Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

FourNorth - Quad Track Railway - North Dublin

1234689

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,960 ✭✭✭csirl


    No chance of putting 4 lines through the D3/D5 sections of the northern line. Anyone suggesting it isnt familiar with the area or topography. Overhead Google maps doesnt show everything.

    The line should be dedicated to suburban rail and an alternative route found for intercity services or an underground tunnel through the urban parts of NE Dublin.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,302 ✭✭✭✭murphaph


    Then you will have to inlcude Irish Rail in that cohort because it's their idea.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,599 ✭✭✭gjim


    Whether it’s technically feasible or not seems irrelevant. Adding more northern coastal capacity seems like an odd priority given there is nowhere for any extra trains to go.

    Connolly and the loop line will already be insufficient for the capacity that DART+ enables. The only benefits would be to speed up Belfast trains by 15 or 20 minutes. And that’s it - just a speed improvement for a service that carries about 250 people an hour - no actual extra passenger capacity would be provided by a massively expensive and disruptive project. Any additional service trying to use the extra tracks, whether intercity or commuter will require removing an existing service from the schedule.

    If DART-U faced questions about CBA, then 4North whether technically feasible or not has as much chance of passing a CBA as my poor 3 legged cat has of burying its sh*t on a frozen pond.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,595 ✭✭✭✭cgcsb


    Connolly could easily be expanded if they weren't trying to use the land around it for development.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,302 ✭✭✭✭murphaph


    Spencer Dock and Docklands can/could also take trains from the northern line. Obviously DU is the long term game plan though. It can't be a catch 22 where we say that DU is no good without 4N and 4N is no good without DU. That would be farcical.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,599 ✭✭✭gjim


    I don’t see any easy expansion of Connolly? At best some extra terminal platforms which would not raise the 12 tph DART limit but might allow extra intercity trains? It was examined as an option for DART+ but was ruled out on the basis of huge cost and disruption for very little benefit in terms of increasing capacity.

    Spencer Dock is not operationally connected to the northern line and will be close to capacity anyway after DART+. The loop line will be at capacity post DART+ so the only way to fit in another northern DART will be by cancelling a S or SW DART.

    The 2 track northern coastal will carry around 12 or so services per hour post DART+, yet the 2 tracks are capable of carrying 23 tph. So we’ll already have excess capacity on the 2 track northern coastal which cannot be used due to the lack of city center capacity so I can’t see adding more unusable capacity will pass any sort of CBA.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,599 ✭✭✭gjim


    DU is no good without 4N and 4N is no good without DU

    But 4N is no good (let’s say “of little benefit” to be fair) without DU or some other radical building of new heavy rail infrastructure in the center. I dunno why you’re connecting the two claims as being interchangeable - the converse isn’t the case at all as DU immediately increases the capacity of the Dublin heavy rail network to accommodate another 20 tph per direction - capacity which will be immediately usable post DART+.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 1,738 ✭✭✭Consonata


    If we're bumping the frequency with 4North, we'll need more terminating capacity somewhere. Spencer Dock is basically full of Dart West trains, particularly if train to Navan is built.

    The real bottle neck in the city tbh is the loop line but we burnt our bridges there with the new trinity development and south of pearse.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 3,518 ✭✭✭KrisW1001


    DART Underground and Four North are two parts of a long-term plan to get around the Loop Line bottleneck. With DU in place, trains from Hazelhatch to Spencer Dock (via Pearse) will continue northward on dedicated track. The loop line, and thus Connolly, will then only serve trains from Maynooth to Bray. (Other measures, like Wexford trains stopping at Bray, and, eventually, Western trains terminating in Heuston, will help with this line’s capacity)

    In the medium term, Four North reduces interference from Drogheda and Belfast services. Long term, it allows a transformation of DART service quality, as it will be part of the main spine of a “Dublin S-Bahn”. This path will be completely isolated from other rail traffic, and can thus be automated.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,302 ✭✭✭✭murphaph


    There is some room for Connolly to expand. The coach shed could go. It doesn't need to be in the city centre. The loco shed the same. There's no loco shed at any major railway station in Germany that I can think of. I don't see why Connolly needs one. It was built for the steam era.

