Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

Northern Ireland 2125?

18586889091188

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 81,207 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    But yet you think such carry on is ok for some others.

    My personal preference is NO public displays by any side and a moritorium on flags and parades by ANY side.

    However I recognise that is not practical and would likely require force.

    I'd prefer we could have an adult conversation about what is respectful commemoration.

    You clearly are not ready for that as you make no allowances for one communities sensitivities while fulminating about another's.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,725 ✭✭✭Francis McM


    We are not talking about flags and displays. But if we were, in America, post 9/11, you say "there should be NO public displays by any side and a moritorium on flags and parades by ANY side." That means no American flags, no Hamas flags, no Hezbollah flags.

    Would you agree there should be no football grounds on America named after any of the bombers / hi-jackers of 9/11? Yes or no?

    If not, then why name football grounds and GAA competitions, and offices, in N.I. after other bombers, given the only difference between the twin towers and Enniskillen or Le Mons is one of scale?

    If you are in a hole, keep diggin'



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 114 ✭✭Tiger20


    As I understand it, the Treaty applied to the whole island of Ireland with a provision that N Ireland could opt out, so technically speaking what was N Ireland ceased to exist as it did before the treaty, and only came into existence when that option was exercised, so thereby only exists since that date



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 81,207 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    America can do as it pleases.

    Here, public displays of commemoration are allowed for people who killed. FACT.

    You choosing to only pick one public display by one side shows you are not yet ready to accept that all sides publicly commemorate their dead.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,725 ✭✭✭Francis McM


    You say "America can do as it pleases" when it comes to naming a football ground beside a Mosque in America after one of the bombers / hi-jackers of 9/11. But yet the party you follow is very critical of America when it comes to their support for Israel? It cannot do as it pleases then?

    I have picked more than one public display by one side - I have discussed the naming of football grounds and GAA competitions, and offices after dead terrorists, as well as the association of a dead terrorist with a band on the Shankhill rd.

    It is very puzzling why name football grounds and football competitions, and offices, in N.I. can be named after some bombers as long as they were Republicans, but grounds, competitions, offices etc elsewhere should not be, given the only difference between the twin towers and Enniskillen or Le Mons is one of scale?

    .



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 81,207 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    Why is it puzzling that people wish to commemorate their dead?

    It is done everywhere in the world.

    Nowhere did I say, that others cannot remember in the same way.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,725 ✭✭✭Francis McM


    I never said it was puzzling people wish to commemorate their dead. I said "It is very puzzling why football grounds and football competitions, and offices, in N.I. can be named after some bombers as long as they were Republicans, but grounds, competitions, offices etc elsewhere should not be, given the only difference between the twin towers and Enniskillen or Le Mons is one of scale?"

    Big difference. Of course people are free to remember their dead privately. Would you agree with the Muslim community naming a football ground beside a Mosque in America after one of the bombers / hi-jackers of 9/11? Should'nt they be free to commemorate their dead too, if communities elsewhere in the world can name football grounds, offices, gaa competitions after other deceased bombers?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 81,207 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    It is very puzzling why football grounds and football competitions, and offices, in N.I. can be named after some bombers as long as they were Republicans, but grounds, competitions, offices etc elsewhere should not be

    Who said the above? Certainly not me.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,725 ✭✭✭Francis McM


    So you think it would be perfectly ok to name a football ground, sports competition or offices after , say, Michael Stone? ( he, in case others do not know was the person associated with the Milltown Cemetery attack which took place in 1988 at Milltown Cemetery in Belfast…during the large funeral of three pIRA members killed in Gibraltar, a loyalist terrorist, Michael Stone, attacked the mourners with hand grenades and pistols.)

    Or you would be ok with a football ground beside a Mosque in NYC named after a 9/11 bomber - one of those who flew one of the planes in to the twin towers. So we can have Mohammed Atta playing fields in N.Y.C, after the hijacker who piloted American Airlines Flight 11 into the World Trade Center's North Tower. 

    Joe Brolly said: 'It's nobody's business if GAA clubs are named after dead republican paramilitaries'

    And you are of the opinion it is nobody's business if some club in New York is called after Mohammed Atta, with a memorial there. Or Michael Stone pitch and football club in Belfast, playing for a competition named after Stone, beside offices named after Stone. Yeah. I do not think you have thought that one through.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 81,207 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    So you think it would be perfectly ok

    Why do you persist with the 'gotcha' style interrogations when I have told you clearly what I would be ok with?

    My personal preference is NO public displays by any side and a moratorium on flags and parades by ANY side.

    Sadly it is not my decision to make, NOR YOURS.

    It will be a decision of all of us who want to live in peace and mutual respect.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,725 ✭✭✭Francis McM


    So in America, your preference is for no flags and parades. I guess that means no Memorial Day in USA - it is a federal holiday in the United States for mourning the U.S. military personnel who died while serving in the United States Armed Forces. It is observed on the last Monday of May. You better not tell Americans that. Very proud of their flags and parades, and many feel strongly about those who committed 9/11.

    Anyway, this debate is not about flags or parades, please do not move the goalposts. You have not answered the question: would you be ok with a football ground beside a Mosque in NYC named after a 9/11 bomber - one of those who flew one of the planes in to the twin towers. So we can then have Mohammed Atta playing fields in N.Y.C, after the hijacker who piloted American Airlines Flight 11 into the World Trade Center's North Tower?  

    Yourself and Joe Brolly seem to think it ok to have GAA pitches etc named after dead republican terrorists, so can we take it you would have no problem naming a football ground, sports competition or offices after, say, Michael Stone in East Belfast? Or if so, of course there would have to be a bi-lingual sign saying Micheál Cloch? 😄

    Tá tú i do leith-chrábhadh

    ,



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 81,207 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    It has nothing to do with what YOU or I would like to see.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 33,195 ✭✭✭✭blanch152


    The only respectful way to do it would be to ban all public commemorations, be they names of sporting organisations and competitions, marches, statues or any other public recognition of individuals who were involved in terrorism on either side in the North until 70 years after they are dead.

