Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
If we do not hit our goal we will be forced to close the site.

Current status: https://keepboardsalive.com/

Annual subs are best for most impact. If you are still undecided on going Ad Free - you can also donate using the Paypal Donate option. All contribution helps. Thank you.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.

It's over

  • 16-09-2025 08:27PM
    #1
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 32


    I have been a trek fan since about the mid 1970s.

    I liked the original, TNG DS9. Even voyager had a lot of good episodes even if overall it was bland

    However since enterprise onwards it's been largely **** bar strange new worlds and the last season of Picard

    I largely hate prequels. Yes SNW is good but no more. No more. No kirk year one

    Get a pair of balls. Go back to the Picard /TNG time line and move it forward but no more dark sets.

    I enjoyed the alternative time line of the trek movies but re booting the old time lines shows a patent lack of imagination



«1

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 24,672 ✭✭✭✭Cookie_Monster


    Enterprise was great, lower decks is pure genius and snw is rapidly moving towards utter shite after a strong debut.

    It'll never go back to classic episodic 22-28 episode seasons, tv just isn't made like that anymore unfortunately.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,178 ✭✭✭✭TheValeyard


    Prodigy ended up a good show too.

    Looks like I picked the wrong week to quit sniffing glue



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21 Zionist.


    If the growing repudiation of woke continues there's a chance. When the goal (story) centered around more blacks, browns and trans it ceased to be coherent



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,619 ✭✭✭✭AMKC
    Ms


    So your against everything that Star Trek is and has always been from the beginning then? Are you really a Star Trek fan? Maybe it's Star Wars or Battlestar Galactica or even B5 you should be watching? Maybe you might enjoy them more. Star Trek was Woke before Woke was a word. If it's not being that then it is not Star Trek. Yes some of the more recent shows have been very in the face but it just needs to go back to not being so in ones face but still have wonderful and diverse crews be they human or alien.

    Live long and Prosper

    Peace and long life.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,833 ✭✭✭liamtech


    I can understand the impulse to feel that star trek is in a bad place. I would disagree on the particulars; i am not convinced its ruined, but it certainly could be ruined. It will all depend on the next season. Season 4 is the last full length outing - It will be a question of ratio of stinkers to Epics, to average run of the mill decent outings. If they squeeze in a few more epics, and maintain a high standard for the rest. Then we will be ok.

    I agree with you, i would prefer they just did a 7 of 9 show set post TNG - personally i have no interest in returning to the Discovery Timeline in the 3000s - i just dont care enough about it. Discovery burned me enough that i prefer to just not think about it.

    My optimism for SNW remains although at reduced levels - they can still end this well in 1 1/2 seasons left - and even if they dont, SNW is still a better show than Discovery. Not a high bar to jump maybe, but it gave me a few decent eps, and two certified epics IMHO - But i would like to see it do better in S4 than it did in S3 - here is hoping

    And yes, please return to the TNG era - its where the franchise belongs

    Where we disagree, is that the only thing i value less than discovery, is JJTrek. I could rant for hours about discovery's descent into pure crap, but i rarely talk JJTrek - for me it is NOT star trek, and unworthy of mention.

    Sic semper tyrannis - thus always to Tyrants



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,833 ✭✭✭liamtech


    The only point of reference i can bring is what happened to another great franchise i have watched as a kid.

    Doctor who.

    If you are not a fan, please forgive me, but there is a point to this detour

    My daughter also got into DrWho, and it was absolutely brilliant to be able to sit down with her, and get stuck into new who. She never fully connected with the classic show, but was interested enough in the lore, to watch a few choice episodes (Genesis, the Chase, Dalek invasion of earth, the Tenth Planet)

    We were both very enthusiastic, and she was thrilled that Jodie Whitaker was going to be the first Female doc! Then, the writing nose dived. I kept my mouth shut, for a while, because honestly watching it with her became our weekly ritual, but i sensed she was disconnecting from it. When it came to the notorious 'Timeless Child Retcon' - namely that the writer decided to retcon the entire show, so that the first doctor was no longer the first doctor - We both reacted with scorn.

