Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

Israel/Palestine Thread

1183918401842184418451949

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,322 ✭✭✭✭markodaly


    According to other posts, they were killed by unexploded ordinance.

    On Twitter?

    Yea, the bastion of proof that is.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,322 ✭✭✭✭markodaly


    It was interesting that not many from RTE mentioned that Hamas were cleaning shop in house in Gaza by executing people on a whim.

    And folks think these people are the good guys.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 22,477 ✭✭✭✭Strazdas


    Netanyahu didn't want to sign the peace agreement, it was practically forced on him by Trump at gunpoint. Any attempts by him to spin this as a big win for Israel are clearly a bluff.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,819 ✭✭✭Sudden Valley


    Ita crazy israel claimed Hamas was defeated in September 2024. I dont think the current Israeli government wants the fighting even though the peace deal seems the surest way for Hamas to be successfully removed.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 22,477 ✭✭✭✭Strazdas


    Trump said this morning that he believes the attack on the two soldiers was carried out by "rebels". Looks like Hamas have tight enough control over their members and are not attempting to breach the ceasefire.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 5,621 ✭✭✭dmcdona


    Israeli economy is on life support.

    Source required for you assertion, especially as Israel has no issue bombing Arabs



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 5,621 ✭✭✭dmcdona


    I posted reports from reputable news sources. Those reports are in the public domain. They even have audio of Hind Rajab screaming for her life as the battle tank bore down on her. If you have alternative facts, supporting your position, why don't you post them?

    Once again, you seem to dislike what I post, that others have said, simply because the truth hurts.

    And the usual "Hamas propaganda" as the go to defence just doesn't wash anymore. The world knows Israel is adept at lying in still refuses the independent press into Gaza purely for fear of being unmasked as the warmonger and Genocider that they are.

    That you wilfully ignore all this evidence clearly shows who the bad faith poster is. You make claims with no evidence yet constantly complain when corroborated evidence is provided.

    So do continue to post justifications of war crimes and genocide and the execution of a five year old girl if it gives you succour.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 5,621 ✭✭✭dmcdona


    Do you have a source for that? Because that is not what the RTE website is saying.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 5,621 ✭✭✭dmcdona


    No - other posters posted news reports here. Not from twitter either.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,024 ✭✭✭ceadaoin.


    No, no. A poster linked to an Iranian propaganda site with an article. It's defintely true.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 5,621 ✭✭✭dmcdona


    Plenty of evidence for Israel slaughtering scores of its own two years ago.

    Look up "Hannibal directive".

    Hamas and IDF - two cheeks of the same árse.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 5,621 ✭✭✭dmcdona


    That's what RTE are reporting which is at odds with what @Brendan Bendar posted.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,121 ✭✭✭ArthurDayne


    Well, why don't the Israelis just overthrow Netanyahu and rid themselves of him? Isn't that one of the thresholds which many seem to expect Gazans to meet (ie, they should overthrow Hamas) as part of the moral negotiation as to what it takes for Gazan Palestinians to not be considered fair game or — at least — acceptable collateral?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 56,680 ✭✭✭✭tayto lover


    He's completely lost it. I've reached a stage where I just skip over most of what they type, several posters in particular. It's as if they are wearing rose tinted glasses. Israel is rarely ever wrong to these lads and if they finally admit that something wrong is done then they have a ready-made excuse up their sleeve. I'm waiting for someone to post that '' the bulldozer was owned by Hamas '' or '' the bombs were interfered with and weren't meant to hit the convent ''. Sorry the last one seems to have been used already.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 5,621 ✭✭✭dmcdona




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 56,680 ✭✭✭✭tayto lover


    Does that mean that they weren't wiped out and that the 70,000 people murdered were in fact innocent civilians ??



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 33,195 ✭✭✭✭blanch152


    The Agreement provides for Hamas to be disarmed, disbanded and exiled. It has been signed up to by all the major regional players except the despots in Iran and has the backing of all the Western major powers. That is not a strategic victory.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,006 ✭✭✭✭volchitsa


    So? You think they withdrew from Gaza in the expectation that nothing would improve? My understanding is that there was meant to be a peace process, and that the whole point of that peace process, from Israel's POV, was that the rockets would stop. Is that wrong?

    And yes, it was a democratic election by the standards of the region (the US was accused by Hamas of trying to influence the election in favour of the PA, so I'm not sure I'd be 100% sure that Jimmy Carter is a completely independent observer, but it's clear that whenever a US president says something that suits you, you're going to cite them!) But sure, compared to other Muslim countries in the Middle East, it was pretty good, and was definitely a reflection of how popular Hamas was among Gazans.

    Because the reality is that despite the balance being pushed down in favour of the PA, Hamas won a clear majority. That they immediately murdered their opponents in order to ensure control just shows that neither the PA nor Hamas are actually all that interested in democracy.

