Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

Presidential Election 2025

1438439441443444517

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,190 ✭✭✭gifted


    We've had Trump...then Putin…Russia….then that woman she got a job for.…now we've moved onto Syria.....jesus wept, next thing they'll start bringing up Shergar 🙄🙄🙄



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 692 ✭✭✭rdwight


    Very poor analogy. If CC paid for the Syrian misadventure out of her net employment income, as most people would interpret "I funded it myself" to mean, there would be no problem.

    A better analogy is if your employer had an Employee Morale Fund and you had the discretion to take your group out for drinks once a month. If one of your colleagues asked you "who's paying for all this?" as you ordered the fifth round, it would disingenuous if you answered "I am".



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 692 ✭✭✭rdwight


    Has anybody asked her why she thinks Sweden and Finland rushed to join NATO in 2022-23. It wasn't as part of an attempt to put military pressure on Russia. It was for the same reason all the eastern European countries joined in the 1990s - mutual defence against the kind of Russian aggression displayed in Georgia, Chechnya and Ukraine.



  • Moderators, Sports Moderators, Paid Member Posts: 32,750 Mod ✭✭✭✭Podge_irl


    She was at it again on RnG today. Won't even answer a simple, direct question on the matter ("I never hesitate to answer questions" before not answering the question is particularly peak Connolly form). Had to get Israel in there somehow also.

    Anyway war frequently achieves peace, so she is displaying how historically illiterate she is once again.

    image.png


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 9,413 ✭✭✭corkie


    Employee Morale Fund Your wages! ~ So would be a lie to answer "I am"! Try better @rdwight

    "Those who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it." ~ George Santayana
    "But that's balanced out by the fact that it's a mandate not to do very much." ~ Prof. Eoin O'Malley



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 13,887 ✭✭✭✭Cluedo Monopoly


    Yeah and it bores the hell out of me and the electorate. It actually looks desperate in terms of looking for a smear. It will be completely and utterly forgotten in a week. All people will remember is FG's failed smear campaign. Similar to the Robinson election.

    What are they doing in the Hyacinth house?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,457 ✭✭✭almostover


    I can't understand how every question she's asked on Russia's invasion of Ukraine always has to be brought back to Israel and Palestine. I think she's a far more manipulative political operator than most of us give her credit for. She knows that the plight of Palestinians in Gaza is current and in everyone's minds and that for the most part sympathy for the people of Ukraine has petered out. It's a cunning tactic that the interviewers should be exposing.

    CC is ardently against imperialism. And she's consistent with that principle when applied to Israel (rightly so). But yet Russian imperialism against the nation of Ukraine is excused with rhetoric about NATO and the military industrial complex.

    I just can't bring myself to vote for someone so duplicitous despite the alternative being so poor.

    Post edited by almostover on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,219 ✭✭✭itsacoolday


    CC has has had very soft interviewers letting her off from not answering questions.

    It is time CC was made answer some hard questions.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,623 ✭✭✭jmcc


    Did it ever occur to you that the quality of interviewers may be the problem? Connolly was a barrister and well able to deal with questioning.

    Regards…jmcc



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,219 ✭✭✭itsacoolday


    Most barristers would be able to do better if they respected the electorate. As someone else said, CC will even answer a simple, direct question on the matter ("I never hesitate to answer questions" before not answering the question is particularly peak Connolly form). Had to get Gaza in there somehow also. Imagine 14 years of that grey woman refusing to answer questions, and destroying our relationships with our neighbours.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 79,468 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    How often have you seen MDH being 70 different ways with same question?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,623 ✭✭✭jmcc


    What do you think of the quality of the interviewers? Pat Kenny tried to question her on some legal issues and it was apparent that he was out of his depth and he is a very good interviewer. Some of the other interviewers were more suited to light entertainment. How does Connolly compare, in terms of communication skills, with Humphreys?

    Regards…jmcc



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,219 ✭✭✭itsacoolday


    Connolly infinitely worse, unable to answer a straight question with a straight answer.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,086 ✭✭✭Homelander


    I agree with this sentiment - CC is giving answers to that specific question, but they're broadly nothing answers, but yet interviewers continue to ask the same question and just accept the answer and move on.

    I don't think it's a question of interviewer skill, just really a lack of resolve to follow through on the question in favor of just moving onto another topic.

    CC is a good speaker no doubt, but when pressed on Ukraine/Russia she says a lot without saying anything of substance that actually answers the question posed, and she's being let off with it.

    At the end of the day I think you really just sometimes have to let the listener make up their own mind. And if listeners don't care about Russia/Ukraine, then it is what it is.

    As far as CC versus Heather in terms of communications, it's beyond night and day. Russia/Ukraine aside, CC answers in incredibly fluid fashion and rarely misses a beat, and tends to offer answer of real substance that are at least worthy of reflection.

    Heather's answers are 10% "Eh…Eh", 20% "Well when I was Minister…." and then 70% complete half-baked fence sitting. There's zero sincerity to her at all, and she rarely comes across as speaking with conviction.

    Jim Gavin had the same problem. You didn't believe anything he was saying was actually his sincere opinion, just what he thought a populist audience might like to hear.

    I wouldn't for a second deny that CC ran rings around them both (and continues with Heather), but I think a huge part of it is simply the shocking quality of candidates FF and FG put forward. That both parties are seemingly just taking these pair of titanic misfires from their respective leaders lying down is incredibly astounding to me.