    And it went downhill from there, so much so that when tennant arrived back she correctly clocked that it was fan bait. The show became something we began to ridicule,and we both disconnected in Gatwa's first season. The storys were dull, RTD seemed hellbent on making it overtly camp, and when we looked online, there was a world of hate coming from both sides of the culture war. RTD had successfully dragged a favourite SciFi franchise into the polarized world of modern day politics. And for me, that killed it.

    What annoys me is that critical but well intentioned voices tend to be conflated with bigotry. There was one episode which summed it all up for me. The Doc and co arrive on a planet which is literally consumed by social media. But while everyone remains oblivious to whats going, something or someone is going around knocking off the population, literally in aphabetical order! And the Doctor is trying to warn them, and they literally ignore him. I remember being REALLY into this episode, classic sci fi nerd style. Because i am a nerd, and i cant help but theorize! What is going on, why cant they see the doctor as an ally, why are they oblivious to the deaths happening among them. WHAT IS going in here!

    Well, low and behold they dont listen to the doctor because they are all racists, and they prefer to die, than accept help from a person of Colour.

    It was totally farcical. RTD clearly has strong opinions, 99% of which i agree with. But honestly if he wants to do a show which attacks supposed systemic racism, Doctor who is HARDLY the medium for that message. The reaction online was staggering too. Half of the audience felt similar to me, that it was a ridiculous bait and switch, of what was actually a decent concept. But then the other side argued that if you had a problem with this episode, then YOU are the problem in society.

    I could go on and on about this - Davros showed up no longer in his travel machine because seemingly RTD felt it was derogatory toward wheelchair users - Tedious nonsense, honestly.

    This relates to Star Trek because i have seen examples of entire shows, and plots, being dragged into modern day political messaging. The Gender Neutral Discovery Crewmember - no issue that they are gender neutral. But honestly, she/they stated it, move on. But instead we have a full section within the show devoted to other crew members repeatidly using THEY overtly - it was about as subtle as being hit over the head with a mallet. Clearly the show began to prioritize this messaging, over actual story telling. And while it can be done correctly, with some subtlty, the writers seemed destined to go entirely the oposite route. And it was a big part of Discovery's slide down the ranks for me.

    Having the president of earth played by a well known woke democrat - the writers knew that was going to cause division. Yes, were i an american, i would obviously vote democrat - but FFS, im watching STAR TREK!!! Can i please TUNE OUT the culture war, for a few hours a week. For the love of sanity and star trek, just WRITE a sci fi story that we can all get behind!

    I only wish that the writers could prioritize story telling, for story tellings sake - Thats why we tune in each week. To be entertained. Not to be lectured to - And i say that as someone who is very liberal, albeit not one who could be considered woke.

    Just write a story, have a point, surprise the audience with your skills as a sci fi writer. Have it be that we walk away, day-dreaming about the plot, and wondering will it come back up! This is a arena for creativity. But if you bait and switch, have a brilliant plot point, and a mysterious villain - and then have the villain be motivated by 'systemic racism', or 'the patriarchy', or 'homophobia' - understand that even though i agree with you, and know full well that these things are wrong - im not entertained. Im not going to rewatch, and if you keep doing it, you will lose me as a viewer - just as doctor who did.

    Its a complicated topic, and i dont want to drag our Trek community into the mud - but those are my thoughts -

    Sic semper tyrannis - thus always to Tyrants



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 526 ✭✭✭eadrom


    They're also "prioritising" more military-esque stories and dialogue. More magic-fantasy. More comic-book plot-lines.

    More bad writing and lack of any coherent meaningful direction.

    I really don't feel like responding to a user posting here for the first time with a couple of lines of nonsense, who chooses to call themselves "Zionist" ffs, but writing 10+ paragraphs in defence of "more blacks, browns and trans" being the problem with modern Trek is bullsh!t.

