Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

Ireland Team Talk XII: Farrell's First Fifteen

1157015711573157515761848

Comments

  • Moderators, Sports Moderators, Paid Member Posts: 33,865 Mod ✭✭✭✭Podge_irl


    I never claimed otherwise. My literal only point is that Frisch wasn't one of them.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,990 ✭✭✭✭aloooof


    Which is fine. The broader point I'm making is that it's oft-repeated on here that Farrell sees them in training / Farrell knows more than us etc. The undertone being we shouldn't question his decisions.

    Boards is probably the only place I've come across this notion. I honestly don't think I've ever encountered that attitude in, say, GAA or soccer, say.



  • Moderators, Sports Moderators, Paid Member Posts: 33,865 Mod ✭✭✭✭Podge_irl


    I mean, Farrell does see them in training and know more than us. He almost certainly has a better idea of what they are achieving or not in terms of their goals. That is true of every coach though and it has never stopped me criticising things in the past - because what else can you do? I have no idea if I've ever used the argument, but if I did it was just as a means of trying to understand why he might have done certain things.

    Equally I would argue accusations of bias are well wide of the mark though.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,069 ✭✭✭Former Former Former


    They’re unconnected though. Henshaw’s apparent decline does not make Farrell one day younger.

    With Aki going to be 37, Henshaw 34, McCloskey 35 and even Ringrose going to be 32 at the RWC, we just can’t look to a guy who’ll also be 34 for the answer.

    It’s cruel because Farrell is a quality player but just unfortunate to have been born the year he was.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,990 ✭✭✭✭aloooof


    Well, I can firmly say I have never used the "bias" argument. But, like the point I made to FTD, systems, cohesion, familiarity, parterships, gameplan all are real things that come into coaches considerations too.

    Which is often overlooked on here as "he picks the best players".

    Look, we'll see how it goes. With the context of everything over the last 12 months, this Autumn Internationals feels like a bit set of games for Farrell, imo. Much moreso than previous AI's.



  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Sports Moderators, Paid Member Posts: 33,865 Mod ✭✭✭✭Podge_irl


    Sure, I don't disagree with any of that. But I think the chances of Henshaw making the RWC are basically zero, and if we are going to play someone who won't be at the 2027 RWC we may as well play someone who is actually playing well.

    I wouldn't pick either for what it's worth.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,571 ✭✭✭OldRio


    But if a player is roughly the same age and in better form?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,311 ✭✭✭TRC10


    I think we could be in for a bit of a reality check against NZ, SA and quite possible Aus. The team has quite clearly been in decline performance wise for the last year and while we’ve still been winning most games, which has somewhat papered over the cracks, France brutally exposed us in the 6N and what Munster did to the bulk of the Ireland team last night is very worrying.

    There should have been a steady evolution of the team post RWC ‘23, but Farrell opted to stick with the same guys and try to eke out every last result from them. But we’ve seen over the last year that this team is over the hill and needs new blood. But with the latest squad announcement he’s once again failed to do this. I think we all know where this is heading. You look at France, England, NZ and SA and see them brining in new guys, refreshing their squad and building depth, but Farrell is simply refusing to do this. I desperately want us to get past the quarters in 2027 but I just can’t see it happening the way we’re doing things.



  • Moderators, Sports Moderators, Paid Member Posts: 33,865 Mod ✭✭✭✭Podge_irl


    SA are absolutely not refreshing their squad. They have an older one than us.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 4,051 ✭✭✭50HX


    All fair enough FFF but tom farrell does not have the mileage on the clock now that the other centres do...esp the years & years of hard lines Henshaw has ran.

    He is never getting a call up...the summer tour proved that but at least go into the AI's looking at another option...assuming Osbourne goes to 15



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,069 ✭✭✭Former Former Former


    Again, it’s not an either/or scenario. There’s no rule that says Henshaw and Farrell couldn’t be called up.

    Henshaw, or Aki or McCloskey, should be kept or dropped based on what they might offer now and in the future.

    Farrell should be picked or not picked based on what Farrell might offer now and in the future.

    It would be a lovely story but giving a player a first cap at the age of 32 would generally be met with outrage on here.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,311 ✭✭✭TRC10


    SA used 47 players in the Rugby Championship. They absolutely are building depth. Could you ever see us doing that in a 6N? Not a chance.

    The Irish Rugby squad is a closed shop. Harder to get out of than it is to get into. Munster made an absolute mockery of Farrell’s selections last night.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 27,562 ✭✭✭✭phog


    If Munster can do that to Leinster, what will the international teams be thinking when facing pretty much the same team.

    Leinster went 70 odd minutes last night without scoring, without scrum penalties where are their entries to the opposition 22, will Ireland face a scrum as poor as Munster's was last night.

    The normal standout players were anonymous last night or worse still stood out for being so poor. Lowe & JGP come top of my list for being so poor



  • Moderators, Sports Moderators, Paid Member Posts: 33,865 Mod ✭✭✭✭Podge_irl


    Ireland are not going to play like Leinster did which is one potential positive. It was also the first game back for all of the Lions (though that didn't seem to bother Beirne).

    I'm sure some more players will be brought into the squad for the Japan game anyway.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 27,562 ✭✭✭✭phog


    Well, if you exclude JvdF, Furlong, Kelleher, Lowe & Osborne then yes, all their Lions were playing in their first game back.