    By that time, it will be clear that they are being remembered for rememberance reasons and not being used, as Sinn Fein amd good republicans now do, to provoke the other side.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 81,207 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    I agree with you.
    All public commemorations of combatants, groups in the conflict/war - banned.

    No Easter Lilies, Poppies, statues, memorials, commemoration days, bands or parades.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 33,195 ✭✭✭✭blanch152


    I didn't mention groups, I mentioned individuals.

    Did you

    (1) misunderstand my post? or

    (2) deliberately misinterpret my post in an attempt to flamebait a response?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 81,207 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    I didn't mention groups, I mentioned individuals.

    So public commemorations could be held for the IRA or the UVF or the UDR or the B-Specials???



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,725 ✭✭✭Francis McM


    What about sports grounds or offices named after individuals who acted outside the law? Some are already named as you know.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 81,207 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    Which bit don't you understand?



    All public commemorations of combatants, groups in the conflict/war - banned.

    No Easter Lilies, Poppies, statues, memorials, commemoration days, bands or parades.

    You claim to be a democrat and for equality. This ok for you? ALL public commemoration banned?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,219 ✭✭✭Fionn1952


    Why do I get the impression the only, 'group' you're OK with being memorialised and commemorated are those that one side have as much legitimate grievance with as the rest have with the Provos?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 12,424 ✭✭✭✭downcow


    this is nonsense. Why are people unhappy about statues of people involved in the slave trade?
    republican memorials remember individuals who have terrorised their own communities and carried out sectarian murder ( I’m sure there must also be loyalist ones but I honestly can’t think of anything more than the occasional painted walls, which will fade over time).
    could you give me an example of memorials to loyalist sectarian killers in rural towns and villages across ni?



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 12,424 ✭✭✭✭downcow


    I don’t think anyone is suggesting that ni existed before that, so I don’t get the point you are making.
    I think we all agree ni didn’t exist before 1921 and Ireland didn’t exist before 1937.
    the geographical area known as NI is under the same continual authority longer than 185+ countries of the world, ie almost the longest. We are actually only beaten by two other regions of our nation ie England and Wales, plus Japan and a couple of principalities.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 12,424 ✭✭✭✭downcow


    I very much agree with your suggestion, but I think 70 years is too short.  

    If we were to apply 70 years, then, in less than 20 years, a memorial could be put in Talbot Street Dublin to the person who planted the devastating bomb, likewise there could be memorials to the Shankill butchers placed at the scene of some of their murders, also within 20 years.  That would be disgusting!

    Some Republicans on here though clearly think that would be appropriate, even today, as they say they have a right to be remembered.  

    It does sound absurd, but why is it any more absurd than those who carried out sectarian killings in my village having memorials in their individual names in the middle of the town Square, on Council property?  



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 12,424 ✭✭✭✭downcow


    You are confusing those who wore a uniform, adhered to rules and set out each morning to protect life, with those who hid in hedges, abused children, had no rules and set out to murder people.
    and I am referring to the raison d’être of the organisation rather than rare individual rogue criminal elements within



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 81,207 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    You are confusing those who wore a uniform, adhered to rules and set out each morning to protect life, terrorise, intimidate, collude in and carry out killings, some of which 53 years after nobody has served a second of time for.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,725 ✭✭✭Francis McM


    The vast majority adhered to rules, did not intimidate or collude and did not break any laws. Otherwise the death toll would have been much higher. Personally I made many hundreds if not thousands of visits to N.I. during the troubles for social, sporting, family and work purposes, encountered many checkpoints, and any security forces in NI. were always courteous and professional to me, as a southerner. The last thing they wanted to be doing was manning checkpoints, in all weathers, at risk to themselves, but was necessary to keep a lid on paramilitary violence, help deter or reduce movement of paramilitary arms and explosives etc.

    Downcow made a good point. He or she said republican memorials remember individuals who have terrorised their own communities and carried out sectarian murder ( I’m sure there must also be loyalist ones but I honestly can’t think of anything more than the occasional painted walls, which will fade over time). Could you give me an example of memorials to loyalist sectarian killers in rural towns and villages across ni?

    Also there are football pitches and competitions commemorating republican paramilitaries. Are there any commemorating loyalist ones? Or ir it nobody's business if most if not all of the sectarian commemorating is on one side?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 81,207 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    their own communities 

    …are putting these memorials in place.

    When you finally accept that ENOUGH British Army and security forces did harm to tarnish the entire army and security force maybe you can offer some credible points to the conversation on how commemoration and remembrance can be allowed in a divided community.
    Until you accept that there are two sides with legitimate views you are a part of the problem.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 12,424 ✭✭✭✭downcow


    the list of memorials in rural towns and villages, to named loyalist convicted killers, must be so long that it is taking francie all morning to compile it. He must have google in overdrive.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 81,207 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    I am not talking about individual commemorative actions.

    I am talking in general, the only way this will be resolved.

    How do we allow people to commemorate or remember their own.

    If you want to pretend that the combatants on your side are NOT commemorated and remembered that is your own delusion.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 12,424 ✭✭✭✭downcow


    I am saying I am not aware of individual names of loyalist terrorists (you can call them freedom fighters if you wish) on memorials in rural towns and villages around Northern Ireland. I am aware of hundreds of permanent granite structures with individual names of convicted republican killers.
    this really is a on-sided problem.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 81,207 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    Public commemoration and rememberance of combatants in the conflict/war is not a one-sided issue.



Advertisement
Advertisement