    As a related aside, are there moderators on this forum? I reported that initial nonsense comment but not sure that it goes anywhere? This shouldn't be the forum for that sort of 'opinion'.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,833 ✭✭✭liamtech


    I questioned whether to respond at all -

    I did feel that the 'modern day political messaging' deserved mention - i have, for a while now, wanted to get a feel for where we stood on this? I truly dont like it. I just wanna watch some sci fi, and forget about life for a while. I also cant help feeling that its pointless. If someone has the opposite political leanings, they are not going to watch a few episodes of a Star Trek, and suddenly change their minds. Id rather sit down with someone of the opposite political camp, and for a few hours a week, discuss star trek. We could disagree on a lot elsewhere, but lets talk shop. Best of Both Worlds? or in the Pale Moonlight - The world is hellbent on driving us apart, lets come together for trek -

    As for the rest of us, who are probably singing from the same hymn sheet as the writers? Well i can only speak for myself, but when im lectured to about topics that i already mostly agree with - its tedious, boring, and i tune out. I dont mind messaging in sci fi - but it needs to be subtle, and trek USED to be good at that. But it has lost its way, and just like Doctor Who, its being dragged into modern day politics which is toxic on both sides-

    It hasnt been as big an issue in SNW which im thankful for

    Sic semper tyrannis - thus always to Tyrants



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 6,234 ✭✭✭DoctorEdgeWild


    Quality posts like this are why I'm sad that boards is heading towards the end. You just don't get decent, honest, regular humans who enjoy a thing and want to chat about it posting in places like Reddit etc.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 526 ✭✭✭eadrom


    Ach, I dunno. Sorry for snapping at your post earlier, I just think calling out Star Trek shows for having too much 'political messaging' is too much emphasis in the wrong place. I'm a TNG-head first and foremost, much more-so than TOS, DS9, or Voyager, although I think they all shared a similar ethos. And, to my mind, it was always socially conscious and politically aware.

    Like yes, I agree, it's ham-fisted these days. But everything they do is ham-fisted. If all they did was take out the socially and politically aware aspect, we'd be left with something akin to Star Wars or Marvel. And there's far more than enough of that to go around as it is!

    So when I read "when the goal (story) centered around more blacks, browns and trans it ceased to be coherent" or a big long post along the lines of "they've got a point, you know!" – it does annoy me a bit.

    Rather I'd argue that their heart is where it's always been with that stuff – in the right place! It's their ability to articulate it and turn it into worthwhile stories that has fallen flat.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,833 ✭✭✭liamtech


    Well to be clear - at no point did i say that the aforementioned post had a point. But i do take your point.

    Its a difficult topic to discuss, because we all want our favourite franchises to succeed. And i couldnt agree more with you, that if you removed all societal, philosophical, and critical topics from Trek, it would be hollow and cold.

    I just feel that in the past, these topics were balanced against engaging storylines. I also feel like nothing was ever singled out as black and white - topics like these are difficult and must be handled with nuance. And Trek was masterly at acomplishing this, while also keeping the audience engaged.

    Whether it was AI, or the rights of non indiginous species - the prime directive, or whether the ends justify the means. Trek always made you think. I have literally spent hours talking trek with friends. Popular topics include whether S31 were correct to try and wipe out the Founders. Look at TNG 'the wounded' - a man who is suffering from PTSD, and can never bring himself to trust the Cardassians. He suffered for sure, and in the end - he may have had a point (Iv Never trusted Cardassians and i never will - il never forgive them for the death of Maxwells family)

    The prime directive prequel, Dear Doctor - I think Archer was wrong to walk away from that dying civilization, who needed assistence. I know some people who disagree, and we debate these topics! Most of all the Klingon Empire - it conquered half the quadrant, and then signed a treaty with the federation, and all is forgiven? Another topic i have delighted in debating - what exactly was the federation going to put Gul Dukat on trial for? Hardly his crimes during the occupation - waging an aggressive war? We never got to see the trial of course, because Dukat wasnt firing with a full phaser bank..

    Complicated topics, done well in Trek are glorious - i love them. Because the topic is there, just beneath the surface, and only later do the analyses start! Its beautiful!

