Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

Manchester United Thread 25/26 - Teamtalk/Transfers/Gossip Mod Note in OP 26.09.24

1119111921194119611971308

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,477 ✭✭✭CantGetNoSleep


    Same Sadiki who cost 15m this summer, while the Ineos scouts could only come up with Carlos Baleba. I'd put a lad from Twitter in charge sooner than any of the current lot, they'd do a better job.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,342 ✭✭✭IncognitoMan


    Both can be true though.

    He can be performing poorly, making poor decisions and also have been badly supported this summer. This is what our new Footballing dept / structure was brought in to avoid!!

    The point is not to defend Ruben and his system - at this stage it's clear as day it isn't working and doesn't suit the players.

    The point is Ruben is the manager (and still is) because our football department looked at his work in Sporting and decided we wanted to move forward with a similar setup here.

    We get Ruben to the club, get through a shitshow of a season and then we start developing doubts, concerns after the manager who has a very specific system fails badly with a squad who aren't setup for that system

    At that stage there are 2 options :

    1 - make sure he has the players to play the system you hired him for, if he fails after that there are no excuses and move to another manger who can work that system or similar as it matches up with your long term vision for the club still.

    2 - pull the plug as his setup no longer matches up with the longer term vision at the club. Replace with someone who does.

    What you DON'T DO is sign players who aren't as needed because they are available or more getable and then persist with the guy who you know won't change or adapt his system(which you brought him to the club to play).

    We have a reduced schedule this season so we could have got by with Bruno, Mount, Zirkzee, Mainoo and Amad for the 10 roles. With a better striker and better midfield either side of them they would have been fine, not perfect but fine. Certainly less of a drop off when you compare other areas.

    We NEEDED a Striker who could step in straight away.
    We NEEDED a Keeper who could step in straight away.
    We NEEDED a new center midfielder x2.
    We NEEDED wing backs to make the system work better if we are to persist with it.

    Instead we got 2 new players to play 10, a position we argurably needed the least reinforcing in.

    A young striker who will need time to adapt to replace our failing young striker who was struggling to adapt.

    A young Keeper who had just broke into the 1st team for a Belgium club side 12 months before - again will likely need time / may never be good enough.

    No center midfielder, no wing back.

    Promoted our 2nd choice keeper who wasn't good enough to displace our 1st choice keeper who wasn't good enough.

    Ruben has lost my faith with his decisions but those above the manager are STILL making incredibly poor decisions.

    That is a **** hand to deal any manager, weather Ruben is good enough or not is a separate issue!!

    Post edited by IncognitoMan on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 497 ✭✭GolfPar


    Player of the Month nominees for September :

    Bruno Fernandes

    Benjamin Šeško

    Patrick Dorgu

    This is how bad it's gotten guys. The 3 of them have been useless.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,211 ✭✭✭✭bucketybuck


    Dorgu got his first PL assist, in todays new world of zero expectations being placed on Manchester United players or managers, that is clearly a successful month for him.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,299 ✭✭✭Charlie69




  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 20,302 ✭✭✭✭y0ssar1an22


    here's the pass map from the weekend. dorgu and ugarte are clearly an issue getting the ball up the pitch, so everything gets shifted towards the right hand side.

    i think he should try shaw at lwb. casemiro will be back to replace ugarte at the weekend.

    Screenshot 2025-09-30 123921.png


  • Subscribers, Paid Member Posts: 44,292 ✭✭✭✭sydthebeat


    thats so depressing.

    sesko has played less than 300 mins with 1 goal and sfa else to show.

    fernandes, taking away his penalties, hasnt been great. 2 yellows as well as dorgu.

    Mbeumo has been our brightest player by a long way. Hes our most positive carrying attacking player.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,961 ✭✭✭✭Zeek12


    Excellent synopsis of where United are right now. If it was as simple as replace Amorim with a more competent Coach, the fix you feel could be relatively straightforward.