    Replace Heather with McGuiness and Gavin with Kelleher and these debates would be a different kettle of fish altogether.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 112 ✭✭casey jones


    The interviewers have asked CC some hard questions but shes gone off on soothing evasive monologues and has ran down the clock. For example shes a barrister and politician and cant recall exactly but thinks, maybe, perhaps she voted yes for some EU referendums. There werent that many, give us a break. My guess is you voted no to all of them. You're an EU sceptic in the Jeremy Corbyn mould.

    CC explained her post Brexit views below were a 'celebration of the democratic process.'

    They [the British people] stood up and said “we see the EU for what it is”, or at least that’s what I’m taking out of it.

    ‘Is it the start of a new dawn? I do not think so. But I think it’s the first step in exposing the EU.

    No Irish person with any understanding of the implications of Brexit for trade, the border, the loss of a key ally in Europe were celebrating. Kelleher or McGuinness would have exposed her euro sceptism in the debates and wouldnt have allowed her waffle but HH doesn't have the debating skills to do that.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,623 ✭✭✭jmcc


    McGuinness versus Kelleher would have been a very different election. I think that Connolly intimidates some of the interviewers because she is smart. That gives her and edge on some interviewers who have become too used to interviewing politicians who have drawn the short straw and have to represent their party on various shows.

    It may come down to something as simple as voters being able to think of a candidate as being presidential. Humphreys seems very popular in FG. But she doesn't appear presidential.

    Regards…jmcc



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,219 ✭✭✭itsacoolday


    I think Connolly is much less Presidential than Humphries. Connolly looks and sounds like something from behind the iron curtain before it fell down.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,623 ✭✭✭jmcc


    Seems that the Gavin fiasco has had a major effect on FF. The Irish Times/Ipos-B&A poll hsd FF down 5%.

    SF 27% +5

    FG 18% +1

    FF 17% -5

    Lab 6% +2

    SocDems 5% -1

    Personal approval level for Martin has dropped 11%.

    https://www.irishtimes.com/politics/2025/10/18/irish-timesipsos-ba-poll-support-for-fianna-fail-slumps/

    Post edited by jmcc on

    Regards…jmcc



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,997 ✭✭✭Bishop of hope


    A shocker for FF. I'd reckon the Gavin fiasco is responsible for that. Just into power though, so no real concern as to leading into an election.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,623 ✭✭✭jmcc


    Yep. There are some things that have to be taken into consideration. Some of the decline could be due to the budget and the IT poll is a quarterly poll. A lot has happened since July 2025 (the last poll). What makes it worse for FF is the 11% drop in Martin's approval rating. FF still has more seats than FG in the Dail. However, the Gavin fiasco has caused a major problem for FF and it could have been avoided with a candidate like Kelleher.

    Regards…jmcc



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 27,588 ✭✭✭✭pjohnson


    Until FFG falls behind SF I doubt they'll give a damn.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,623 ✭✭✭jmcc


    FFG is on 35%. SF+SocDems+Lab+PBP = 40%. The combined Left on 40% is a product of this presidential election and Martin trying to impose his mini-me candidate, Gavin, on FF. His personal approval rating is down 11% to 33%. Harris is on 35% and MLMcD on 39%. Not sure if the Sindo or the SBP will run a special poll for Sunday. This presidential election is already having an impact beyond the election.

    Regards…jmcc



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,439 ✭✭✭Dr Robert


    SF failed to when it mattered in the GL.

    Poor leadership is killing them. A lot of their base don't agree with their pro immigration stance over the years. How many of that part of the base bother to vote I'm not sure.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,791 ✭✭✭pureza


    I think we’ve seen this play before

    Of course when it came to the actual year of the election and the election itself,people voted to protect their wallets as they always do



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,250 ✭✭✭BQQ


    how did their wallets fare in the recent budget? Even with all that Apple money

    Maybe they’ll start to realise a vote for this government is protecting nothing



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,623 ✭✭✭jmcc


    Despite the Gavin fiasco, FF supporters are still happy with Martin's leadership.

    Regards…jmcc



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,623 ✭✭✭jmcc


    SF's stance on the Immigration issue cost it votes but it still has a candidate in the presidential election. FF leadership is the reason that FF doesn't have a candidate in the presidential election. With McGuinness out of the race, FF should have been able to produce an FF candidate who would have won the election easily.

    Regards…jmcc



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,439 ✭✭✭Dr Robert


    CC is ex Labour and an Independent. The independent piece is key. If she was SF alone she wouldn't be as high in the polls.



  • Moderators, Politics Moderators, Paid Member Posts: 45,316 Mod ✭✭✭✭Seth Brundle


    SF's stance on the Immigration issue cost it votes but it still has a candidate in the presidential election.

    Cotrection: SF does not have a candidate in the election. They are supporting an independent candidate because they clearly could not find a suitable candidate within their own ranks.

    Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/ .



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 672 ✭✭✭Madeoface


    The 3 candidates were very poor. I'm no fan of CC, she's living in denial about the threat of Russia, but she's a better talker than HH.

    FF and FG showed too much complacency with their picks. Labour didn't even bother thinking. So we've 2 uninspiring ladies vying for it.

    Part of me is glad cc looks like winning to give the government a kick up the hole. Then I think of the nonsense she spouts and I think not.

    If it wasn't for the fact I live beside the school where the ballot boxes are I would not cast a vote.



Advertisement
Advertisement