    Compare the above, and more - to the literally mallet sized hammers we are hit with in modern trek, and specifically in Discovery - There is no subtly what so ever. Its even worse in Doctor Who of course, but its not a million miles away from Trek. And nothing is grey anymore, or up for debate. THIS is right and proper, the OTHER is wrong, and if you disagree your a terrible person. Iv eaten Vindaloo that could be considered more subtle than modern Trek

    But it is complicated. And if i rubbed you up to the wrong way @eadrom , by seemingly defending a very strange post - i apologise, it wasnt my intention. I suppose i havent seen a discussion on this topic, anywhere - at least one that doesnt invariably end up derailed by shouting from both sides of the ring. I watched Doctor who fandom split in two, and its ratings diminish, and i believe the divisive topics, delivered with no nuance played a part in this. That franchise seems lost now, and we dont even know if it is coming back.

    I guess i dont want to think it can happen to trek - but it can. And i think it warrants discussion

    Sic semper tyrannis - thus always to Tyrants



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,897 ✭✭✭Evade


    Re Dukat's crime. It probably would have been something like violating the D in DMZ, or at least just more overtly than both sides already were, or renegging on some other treaty. I don't remember any actual warcrimes being committed by the Cardassian/Dominion/(Breen) alliance, there were however one or two committed against them. Even the Breen sneak attack focused on a legitimate target, Starfleet HQ.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,833 ✭✭✭liamtech


    Yea its all rather interesting. If you go to the root of the Dominion War, you obviously reach the founders, and their ultimate goal of excersizing control over the Galaxy. And obviously within the Gamma Quadrant, they have committed serious crimes. The quickening, for example. Obviously creating a race of soldiers and addicting them to drugs, to say nothing of brainwashing them to view the founders as gods. But all of this pre-dates the Dominion War.

    The broke treatys, but from a realist interpretation of Interplanetary relations (based on modern day IR), treatys are there to be broken. They waged war on states they considered their enemies.

    Its all very fascinating, because ive debated numerous things surrounding the War with Fellow Trekkies! The Section 31 virus, tricking the Romulan Star Empire into war - all of these things. Fascinating stuff. I put this into the good camp, of morally debatable topics brought up and explored by trek. And its in stark contrast to the black and white, 'with us or against us' topics of New-Trek. More-over in old trek, the subjects only tangentially related to modern day politics. Retrospectively iv read that some reviewers look at Wolf 359 as a sort of federation equivalent of 9/11. Its only partly analagous, given that the borg are a powerful state, as opposed to non-state actor. But i suppose they look on the militarization of starfleet in the aftermath, and frame 359 as a fork in the road. Would be interesting to see how the dominion war might have gone, had the borg not attacked.

    But yes Trek used to be great at giving us stuff to debate. Modern day political allignment never really mattered or impacted a persons perspective on trek. so i thought anyway! And i always viewed that as one of the reasons for Star Treks ultimate success.

    I could hypthetically sit in a room with a MAGA adjacent Right wing person. And debate issues of politics and policy with them. Its not a jump to say, i would probably disagree with 99% of what they stated. But then Star Trek comes on, we watch it, realize we are both fans. And spend the next 3 hours debating the prime directive! Or whether alligment with the Klingons is a good thing. Should the Cardassian Union ever have been trusted or dealt with after the Bajoran Occupation. Etc - these hypothetical chats could happen with Old Trek - undoubtedly they did on many occasions.

    But with New Trek its almost unimaginable because the writers leave no room for interpretation or discussion. They believe 'this' is correct, the rest is wrong. And if you dont agree, you need to reflect on your positions. Its a poor way to write a franchise, that used to have universal appeal

    Sic semper tyrannis - thus always to Tyrants



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19 Dre Colman


    Couldn’t agree more the constant prequels feel like they’re just recycling the same ground. SNW is well done but enough’s enough, it’s high time they pushed the timeline forward again. The TNG/DS9 era had so much scope for proper storytelling without relying on nostalgia.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,619 ✭✭✭✭AMKC
    Ms


    "Would be interesting to see how the dominion war might have gone, had the borg not attacked."

    I think without the Borg attack there is no doubt that Starfleet would have been in a far weaker position. I think the Federation might have lost a lot of worlds before finally making a proper fightback. Be like the Allies against Nazi Germany in WW2. A lot of ground was lost in Europe to Nazi Getmany before Great Britain and the USA finally started to fight back and get back the land lost in Europe to Germany.

