Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
If we do not hit our goal we will be forced to close the site.

Current status: https://keepboardsalive.com/

Annual subs are best for most impact. If you are still undecided on going Ad Free - you can also donate using the Paypal Donate option. All contribution helps. Thank you.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.

Wicklow Rail Capacity Enhancement

135

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 29,687 ✭✭✭✭end of the road


    only 2 of the biggest factors but not all the factors.
    as i said previously, there is not going to be an hourly shuttle, it's just not going to happen and even if it did the unreliability would be a joke as would the amount of empty running.
    it's not just the existing usage that needs to be factored in, it's increased usage and getting people out of their cars, which is not really going to happen if the option is to get on a train at wexford or wherever and then wait 15 minutes for a dart because the train got delayed somewhere.
    a more frequent direct service is the only way you are keeping and growing usage numbers, that is just the reality.

    I'm very highly educated. I know words, i have the best words, nobody has better words then me.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 2,935 ✭✭✭KrisW1001


    Okay, it’s clear you don’t understand why this change is being proposed at all.

    You are using current DART service levels as a justification for keeping things the way they are. Current service levels are not staying the same: they are increasing.

    Increased DART services remove the long gaps in track space that used to allow the Rosslare service to come in. There was a simple A/B choice: A = clear three DART slots every time the Rosslare train needs to come through, or B = stop the Rosslare train at Wicklow before it can interfere with DART services. B won, because it means more people can now use the train. A side effect of B is that it now allows more trains to go between Rosslare and Wicklow because there’s no longer a requirement to clear their way all the way to Pearse Station.

    It is not a change for change sake. It’s a change that makes better use of limited track space into Dublin, and also gives more services from Rosslare.

    That’s not an opinion, that’s fact. After the change, more trains will stop at all the stations affected, and more passenger capacity will be in place.

    Your opposition boils down to a dislike of change in general, and inconvenience to you in particular. I’m not interested in debating that, because honestly, your personal preferences don’t matter in a system designed for millions of users… and neither do mine.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 1,385 ✭✭✭riddlinrussell


    Also the overall plan is for Rosslare trains to go the Heuston, so where you say Rosslare trains, you mean Wexford North trains.

    Boards is in danger of closing very soon, if it's yer thing, go here (use your boards.ie email!)

    👇️ 👇️



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,469 ✭✭✭spillit67


    You debunked this?

    He was unconcerned about potential delays changing trains at Wicklow or Greystones. “The Dart stops at a lot more places than the [diesel] train – I’m happy out,” he says.

    You know it’s possible for others to have a different opinion than you, right? Who appointed you as spokesperson? I can certainly see different perspectives myself. On balance for society I think we need to go ahead with the shuttle. If people are so determined to have a direct service they can get the bus . The original intention for the line to Kingstown and then Bray was for commuters, not leisure users on a free travel pass or those who want to go on a laptop. It became the Rosslare alternative once the Harcourt Line shutdown. It shouldn’t impede what is best for society as a whole and what also improves service coming from further south than the DART (depending on your perspective).



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 29,687 ✭✭✭✭end of the road


    oh i absolutely understand why it is being proposed, whereas you believe the nonsense out of irish rail i know from experience is just that.
    no i'm using the future services, actual realities on the ground and everything else as a reason to keep and increase the direct services, and to actually deliver a reliable dart service.
    services are increasing yes, but that, unlike last time services increased, still allows for rosslare services through.
    increased dart services over all don't remove the not so long gaps that allow rosslare trains through as it's not 3 darts that allow it through in reality, but the extra necessary slack in capacity that is needed regardless to allow for reliability, empty running if there is an issue and unplanned maintenence.
    the choice was to continue to run a reliable dart service and continue to have reasonably used services from rosslare, or throw rosslare passengers under the bus and suppress demand to then try deliver a dart service that will run on a knife edge all of the time with everyone waiting for the lot to go bang.
    b won out because it means not actually improving services to wexford for which there is no interest, no investment in any infrastructure what soever, it suppresses demand south of wicklow while not really increasing numbers north of greystones in reality.
    it does not allow for more trains to run between rosslare and wicklow because that can already be done direct and can always be done direct to dublin, and you still need to clear trains all the way to perse for the large scale empty running that will be required so that servicing at connolly and heavy maintenence at portlaoise can be carried out.
    it's a change for change sake that doesn't in reality make better use of limited infrastructure all the way into dublin and does not give more services from rosslare as that can be done and could be done.
    that's not an opinion, that is fact.
    after the change, rosslare line capacity will remain the exact same, just delivered differently.
    my opposition boils down to seeing and understanding the reality, and understanding that on this line a change for change sake is not going to keep the existing numbers which are growing, never mind continue to grow numbers, it is a nonsensical change that is being implemented to do nothing and get out of addressing any of the issues.
    you have to claim it's about a dislike of change, inconvenience to me and personal preference because you know there is no argument for this change for change sake so have to make it about me.

