of course they did ride their luck at times but my point was to give the manager the benefit of the doubt on his team selection after such a great win



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 48,935 ✭✭✭✭Mitch Connor


    I don't get this. The talk is baffling to me.

    Why were they not interested when the club was actively for sale?
    Why would they be interested now when it will cost minimum 5.5billion (and not 18months ago), but in 18months the minimum valuation clause will have disolved and you have the chance to get it for less?

    And all of this talk started with it being said it was already advanced with the Glazers. Now there isn't a concrete consortium, they are weirdly asking players to front it and no discussions have been had with anyone on the United side because no group fully exists.

    It all stinks of being made up, and I can't understand why. Artificially create value in the club/shares while we will be looking for funding for the stadium and the bonds due in '27? (and i think that would be highly illegal)



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 26,874 ✭✭✭✭pjohnson


    The Grimsby game might have been a huge turning point for the club for the fairly major reason it was at long last the final nail in the coffin of one of the worst keepers (maybe just ahead of Roy Carroll) at the club in the PL era.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 48,935 ✭✭✭✭Mitch Connor


    I find the handling of the keeper situation over the summer just utterly bizarre. Looks like we've ended up with a good prospect at the end of it, but what on earth was going on that it took til deadline and beyond to actually do something about it.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 26,874 ✭✭✭✭pjohnson


    I think they just fell for whatever useless stats were being bandied about that showed Onana was actually a world class keeper it was everything else that was wrong.

    Grimsby just killed off all those bullshìte stats and made it glaringly clear Onana could just never play for us again.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 48,935 ✭✭✭✭Mitch Connor


    but i think they were the ones peddling that story in the summer. How Bayindir and Onana were actually really good just unlucky!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 35,338 ✭✭✭✭The_Kew_Tour


    I appreciate had Liverpool scored their chances yesterday they have won 5-1.

    The only thing is if we had taken our big chances we would have won 5-0

    We had 5 decent chances in that game as did Liverpool. Liverpool did miss a sitter but we could have been 3-1 up at half time.

    We got few breaks no question but its not like we were totally outplayed.

    We created chances at Anfield and looked like we could score a few.

    That's most welcome.

    Consistency is off course highly important now but let's enjoy a victory that looked like it was years away a month ago.

    EVENFLOW



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 26,874 ✭✭✭✭pjohnson


    Yeah and I hope whatever eejit was producing those stats to them for them to peddle has been laid off.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,299 ✭✭✭Charlie69


    You would think this would be the mood in here today wouldn’t you?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 17,868 ✭✭✭✭keane2097


    I think rightly or wrongly they were planning to make do with Onana this season but his poor judgement in coming back unfit/injured and looking for a new contract caused the staff to question whether they were willing to put up with him. Grimsby game was presumably meant to be his reintroduction to the first team after leaving him out a couple of games as punishment for the other stuff, but it was so bad they solidified their feeling that he had to go.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 576 ✭✭✭Seattle


    It's definitely not a bad start to the season results wise. The 3 wins v Chelsea, Sunderland and Liverpool have solidified that. Performance wise it has been decent. I think the perception that he's doing badly stems from a couple of things.

    The baggage from last season is a big problem. We were bad last season but the league performance was unquestionably affected by a decision to prioritise the Europa League (which was the correct decision imo given the level of teams that were in it). Also, many of Utd's top earners were getting frozen out for character reasons, shipped out or were injured. Rashford and Antony were loaned out and not replaced, Sancho had already been loaned out in the beginning of the season. Mount, Shaw and Amad all missed many months through injury. You take out the players from any team in the league that make up 30-40% of the entire wage bill, and see how they get on. I don't think Amorim gets cut enough slack for this. On top of all this, he had to come in mid-season and has an approach + style that's very different to ETH.

    I think when the club appointed him, they wanted him to play the same style he did at Sporting. He tried this in the beginning. I remember the first couple of months, the emphasis was on lots of controlled possession and lots of short build up. He tried to mirror what he did at Sporting, which is why we signed him. But imo, the league has sort of undergone a rapid evolution in the last 12-18 months which is becoming clearer each week. There's a much bigger emphasis on set pieces, physicality and directness. Arsenal's evolution over the last 3 seasons is the best illustration of this. When they had their breakthrough season and ran City close in 22/23, they were pretty slick and smooth. Now their defining characteristics are tough and athletic with a huge emphasis on set pieces. Amorim has had to move away from his original vision (not the formation itself, but the execution of it) to attempt to meet these challenges and mould a team that's able to compete in this version of the PL. He's not the only one, even Pep is still figuring things out and look at how inconsistent every other team has been bar Arsenal.

