Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
If we do not hit our goal we will be forced to close the site.

Current status: https://keepboardsalive.com/

Annual subs are best for most impact. If you are still undecided on going Ad Free - you can also donate using the Paypal Donate option. All contribution helps. Thank you.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.

Presidential Election 2025

1224225227229230474

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,871 ✭✭✭TheCitizen


    Ah, so he was lying. Should have known it; typical FFGer liar.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 33,451 ✭✭✭✭AndrewJRenko


    Endorsing a candidate that has completely different values to your party makes absolutely no sense at all at all.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 33,451 ✭✭✭✭AndrewJRenko


    I think this is the worst kind of muckracking, similar to the Mail ( a Nazi supporting newspaper, if you want to play your game) treatment of HH, dragging up a tiny minor issue from the dark distant past and making a big deal out of now, though it wasn't exactly a big deal at the time.

    I suppose it's some measure of Connolly's strength as a person that this is all you've got.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 33,451 ✭✭✭✭AndrewJRenko


    You've missed the point. Lots of elections have uninspiring candidates. Sometimes you've got to pick the least worst options, or you let others choose for you



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,775 ✭✭✭Bishop of hope


    It will be interesting to see the first opinion poll after nominations close to see if there's a big bounce for CC, if the SF effect gives her momentum. It seems to have ignited a few posters on here anyway. Lads that hadn't much to say prior to yesterday now chomping at the bit to have their views aired. CC has certainly got a bounce on here anyway.



  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Politics Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 17,287 Mod ✭✭✭✭Quin_Dub


    That was always going to be the way though…

    But the point made is valid.. Are SF voters more or less likely to actually come out and vote for Connolly alone vs. coming out to vote for a named SF candidate and transferring to Connolly??

    Unlikely that any candidate gets in on the first count, so where does Connolly get transfers from now?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,328 ✭✭✭✭VinLieger


    No I see it clearly, you were happy your vote would mean more thanks to my spoiled vote indicating you had someone you were happy to vote for



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,328 ✭✭✭✭VinLieger


    I am very much not a SF supporter but I think I would have voted for MLMcD if she had stood.



  • Moderators, Sports Moderators, Paid Member Posts: 31,330 Mod ✭✭✭✭Podge_irl


    It is not "all I've got". I have posted about numerous issues and her repeated poor judgement when it comes to her political associations and foreign policy views.

    Of course you mocked me when I referred to her continued association with Daly and Wallace and implied it didn't exist, and then she has taken every opportunity handed to her since to double down on that association and praise those two clowns.



  • Moderators, Politics Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 17,287 Mod ✭✭✭✭Quin_Dub


    Let's see what the polling next week looks like, but with no other "left" candidate it seems to me that Connolly either wins on the first count or she doesn't win at all.

    Even if one or both of Sheridan & Steen make it on the ballot, it's very hard to see those votes transferring to her.

    If it's a 3 horse race then the lesser of Gavin/HH will get the other over the line.



  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Sports Moderators, Paid Member Posts: 31,330 Mod ✭✭✭✭Podge_irl


    If anything I would think Steen being on the ballot would be detrimental to Connolly. You'd think her votes would either not transfer or go to HH/JG.

    I have absolutely no idea where Sheridan's votes would go, not like he has any obvious coherent political ideology.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,794 ✭✭✭almostover


    Reasons I won't be voting for CC.

    Mick Wallace, Claire Daly, Gemma O'Doherty, George Galloway, Bashar Al Asaad, Vladimir Putin.

    Her opposition to NATO, she must have been in hiding during the Balkan/Bosnian war of the 90s. Where NATO supported the UN forces to prevent further ethnic cleansing of Bonsian Muslims. The same NATO that is the only thing preventing Putin trying to take over the Baltic countries.

    Opposition to Ireland developing the military capability to defend our Neutrality. This is one thing that drives me crazy. I also wish for Ireland to be Neutral. But that means we have a responsibility to be able to defend ourselves.

    Ultimately shes not a realist and is more of an idealogue.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,096 ✭✭✭✭gormdubhgorm


    True, she would not likely be very apolitical. And I assume by your reasoning Gavin is your preferred candidate?

    He wants to remove the treble lock, military background and won’t rock the boat. Also the POI is the symbolic commander of the Defence Forces.

    I understand all that argument. However my ptt problem with Gavin he was parachuted in the last minute. Never before mentioned an interest in politics, even in his years after he was not Dublin manager. It just seems very opportunistic and manipulative on the part of FF.if Gavin was independent I would be more inclined to give him no1.

    On HH the cross border ties literal embodiment of the three colours of the tricolour if she gets the gig. But I just can’t warm to the woman her lack of effort in learning the Irish language when she was in department supposed to promote it, irks me.

    So that leaves me with Connolly at least we know what we would get from her idealism, but at least it is an idealism with a legal background. Also of course speaks the Irish language.

    For me CC is the “least worst” choice out of the three. Given my reasoning. If HH was more sincere she would be my number 1.

    Realistically is Ireland capable of defending itself? Not even if it became a militaristic country in my view. Are the electorate willing to increase military spending at the expense of Heath, Housing etc? No, I would argue. So then some of Connolly’s view make sense in light of that reality.

    Ireland is the soft underbelly of Europe. The RAF already in all but name defends Ireland. And the British navy would also end up doing so if Ireland faced real threat given Ireland’s geographical position. Otherwise the British themselves leave their own country open.

    Still Connolly for me unless something disastrous happens between now and polling day.

