Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
If we do not hit our goal we will be forced to close the site.

Current status: https://keepboardsalive.com/

Annual subs are best for most impact. If you are still undecided on going Ad Free - you can also donate using the Paypal Donate option. All contribution helps. Thank you.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.

Random Renewables Thread

18990919294

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 965 ✭✭✭Exiled Rebel


    Meanwhile this week the Brits give consent for another mega offshore wind farm in the Irish sea. This one will supply enough power for 1.5 million homes.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 13,098 ✭✭✭✭the_amazing_raisin


    Is the thread borked? I'm seeing unread posts from Exiled Rebel but his post isn't showing up?

    "The internet never fails to misremember" - Sebastian Ruiz, aka Frost



  • Moderators, Home & Garden Moderators Posts: 7,193 Mod ✭✭✭✭graememk


    pushing the thread back into line 1



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 332 ✭✭PressTheButton


    Just launched by Tim of (Tim & Kat's Green Walk YouTube channel) at https://youtu.be/UR-F9d5Fm7k:

    Solar Tariff Optimiser

    … A similar tool to the one at energypal.ie (a service which analyses your smart meter data to find the most suitable energy plan for you) but in a UK tariff context. Allows for custom tariffs.

    Something to experiment with.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 8,020 ✭✭✭deezell


    I see Ryan spouting his blinkered view of Nirvana again. He suggests in so many words that pricing Fossil into oblivion would make us use renewable exclusively. Somehow he thinks this will make leccie cheaper. It might work if the renewable solar and wind farms are paid for the unwanted electricity during peak production. That would mean extremely expensive electricity. Maybe that's why they're getting cold feet. Ryan thinks all the tech is mature and instantly available. He even has a dig at those who reasonably don't share his fanboy view. Zero emission is not small, it's far far away Dougal.

    https://archive.is/HEIsu



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 13,098 ✭✭✭✭the_amazing_raisin


    Okay, clearly you read a different article to the one you linked because literally nothing of what you claimed was said in the article

    Unless I missed a key paragraph, Eamonn Ryan was basically saying gas is expensive so we should use less by building up renewable generation, building more interconnectors and moving ahead with the private wires bill in the Dail

    Perhaps you could quote the particular paragraph where he says fossil fuels prices need to go up?

    "The internet never fails to misremember" - Sebastian Ruiz, aka Frost



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 8,020 ✭✭✭deezell


    Sure, he says it in a sentence; "we need a good gap between the cost of electricity and the fossil fuel alternatives to help drive the switch." Go figure.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 13,098 ✭✭✭✭the_amazing_raisin


    The entire paragraph for context with the snippet you quoted in bold

    Electricity prices have to come down. We need that to happen so we can help Irish households pay their bills and businesses to maintain their competitiveness, which is threatened by volatile and high energy costs. We also need prices to fall to help us meet our climate targets. The electrification of transport and heating systems will be vital in this regard and we need a good gap between the cost of electricity and the fossil fuel alternatives to help drive the switch

    Pretty clear that he's saying electricity prices need to come down to ensure electrification of heating and transport is financially viable for end consumers

    At no point is a price hike for fossil fuels mentioned

    Please stop spreading misinformation

    "The internet never fails to misremember" - Sebastian Ruiz, aka Frost



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 5,174 ✭✭✭John mac


    spotted this today ,

    image.png image.png

    had a look for it , doesn't give any details though , called smartflower



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 8,020 ✭✭✭deezell


    €40K for maybe 2.5kw. A gimmick.

