Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

Northern Ireland 2125?

1959698100101188

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,219 ✭✭✭Fionn1952


    That the one where he demonstrates that he doesn't know the difference between prescribed and proscribed? Given his associates and their penchant for pharmaceuticals, it's an amusing slip.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 81,170 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    Like you need to learn the difference between flags erected for a celebration and those erected to taunt and mark territory that young fella needs to learn that triumphalist and intimidating parades are a whole order of difference to a passive sign with languages that belongs to everyone.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 81,170 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    Yep. Hard work to get through what was basically a plea to pay loyalist paramilitaries to do what they should have done many years ago - transition.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 81,170 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    How often do these people have to tell you they don't care two hoots about you and just go through the motions.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,702 ✭✭✭Francis McM


    They do not make conservative leaders of the same calibre as Mrs Thatcher nowadays. She would not have made a mistake like that. Still everyone is human. Our health minister not many years ago made a gaffe too

    Goes to prove my point, we would have a better calible of unionist and conservative politician if the military wing of the party you support did not murder such politicians as Edgar Graham, Bradford, etc etc. And leave their wives in wheelchairs / seriously injured like Norman Tebbits wife. Who would want to enter politics after that? And it continues with Kneecap urging their followers to kill Toy MPs.

    If the party you support did something, you should not complain about the consequences.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 81,170 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    Thatcher, who threw Unionists under the bus by signing the Anglo Irish Agreement?

    Aye, I'm sure Unionists miss her alright. 😁😁

    The unionist population was so angered by the Anglo-Irish Agreement that it decided to try and destroy it by a series of protests and other actions.

    These included:

    Protest marches across Northern Ireland (which sometimes became violent).

    rally to oppose the Agreement. Held in front of the City Hall in Belfast on 23 November 1985, this gathering was attended by over 100,000 people.

    ‘Day of Action’, held on 3 March 1986. This event brought most of Northern Ireland to a standstill. By and large it was a peaceful protest, but in a few places the ‘Day of Action’ ended in violence.

    • Unionist MPs refusing to attend the Westminster Parliament.Unionist leaders refusing to meet members of the British government.Unionist councils refusing to set rates for their area.

    The resignation - by all 15 unionist MPs – of their membership of the Westminster Parliament. This action meant that new elections had to be held for these 15 constituencies. The unionists’ intention was to show – by the number of votes gained by their candidates – how much support they had in their campaign of opposition to the Agreement.

    While these actions were mostly peaceful, loyalist paramilitaries showed their opposition to the Anglo-Irish Agreement by:

    Trying to frighten members of the RUC – who were seen as key to making the Agreement work – through the use of violence and intimidation.

    Setting up a new paramilitary organisation – Ulster Resistance – to oppose the Agreement.

    The British government/establishment again and again signal they don't know anything about NI and worse, they don't care two hoots about it.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,702 ✭✭✭Francis McM


    You obviously think Thatcher was harsh on Unionists, threw them "under a bus" according to you, but I think she was fair enough and done her best in the circumstances. The British government over the years gave billions to both sides in N.I., plus risked their own lives. Think they cared a lot more about BOTH sides than the Irish government sometimes did (think Arms trial, lack of extradition etc).

    You say Thatcher threw Unionists under a bus : is your theory that she was a closet Irish nationalist and could have ended the troubles in N.I. quickly by taking out the Republic leadership ( they knew who they were )? Would you have prefered if Thatcher did not "throw Unionists under a bus", according to your theory? Never knew you were that concerned about the wellbeing of unionists? And your theory is she was so harsh on unionists then she was too soft on Republicans. Who would have known. 🤣

    Funny, I always thought that Republicans gripe with Thatcher was that she was hard on Republicans / stood up to Republicans? And that is why Republicans tried to murder her and her husband and other civilians etc? Next time I hear republicans singing Maggie in a box I must try to remember FrancieBrady's unique take on her.

    You never thought that one through, did you. You have been caught out again, you cannot have it both ways.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 81,170 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    is your theory that she was a closet Irish nationalist

    TBH I don't spend a lot of time thinking about her considering all she did to destroy the lives of her own people and enrich others.

    But you could write an interesting theory on what she had in the 'closet' if things proved opportunistic for her selfish interests. Resisting Irish Unity didn't seem to keep her or her senior ministers awake at nights anyway.

    We all know Margaret said more than her prayers when it suited her.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,702 ✭✭✭Francis McM


    Nothing new or interesting in those state papers. The Irish government minister Lenihan noted that the British said "The destiny of the people of Northern Ireland" was up to the people in N. Ireland, and stuff like that. The British would not stand in the way of Irish unification if the people of N. Ireland wanted that. We all knew that. That is why the British held a border poll in 1973. The British got out of every country around the world they were not wanted in, and left with a better record than the French in Algeria, the Belgiums in Congo etc.

