Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

General Irish politics discussion thread

1279280282284285294

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 79,472 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    The book bag thing only came out later.

    A question was asked about it.

    Why is he giving a presenter gifts, would be good to hear.

    It has been answered.



  • Moderators, Sports Moderators, Paid Member Posts: 32,790 Mod ✭✭✭✭Podge_irl


    It is literally in a Hodges Figgis bag. The info was there all along for anyone who didn't want to run down a conspiratorial rabbit hole



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 79,472 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    How would I know it was a Hodges Figgis bag? I have no idea what a H&F bag looks like.




  • Moderators, Sports Moderators, Paid Member Posts: 32,790 Mod ✭✭✭✭Podge_irl


    Well maybe instead of wondering why RTÉ didn't put out a press release with the contents you could have looked into it a bit?

    Someone handed someone a book, and quite rightly no one in RTÉ or the government thought this merited a single moment's thought. Then a bunch of people decided to go pell-mell on declaring it evidence of media complicity with the government. The latter people are the ones categorically in the wrong here.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 33,195 ✭✭✭✭blanch152


    The book bag was in the original video!!!! That didn't come out later!

    In your rush to condemn, you didn't even do the most basic of analysis!



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 79,472 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    you could have looked into it a bit?

    I did.
    I asked a simple question here. And it has been answered.

    I now know what a HF bag looks like, apparently that is an unforgiveable lapse in my education.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 33,195 ✭✭✭✭blanch152


    Just like the media are asking simple questions of Connolly such as, who paid for your trip to Syria? Did you help the banks evict people from their homes? etc.

    Again, when you ask it of others, it is just a simple question, when the media ask it of Connolly, it is some big conspiracy.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 79,472 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    No, my view would be some elements don't like her and her kind and what she stands for.

    And I will call that out if I see it. A 'journalist' is a different thing to an 'opinion piece writer' imo and many so called journalists stray in to letting their opinions slant a story.




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 3,307 ✭✭✭Good loser


    I don't like her and her kind and what she stands for.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,015 ✭✭✭Bishop of hope


    So the great budget will, as I said, actually leave people worse off. Hard to spin a positive off of that.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 33,195 ✭✭✭✭blanch152


    The budget has seen large increases in spending on housing and health. Would you have preferred income tax cuts?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,519 ✭✭✭✭dulpit


    The obvious one is there - don't cut tax for the hospitality sector and use that for some good rather than subsidise McDonalds…



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,519 ✭✭✭✭dulpit


    Oh and the greyhounds are getting €20million again this year…



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,353 ✭✭✭Fanny Wank


    The obvious thing to do is look at the current obscene levels of expenditure and try deliver better for less money in real terms. When have we ever seen money in -> better outcomes ffs. Expenditure up 100% in 10 years or 50% in 5. Take your pick

    Oh and if I'm not getting a tax cut fine as long as welfare payments don't increase at the same time, however.......



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 41,078 ✭✭✭✭Hotblack Desiato


    If they wanted to do something for small business, they should have done something about business rates. This hospitality VAT cut is far too broad, far too expensive, will benefit the biggest most profitable players the most, and may not help its intended targets that much at all.

    I'm partial to your abracadabra
    I'm raptured by the joy of it all



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 3,307 ✭✭✭Good loser


    There is a consensus amongst the 'thinking' classes and the institutions that this was a bad mistake for a variety of reasons.

    Would expect better from FF/FG. Apparently SF and the SD's had it in their election manifestos - probably aping the others.

    Hope it can be reversed sometime.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 26,104 ✭✭✭✭Kermit.de.frog


    The government must be disappointed they weren't invited to the party in Egypt today. Every single day someone or other in the government and moreso the opposition has been talking about Gaza and we should do this and that. Maybe it's a sign no one cares what we think and they'd be better off looking after affairs here than having notions of our self importance abroad.

    Maybe we can look forward now to not having our politics dominated by a conflict thousands of miles away.



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Or maybe it's a sign that they don't want to play PR games for Trump?
    Either way, they seem to be taking on a whole lot of space in your head. You may not care about ongoing genocide, but many other people do.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,787 ✭✭✭✭Red Silurian


    At the end of the day what did our government do to help bring about peace there? F**k all, that's what.

    The only people who actually deserve to be there are the representatives of Israel, Hamas and the US. Maybe 2 guarantors as we currently have with Qatar and Turkey. Also an argument for the PLA to be there in some respects

    You ask me every other nation pretty much sat on their hands for the last 2 years and do not deserve to be there in any way shape or form



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 33,195 ✭✭✭✭blanch152


    Ireland wasn't invited. We took sides unlike the neutral Arab countries.



  • Advertisement
  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Shocking. Taking sides in a genocide. Who'd have thunk it.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 28,401 ✭✭✭✭Peregrinus


    Lots of countries that "took sides" are there. Ireland stood on a platform along with Spain and Norway to simultaneously announce their recognition of Palestine; Spain and Norway are there but Ireland is not. How do we account for this?