    But it's difficult to:

    a) Understand how the Ineos recruitment policy in the Summer aligned with this Coach's vision of how he wants the team to play

    b) Have much faith that Ineos will get the next big decision right, because almost every decision during the last 16 months have been poor ones

    Like many fans, I'm incredibly frustrated by some of the things RA is, or is not doing. And he has to answer for his mistakes and there have been plenty of those.

    But I do really believe Berrada & Co. are showing considerable incompetence here also.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,832 ✭✭✭ericzeking


    I agree with the poster above who basically says the job is too big for RA, from day one he was bemoaning the interviews and the scrutiny. This is essentially the fault of INEOS et al.

    I can't help but feel he could have benefitted from someone in the staff with more experience in general or even an English conduit. When Pep came he brought in Brian Kidd for example.

    In theory, it shouldn't be needed because Wilcox and Berrada are supposedly doing more of the traditional old school manager jobs but RA is still getting swamped in every interview and press conference and really has been verbally putting his foot in it intermittently from day one for all his charm.

    In this vein, I think it's wrong to have Wilcox posing with the new signings for the big happy clappy PR shoots..….while RA gets all the sh!t day in day out, it is somewhat undermining.

    As an aside, and I don't care if this is harsh, but I can't take the slightly more rotund coach seriously, he's only about 30, he's not in good physical shape, he's not some 60 year old ex pro who likes a few shandys. If I was playing 5 a side, I wouldn't be taking advice from him…not to mind at the elite level of the game.

    The players play like they don't believe in what they are doing, they do it, but they don't do it with the required conviction.

    I will never call for a manager to be sacked but it looks done at this point, but it's not just Amorim and his fabled systems fault, there is plenty blame to go round.

    Ever the optimist, I think he will end up being successful after though, he has a charisma that will work in the right environment and he's only 39 ffs.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,211 ✭✭✭✭bucketybuck


    One thing I know about this forum is that if you dare criticise anything then you are just a negative nancy, so despite INEOS making mistake after mistake, there are people who don't like it being discussed.

    Pointing out INEOS flaws is like pointing out early in the transfer window that the transfer policy is all wrong. All you get is people saying its too soon to know that.

    Anyway, regardless of that. Regardless of INEOS making mistakes, that still is not a reason to overthink the new manager appointment.

    The vast, vast majority of manager appointments are a complete crapshoot. Good managers fail, bad managers go on a run and pick up a trophy. Most of the time it hinges on a few sliding doors moments, a player getting injured or a goal being given. Then you get momentum and it goes from there.

    Very few managers are as incompetent as Amorim, most have at least a baseline and thats why the new manager bounce is a thing. At the other end of the scale, very few are genuinely Ancelotti style guarantees.

    So just do the due diligence, do the interviews, pick one and get the **** on with it. And if he fails, then do it again, and again, until you get the one that works.

    I know the club has been burned before, but there is no need to overthink this at all.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,711 ✭✭✭Caustic


    People tend to get pushback when they are being hyperbolic in there critisism, there is valid criticism and then is people shouting at clouds, I doubt anyone gets much if any push back on saying something like inoes have made mistakes but at least look like they are trying to do things the right way over something like inoes are totally clueless and worse then the glassers.

    In terms of manger bounce it is a very short term thing 3-6 game usually and it happens when a manger leaves so united got it just so happened to be under rudd and a little under Amorim.

    If it was a case you could continually get a bounce by constantly changing managers short term there would be people doing it.

    This is an example of someone getting push back on saying something incorrect but it's not a defence of the manger as you will probably take it



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 577 ✭✭✭Seattle


    I don't really care if people criticise INEOS, I just see it as a waste of time. It's not really constructive. They're the ones in sporting control, if you want to try to change that then maybe get a flight to Manchester and get your placards out, and see how you get on. Maybe set up a protest account on Twitter. Or if you want to argue for the Glazers to resume decision making on the team, knock yourself out.

    At least when we're discussing team selections, transfers and managers, we can debate over realistic alternatives and scenarios that are possible and might actually happen.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,961 ✭✭✭✭Zeek12


    But why not question the Ineos strategy? A change in strategy need not mean a change of ownership or reverting back to the Glazers.