    The blockade happened in 2007, after Hamas seized control, and was triggered by the EU withdrawing from their role in the Rafah border crossing. So how is Israel responsible for that? Surely it's more the EU's fault? What Israel did was respond to the EU's departure as a result of Hamas' violent takeover, in a way that Israel hoped would ensure their citizens' safety.

    "If a woman cannot stand in a public space and say, without fear of consequences, that men cannot be women, then women have no rights at all." Helen Joyce



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,819 ✭✭✭Sudden Valley


    It may be a strategic victory for the Palestinians though if it does lead to a two state solution. Before this conflict there was no road map in place.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 298 ✭✭AugustRain


    ok so I assume that for you, Hamas are among the most honourable gentleman one could ever hope to encounter, 100% truthful, can back up all of their actions as being completely humane, justified and honest. Any allegations that they are bloodthirsty terrorists whose only aim is to exterminate the Jews is completely slanderous? Rape is resistance, etc etc etc



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 33,195 ✭✭✭✭blanch152


    The Palestinians were the ones who have resisted a two-state solution for decades.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,399 ✭✭✭✭Grayson


    Did they do this by occupying Israeli lands and colonising it?

    Oh wait, sorry.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,819 ✭✭✭Sudden Valley


    While The israeli cabinet at the beginning of the conflict said the two state solution was dead. I think the PA will be happier with this situation then the Israeli government.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,006 ✭✭✭✭volchitsa


    Interesting that you can't see a difference in overthrowing an unpopular leader who has been democratically elected and overthrowing a military group that's been in power without elections for 2 decades that launched a disastrous war against their bigger neighbour, a war that they could not possibly win.

    But FWIW there were protests against Netanyahu the whole summer before October 7th. Many Israelis believe that this was taken as a sign of weakness by Hamas, and helped lead to the decision to attack on Oct 7. Whatever about that, it seems likely to me that Hamas wanted Netanyahu to stay in power, and were in fact afraid of him being replaced by a more moderate leader - because what Hamas want is war with Israel, and for ordinary Gazans to be sacrificed on the altar of "Jihad" against the very existence of Israel. The last thing they want is a peaceful settlement. As they are currently demonstrating.

    "If a woman cannot stand in a public space and say, without fear of consequences, that men cannot be women, then women have no rights at all." Helen Joyce



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 33,195 ✭✭✭✭blanch152


    The claim was that Hamas had secured a strategic victory, which is wrong.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,108 ✭✭✭SafeSurfer


    You say the Palestinians have no interest in democracy. They participated in a free and fair election in Gaza and Israel refused to accept the result and imposed sanctions and later a full blockade.
    Israel aided Fatah, yet again stirring internecine violence between Palestinians as they continue to do so now by arming criminal gangs.

    Multo autem ad rem magis pertinet quallis tibi vide aris quam allis



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,819 ✭✭✭Sudden Valley


    I dont dispute that, I just stated it may lead to a strategic victory for the Palestinians. Bibi has been aggressively against the two state solution for years so will be hardly happy with this part of the agreement.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 33,195 ✭✭✭✭blanch152


    It may, but as I have pointed out before, there are a number of hurdles to be crossed before that point is reached, and the record of the Palestinian Authority and Hamas and other Palestinian representatives has been such in recent decades that many have doubts as to whether those hurdles can be negotiated.

    Remember that Yasser Arawat left a better deal on the table many years ago.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,819 ✭✭✭Sudden Valley


    True but I think overall getting rid of hamas and having a road map in place and having a few countries behind the deal not just israel and America are all positives. Netanyahu, i think, was happy for Hamas to stymie a two state solution as that is something he and his party are dead set against.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,121 ✭✭✭ArthurDayne


    "A war that they could not possibly win" — but a war in which it was seemingly necessary to tackle this force that had no chance of victory by flattening Gaza, slaughtering tens and thousands of people, and injuring who knows how many. And now that Israel has once again proven to the world that it must defend itself against obliteration by the people who have no chance of obliterating them — by obliterating those defenceless people and their homes — I guess we should now expect that Gaza will become a model of functioning administrative government and a cohesive society that has in no way been affected whatsoever by what they have just endured and continue to endure in the post-apocalyptic hellscape that is left of their city.

    In any event however, the real point I was getting at was that I think it would be reprehensible for Hamas to attack Israel and kill civilians in the process — either deliberately or attacking military targets with such reckless disregard for civilian life that it cannot be divorced from murder — and for anyone to then claim that the Israeli populace's acquiescence and lack of overthrowing Netanyahu made them complicit, fair game or at least sad but unavoidable collateral.

    I apply the same thinking to the people of Gaza, which I presume should not be controversial.



Advertisement
Advertisement