Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

Ireland Team Talk XII: Farrell's First Fifteen

1156215631565156715681849

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,541 ✭✭✭clsmooth


    All you’re saying here is that the schedule hurt us. Thats not a ridiculous take. The idea that we should have rest players against Scotland when we hadn’t qualified for a QF yet is though.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 904 ✭✭✭HanShotFirst




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 460 ✭✭Bart97


    Ireland the number 1 side in the world, grand slam champions and unbeaten in 17 tests over a span of 18 months were knackered going into a QF after playing 1 game in 14 days…I surely don’t need to say anymore.



  • Moderators, Sports Moderators, Paid Member Posts: 33,874 Mod ✭✭✭✭Podge_irl


    It is notable that the two big QFs went the way of the team that had a bye the week before. Resting people for 3 weeks is seriously verging into getting undercooked territory.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 904 ✭✭✭HanShotFirst


    ?

    I don’t think you were or are paying attention

    Ireland played 7 days earlier

    I don’t think I need to say anymore myself either on the matter.

    Former international outhalf, who also played in a World Cup and a respected analyst also happens to think the same.

    Some rotation should have been factored in. Not zero.

    People can have different opinions. Fine. But for my opinion to be attacked (and allowed to be attacked btw) as “i don’t know what I’m talking about” says everything.



  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Sports Moderators, Paid Member Posts: 33,874 Mod ✭✭✭✭Podge_irl


    The players who might have been rotated played about 40 minutes. They were not fatigued going into the NZ game.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 5,965 ✭✭✭ionadnapóca


    I actually think they were in comparison to the NZ players.

    Anyway, moving on to the games at hand.

    Irish players will be seriously undercooked in comparison to v NZ in Chicago.

    Not expecting many Irish wins this AI window.



  • Moderators, Sports Moderators, Paid Member Posts: 33,874 Mod ✭✭✭✭Podge_irl


    lol, ronan (ironically I am fairly certain rob herring would have scored that). Doesn't change the point. Some of the biggest mistakes in the final 20 came from some of the freshest players.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,392 ✭✭✭FtD v2


    There is zero logical argument for claiming the Irish team were fatigued going into the NZ game. As many of us have shown here multiple times now, on average players in our 23 had played just over 2 games in 5 weeks coming in to that match (an average of less than 3 games in 5 weeks for the starting 15).

    I'd say without a doubt the pressure and the expectations got to them, allied with the somewhat claustrophobic atmosphere perhaps of being in camp etc, and all those things combined to see us freeze like a deer in the headlights and basically not fire a shot for the first 20 mins, but the notion we were "fatigued" doesn't wash with me at all.

    I do think some of our players will be a little undercooked going into the NZ game, but, worth noting NZ last played on October 4th, so won't have played any rugby in 4 weeks by the time we kick off in Chicago.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 14,645 ✭✭✭✭AbusesToilets


    all those things combined to see us freeze like a deer in the headlights and basically not fire a shot for the first 20 mins

    Even this narrative isn't accurate though. We had multiple attacks on their line in that period. We didn't freeze, just failed to execute. JGP playing for a penalty and gently falling into the arms of a NZ defender being the worst example, when we were threatening on their try line. We had two kickable penalties go against us, and a brilliant piece of individual play from Barrett, that targeted a consistent gap in our defensive structure.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 5,965 ✭✭✭ionadnapóca


    I can actually see some logic FtD. Sorry!

    Anyway, I dont like the breeze is blowing in here! Thats all in the past and as a paid up member I find it disappointing to see posters get attacked and piled-on for posting different opinions. Thats not directed at you btw! Hope it gets sorted because Lots of 'different opinions' incoming on the Leinster-Munster thread this weekend!!

    Great to see Ringrose, Ryan, Furlong, Beirne et al back for this weekend.

    I'd prefer to be in NZ position re: 4th Oct last game.



  • Moderators, Sports Moderators, Paid Member Posts: 33,874 Mod ✭✭✭✭Podge_irl


    Ah here, no one is getting piled on.

    But when someone comes out with a statement that "we lost cause we were fatigued" and others painstakingly point out the minutes played and comparisons to 6N campaigns and how the logic doesn't really stack up, I don't think continuing to just go "nah, we were definitely fatigued" is a particularly productive response. The players simply had not played that much over the course of either 5 weeks or the 3 weeks prior to the NZ match. And the game was lost in the opening 20 minutes.

    There is nothing unusual about our position going into the AIs these days. The revised calendar and European competition has really screwed the NH teams.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 5,965 ✭✭✭ionadnapóca


    They were

    and there is a serial offender btw

    It is actually slightly different this year I think. Later start to season, post summer tour etc. Or maybe Im wrong



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,541 ✭✭✭clsmooth


    I don’t think physical fatigue was a big issue. I would argue we peaked the week before (and had to as we hadn’t qualified) and struggled to peak again the next week. You could say it was an emotional fatigue.

    We turned up at our best and blew Scotland away in the first half. The next week we turned up a bit flat against NZ. Happens all the time, especially in rugby where you struggle if you’re a percent or two off your best and the other team is dialled in.

    SA struggled to put a poor England team away after a huge performance against France. In 2019 it happened to England after they hammered NZ in the semis and didn’t turn up in the final. Same thing happened to NZ after hammering us and then getting beaten out the gate by England in the semis.