    We keep hearing they are “all in”on Amorim. Yet they sign only one WB (who is young and very raw), in a squad lacking any wing backs at all.

    Were still carrying players at the back clearly not comfortable playing in a back 3 with a high line.

    And there’s a gaping hole at midfield where at least one good DM is needed.

    How does this align with being “all in” on RA? How does this facilitate his way of playing to bring success?

    I don’t particularly care for Amorims way of playing…. But what’s the sense in prioritizing 2 No.10s over other problems as they did in the summer. And then keep insisting Amorim is the guy?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 20,302 ✭✭✭✭y0ssar1an22


    i've not watched this yet - another amorim interview. this uploaded today.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 14,736 ✭✭✭✭JRant


    I'm at a loss as to why he's so determined to play Bruno in that midfield 2 though. Even when Cunha was out he didn't move him up to one of the 10's and play Mainoo. It's very odd to me.

    "Well, yeah, you know, that's just, like, your opinion, man"



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,468 ✭✭✭FrankN1


    If anything we have given managers too much time. Have any gone on to do anything great? We need to act quicker and eventually one will click.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 577 ✭✭✭Seattle


    I don't think there's anything wrong with that, I try to figure out + discuss their strategy myself. But the shallow 'INEOS out' vibe posts with no viable alternative suggestions or discussion of strategy is boring imo.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 377 ✭✭17togo


    Misleading tag line on the video, "we are going to change the system" obviously to get utd fans to watch it thinking there's some big reveal. 🙄 He didn't mention anything about the system or changing it, unless there's more of the interview to be released!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,491 ✭✭✭✭StringerBell


    He has said the same thing many times.

    "People say ‘go with the flow’ but do you know what goes with the flow? Dead fish."



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 14,736 ✭✭✭✭JRant


    The briefings have started so it's only a matter of time now. Muppetiers saying time is running out and results are needed now with the club discussing options internally. Fletcher getting a big up by a couple of other outlets (possible interim manager?). It's looking like the end of the road for RA and what's disappointing is he's going down by relying on the usual old heads rather than try to actually build for the future, oh well.

    "Well, yeah, you know, that's just, like, your opinion, man"



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 20,302 ✭✭✭✭y0ssar1an22


    they need to figure out who they want in. for example, if they want glasner there's no point getting in an interim. he has 9 months left on his contract, so pay up and get him now.

    if they want a WC manager or conte, and they can do a deal for them to be in place next summer, then get an interim.

    if they have no clue, i suppose an interim to buy time. if this is the case, they are as bad as amorim. cos he's been **** for 10 months now, so contingency should have been in place.

    for the weekend, i'd go with:

    lammens

    yoro de ligt heaven

    amad mainoo cas leon

    cunha mbuemo

    sesko

    means dropping some of those old heads (shaw, maguire, bruno, dalot) who have been around for 3/4/5 sackings.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,261 ✭✭✭✭billyhead




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 20,302 ✭✭✭✭y0ssar1an22


    when he wasnt moved to 10 with no mount or cunha the chances are remote. last throw of the dice, so maybe.

    it seems bruno will be the sword he dies on.

    that to me makes glasner a more attractive option (and a carrick type less attractive, notwithstanding the need for an interim should plan C be their chosen option). has no connection with any of the players, either via managing/playing with them previously or by being compatriots.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,711 ✭✭✭Caustic


    Football is a funny old game isn't it, glasner name is rightly being touted as a possible replacement for Amorim especially as he plays a 3atb.

    To play devil's advocate a little this time last year or close enough Palace had played 8 games had no wins, just above the relegation zone there was starting to be plenty of talk about him being moved on from palace, people giving out about the formation etc even after 18 games they were 16th 3 points of relegation and no one would be looking at him for the united job.

    Fast forward 9 months and he is a very hot property and being widely regarded as doing an excellent job at place again rightly so after being unbeaten for so long and an Fa cup, charity shield and most recently beating the champions fairly easily.