    Interesting you think Maggie was on nationalists side in shafting the unionists one minute and was next minute was colluding with them, and then was pushing them under the bus. lol. Will you ever make up your mind?

    Was she pushing the unionists under a bus when she sought the extradition of over 100 pIRA / INLA which the Irish government refused to extradite? Who was pushing who "under the bus", when the pIRA was engaged in (as many saw it, especially in border counties like Fermanagh) a campaign of ethnic cleansing against protestants? Something like 90% of the killings in Fermanagh were by republicans? And some of the balance of the 10% were self defence etc?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 81,170 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    Unionist reaction to being thrown under the bus with the AIA is all you need to know.

    It's been happening to them ever since but they keep going back for more.
    The British suited themselves in Ireland, that allowed them to collude and shaft at will.

    And PLEASE, don't tell me unionists would have been sanguine about Thatcher and her minister reassuring the Irish government about zero resistance to a UI.
    I can just hear Paisley now! 😁



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,702 ✭✭✭Francis McM


    You have not answered, who was pushing who under a bus? Was Thatcher pushing the unionists under a bus when she sought the extradition of over 100 pIRA / INLA which the Irish government refused to extradite? Who was pushing who "under the bus", when the pIRA was engaged in (as many saw it, especially in border counties like Fermanagh) a campaign of ethnic cleansing against protestants? Something like 90% of the killings in Fermanagh were by republicans? And some of the balance of the 10% were self defence etc?

    One minute you think Maggie was on nationalists side in shafting the unionists, and "pushing them under a bus," and next minute was colluding with them. Will you ever make your mind up: which was it?

    Are you going to tell your fellow republicans they are wrong to be singing "Maggies in a box" and instead should be thanking them for pushing the unionists (you think) under a bus?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 81,170 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    You have not answered, who was pushing who under a bus? 

    Thatcher was throwing the lad bellowing NEVER NEVER NEVER NEVER and the 100,000 Unionists he was addressing under the bus of the Anglo Irish Agreement. An agreement John Hume called the 'end of the Unionist veto'.
    An Agreement South Down MP Enoch Powell called 'treachery'.
    What about MP Harold McCusker, who is buried near, who has this on his gravestone as a result of what he felt about the AIA

    I shall carry to my grave with ignominy the sense of the injustice that I have done to my constituents down the years – when, in their darkest hours, I exhorted them to put their trust in this British House of Commons which one day would honour its fundamental obligation to them to treat them as equal British citizens.

    I mean, Carson had figured it out and yet these men went back for more as Trimble, Robinson, Allister have done since.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,702 ✭✭✭Francis McM


    I asked you already: given that one minute you think Thatcher and the British were on nationalists side in shafting the unionists, and "pushing them under a bus," and next minute you think the British were colluding with them. Will you ever make your mind up: which was it?

    Would you not be of the opinion the Irish government pushed the unionists much more under a bus than the British did because of Irish govt collusion with gunmen (remember the Arms trial in Dublin), lack of extradition etc?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 81,170 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    BOTH, I answered you.

    The British suited themselves here, always. The Irish don't matter to them, Unionist, Nationalist or neither of the two.
    If it suits them to shoot them dead in the street, they have done it and will do it again if necessary. If the British do hand over NI and belligerent Unionists go on a militant campaign, they'll gun them down too. They'll suit themselves because ultimately they don't care. Read the room.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,702 ✭✭✭Francis McM


    The Irish make up part of the Union Jack, which after all is the British flag. You claim the British do not care about those parts of its flag equally? I still think, and facts show, the Protestants / Unionists in N.I. get a better deal, and more respect, being part of the UK, than they would get from republicans in Ireland. Here the orange is part of out flag, but we saw a few weeks ago the bitterness and hundreds of negative comments on social media towards HH when she was forced to admit her husband was once "Orange". At least the British are not sectarian. And they tried to extradite pIRA paramilitaries from Ireland during the troubles : the Irish government mostly refused. So we can see who Unionist's friends were.

    Incidentally, if there was a U.I., I guess the Union Jack would have to change too, as it would no longer be appropriate to have - we would no longer be entitled to have - the Saint Patricks Saltire on it.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 81,170 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    Union Jack and what happens it, has nothing to do with me.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,702 ✭✭✭Francis McM


    Even though it contains the Saint Patricks Saltire on it?

    And you do not really care about those in N. Ireland who show allegiance to it either: I thought seeing as you earlier on board.ie advocated paying those who wanted to leave N.I. in the event of a U.I., you would have a guess at what our flag and our neighbours flag would look like.