    Post edited by AMKC on

    Live long and Prosper

    Peace and long life.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 29,724 ✭✭✭✭_Kaiser_


    I was/am a big fan of TOS, TNG and VOY and regularly dip into my library of each to watch a random episode or 3! Even ENT makes the cut nowadays as I've warmed up to it over the years and it should have definitely gotten at least a fifth season.

    The TOS movies were great - The Search For Spock being probably the last time they took the material anyway seriously - but it wrapped up well with The Undiscovered Country. The later TNG movies are where the slide started but still very much recognisable as part of the same universe.

    The Kelvin movies - the first (2009) was pretty good as a standalone space adventure movie, and I can mostly see a younger Kirk in Pine's performance alright. McCoy was pretty spot on. Spock not so much!

    The darker tone didn't really wortk for me, but after a reasonable start, the trilogy goes downhill fast.

    Which brings us back to TV - Discovery was a mess from the start. Lorca was a great character, but Klingons that weren't Klingons, interstellar mind-melds, Spock's never-before-mentioned "sister" being the centre of Everything, the reason Spock reached out to Kirk and McCoy in the first place, and Space Jesus complete with Angel suit… nah, that was enough nonsense for me and I checked out there! From reading the occasional post here though and the Youtube reviews, I think I made the right decision.

    Lower Decks was brilliant and surprised me! After a shaky first few episodes (explained by the end of the first season) it became a must-watch. I don't watch Rick and Morty at all, but I really liked this crew and even the California-class grew on me! Was very sorry to see it end.

    Likewise with Prodigy which though billed as for young kids, was actually better than the live-action Trek offered at the same time, and essentially became Voyager season 8. Again was very sorry to see this one wrap. Wasn't mad about the hasty tie-in to the events of Picard S1 either, but otherwise ended well (if too soon!).

    Picard with the exception of S3 and the scenes between Q and "JL" in S2 was a mess best forgotten.

    Strange New Worlds I was initially a fan of, but this was overshadowed by the nonsense pretty quickly. They killed off one of the best and most interesting characters, only to replace him with a joke character. The whole casual informality and 21st century So-Cal attitudes of the crew irked. The yet again rewritten Spock just wasn't Spock, and it only deteriorated from there. One season of this was enough!

    I haven't watched (and have no intention of doing so) the Section 31 TV movie, and the upcoming Academy series likewise isn't for me from what I've seen so far. The off-again, now apparently on-again fourth Kelvin movie likewise holds little interest.

    Unfortunately because of the damage already done, and the shifting nature of TV generally in the past 20/30 years (wow it really HAS been that long!), a return to Classic Trek is unlikely - but as Q said, All good things……

    Post edited by _Kaiser_ on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,833 ✭✭✭liamtech


    Yea I think that is very valid. You do honestly look back on early TNG, and the disposition of federation resources. A lot of enphasis on exploration, diplomacy. Almost pacifistic in nature. Remember in Peak Performance, Riker really downplayed the idea of 'starship combat' - words to the effect, that a captains perficiency in combat was very unimportant.

    And as for the hardware - i always cast my mind back to 'the Arsenal of Freedom' - remember the unseen USS Drake - it had a maximum speed of like warp 3 or something quite low -

    Post Wolf 359 -

    We started to see faster ships, newer designs - the Excelsior class started to show up in a more refitted modern design. I know that Star Trek Fact Files might not be considered canon - but some of the best starship designs came post Wolf 359

    Obviously the Defiant is the most well known, but also the Intrepid class, we saw more Nebula class variants with emphasis on extra phaser and photon torpedo banks. I might get some of the names wrong, but the Sabre and Akira??** class? Steamrunner class.

    The perfect thing to look at would be the borg attacks - the wolf 359 encounter was totally different to the First Contact borg invasion. Far better armed and combat efficient ships. There are numerous non-canon sources for this - really is fascinating to watch!

    And i agree with your assessment, the Federation would have fought back no doubt, but it would have been a far bloodier affair, had the Federation not received the wakeup call at Wolf 359 - I always remember Q's words from Q-Who

    If you can't take a little bloody nose, maybe you ought to go back home and crawl under your bed. It's not safe out here. It's wondrous, with treasures to satiate desires both subtle and gross. But it's not for the timid.