    However to me the more important aspect is that the mere fact of the existence of 4N and the quad tracked Kildare Route will build the pressure for DU. That alone is a good enough reason for me to see it proceed. It also adds operational flexibility to the northern line in case of an incident. If we are being imaginitive we could also envisage some DART+ SW trains arrive into Spencer Dock and immediately depart out towards Drogheda instead of returning to Hazelhatch. An "interim" DU if you will.

    I don't think we should underestimate the benefit to Enterprise either. We want people to make the shift to rail. Expecting the Enterprise, which connects the two largest (by far) population centres on the island to wait behind DARTs is backward in 2025. It should be a flagship service with 200km/h running.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,885 ✭✭✭spillit67


    Surely the various initiatives frees up Connolly capacity.

    I’d have thought that the new Spencer Dock station and removing the likes of the Rosslare train would help.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,302 ✭✭✭✭murphaph


    If we are feeling politically brave we could create a lot of capacity at Connolly by simplifying the network and eliminating most of the conflicting movements:

    1. Run all Maynooth services to Bray via P6/7 at Connolly. Do not send them anywhere else. Terminate Rosslare trains at Bray. Build the relatively short cross country Maynooth-Adamstown link and send all Sligo etc. trains to Heuston. Finally sort out the level crossings on the DSER. Maynooth-Bray DARTs operate with no conflicts at very high frequency and capacity.
    2. Run all DART+ SW trains to Spencer Dock only. Passengers bound for Tara, Pearse or GCD change at Glasnevin to metrolink or Bray bound DART. No conflicting movements here either as far as I can see as the DART+ SW lines are the northern pair and will just peel off into the PPT.
    3. Terminate all northern line services at Connolly's 5! remaining plaforms. Passengers bound for Tara, Pearse or GCD change here to a Bray bound DART. If 5 platforms aren't enough to handle the load, demolish the coach shed and move those parked DMUs the hell out of there down to the docklands or out to Inchicore where space is readily available or could be made available by moving parked up stock that is rusting away at both locations. There is absolutely no reason to park all that rolling stock in the city centre. You could easily add another two platforms to Connolly in the given space. I refuse to accept that 7! platforms wouldn't be able to handle most of the massive capacity of 4N with relative ease.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 1,532 ✭✭✭riddlinrussell


    That sounds like a solid plan to tide over until DU is done

    Boards is in danger of closing very soon, if it's yer thing, go here (use your boards.ie email!)

    👇️ 👇️



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,642 ✭✭✭Citizen  Six


    Valeting plant/coach shed is due to become a maintenance shed. There’s also plans to build over it. But those plans seem stalled at the moment.
    The loco shed is a protected structure. It might have been built for the steam era, but it’s still in use today.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,885 ✭✭✭spillit67


    I know the original plan was for this DART X and for that to happen, but that was with DART Underground.

    Although wasn’t part of the original DART+ to have less DART Coastal North trains crossing the Loop Line bridge too?

    I would think from an accessibility perspective, that keeping those trains through running on the Coastal line is a priority. Coastal North users won’t have the option of shifting to Metrolink line SW and W users will. Coastal North users would have a significant degradation of services under that I would think, particularly so given the Howth Shuttle. I’m not against two changes but it shouldn’t be standard for most users.

    Would seem to underutilise Spencer Dock too.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,302 ✭✭✭✭murphaph


    We're going to have to get away from the idea that two changes is a no go. Having said that, with 4N in place they could actually revisit the Howth shuttle. Demolish Howth Junction station entirely and replace it with a GSJ and a new build station on the Howth branch as close as possible to the site of the old station. The vast majority of passengers using HJ are travelling into the city. Very few need to travel northbound.

    Howth Junction Cottages is one of the few places where the land beside the embankment is in public ownership and does not back directly onto housing so there's room to taper the GSJ into the mainline there.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,302 ✭✭✭✭murphaph


    Just because IE want to turn it into a maintenance shed doesn't mean it has to be turned into one. If they were given funding to build a greenfield shed out on the northern line somewhere they could build it there instead. It does not need to be in the city centre and railway maintenance facilities rarely are these days.