    I'm very highly educated. I know words, i have the best words, nobody has better words then me.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 29,687 ✭✭✭✭end of the road


    the rosslare/wexford trains will not be going via waterford to heuston, i can absolutely bet that won't happen.

    sure, it might be "the plan" but it won't be the reality.

    I'm very highly educated. I know words, i have the best words, nobody has better words then me.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 16,041 ✭✭✭✭loyatemu


    I don't think it's particularly useful to keep going on about this "via Waterford" idea. It's 20 years away if it ever even happens, which I have serious doubts about - it's a notional idea in a strategy document of which there have been many over the years. The plans for Greystones and Wicklow are in detailed documents and tenders for them are out now. It's like saying there's no need to worry about bus services to Cavan because the AIRR says there'll be a new railway there eventually.

    Put your money where yer mouth is... Subscribe and Save Boards!

    https://subscriptions.boards.ie/



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,469 ✭✭✭spillit67


    The plan means more capacity to Dublin using the line, that’s the beginning and end of this.

    Now losing your direct service is a consideration of course, but quit the games.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,195 ✭✭✭✭Zebra3




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,469 ✭✭✭spillit67




  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 2,935 ✭✭✭KrisW1001


    The way you write is painful to read, so I’m finished discussing this.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 29,687 ✭✭✭✭end of the road


    yes i debunked it, 1 or 2 people in an article is proof of nothing.
    well if he is happy out with such a **** service then that's fine but quite frankly he is probably happy with all sorts of **** public services which again is fine but better can be delivered.
    no on balance for your believing the nonsense out of irish rail and the NTA you believe we need to go ahead with the shuttle which has little potential usership and makes services even more pointless then they are.
    if people want direct services they can get the bus is not workable as road is oversubscribed and increasing dependance on road transport is not workable in a country needing to cut carbon emitions in terms of transport especially not to mention it's discredited 1960s nonsense.
    what the original intention for a line that was built over 100 years ago and was extended a bit later on is meaningless really, it's a desperate nonargument really.
    most passengers on the line are not FTP users or leasure travelers, and people working or traveling for whatever reason is exactly what all railways are for.
    the existance of a direct service between rosslare and dublin does not impeed society or what is best for society nor does it stop improvements to other services on the line.

    I'm very highly educated. I know words, i have the best words, nobody has better words then me.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,469 ✭✭✭spillit67


    That’s not debunking anything. I gave you a quote there where the question was implied.

    There’s different perspectives, get over it. Your posts are basically “I don’t trust Irish Rail”. It’s bad faith arguing.

    Actually it is workable to provide a direct service. The N11 is getting a bus lane. Bus Eireann lose money right now on those routes because Irish Rail undercut them. Bus services work perfectly well for many parts of the country.

    The existence of this service on the coastal line does impede service. DART can be improved substantially if it returned to what its purpose actually was for.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 29,687 ✭✭✭✭end of the road


    quit the games? god you're really grasping at straws here.

    no, the claim is about improving capacity to dublin, in reality, it's about doing nothing while throwing a bit of capacity down which over all they will end up not being able to provide reliably because they won't build any infrastructure, anywhere.

    I'm very highly educated. I know words, i have the best words, nobody has better words then me.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 29,687 ✭✭✭✭end of the road


    my source is report after report after report with very little delivery and little to show for them.

    the likely reality that as much as i support it being done, they won't reopen the south wexford line either.

    I'm very highly educated. I know words, i have the best words, nobody has better words then me.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,469 ✭✭✭spillit67


    More DARTs is more capacity. The reports on clear on this.

    Your “I don’t trust Irish Rail/NTA”’ and swearing at people who use the line with a different opinion is not “debunking” anything. My suggestion is to pepper politicians with your “arguments”’ as this is a serious enough discussion forum.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 29,687 ✭✭✭✭end of the road


    i'm afraid showing that the article not being a reliable metric of anything (it's not supposed to be you do know that don't you) is debunking something, your argument and that article.
    exactly, it's a serious discussion forum, hence your desperation tactics of trying to bate posters (it doesn't work on me) has no place here.

    more darts is only more capacity when operated on a service that can be delivered reliably, as in one that has proper infrastructural investment to support it.

    I'm very highly educated. I know words, i have the best words, nobody has better words then me.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,469 ✭✭✭spillit67


    Again I said it was anecdotal. Just like your opinion is.