    Screenshot_20250918_210035_Chrome.jpg


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 13,098 ✭✭✭✭the_amazing_raisin


    Takes a bit of digging, 2.5kWp

    https://smartflower.com/tech-specs/

    Presumably utilisation should be good given its tracking the sun, but you gotta wonder about cost versus a fixed ground mount array

    Looks like thatched roof cottages beside it so I'm guessing they're protected buildings and they might be limited on what they can install

    "The internet never fails to misremember" - Sebastian Ruiz, aka Frost



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 8,020 ✭✭✭deezell


    You'd get a similar spread of power from a 2 aspect installation with East West split, say ten panels per side each on a string. The math is easy to do, you get a very wide band from sunrise to sunset.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 149 ✭✭fael


    A bit cheaper actually. This article (in Dutch, you can translate in browser) states about €14000.
    Still expensive but pretty cool to see. I assume the 2.5 kWp would be a lot more effective than 2.5 kWp on your roof as this tracks the sun so yearly production would be higher.
    It's not anchored permanently thus you don't need planning permission for it, in the Netherlands anyway.

    De smartflower: de slimme bewegende zonnepaneel | Homedeal



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 8,020 ✭✭✭deezell


    That's just to buy the yoke in a crate. You can double that to physically install it and commissioning, but then add the cosy of inverter, house cabling, trenches, connection to the grid etc. That UK price is for the install I'd imagine. A standard panel solar install tends to be 2-3 times the material cost.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 21,356 ✭✭✭✭Cyrus


    Obviously worth it to someone especially if roof mounted isn't an option



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 14,891 ✭✭✭✭josip


    A lot of people also bought domestic wind turbines thinking they were worth it.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 8,020 ✭✭✭deezell


    It would cost a fortune to maintain too, the petals opening and closing while it rotates and tilts all day All those hinges and servos, exposed to the elements. You'd certainly face a 4 figure bill once in its lifetime, such is its mechanical and electrical complexity. If you've roof mount issues, go for ground mount as @John mac suggests. It's significant that the AI summary on it suggests the cheaper option of used/refurbished, which means it's being ripped out faster than its going in new.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 13,098 ✭✭✭✭the_amazing_raisin


    8n

    So before anyone asks, no the fire wasn't started by the inverter

    It's interesting to see the fire department response to the solar panels. They basically sprayed black rubber stuff over the panels so they couldn't generate any power. The idea being that the cable from the panels to the inverter is probably damaged and might spark and start another

    "The internet never fails to misremember" - Sebastian Ruiz, aka Frost



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,669 ✭✭✭SD_DRACULA


    Maybe the yanks aren't crazy for forcing people to put fire safety disconnects (tigos) for all roof mounted installaitons, at least that isolates each panel if used with the access point.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 13,098 ✭✭✭✭the_amazing_raisin


    Yeah it's a bit of a developing feature. I get the feeling that everyone is seeking their own solution as well instead of a common standard

    The standard in Ireland seems to be that the firefighters want to turn off one switch and know that the power is off

    I feel this is a bit restrictive since it makes installing a changeover switch quite tricky, however I also want something safe so the firefighters can do their job without the risk of being electrocuted

    I thought it was very interesting they considered the risk of the panels starting a new fire due to damaged wiring. It isn't something I'd personally thought about but makes sense when you think about it

    "The internet never fails to misremember" - Sebastian Ruiz, aka Frost



  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Home & Garden Moderators Posts: 7,193 Mod ✭✭✭✭graememk


    Well fireman switches are required in Ireland where they aren't in the UK.

    Does make changeover a bit more complicated but not impossible(as it's usually just a fused spur from the inverter supply)

    But if it's got it's own supply and the change over switch is beside the main fuse, does it make a difference?

    (And if the inverter is in the attic it would be fried anyway!!, with the heat from the fire)

    It is mentioned, that we think of electric shock from the wires, but more likely it's restarting a fire due to a short, on the burned out wires.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 13,098 ✭✭✭✭the_amazing_raisin


    I didn't realise that fireman switches weren't required in the UK, makes a bit more sensense now why they'd spray the panels

    The rule I heard from the electrician was that the changeover switch has to be withing 2 metres of the door or meter box and needs to be appropriately marked

    "The internet never fails to misremember" - Sebastian Ruiz, aka Frost



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 949 ✭✭✭JohnySwan


    I've never seen anything in IS10101 regarding it needing to be within 2 meters, of course that doesn't mean it's not in there, the bloody size of that book. I wonder is it a building reg.

