Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

Israel/Palestine Thread

1173017311733173517361950

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 33,195 ✭✭✭✭blanch152


    Fair play, we must remove the Triple Lock then.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 22,404 ✭✭✭✭Tony EH


    A flotilla is merely a small fleet of ships or boats. There doesn't need to be any military presence at all.

    Yet another load of bollocks from an Israeli supporter to try and derail the point of the thread.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,824 ✭✭✭✭Red Silurian


    Maybe an unpopular opinion but I think it should have been gone long ago. As far as I know we're the only nation who has one and we're definitely not the only ones claiming neutrality or peacekeeping



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,478 ✭✭✭Miniegg


    I don't really understand what you are getting at. Are you saying Ireland are at war?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,928 ✭✭✭Ozymandius2011


    RTE radio 1 speaking to a Christian priest in Gaza Christian now. Palestinian Christians are ignored by the US because it undermines the propaganda about it being a war with Islamists. The truth is Palestinian Christians also suffered the Nakba, destruction of homes today in Gaza and the West Bank.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,824 ✭✭✭✭Red Silurian


    The last flotilla got stopped by the IDF and this one is likely to be stopped also unless there is military protection. To the question of whether or not we should send the Irish navy in I was giving an honest opinion.

    We might as well be



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 14,074 ✭✭✭✭Cluedo Monopoly


    What kind of crazy talk is that? You want us to go to war?? If you hadn't noticed, we want an end to the one sided "war" in Gaza and the genocide to stop. It's quite simple.

    Q. Do you agree with the UN report re genocide? No reply expected...

    Post edited by Cluedo Monopoly on

    What are they doing in the Hyacinth house?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 22,404 ✭✭✭✭Tony EH


    The last flotilla got stopped by the IDF and this one is likely to be stopped also unless there is military protection. To the question of whether or not we should send the Irish navy in I was giving an honest opinion.

    Are you insane? Sending any military vessels along with them is a recipe for disaster, for everybody involved.

    Of course this flotilla will be turned around. The idea is to keep in people's minds in the west that Israel are refusing to let food into Gaza and to let Gazans know that the world hasn't completely abandoned them. There's no question that the boats will be turned back. But sending Irish military vessels into the area is a ridiculous thought that will only inflame everything much worse than it already is.

    We might as well be

    We aren't at war with anyone. We are opposed to Israel's genocidal campaign in Palestine. That is not war.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,156 ✭✭✭wildgreen


    There is a long history of Israel attacking and killing activists on the freedom flotillas

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gaza_Freedom_Flotilla

    16 countries have warned Israel not to attack the Sumud flotilla. Countries need to send military vessels to protect the Sumud flotilla from attack.

    You either support the genocide or you hide and hope it will pass you by.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,156 ✭✭✭wildgreen


    Israel is most likely to attack civilians hence the need to protect the flotilla from the genocidal ethnic-cleansing Israel. This is not going to war, it is protecting activists who are brave enough to challenge the genocide.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 22,404 ✭✭✭✭Tony EH


    What's most likely going to happen is that they will turn the flotilla around.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 14,074 ✭✭✭✭Cluedo Monopoly


    Good article on BBC to explain the UN report on genocide in Gaza. The analyst and others who refuse to comment on the report might find it enlightening.

    Israel has committed genocide in Gaza, UN commission of inquiry says

    The 72-page document alleges that Israeli authorities and Israeli security forces have committed and are continuing to commit four of the five acts of genocide defined under the 1948 Genocide Convention against a national, ethnic, racial or religious group - in this case, Palestinians in Gaza:

    • Killing members of the group through attacks on protected objects; targeting civilians and other protected persons; and the deliberate infliction of conditions causing deaths
    • Causing serious bodily or mental harm to members of the group through direct attacks on civilians and protected objects; severe mistreatment of detainees; forced displacement; and environmental destruction
    • Deliberately inflicting conditions of life calculated to bring about the destruction of the group in whole or in part through destruction of structures and land essential to Palestinians; destruction and denial of access to medical services; forced displacement; blocking essential aid, water, electricity and fuel from reaching Palestinians; reproductive violence; and specific conditions impacting children
    • Imposing measures intended to prevent births through the December 2023 attack on Gaza's largest fertility clinic, reportedly destroying around 4,000 embryos and 1,000 sperm samples and unfertilised eggs