    You haven’t debunked anything. Again I’d suggest taking your emotive act to where it will have some success with politicians because God knows it’s an effective way to stall progress for people.

    More DARTs means more capacity, that has happened since the service was launched in the early 1980s. That’s a fact. “I don’t trust Irish Rail/NTA” is not that.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 29,687 ✭✭✭✭end of the road


    my opinion is more the truth based on direct experiences and actual realitiees on the ground based on the realities from services where there were previously change of trains on the line.
    i debunked the article, and i can take my valid factual and non-immotive arguments to politicians and wherever i feel they should be heard as i will do.
    more darts is more capacity when operated reliably on infrastructure that can support it.
    when not it's not ultimately more capacity.

    I'm very highly educated. I know words, i have the best words, nobody has better words then me.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 1,385 ✭✭✭riddlinrussell


    Also if you're going on about the 'reality on the ground' the reality on the ground is that the line is operated by Irish Rail, who you don't trust, so they will likely do this regardless of your feelings on the matter, whether the end result is better or poorer service it seems to be their intention, so why waste your breath arguing with us instead of petitioning some Wicklow TDs? Like the Taoiseach?

    Boards is in danger of closing very soon, if it's yer thing, go here (use your boards.ie email!)

    👇️ 👇️



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,819 ✭✭✭Working class heroes


    you sound like a deranged priest preaching at the alter of stagnation, in an empty church.

    Racism is now hiding behind the cloak of Community activism.



  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 20,540 Mod ✭✭✭✭Sam Russell


    Mod:

    @end of the road

    If you persist in long posts, can you please use capital letters and proper punctuation as it is hard to read your posts.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,469 ✭✭✭spillit67


    Their opinions are also based on their experience. You are simply discounting them and swearing at them because you disagree.

    The word is “emotive”, not “immotive”. You saying you don’t trust Irish Rail is not debunking capacity improvements. It’s a valid concern but it “debunks” nothing.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,007 ✭✭✭✭road_high


    It’s obvious that having a switch to DART services into the city centre opens up a massive range of options for increasing frequencies and services. Saying that it won’t is like arguing water isn’t wet - there are numerous examples of this model working for years around the country and elsewhere- still not good enough. The Wexford timetable as it stands is poor and has massive room for improvement



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,936 ✭✭✭✭Marcusm


    But that’s the point, you oppose it because it doesn’t suit you. We have no idea what non-commuter demand could be stimulated by the proposal which, together with the improved Dart service, might suit the populace overall.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,936 ✭✭✭✭Marcusm


    I guess you miss the point that it is mostly irrelevant whether 90% of the IR commuters are against it as the proposal will increase services for Dart users which comprise a much greater cohort.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 29,687 ✭✭✭✭end of the road


    i think we have a fair idea, and it's not likely to be very much when they could just take the car as that option then makes huge sense over going by rail.

    the reason i oppose it is that it is sub par, which is typical when it comes to almost everything in relation to wexford and south wicklow, cobble together and do as little as possible.

    I'm very highly educated. I know words, i have the best words, nobody has better words then me.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 29,687 ✭✭✭✭end of the road


    actually it isn't irrelevant at all, especially if it's the case that regional and inter city passengers in reality contribute the greater level of fares income to the railway (something i have heard quite a bit) how true or not don't know.

    the reality is, it's not up to other passengers to be thrown under the bus to give dart passengers disproportionately more then they actually need or to try and cover the likely reality that they won't be able to deliver what is being proposed because they won't implement any extra infrastructure at all.

    anyway, nothing new is being raised here, have heardd it all before so unless there is anything else i'm going to step out.

    I'm very highly educated. I know words, i have the best words, nobody has better words then me.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,936 ✭✭✭✭Marcusm


    Can’t you see both sides? Could it not be asserted that the Dart passengers are thrown under the bus for 40 years to accommodate the Rosslare/Gorey trains?



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 454 ✭✭Ireland trains


    Where has this narrative came from that improving DARTs or Rosslare services is a binary choice.

    Firstly, Rosslare services do not get a path cleared for them as has been claimed, they squeeze between dart services which slightly altered. If services were to increase to every 5 minutes, one of those slots could be used by a diesel service.

    Saying that diesels empty out by Bray is just nonsense, morning services are rammed by the time they reach Greystones. Posters also appear to be conflating ridership with demand, and using this as a reason to further degrade what is already a threadbare service.

    Dumping passengers onto DARTs somewhere in Wicklow is not going to be attractive and would further increase travel times.
    The via-Waterford proposal for the line is not going to happen, as I’ve outlined previously, and the existing service desperately needs improving.



Advertisement