    I think there's a lot of understandable frustration that we don't see a clear upward curve of improvement that we can have confidence in having a high enough ceiling to compete at the highest level. But I dunno, maybe we are not taking into account enough the sheer competitiveness and uniqueness of this league. It's very messy to build and compete at the same time.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,299 ✭✭✭Charlie69




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 376 ✭✭Ultimate Gowlbag


    I think if people came across balanced instead of just sticking the boot in all the time…only one poster I seen admitted to being wrong yesterday….before kick off it was "line up is a sackable offence","wont lay a glove" etc etc,nobody says "hey,i was wrong this time" and balances their opinions and makes their post worth reading,they just disappear until the next rant or ignore anything they wrote……you yourself just went with something along the lines of "well i was right about dalot"!!



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 35,338 ✭✭✭✭The_Kew_Tour


    I was one of those posters " we wont lay glove on them" and believe me I was **** delighted we won yesterday and could not give a **** about my opinion been so far wrong up my ass.

    Bookmark it away.

    Delighted I was wrong and I hope I am everytime I think we are going to lose

    EVENFLOW



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 48,935 ✭✭✭✭Mitch Connor


    We got the result. But I thought Cunha looked better with Sesko up top. Gettign the result doesn't mean the selection was automatically correct does it? It can still be wrong can't it? I don't understand the reasoning for not playing sesko either - so we would go with more pace than aerially according to Amorim? But Sesko is quicker than both Cunha and Mount - his stated reason for the change makes no sense.

    My issues with the team were (1) Dalot - he was rubbish. (2) Bruno CM - his creativity is not in questioin, its his defending, and I think we were caught out on transitions multiple times due to that, and he left his partner stranded, as he does and (3) Mount for Sesko, and I don't think Mount did anything amazing. Shaw for Yoro I still don't like and i don't think Shaw proved me wrong either.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,211 ✭✭✭✭bucketybuck


    Our next 13 games are all games we should be winning as far as I am concerned, up to the City/Arsenal games in January.

    Not just the likes of the 2 wolves games and Leeds. If they can beat Liverpool then they should be beating Everton, Villa and Spurs.

    Brighton next week will define this for me. Beating Liverpool away like this should be momentum injected straight into the veins for the squad, they should be taking and running with it and after 12 **** months finally starting to show something real. No big injuries, finally won 2 games in a row, beat Liverpool away, is that not what the squad wanted and needed?

    But drop points next week with the same old issues on show and that momentum will drop like a wet fart.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,299 ✭✭✭Charlie69




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,710 ✭✭✭Caustic


    I don't think he played Cuhna for his pace I think he played him for his ability to run with the ball and his holed up play.Which are better then seskos.

    This kinda only makes sense if we were going to try build up more during the game or maybe we planned to press more aggressively from longer balls possibly. Neither of which we saw much of.

    The early goal changed the game massively so if id to guess I'm sure the game plan A was out the window after and we had planned to defend deeper had we gone ahead. Just ended up being all game



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,961 ✭✭✭✭Zeek12


    I think this goes both ways.

    There should be balance in how we assess the performances

    It's also totally Ok to say, I was delighted with the win at Anfield.

    And….I still have a lot of concerns because of the dysfunction elements in the side (especially at CM and with the WBs, for me).

    I wouldn't call the lineup a sackable offence, or anything like that. By the same measure I'm not jumping on any cheerleading bandwagon either. Liverpool are in their worse run in about a decade, and still wasted numerous chances to easily win that game yesterday. We did ride our luck 2nd half, for sure.

    I can understand it's frustrating for some to see underperformers (Dalot being the obvious one) repeatedly start big games. So the lineup can provoke a reaction.

    Let's assess in a months time and hopefully we see some momentum being built. If not, the caution some posters are showing won't be unfounded.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,490 ✭✭✭✭StringerBell


    Yeah bang on, as long as you ignore game state I suppose.

    "People say ‘go with the flow’ but do you know what goes with the flow? Dead fish."



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,225 ✭✭✭✭DrPhilG




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 14,736 ✭✭✭✭JRant


    I said that lineup was a stackable offence before the game but I also said the manager got it more or less right after that game and that I was glad to be wrong.

    "Well, yeah, you know, that's just, like, your opinion, man"



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,269 ✭✭✭paulbok


    Nee'r mind



Advertisement