    I think boardies are too obsessed with the attempt to read this as a comment on Ireland's status/reputation. Ask yourself for a moment what the summit was for. Then ask yourself what criteria you would adopt to decide which countries should participate in the summit, given its purpose. Then apply those criteria. Do not delude yourself into thinking that the objectives of those running the summit is to express moral or political judgments about Ireland; they don't share your obsession with that question.

    The purpose of the summit was to discuss the implementation of the first phase of the Gaza peace plan. The appropriate invitees are (a) those countries that are going to, or might, be involved in implementing it, and (b) those countries that might be affected by its implementation.

    The only reason that I can think of that Ireland would be invited to attend is if it were proposed that Ireland would contribute to the international stabilisation force, or if Ireland were offering to do so. SFAIK neither of these things has happened yet. And, while this is guesswork on my part, there might be a feeling that it would complicate matters if Ireland, already on the front lines of of UNIFIL and interacting regularly with Israeli forces, were also to be involved in the Gaza stabilisation force — it would increase the risk that incidents involving one force would impact on the other. Plus, Ireland may simply not wish to increase its commitment to peacekeeping in the region, given its, um, relatively limited military capacity.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 6,089 ✭✭✭Widdensushi


    I just noticed politics.ie is no more,,I used glance at it maybe a few times a year, mainly if there was an upcoming election to look at polls discussion on them,a shame it's gone though,,Francie must have alot of spare time.



  • Moderators, Sports Moderators, Paid Member Posts: 32,790 Mod ✭✭✭✭Podge_irl


    And, while this is guesswork on my part, there might be a feeling that it would complicate matters if Ireland, already on the front lines of of UNIFIL and interacting regularly with Israeli forces, were also to be involved in the Gaza stabilisation force

    Not sure how much sense that would make given Spain, Italy, India and France were present and all contribute more troops to UNIFIL than Ireland do.

    I suspect the real answer is the simplest. We're not there cause why would we be? We are a small, peripheral nation.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 28,401 ✭✭✭✭Peregrinus


    Yes, but so are e.g. Norway and Azerbaijan, and they were both there.

    I think the possible significance of Irish participation in Unifil is that IRISHBATT, and now IRISHPOLBATT, effectively forms the front line, so those are the troops that are most likely to, and in fact do most often, interact with Israeli forces, or with local elements engaging Israeli forces. It's a particular sensitive position.

    But, yeah, I may be reading to much into that. Another factor which might account for the presence at, or absence from, the summit of smaller and more distant nations is simply whether they wanted to be there or not. And we didn't.

    Kermit's original post presumes that there is some reason why we should wish to be at the summit. But is that true?

    Bear in mind that the only outcome of the summit was a declaration entitled the "Trump Declaration for Enduring Peace and Prosperity" (yes, "Trump" is part of the title) which was signed by Egypt, the US, Qatar and Turkey. It seems that none of the other participants at the summit could bring themselves to sign it, or perhaps they weren't invited to. And of course neither Israel, nor Hamas, nor the Palestinian Authority, signed it. The declaration has been widely criticised as being simplistic, lacking in detail, symbolic and virtue-signalling. But it does hail "the Trump Peace Agreement" (yes, by that exact title) and applaud "President Trump’s sincere efforts to end the war in Gaza". No other person or country is mentioned in the declaration. It seems that (a) the declaration was little more than an opportunity for countries that wished to do so to insert their tongues into Trump's anus, and (b) not many countries wished to do so.

    So perhaps the question that we should be asking ourselves is not "Why did Ireland not attend?" so much as "Why did those other countries attend?" — a question they might well be asking themselves at this point.

    Post edited by Peregrinus on


  • Moderators, Sports Moderators, Paid Member Posts: 32,790 Mod ✭✭✭✭Podge_irl


    Well, I wouldn't be surprised if Norway were there just cause Trump thought it would help his Nobel bid…

    But sure, there was no particular reason for us to be there and I doubt we were strongly advocating to be there. And ultimately we're better off for not partaking in that narcissistic, ego massaging nonsense. I do think it should potentially provide some slight introspection opportunity for asking whether we spend a bit too much parliamentary time on the topic though.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 28,401 ✭✭✭✭Peregrinus


    I don't think we do spend a lot of parliamentary time on the topic.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,867 ✭✭✭Ozymandius2011


    I dont think the OTB will ever be passed. A meeting by pro Israeli figures in the US in 2023 or last year heard someone say the Irish government was opposed to the bill. Factual or not, it's not what we are being told by our own government. Is it different messages to different forums?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 28,401 ✭✭✭✭Peregrinus


    Are you assuming that the "someone" was speaking for the Irish government, or do you know this?

    I'd like to know (a) who the "someone was and what their relationship to the government was, (b) when they said this (with a bit more precision than "some time in 2023 or 2024") and (c) what exactly they said. I'll suspend judgment until then.



  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 20,702 Mod ✭✭✭✭Sam Russell


    I think business rates could be used as a more precise way of aiding small businesses in hospitality. It could be shaped to help the cafe but not the international burger outlets.

    The VAT reduction is also coming too late to increase the provision of apartments. Better to tackle development costs, and planning obstacles.

    Do these politicians actually understand the economy or are they in thrall to lobbyists?



Advertisement
Advertisement