    'We went to the facts first," Pillay told the BBC. "So we looked at statements made by the Israeli authorities indicating genocidal intent. And we looked at the pattern of conduct of Israeli authorities and Israeli security forces to show that genocidal intent was the only reasonable inference."

    Pillay added: "It took us two years to gather all the actions and make factual findings, verify whether that had happened... It's only the facts that will direct you. And you can only bring it under the Genocide Convention if those acts were done with this intention."

    The commission says the acts of Israeli political and military leaders are "attributable to the State of Israel", and that the state therefore "bears responsibility for the failure to prevent genocide, the commission of genocide and the failure to punish genocide".

    It also warns all other countries have an immediate obligation under the Genocide Convention to "prevent and punish the crime of genocide", employing all measures at their disposal. If they do not, it says, they could be complicit.

    What are they doing in the Hyacinth house?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 8,943 ✭✭✭Odhinn


    Hopefully, but with the kind of headbangers in charge of the Israeli state at the moment, there is a risk.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 22,492 ✭✭✭✭Strazdas


    The dismissal of this in a couple of sentences by Israel and their psychopathic supporters is a joke. A 72 page legal document (perhaps around 30,000 words) and all these clowns can say in response to a mountain of evidence is 'It's lies' and 'the UN are Hamas supporters'.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 37,015 ✭✭✭✭NIMAN


    Theres zero point warning Israel NOT to attack the flotilla, if you do nothing about it when they do. Empty words. That's all we have got for 2 years now as children are slaughtered.

    IId love to see those 16 countries who have warned the Israelis all to send one or two of their navy ships alongside them to deliver the aid, and if they get attacked, fire back!

    Israel needs to have repercussions for its actions, as its had none for too long.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 22,404 ✭✭✭✭Tony EH


    I agree.

    But the risk of escalation involved with us sending our only two military vessels capable of the journey is even greater. It would be the exact kind of provocation that Nutanyahu would need to kick things up a notch.

    Everyone on the flotilla knows what the risk is that they are taking.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,156 ✭✭✭wildgreen


    The only limits that we have seen are if the US says NO. With the US now doing summary executions of people in boats in Venezuelan waters, they are going down the Israeli force is the only law route. Back to the Wild West, where the gunman ruled. Western countries need to show their military strength and engage in warfare if necessary.

    What is playing out now would be the equivalent of everyone watching Hitler conquer Europe and committing a holocaust against Jews while western leaders sought photo opportunities with him.

    Extract below from an article on Palestine Chronicle

    https://www.palestinechronicle.com/the-unga-declaration-on-palestinian-statehood-as-performative-theater-at-best/

    If this international community was truly concerned about a just peace and really implementing a two-state solution, the formula is very simple: a full international economic embargo on Israel, followed by military intervention if they still fail to comply. It suffices to say, this isn’t even on the cards. Why? Because these resolutions are performative, meant only to benefit those morally bankrupt political forces behind writing them.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,156 ✭✭✭wildgreen


    The people on the flotilla are taking that risk for us - to protect humanity and a law based international order.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 22,404 ✭✭✭✭Tony EH


    They know they're taking a risk. Everyone on those boats will have been made aware of what the are potentially facing. But you add military vehicles into that mix and something kicks off, then you have a much, MUCH, worse situation happening.

    Post edited by Tony EH on


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 554 ✭✭✭Full_Circle_81


    Is there absolutely nothing that any EU state can do separately to help or put pressure on Israel? If all proposals, especially ones of sanctions need the approval of all EU members, then that's just never going to happen. Ah this talk of proposals that don't have a hope of being enacted is just words, and that's helping no one.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 9,911 ✭✭✭SeanW


    That website seems kinda biased tbh.