    Honestly, why is it so difficult to find out exactly what to do in these situations? I ask the opinion of every electrician I meet regarding gen sets, changeover switches and earthing arrangements, the variation in opinions is scary.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 8,020 ✭✭✭deezell


    It's worth linking your post from 2022 of the regultions on this. It seems to imply in bullet point 1 that if cutting the mains supply ( e.g, the MCB in the meter box if there) is sufficient to provide "isolation of the circuit (whether AC or DC, and two pole)" then that's fine. Cutting the mains does kill the inverter, and effectively isolates the DC. It's moot as to whether adding a powered DC switch prior to the inverter achieves anything, as at some place in the circuit the series DC voltage of all the panels, maybe 500v, will be sitting idling in cables and on a pair of switch contacts. When the inverter closes down, this is effectively a DC isolator. Having the manual isolator in the attic a half mere away is required and a solenoid operated one in front of (or after?) the manual one seems overkill.

    Further into your post the regs describe shunting or isolation the PV modules unhelpful language in my opinion as shunting is not the same as just switching off. The pount is, you can't switch the panels off, at best you can isolate their live DC on an outside wall switch. The regs are confusing to say the least. Here it is anyway.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 949 ✭✭✭JohnySwan


    I'm confused by your post, there's no requirement for a manual isolator before the fireman's switch (shunt, electromechanical switch, solenoid or whatever you want to call it).



  • Moderators, Home & Garden Moderators Posts: 7,193 Mod ✭✭✭✭graememk


    The automatic DC disconnect in a domestic scenario is done by a fireman switch, also called a shunt, but I don't know why it's called a shunt.

    It needs to be within 1.5m of cable entry or if not entered, it is within 1.5m of the panels.

    As I know a shunt in a electricial sense is used to measure current, and in a physical sense is to move something.. (like a train). I digress.

    In the UK they are moving to no isolators bar the one in the inverter as it's another point of failure. (I've seen one burn out, there was water ingress on it, i think it must have come down the conduit, and it stank)



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 949 ✭✭✭JohnySwan


    Agreed, dc isolators are actually a major source of fire in pv systems



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 13,098 ✭✭✭✭the_amazing_raisin


    You've better memory than me 😉

    I think the fireman switch is a reasonable precaution, you can't guaruntee tbe inverter is in the attic. For example my neighbour has theirs in a cabinet in the garden

    So without the fireman switch there is the possibility of a long cable run which will still be live even when the inverter is shut down

    The regulations are a mess however, they seem to contradict themselves in several places

    Whats particularly infuriating is that other countries have already figured this out and seem to do fine

    In the US for example there's a requirement for a very obvious and simple isolator switch that disconnects the panels before they enter the house

    "The internet never fails to misremember" - Sebastian Ruiz, aka Frost



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 8,020 ✭✭✭deezell


    There's always a manual DC isolator just before the inverter. This in itself is not accessible to a fireman, its for installation and maintenance. Any relay/solenoid operated 'firemans' DC isolator of the panels would have to be on the same circuit path as the existing manual switch, and I mused as to whether this remotely operated isolator would be before or after the manual isolator of the DC feed into the Inverter, which inverter itself acts as a DC isolator when AC on the house grid is cut at the meterbox or Consumer unit MCB. None of these remove the DC voltage from the panel cable pair, which may have a significant run from the first and last string panels inside the attic to the inverter DC isolator. If these melt and touch, plenty of current and heat. It would be better to break the panel loop mid string, say between panel 5 and 6 of a 10 panel string. This would leave two 5 panel sets with only one terminal in the circuit, as the other ends would be isolated and out of harms way at the junction of 5 and 6.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,669 ✭✭✭SD_DRACULA


    I think I prefer the way of the Tigos when set up correctly with the TAP, they can isolate each panel and everything is isolated on the roof, no live cables going to the fireman switch either but not a fan of an extra thing that can fail and huge cost if you add them to every panel in a string.



Advertisement