    Guff about stuff, and stuff about guff.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,228 ✭✭✭Archduke Franz Ferdinand


    Gavin has all the charisma of a cardboard box from the interviews lve seen him do so far.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,096 ✭✭✭✭gormdubhgorm


    You don’t need charisma to be a symbol of a country. Just embody the values of that country.

    This was Gavin when he was given Freedom of Dublin in 2020. Just more emphasis would be put on Ireland in his victory speech if he got the Áras. Instead of Dublin.

    https://www.rte.ie/news/dublin/2020/0118/1108320-freedom-of-city/

    Guff about stuff, and stuff about guff.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,128 ✭✭✭harryharry25


    1000027051.png

    Jim Gavin it seems have questions on who he does be having lunch with



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,064 ✭✭✭HBC08


    Haha!

    Feic me but SFs " game changer" tactic was to row in behind CC....

    Total joke shop organisation.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,004 ✭✭✭✭markodaly


    Many posters have commented that she wasn’t at the SF conference today - because she’s not their candidate, and she doesn’t need to play to anyone’s party line.

    You can spin it like that, but that is a weakness. Presidential elections are very expensive. You are talking a minimum of €250k to €750k. Are SF going to put their hands into their own pockets and spend money on CC?

    The advantage of FF and FG running their own candidate was that the whole party machine would come out and support them. You had this in the ploughing already, where CC was hanging around with Luke Ming like a lost shoe, Gavin and Humphries had big party tents and an army of people, including ministers doing ground work for them.
    The ploughing attracts approx 250,000 people so its a great opportunity to meet and greet. CC would already struggle with name recognition, so this was an own goal.


    SF were there, but did not do one thing for CC. Did not pass out one leaflet or shake one hand in support of CC. What were they on?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,004 ✭✭✭✭markodaly


    The only people scarmongering are folks like yourself in relation to the dismantling of the Triple Lock.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,794 ✭✭✭almostover


    Not sure who I'll vote for really between the other 2 non CC candidates. Gavin has an interesting CV but im not sure of his suitability to the role and his appointment as FF candidate has the whiff of stroke politics off it. HH is interesting from the point of view of being a Presbyterian and from a former unionist family. She wasn't the best performing in her time as a minister. Sort of a solid but slightly underwhelming candidate.

    I'll have to watch to debates to make up my mind. I can't see CC being able to convince me to vote for her given her past stances on a wide range of political issues. She's too extreme to the left for my tastes. And I say that having voted for MDH in both previous elections. Ultimately he is/was a socialist with a small 's'. Which I can get on board with no problem. CC is a bit too far left for me.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 747 ✭✭✭feelings


    If the priority is hardline security, military deterrence, and alignment with NATO, Connolly looks dangerously naive.

    If the priority is neutrality, peacekeeping, and Ireland acting as a voice of conscience in global affairs, her position has merit.

    You cannot have both, we're either neutral or we're not. The reality is that Ireland will never have an army capable of defending itself.

    Funnily, herself and Higgins are of the same viewpoint in this regards. Both are critical of the US and NATO foreign policy. Connolly is just more blunt in her critique of both . I suspect you think Higgins was a great president though.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,004 ✭✭✭✭markodaly


    If CC shared a platform with say, Justin Barrett, would you care?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,004 ✭✭✭✭markodaly


    She needs to be streets ahead of HH and Gavin to have any chance.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,004 ✭✭✭✭markodaly


    I would agree with this.

    CC seems to have terrible judgment, and the people she surrounds herself with are questionable, to say the least. Electing her would be good for Putin and those wanting to weaken the EU, and NATO.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 25,664 ✭✭✭✭Kermit.de.frog




  • Moderators, Politics Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 17,287 Mod ✭✭✭✭Quin_Dub


    Agreed.

    If Steen is there the vast majority of her votes aren't going anywhere and those that do are definitely not going to Connolly

    Practically speaking, Connolly needs to be within a point or two of an overall majority of 1st preferences to have a shot in a 2nd count given the likely makeup of the ballot.

    The transfers just aren't going to be there for her.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,474 ✭✭✭✭Oscar_Madison
    #MEGA MAKE EUROPE GREAT AGAIN


    “HH is interesting from the point of view of being a Presbyterian and from a former unionist family.”

    I agree- but I think she needs to capitalise on that background - opposition will likely paint her as some sort of UVF volunteer by the time they’re finished with her- but I think the challenge here is the Presbyterian community themselves- reading the Irish times yesterday there doesn’t appear to be a cohesive support for her from that community and many in her hometown don’t want to talk or go on record - they seem to be at best, neutral - there’s certainly neither a feeling of hope or excitement about the prospect of her as the next president of Ireland



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 33,451 ✭✭✭✭AndrewJRenko


    I never said I was happy about anything, but that's also completely irrelevant. Your strategy is to let idiots like me and all the other idiots on here and the idiots you meet every day choose the next president. Sometimes you gotta pinch your nose…

    Take just about everything HH says and believes in, and it's the mirror image of that. Do you think FG would support CC if on the off-chance she came from a border county? It's nonsense.

    All you have is smears. Maybe give an actual quote of some actual words she said that show this poor judgement and questionable foreign policy views?



  • Moderators, Politics Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 17,287 Mod ✭✭✭✭Quin_Dub


    Not sure if it's poor judgement or just political naivety.

    Looking at some of her "incidents" she seems to not think about the optics of who else is there and focuses just on the headline topic/issue.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,600 ✭✭✭✭Loafing Oaf


    I have absolutely no idea where Sheridan's votes would go, not like he has any obvious coherent political ideology.

    Unlikely to be very many of them in the first place even if he does get on the ballot and the even smaller number that transfer will probably spread around fairly evenly unless he positions himself fairly clearly on the ideological spectrum…



Advertisement