  • Moderators, Sports Moderators, Paid Member Posts: 33,874 Mod ✭✭✭✭Podge_irl


    It is ever so slightly worse (5 URC rounds prior to the AIs rather than 6) cause of the Lions tour. We really miss the two European rounds prior to the tour, but the whole domestic season has been adjusted to be slightly later while the AIs haven't really moved.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 5,965 ✭✭✭ionadnapóca


    But sure yea, thats my point e.g. Munster-Leinster game was 12th Oct last year.

    Irish lads played 2 more rounds after that and then played 1st AI v NZ on 8th Nov. They still were undercooked then.

    This time its what - 1 game? Munster-Leinster and then 1st AI v NZ (& Chicago!) on 1st Nov. It'll surely be harder this year to get up to speed.



  • Moderators, Sports Moderators, Paid Member Posts: 33,874 Mod ✭✭✭✭Podge_irl


    That's cause Ireland are choosing to not let them play the next round to bring them to Chicago. An entirely self-inflicted issue.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 5,965 ✭✭✭ionadnapóca


    ok…so it is or isnt an unusual position to be in compared to other years?



  • Moderators, Sports Moderators, Paid Member Posts: 33,874 Mod ✭✭✭✭Podge_irl


    Sorry, you are correct, it is unusual but that's cause we are not allowing our players to play a round of matches so its a deliberate choice. I'm not convinced it is a good choice.

    So the difference isn't the season, but the IRFU basically.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 460 ✭✭Bart97


    Mod Edit

    Warning issued.

    Post edited by ShamoBuc on


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 460 ✭✭Bart97


    So from that list 4 out of the 6 will be bang in their prime for the RWC

    That’s brilliant!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 5,965 ✭✭✭ionadnapóca


    ok yea thats what I thought. Irish lads usually are given at least 3 matches prior to the AI games. Then they would ordinarily miss the last round before the AIs.

    What was the stat v NZ last year? 20+ handling errors, 10+ turnovers, 10+ penalties and almost as bad by HT v Australia 3 weeks later.

    I think Ireland wont be ready for NZ and still might not be up to speed for Australia 2 weeks after. SA will focus the minds but 3 losses wouldn't shock me.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,996 ✭✭✭✭aloooof


    I'm loathe to get into this for the reasons you've mentioned ionad - I don't have a strong opinion at all one way or the other (even tho I think do think Crowley should've been on the field) - but I do have a memory that our starters had fairly significantly more minutes played going into that QF than NZ (and other teams too).

    But as you say, moving on; I think the undercooked element means I think there's more of a case to pick certain positions / players on form for this reason.

    It's a real shame Izuchukwu is injured, was really looking forward to seeing him involved again and think he could put his hand up for the 6 jersey. Baird finished the last season well, but that seems like the most open jersey in the starting 15. Looking forward to seeing what TOB can do, he deserves a good spell injury free.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 460 ✭✭Bart97


    NZL was truly awful but looking back in hindsight I question how much of it was down to early season rust because they were still making similar handling errors and il discipline for Leinster (mostly) as late as December… as someone else said the difference between now and previous seasons realistically is probably an extra game or two that we would normally get. It would help yes but it shouldn’t be the difference between the sh!t show we saw last year versus NZL and Ireland at their best.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 5,965 ✭✭✭ionadnapóca


    Moving on indeed!

    Yes thats primarily why I was hoping Crowley would start v NZ and Aus because he had been playing with Casey since the start of the season. Then he got injured!

    Baird and Ahern are better players than Izzy to my eyes. Now Leinster have Baird back playing at Lock. Again. Plus he's gone at got dropped from the 23 for Munster! Weird. Of course no mention as to why from Leinster. This would have been a perfect game for Baird at 6.

    Wonder who Farrell is thinking of starting at 6 v NZ. Prendergast has a shot now.

    I cant see Farrell starting TOB v NZ. He should, It would just mean he'll be dropping Hansen, and he loves Mack Hansen. With good reason.



  • Moderators, Sports Moderators, Paid Member Posts: 33,874 Mod ✭✭✭✭Podge_irl


    He was forced out for player management.

    In my ideal world we would have Hansen at 15, TOB at 14 and Osborne at 12.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,392 ✭✭✭FtD v2


    Mod Edit

    Warning issued.

    Post edited by ShamoBuc on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 5,965 ✭✭✭ionadnapóca


    You're joking? As in - take a break Baird you'll be fatigued??

    Ideally, but Osborne is going to play 15 for all of the AIs by the look of it. Hansen at 15 v Japan?



  • Moderators, Sports Moderators, Paid Member Posts: 33,874 Mod ✭✭✭✭Podge_irl


    I am not. IRFU player management and unfortunately he was needed in the first three games given the locks available.

    Oh I have no expectation of it happening, it would just be by far my preference. vs Japan maybe alright.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,392 ✭✭✭FtD v2


    It's the case for a chunk of players close to the Irish side, they had to be rested for one game out of the block of 4 to start the season (obviously wasn't an issue for some of the guys who were never going to return before this game).

    But of the guys largely available you'll notice the following:

    • Tom Clarkson left out R1, named for Rounds 2-4
    • Jamie Osborne missed R1, named for Rounds 2-4
    • Ryan Baird - played Rounds 1-3, rested for Round 4
    • Sam Prendergast & Jack Crowley - each rested for R3
    • Tommy O'Brien - rested for R3

    The really strange one is Leinster have said Jimmy O'Brien isn't involved this weekend because of this rule, even though he wasn't named in the Ireland squad this week (and I think I'd struggle to see how he gets in this 23 either, unless we went 5-3 on the bench).



Advertisement
Advertisement