    Post edited by liamtech on

    Sic semper tyrannis - thus always to Tyrants



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,619 ✭✭✭✭AMKC
    Ms


    "Obviously the Defiant is the most well known, but also the Intrepid class, we saw more Nebula class variants with emphasis on extra phaser and photon torpedo banks. I might get some of the names wrong, but the Sabre and Akirea??** class? Stemrunner class."

    Yes thay are right. Just need to fix the spelling mistakes also the Norway class as well.

    "And i agree with your assessment, the Federation would have fought back no doubt, but it would have been a far bloodier affair, had the Federation not received the wakeup call at Wolf 359 - I always remember Q's words from Q-Who"

    Yes Great words by Q and as Picard said Q done them a favour by bringing them to the Borg early.

    Live long and Prosper

    Peace and long life.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,897 ✭✭✭Evade


    The Peak Performance line is odd since at that time they weren't too far removed from the Cardassian and Ferengi skirmishes.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 24,672 ✭✭✭✭Cookie_Monster


    The Dominion annihilated multiple Bajoran (and other?) Civilian colonies in the gamma quadrant without any declaration of war etc. That's 100ks of people minimum and an obvious war crime.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,833 ✭✭✭liamtech


    I think Gene was still at the helm, and was always adament that the show remain true to vision. Pacifistic and purely exploratory and scientific. I love Gene for what he gave to the world, but really, the franchise matured in his wake.

    I know some purests who dont see it that way, and we spar over these topics. But i think DS9 was Treks best outing, and the Dominion war made it all the more addictive to watch!

    The Dominion war, for me, was Treks Golden era. We had the build up and political intrigue of the Dominion Cold War, followed by the war itself. And at the same time, Voyager was beginning to encounter the Borg - Both shows were at their Apex, and we had recently been gifted First Contact too. The franchise was killing it.

    The decline began when DS9 began to draw to a close - I felt Voyager wasnt as good, and we had some relatively poor movies. Then Enterprise, and the rest is History

    Sic semper tyrannis - thus always to Tyrants



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 927 ✭✭✭RickBlaine


    My heart sinks a little every time they announce a prequel. I would love to see the timeline progressed passed Picard season 3. If I had my way, there would be a show following on from that season set on board the Enterprise G with Seven as her Captain.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,210 ✭✭✭Inviere


    The writing chops just aren't there anymore for me to have any faith in a post-Voyager live action series. The days of Behr, Moore, etc are long gone. At this stage I'd actually prefer it be left alone, it's in terrible shape as it is.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 6,234 ✭✭✭DoctorEdgeWild


    The worst part of it is that the writing chops occasionally show themselves and that makes it more painful! A few episodes of SNW have been absolutely fantastic and it's shown that we can still have a true Star Trek show on our screens.

    As for your final sentence, I can definitely understand that position, Star Trek has taken so many hits and damage over the years from some truly terrible choices by the powers that be. Honestly, up until SNW I was in the same boat, would have preferred it to disappear into history and maintain some dignity buuuuttttt… I can't help but have hope, and it's the hope that kills ya!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 29,724 ✭✭✭✭_Kaiser_


    For those who never got to see this for whatever reason, What You Leave Behind (the DS9 documentary) is up on YouTube.

    I can't say I'm sold on their ideas for a S8E1 but it's an interesting watch - especially given some of the comparisons to modern Trek being talked about above



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,833 ✭✭✭liamtech


    I think i would probably agree with you both. It is staggering to watch SNW at times. Iv indicated before, i believe it has delivered us several epics, and several more near-epic episodes. And unlike Disco, these episodes remain untarnished by season long story arcs. I can sit down and watch these episodes at any point, and still enjoy them.

    I can understand feeling less confident moving forward, given the decline in quality that most of us have seen. I remember my enthusiasm for Disco in the early days, and how let down i felt when the show deteriorated. And yet, like you DoctorEdgeWild - I remain hopeful that SNW can still offer more in the time it has left. If this thread were mainly about SNW i would defend it, based on my hope that it will occassionally deliver us an epic!