    The loco shed is actually a side issue. It could probably just remain and you could still build 2 or even 3 additional platforms on the site of the coach shed/DMU sidings. The point is, there is ample room there and the land is all in CIE ownership. They just need somewhere else outside the city centre to do the things they currently do there. Government needs to fund that.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,642 ✭✭✭Citizen  Six


    Timeframe doesn’t allow to build on a greenfield site. Dart+ is moving too slow as it is.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 33,195 ✭✭✭✭blanch152


    A GSJ at Howth Junction would never pass a CBA because there are two few passengers on the Howth line.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 104 ✭✭DrivingSouth


    I might be wrong here. But at Glasnevin, the ppt trains have to use the northern tracks, there is no crossover to the southern tracks. So if the next thing is full segregation, then Dart+ Sw would be using the Drumcondra line which gives an option into connolly or the little used tracks into the new unbuilt spencer dock.

    The Maynooth trains would then have to use the southern tracks which go to docklands bar the newcomen bridge which is only 1 track and 10kph into connolly.

    So basically to make your idea work we would need the crossover both ways at Glasnevin. And even so it would still be an at grade conflict.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 16,584 ✭✭✭✭loyatemu


    this was discussed on the Dart+ thread and apparently they are building a new crossover to facilitate use of both lines from both directions at Glasnevin.

    Put your money where yer mouth is... Subscribe and Save Boards!

    https://subscriptions.boards.ie/



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,302 ✭✭✭✭murphaph


    Or double track Newcommen Curve and bridge. The slow speed limit is not a problem as every train would be passing at that speed. It would just add 60s to the journey between Maynooth and Bray (in fact it would be a shorter journey time overall as the MGWR route is more direct more direct).



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,302 ✭✭✭✭murphaph


    What timeframe doesn't allow a greenfield build? 4N is not happening anytime soon. It won't happen before DART+.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 622 ✭✭✭Grassy Knoll


    With the NDP monies signalled for the next number of years, do we actually know what the Irish Rail investment project priorities are ? Is the 4 tracking of the Northern DART / inter city lines confirmed as part of this, if indeed it has been confirmed ?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,885 ✭✭✭spillit67


    I don’t think it’s a no go, but I do think it’s hard sell for people to take for all of their services when previously it would have been regular and direct. A lot of people on the Howth spur would be getting to the south core of the city as of right now with no stops- it’s honestly a really hard sell to say your default should move to 2 changes.

    I would find this slightly more justified if Connolly had a direct St Stephen’s Green-Charlemount Luas link. That way at least you could change at Connolly and have a one change link to basically every key city core destination (which would enhance the Northern line as a whole as a trade off for not having city centre through services anymore).

    Even still, I’d be fairly sure we’d be underutilising Spencer Dock based on your suggestion.

    To me on balance here all lines would see a significant boost where as whilst the Northern Line would get improvement in frequencies, it would absolutely see a degradation in the quality of service for many.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 33,195 ✭✭✭✭blanch152


    Even if substantial work was required to achieve this, the benefits would be significant in terms of improving frequency.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 904 ✭✭✭loco_scolo


    I had brought this up - it's not proposed to be grade separated, just an "at grade" crossover point to allow both Maynooth/PPT lines to access either of Drumcondra/Royal Canal lines. Right now, the PPT line can only access the Drumcondra line.

    And to be clear, docs from the Railway Order site for Dart West still show the current configuration, but I'm certain there was update in more recent docs.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,642 ✭✭✭Citizen  Six


    Newcomen is 10 mph. Not that fast, but a bit faster than 10 kph. 🤣



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,642 ✭✭✭Citizen  Six


    Nothing to do with FourNorth, all to do with Dart+. Look how long it's taking to get a depot in Kilcock. You can't just magic up a depot in some green field site north of Dublin because you want more platforms in Connolly.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,302 ✭✭✭✭murphaph


    I don't think anyone suggested anything would be "rustled up". 4N is not happening anytime soon. It's not happening before DART+ and probably Metrolink are complete.



Advertisement
Advertisement