    Of course there are obvious caveats, palace aren't united, he had a great start to his palace career so had credit in the bank, was dealing with losing his best players etc

    This isn't a post saying Amorim should get more time but i was just looking at the table last season earlier and was thinking how perceptions can change so quickly in football especially these days and that it's a funny old game



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 20,302 ✭✭✭✭y0ssar1an22


    it is a funny game, and for the most part us fans have no patience (WHU sacking moyes, de boer being appointed at palace).

    with glasner, i should have () that with (as an example). that can be any manger attainable now. inzaghi would be another. 2 CL finals with inter with a decent few utd cast offs.

    those 8 games aside, he built up enough credit the prior season (25 points from 14 games). 1.68 PPG at palace in PL. i think amorim is less than 1 in the PL.

    amorim has the opposite of credit in the bank. he is maxing out the credit card.

    i suppose the only question that matters is, does the board believe in him? i would think not cos the results are as bad as ever, zero signs of improvement, and relegation is a legit possibility given his track record to date.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 15,145 ✭✭✭✭josip


    Am I over-simplifying things? Amorim insists on/can only play the same system game after game. All United's matches are available for opposition coaches to analyse and work out how to counter. Matches are played and opponents duly beat us.

    Why is anyone surprised by this outcome? Did anyone (Ineos) not see this coming? It's not going to get better, it's going to get worse.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,711 ✭✭✭Caustic


    Ah you didn't need to with (glasner) I was half hijacking to so I could have my speil 😂

    Your right there is loads of managers we could get in who would in all likelihood improve us.

    I do think there are some caveats to Amorims time at united, especially last season, some his fault some due to circumstance.

    The move away from ten haggs style of football to his not just in formation but style wise was a huge leap, he had a crazy bad injury crisis where we had the bench full of youngsters at times, him (probably rightly) prioritizing the cup over the league.

    His failure to land that gamble and our awful performance in the final certainly hurt his reputation badly and as you say he absolutely has no credit in the bank or even close to it because of it

    It's why when I saw our opening fixtures I did fear the worse for him.

    In isolation the opening 6 games points wise isn't awful when taking the opposition into account, there has been some flashes of performances this season but then we had a bit a luck via Chelsea win the game but turn out our worst performance of the season via brentford.

    There probably is a broader more interesting discussion around Amorim that never gets explored anywhere even if it all points back to him getting the sack soon or needing an extremely good run of wins to survive the season

    I don't think he would ever get us relegated but I never really thought we would sink this low either and it's hard to argue how ugly his win ratio looks in cold hard light or day



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 20,302 ✭✭✭✭y0ssar1an22


    i put up his quotes on pep before the city game, maybe a week ago. along the lines of, pep is the best, you dont know what he's gonna do. makes it tough as an opposition manager.

    in the same interview he said he wont change.

    can anyone make sense of that?

    disappointed no one in the press queried that fairly big point.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,180 ✭✭✭✭Sand


    If Amorim does go, and it's commonly accepted the squad isn't a good fit for 3 at the back then is Glasner really the right replacement? He would likely tweak a few things and hopefully get more out of some players, but fundamentally this squad is still going to be a poor fit for 3 at the back unless and until the club invests heavily in wingbacks.

    Given all the other gaps in the team that need solving in the next 12 months (GK, 2 CMs, maybe ST, CB to replace Maguire) getting a coach who prefers 4 at the back cuts down the size of the recruitment problem, at least for the next 2-3 years.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 14,736 ✭✭✭✭JRant


    I'd love to see us get Nagelsmaan signed up but it's probably too far away and he wouldn't be available until the end of summer. Other than that I'm not pushed on any of the other candidates being floated around.

    There's still a place for Bruno but not in midfield amd not as captain either. He's just too temperamental and it's not getting the best out of him.

    The bit I'm really struggling with is why he's using the old heads so much. Heaven made a fraction of the errors Shaw has this season and can't get a minute. Mainoo can't buy a game yet Bruno is having a horrible time in midfield. Yoro has an off day against City and gets dropped straight away. And we've a keeper that just can't save a ball for love nor money.

    "Well, yeah, you know, that's just, like, your opinion, man"



Advertisement