    But as a franchise, i am worried about star trek. To my knoweldge the only confirmed Series which is upcoming is the Starfleet Academy show, set in the discovery 32nd Century Era - To say that i have no interest in this, would be a huge understatement. I literally loath Discovery's contribution to the franchise, and anything that continues its legacy, is unwelcome to me. Its astonishing when i remember viewing ST Enterprise as Treks worst series. And genuinely believing that nothing could ever promote it from absolute bottom. Where as I felt sorry for Enterprise, as a missed oppertunity, Discovery ended up infuruiating me. ST-Enterprise now seems far better than it actually was, in comparison.

    Aside from the Academy show, we have the possibility of another JJTrek movie - no interest at all. I view the JJ-Verse as NOT trek, so i wont be tuning in. The much discussed 'Trek Anthology' show seems to have vanished from discussion. And despite teasing a Captain 7of9 of the Enterprise G series, that also looks dead in the water.

    If the choice was more Disco adjacent crap, or for the franchise to bow out - im sorry, i would probably prefer the later. For me I only have to look at Doctor who, and Star Wars to see what happens when things are continually dragged on, and quality deteriorates. One of my friends is a Star Wars fanatic, and to say he was burned by Disney's purchase of lucasfilm, would be an understatement - He has trouble now even remembering the good old days of two George Lucas trilogys - He has literally scrubbed Disney from his Star Wars database, with the possible exception of Rogue One.

    Im the same with Trek at this point - Bits of Picard were ok, and SNW is the only hope, even with only 16 episodes left - Heres hoping it goes out with a bang

    Post edited by liamtech on

    Sic semper tyrannis - thus always to Tyrants



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 6,234 ✭✭✭DoctorEdgeWild


    Yeah, nothing is pointing towards a hopeful future as everything since VOY has been, to my eye, very poor.

    it does make you look back at ENT with a certain appreciation, it wasn't great, it probably wasn't good, but it was decent, and it was Star Trek.

    I think I'm lucky to not be a Who or Wars fan, it really sounds like they have done an absolute number on those.

    Same as you say though, a strong finish to SNW is our last, best hope for peace enjoyable Trek!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,833 ✭✭✭liamtech


    Its a tough topic for a fan to discuss. I think with Star Wars it was purely bad writers, with bad writing incentives, and a general change in ideology within Disney. I wouldnt spend hours hating on Kathleen Kennedy, but she does take a large share of the blame. I think the money was there, and remains available - but they do seem hellbent on hiring writers who prioritize modern political issues, over story-telling. I never watched the MCU, but seemingly there are elements of the same deterioration in writing.

    I feel more dismayed and a tad bitter about Doctor who. My daughter never got into Star Trek, which was always a bit dissapointing to me. But she really loved Doctor who, and it seemed never in doubt that she would be a fan for life. Horrific writing, bad production decisions, and showrunners who decided that staying true to canon was 'too restricting on their creativity' - We both watched as the show was undone - and the tedious messaging was infuriating.

    My daughter is a fantastic environmentalist, which is a source of pride for me. But then doctor who decided to do 'yet another bait and switch' - Doctor and co land on a planet, infested by alien menaces - but low and behold, they are actually humans, the planet is earth, and global warming caused all of this - they even went as far as to call the aliens 'the dregs' - Pure insanity as a story telling decision, but this was happening week on week, and the above episode was ridiculed by my daughter.

    Hopefully Star Trek pulls through, and even if we just get 15 more episodes - maybe a few decent ones, il be happy. I still havent watched Section 31, and i am unlikely to watch Academy. If SNW is the 'finale' of 35 years of trek for me - thats fine.

    And new trek can just leave me out, for as the great man said

    image.png

    Sic semper tyrannis - thus always to Tyrants



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,897 ✭✭✭Evade


    Not necessarily. The Dominion claimed the colonies were on their worlds illegally.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,178 ✭✭✭✭TheValeyard


    And they might have been right. We dont know I think.

    But the Dominion could have easily sent a fleet in orbit and opened communications about telling the colonists to fcuk off and not commit an act of genocide instead.

    Looks like I picked the wrong week to quit sniffing glue



Advertisement