Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
If we do not hit our goal we will be forced to close the site.

Current status: https://keepboardsalive.com/

Annual subs are best for most impact. If you are still undecided on going Ad Free - you can also donate using the Paypal Donate option. All contribution helps. Thank you.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.

Presidential Election 2025

1271272274276277504

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,123 ✭✭✭Ardillaun


    So they might actually notice the guff she comes out with. Even worse.

    Do I contradict myself?
    Very well then I contradict myself,
    (I am large, I contain multitudes.)



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,154 ✭✭✭✭gormdubhgorm


    Irish, English, and German are among the 24 official languages of the EU. So Connolly has three of those. Probably best suited as an MEP, not President of Ireland.

    Guff about stuff, and stuff about guff.



  • Site Banned Posts: 4,164 ✭✭✭Oíche Na Gaoithe Móire


    He reminds me of his grandad, politically.

    I never said anything about being happy or not about his genetics. Those are your words.

    Quite frankly I love your posts, they are so in earnest.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,123 ✭✭✭Ardillaun


    I assumed such fightin’ words were being dragged up from decades ago but no, they seemingly represent her current views. Does she realize her dream job entails being as inoffensive as possible on both home and away fixtures?

    Do I contradict myself?
    Very well then I contradict myself,
    (I am large, I contain multitudes.)



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,701 ✭✭✭✭Galwayguy35


    She is on a roll this week, insulting an entire country by suggesting they are returning to what was happening under the nazies puts her Hamas comments in the shade.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,123 ✭✭✭Ardillaun


    What are any of these people going to do about houses or hospitals up in the Park? That’s not their job. Higgins was lucky enough not to attract too much attention stateside for some of his more colourful statements but we can’t afford someone even wilder by the looks of things with that maniac in the White House waiting to take offence. Connolly simply does not fit the job description. She’s way too ready to wade into delicate foreign policy matters that would be none of her business.

    This is a very odd job. The candidates have to pretend they’re ready to change the country even though they can do no such thing. We big it up too much and force them into these silly performances.

    Do I contradict myself?
    Very well then I contradict myself,
    (I am large, I contain multitudes.)



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 9,854 ✭✭✭blackwhite


    I see we’ve the first debate scheduled for Monday night on Virgin. Will be interesting to see how all 3 perform when it isn’t one-on-one interview format



  • Moderators, Business & Finance Moderators Posts: 11,079 Mod ✭✭✭✭Jim2007


    She is an activist and the majority of the voters know very well that an activist is not the material for an Irish president. And as the campaign ramps up she'll have endless opportunities to demonstrate why she is wholey unsuit for the office.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 78,599 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    Isn't that what she said - it is up to the Palestinians to decide their fate not a PM riding shotgun for his masters in Washington.
    I was at an event last night and somebody who worked for Heather was at the table, when the comment was discussed she laughed at the faux outrage about Connolly's comment - 'have people forgotten what happened here?'

    Any well informed Irish person knows Connolly was spot on with that comment.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,865 ✭✭✭✭Brendan Bendar


    Amongst a certain section of the populace, maybe, Pat.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 31,969 ✭✭✭✭breezy1985


    Mary Robinson and Michael D could be described the same way and they were our excellent in the role.

    Connolly is way off their level but not because she is an activist.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 31,969 ✭✭✭✭breezy1985


    A large portion out there in the real world. Probably not many in whatever bubble you live in.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,805 ✭✭✭Bishop of hope


    As any well informed person can see, the Palestinian authority doesn't agree with her, in fact they want rid of Hamas. Hamas won an election and then decided they wouldn't relinquish power or hold any further elections. They in effect isolated Gaza from Palestine, making it it's own entity. A wider palestine doesn't want Hamas involved. Starmer, for all his faults, recognised the overall Palestinian feelings and expressed that view. Connolly on the other hand just mouthed her usual outrage by criticising those who have the power to affect a solution.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 78,599 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    The Palestinians are making the decision - which bit of what she said contains a problem for you?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 12,778 ✭✭✭✭Cluedo Monopoly


    As per usual you missed the entire point. Do your beloved Israel have nuclear weapons? Remember when you told me that Israel has no plans for expansion? Hopefully Germany can keep sending them the arms they need to wipe out the locals eh.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,805 ✭✭✭Bishop of hope


    Not the problem at all. Her criticism was of Starmer, why? He said it couldn't involve Hamas, because he knew, being informed, that the Palestinians didn't want them. Connolly being a mouthpiece criticised him for recognising that.

    She virtually said it should involve them!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,143 ✭✭✭Montage of Feck


    I'm voting for Dustin the turkey! But seriously as the three candidates are so woeful im spoiling my vote rather than abstaining or defaulting to Connolly.

    🙈🙉🙊



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 78,599 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    Pretty simple.
    You cannot genuinely recognise a state as a sovereign entity and then go on to dictate how it is governed.
    Research the British trying that here and having their asses handed to them and climbing down.
    What Starmer wants is a dependent puppet government.