    As for those alleging genocide, my questions are the same as they have always been:

    1: How should Israel wage all-out war against Hamas without collateral damage?

    2: Of those killed in Gaza, how many were:
    a) Legitimate Hamas militants
    b) Civilians killed as collateral damage in pursuit of Hamas militants/infrastructure.
    c) Murdered for giggles.

    If those questions are answered in that UN report, that would be great.

    https://u24.gov.ua/
    Join NAFO today:

    Help us in helping Ukraine.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,132 ✭✭✭SafeSurfer


    Multo autem ad rem magis pertinet quallis tibi vide aris quam allis



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,132 ✭✭✭SafeSurfer


    How do you explain the hundreds of children killed by Israeli snipers in Gaza? Were they thinking about Hamas when they were shot in the head?


    https://www.volkskrant.nl/kijkverder/v/2025/gunshot-palestine-children-israel-war~v1819649/?referrer=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.google.com%2F IMG_9166.jpeg

    Multo autem ad rem magis pertinet quallis tibi vide aris quam allis



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 9,911 ✭✭✭SeanW


    If they were straight up murdered for no possible military reason, then they would fall under my category c) above "murdered for giggles" and that's indefensible.

    My question relates to the breakdown.

    https://u24.gov.ua/
    Join NAFO today:

    Help us in helping Ukraine.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 22,492 ✭✭✭✭Strazdas


    Excellent video from the Guardian, but profoundly depressing to watch. The reporter spent three days in Tel Aviv but could scarcely find a single person who was prepared to admit concern for the civilians in Gaza - a mixture of some who are in total denial about the genocide but many others who seemingly strongly approve of the killings ("there are no innocents in Gaza").



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,566 ✭✭✭✭nacho libre


    The ones who support Israel presumably. The rest are all duped by hamas-including the holocaust surviour who was asked to give his opinion on whether there was suficient evidence to indict Bibi for War Crimes. The fact is no amount of evidence will get Political Analyst and his ilk to change their minds. They have about as much credibility at this stage as the Holocaust Denier David Irving. The irony is they would identify their own nauseating behaviour in him and likely be appalled by his similar ability to deny the overwhelming body of opinion against his grotesque views



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,478 ✭✭✭Miniegg


    That's bizarre tbh.

    Who are we at war with? Who are our allies?

    A neutral country is absolutely able to argue for international law, provide aid, and be involved in peacekeeping missions.

    Israel are breaking international law, are using weapons of mass warfare on civilians and blockading food, clean water and medicine to approx 2 million people, whilst invading and annexing territory in a further enclave. It is bombing countries without merit, and completely flouting international law.

    If we condemn this, it doesn't mean we are at war. War is being militarily involved or supporting a belligerent militarily. Who are we supporting with our words and actions?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,478 ✭✭✭Miniegg


    1: How should Israel wage all-out war against Hamas without collateral damage?

    That is a false dichotomy, which automatically places Israel's genocide and all it's acts of ethnic cleansing, mass starvation and targeted child murder in Gaza as legitimate and unavoidable, with no other path or tactic possible.

    If you are arguing that committing genocide, the most debased and grevious act that can be committed on this earth, as a valid response to a terrorist attack, I don't know what to tell you.

    It's akin to saying how exactly was Hitler supposed to get rid of all Germanys Jewish enemies without carrying out the holocaust?

    And tbh, you could get a dozen well thought out answers to what Israel could and should have done differently, but due to the inherent fallacy in the question, and your past posting history, you really aren't asking in good faith are you?

    I would imagine an answer like "not commit genocide on civilians" should cover them all though.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,132 ✭✭✭SafeSurfer


    Israel has not allowed any independent observers in to Gaza and has gone out of their way to kill those documenting the conflict.
    Who do you expect to give you a breakdown of those murdered by Israel?

    Multo autem ad rem magis pertinet quallis tibi vide aris quam allis



Advertisement
Advertisement