    At least you do not dispute the fact that the Protestants / Unionists in N.I. get a better deal, and more respect, from the British being part of the UK, than they would get from republicans in Ireland now and in the event of a U.I. The sectarianism displayed by some towards HH because of her family background was enough demonstration of that.

    n.b. Did you ever find out why she is at pains to plead she is a "proud republican" (please stop attacking her), and if she had any comment on the Presbyterian church and buildings firebombed in her locality as recently as 1999? Did she dare condemn those attacks? If she describes herself as "a proud republican", where does she stand on the murder of the other protestant FG politician in Co. Monaghan, Billy Fox, who was killed by other "proud republicans" during the troubles, and his girlfriends house burned down, after first burning the bible in front of the terrified occupants of the house, so it really was a sectarian attack? Why is she afraid to say anything about that?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 81,170 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    I never did and don't give a hoot about flags or anthems Francis.

    You choose it and wave it to your hearts content.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,702 ✭✭✭Francis McM


    So you would'nt mind in a U.I. if the flag of Ireland was an orange flag with a picture of King Billy on it, and our anthem was the same as GFTK but with a few words changed?

    I'd say you would give a hoot about it then quickly enough. Or if someone flew a Union Jack south of the border, or put it on a sign, you you would care about it quite quickly?

    Funny how you do not care about anthems but yet you are so defensive about people chanting uh ah Up the Ra. Which I suppose you could say is a sort of an anthem almost among some people.

    And as far as flags go, I'd say many unionists / loyalists look on the Irish language going up on signs in their areas in Belfast as alien to them as if someone put tricolours up on their signs, because they associate the Irish flags with Republicanism now thanks to Kneecap and their slogan "every word of irish is a bullet for Irish freedom etc". If flags are not important to republicans, why does the man in Kneecap wear a tricolour balaclava?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 81,170 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    The slogan is Padraig Pearse’s and he may have been right because with every petulant bigoted stamp of their feet they are showing they have no intention of sharing ‘their wee country’.

    Keep it up, the history of Unionist strategy shows it will ultimately leave them in a worse place than they are now.
    Remember, come a border poll they will have to sell the UK union case and the history of their behaviour will be all there.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 12,424 ✭✭✭✭downcow


    you don’t give a hoot about flags!

    Yet a few pages back you wanted them banned 🤔



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 12,424 ✭✭✭✭downcow


    Who is not sharing OWC with who.
    Rory Mcilroy, Connor Bradley and endless other catholics are very happy and content to share it with me - they are not trying to keep it all to themselves



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 81,170 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    I would like to see flags and other things used to taunt banned



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 81,170 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    Yeh they are fine until they look for something or say something a Unionist doesn’t like or is so insecure about they do a tail spin about it.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,873 ✭✭✭ittakestwo


    If you're happy to play for NI and dont care being called northern irish orirish and are open to the idea of a UI are you part of the OWC? Is the OWC just a synonym for NI or do you actually have to have to have a preference regarding a border poll to be part if the bp.

    And what do you mean by " trying to keep it all for themselves". From your previous posts i thought you had the problem with sharing things like our natinal patron saint.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 81,170 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    SDLP calling out the Dublin government is unusual. Change is in the air.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,219 ✭✭✭Fionn1952


    We're plenty happy to share it with you, Downcow. You just dont want a bit of us about the place. When you talk about, 'Our' wee country, you're only thinking of sashes, marching, blood and thunder bands, the NI soccer team.....the GAA, the Irish Language, Irish tradition music and anything else from my culture don't feature in YOUR wee country.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,702 ✭✭✭Francis McM


    Thre Same Claire Hanna who says "Unity is not worth having if it’s not based on reconciliation", yet she forces the Irish language on communities in Belfast who are opposed to it and who never had Irish language in their communities before. Businesses would not stick being told to have 50% of their signage in Irish : why should communities? If she like the Irish language so much, why does she not go back to Galway, where she was born?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 81,170 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    A democratic vote is not 'forcing' anything on anyone.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,702 ✭✭✭Francis McM


    As you are aware, the 2022 policy change significantly lowered the required support level from 66.6% to 15%, so plently of areas in belfast where the support for Irish language on Street signs is only 15 or 20% have Irish forced on everyone else.

    Just one in eight Irish street signs approved in Belfast since a controversial council policy came into force were supported by 50% or more of residents of the street.

    When you say "A democratic vote is not 'forcing' anything on anyone.", did a democratic vote in Germany in the 1930s change anything for minorities there?

    Nor saying that the SF led council in Belfast this past few years is like 1930s Germany, but a situation where someomething is done just to annoy the majority in 7 out of 8 areas is not helpful to good community relations. Especially when the likes of Kneecap say that every word of Irish is a bullet for Irish freedom.

    As someone who learnt Irish here for 13 years in school, I can see the situation up North and it is not fair on the PUIL community there if, as the survey showed, "just one in eight Irish street signs approved in Belfast since a controversial council policy came into force were supported by 50% or more of residents of the street."

    Post edited by Francis McM on


Advertisement
Advertisement