    If the Palestinians decide Hamas will have nothing to do with the state that's fine and up to them.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,766 ✭✭✭✭Red Silurian


    As I was saying, one of these candidates, whichever one is elected our next president, will be doing absolutely nothing to protect the Irish people from homelessness and healthcare crises. As you correctly say they simply don't have the power. Nor would either of the three candidates have the power to wade into delicate foreign policy matters (unless instructed to do so by the Dail of course)

    One of those 3 will be our next president, do you want to give it to one of the ones who represent the parties of the landlords, developers and bankers or do you want to give the position to the one who has opposed many of the policies of FF and FG and actively campaigned for social justice throughout her career? For me it's an obvious choice



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,805 ✭✭✭Bishop of hope


    We are on the wrong thread to go into the whole Gaza/Palestine solution. But CC, like yourself can't see the trees you're so lost and deep in the woods , well maybe you can but your going to defend CC to the hilt as you would if she were a SFer now.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 32,468 ✭✭✭✭zell12


    Radio titbit this morning that Connolly TD was working three days in the Dáil this week, no mention of what the other candidates were doing



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 78,599 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    You cannot dictate who runs a sovereign state.

    It is counter to any notion of sovereignty to suggest otherwise.

    Those are the very clear trees.



  • Moderators, Sports Moderators, Paid Member Posts: 31,466 Mod ✭✭✭✭Podge_irl


    They are absolutely not making the decision in Gaza, that is one of the many problems with Hamas.

    It is actually quite common for Nations to not recognise dictatorial regimes as legitimate. It is normally viewed as support for the people living under the oppressive regime.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 2,478 ✭✭✭Cyclingtourist


    Yes Mahmoud Abbas, who last stood for popular election in 2005, said Hamas wouldn't have a role. Possibly because Hamas opposed Abbas' 'President for Life' designation by the PLO in 2009.

    "Abbas was elected on 9 January 2005 to serve as President of the ,National Authority until 15 January 2009, but extended his term until the next election in 2010, citing the PLO constitution, and on 16 December 2009 was voted into office indefinitely by the PLO Central Council."

    Mahmoud Abbas - Wikipedia

    Connolly is better informed about Palestinian affairs than many of her detractors on here.

    Either way I won't be basing my vote on her views on Palestine, rather her suitability for the office of President.



  • Moderators, Sports Moderators, Paid Member Posts: 31,466 Mod ✭✭✭✭Podge_irl


    There are no similarities and it is absolutely not true that Germany was "allowed" build up the military due to a perceived threat from Russia. That is a complete fiction you have just made up.

    It is a competitive league, but that is the most outrageous and stupid comment she has come out with. One by one she is just shredding her standing with our allies. "we can't trust France and Germany are nazis again".



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 33,195 ✭✭✭✭blanch152


    The Palestinian representative at the UN happens to disagree with her - they see no future for Hamas.

    She believes that they are the legitimate government of Palestine based on a 20-year old election result. Shades of Stalin in that one.

    Irish people are smart enough to see that a loose tongue is not a good attribute for a President.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 59,650 ✭✭✭✭walshb


    Connolly now wants to alienate us from England, our nearest neighbour; France, another close neighbour; America, our largest trading partner and a country we have so much connection to; and Germany, another fellow EU neighbour… all to cosy up to Arab terrorists and Russia.. an absolute dangerous candidate. And no wonder SF, PBP, Wallace/Daly are backing her!!! Anti west brigade!!!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 33,195 ✭✭✭✭blanch152


    Do you realise the irony and hypocrisy of what you are saying?

    Connolly and you are telling the British what they can and can't do, based on what? Some made-up principle in your own head? After WW2, the Japanese emperor was stripped of all power and made a puppet, and the Japanese people had no say in that. The German people were told they could not elect any Nazis. These are the things that happen in the aftermath of wars!!! Conditions are imposed on states.

    History exists outside of the faux republican narrative of what happened on this island.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 33,195 ✭✭✭✭blanch152


    History tells us otherwise.

    The Potsdam conference demilitarised Germany, which was a sovereign state.

    Given you have made this point in a number of posts that "you cannot dictate who runs a sovereign state", perhaps you would point us all towards the provision in international law that prevents a recognition agreement coming with conditions. The reality is that all of the large countries who have recognised the state of Palestine have made it conditional on Hamas not being a part of its future.

    More importantly, our Irish government, who decide such things, have also said that Hamas have no part in the future of Palestine. As our representative, Connolly would need to get on message, and fast.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 78,599 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    Germany are nazis again

    Did someone just mention 'making stuff up'?

    You might disagree with the view that part of why Germany was allowed rebuild in the 1930's was a fear of Russia and communism, but it is not unique to me.

    American companies were right in there financing and rearming them, Ford, IBM GM etc. They even gave Henry Ford The Grand Cross, the highest Nazi award that could be given to a foreigner.

    It's complex and there are other reasons but Germany was seen by some as a potential bulwark against the Russians.



Advertisement