    As I said Lowe & JGP were my pick of the poorest out there last night and it's a concern for me as an Irish fan.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,571 ✭✭✭OldRio


    It would be a lovely story but giving a player a first cap at the age of 32 would generally be met with outrage on here.

    Ahh now. 'Outrage on here'

    There's always outrage on here. Hardly the barometer is it?



  • Moderators, Sports Moderators, Paid Member Posts: 33,865 Mod ✭✭✭✭Podge_irl


    I'm not saying it's not a concern. Just saying that a lot of the problem was whatever godawful abomination of a gameplan Leinster were supposed to be trying.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,069 ✭✭✭Former Former Former




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,069 ✭✭✭Former Former Former


    The optimistic slant is that these are quality players who did very well in the summer under Farrell and are now going back to him, so they’ve a week and a half to undo whatever the hell was wrong last night.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,051 ✭✭✭johnh6767


    Munster were a group of 23 all fully dialled in with Crowley & Beirne leading from the front with passion and precision. Leinster were disjointed and didn’t turn up at the collision front. Ireland will be more Munster than Leinster when it comes to Autumn despite the numbers and I suspect Beirne & Crowley will once again lead



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 22,031 ✭✭✭✭El_Duderino 09


    Given the form of the players generally, I think they're unlikely to beat NZ (no shame in losing to NZ BTW). So whoever starts at 10 is likely to lose the jersey for the second game.

    I know they both want the opportunity to play and beat NZ, but I don't think that's actually the prize it appears to be. It could be a poisoned chalice and the 10 battle will rumble on. That's actually fine as it's good to have competition, but neither is a superstar sp we probably won't emerge with a Sexton or a ROG for the world cup.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 601 ✭✭✭thamus doku


    what should happen is they both start 2 games each regardless of how they go

    I have no problem with Pendergast starting New Zealand and South Africa and Crowley Australia and Japan.

    Same across the squad. Farrell must rotate. I would like to see him try things even our own version of the bomb squad against South Africa.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,225 ✭✭✭TomsOnTheRoof


    I really don't get this line of thinking. What's to say Crowley can't go on and have a career to equal Sexton or O'Gara. Sexton was 26 before he nailed down his spot for Ireland and even then he wasn't the finished article. He ended up on the bench in the 2011 RWC because his goal kicking wasn't up to par.

    Crowley has already led us to a 6 Nations title. He's also led a Munster team to a league win down in South Africa. He's not a complete player yet but either was Sexton at his age and it's not like he's miles off. He has no glaring weaknesses but it's true his goal kicking needs work. He's an excellent defender, kicks off both feet, is very agile as evidenced multiple times last night, is powerful and fast enough to threaten the line and is more than capable of creating space for those around him.

    There is more evidence than not to suggest that Crowley could have a fantastic career in green should he stay injury free and should he actually be given the opportunity. It seems all the talk of Prendergast's high ceiling have blinded people to what's actually in front of them, a very talented fly half. It's becoming increasingly clear that Irish management made a significant error in judgement. It shouldn't be compounded because people can't acknowledge that mistake. Just because a certain subset of supporters backed the wrong horse it doesn't mean that the other should be written off.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 22,031 ✭✭✭✭El_Duderino 09


    I think you're right and Farrell will do something along those lines.



  • Moderators, Sports Moderators, Paid Member Posts: 33,865 Mod ✭✭✭✭Podge_irl


    It is a safe bet to assume no player will have a career equal to Ireland's greatest ever player to be fair. The comparisons don't do anyone any good.

    Crowley will continue to get lots of opportunities if he continues playing this well. He didn't play well last season. None of this is rocket science.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,990 ✭✭✭✭aloooof


    Early days but his kicking %’s off the tee this season have improved on last.

    I actually think the penalty last night to go 17 ahead was the winning of the game. Before that I was always wary as Leinster are capable of putting 14+ points on you inside 15 mins, but that pushed it out to a 3 score game.

    It wasn’t the easiest kick either and he nailed it.

    His footwork as well was excellent last night, but it was his decision making and kicking from hand that were the highlight.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 22,031 ✭✭✭✭El_Duderino 09


    Sure, either or both of them could go on to be superstars. Might even happen by turning world cup. I can't say I'd bet on it, but it's possible



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 27,562 ✭✭✭✭phog


    Another question is have is which of two has developed more since then end of last season



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,225 ✭✭✭TomsOnTheRoof


    Apparently he was struggling with an abductor issue last season which didn't help. Spent the Summer with a personalised training regime and it shows. He looks fit and lean.

    Yeah, the penalty to go three scores up was the key moment, along with that 10 minute defensive set in the second half. Like you said it wasn't the most straightforward kick, especially when you factor in the pressure, but it is one you'd expect a top fly half to get and he nailed it. He looks far more assured off the tee this season.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,225 ✭✭✭TomsOnTheRoof


    I think the issue there is that place kicking is a much easier fix than issues like a player's baseline agility or their willingness to tackle. That's not to say Prendergast won't improve, he's still young, but I don't ever see him being a real attacking threat on the line or a lad who monsters an opposition centre. He's actually a lot closer to O'Gara in style than any other fly half we've had since and if he ends up anywhere close to him that's great but this season is very important for him you imagine.



Advertisement
Advertisement