Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

Israel/Palestine Thread

1172517261728173017311950

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 546 ✭✭✭mvt


    I think Israel is doing a pretty good job of isolationing itself all on it's own.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,698 ✭✭✭walus


    don’t worry another month or two and what you just said there will be officially considered anti-Semitic in the western world.

    ”Where’s the revolution? Come on, people you’re letting me down!”



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 5,648 ✭✭✭dmcdona


    Who is "the western left"?

    Seems the only supporters of Israel at the UN are :

    Israel, the US (evaporating rapidly), Argentina, Hungary, Micronesia, Nauru, Palau, Papua New Guinea, Paraguay, and Tonga.

    Presumably, everyone else is the "western left"?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 9,911 ✭✭✭SeanW


    Nuclear weapons also have an aggressive use, as Russia has demonstrated in Ukraine. Nukes can be used to facilitate aggression and keep potential allies of your enemy at bay. Do you think that the West would have been as measured in its response to Russia's war on Ukraine as it has been if Russia did not have nukes?

    I think Iran is hoping to follow the same playbook - that nukes will allow them to get away with a lot more s*** stirring. Anyone who thinks that would be a good thing needs to ask themselves some serious questions.

    https://u24.gov.ua/
    Join NAFO today:

    Help us in helping Ukraine.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,248 ✭✭✭✭Sand


    I wouldn't be so sure US support will change in any real way. There has been media narratives before that Trump (and Biden before him) were angry with Netanyahu, having arguments with him, threatening him etc. But it always seems to have just been a story with the US rowing in to support further israeli efforts to complete the genocide in Gaza, or to attack neighbouring countries. I really doubt a strike in Qatar is going to be the thing that reverses 80 years of US policy if outright genocide hasnt.

    It is clear that israel is deeply unpopular in the US in a way that it hasn't been - ever. Even a majority of young US Republican voters are hostile to israel at this point. Genocide is a very bad look. Qatar is formally a US ally, with a huge US airbase in the country. There is a certain amount of performance that Trump and the wider US political leadership feels they have to do no doubt to keep Qatar pacified, but its just a performance in my opinion. It is going to take another 30 years before those young US voters who see israel for what it is are themselves the senators, congressmen and presidents who actually set US policy.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 546 ✭✭✭mvt


    Or maybe the dastardly Arabs in Iran might feel that having a nuclear weapon might offer a deterrent against the proven aggressor in the region.

    Does anyone honestly think that Iran wants to lay waste to their region & ours ?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,027 ✭✭✭Bishop of hope


    And even then, US security services feel they need Israel, Qatar etc onside. It'd take a major change in policy in more than just politics to have them disavow Israel.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 5,648 ✭✭✭dmcdona


    Well, their vote in support of the UNSC statement is a very real change. Yes - it's a just a single vote. But I'd imagine it made Israel sit bolt upright.

    The US Govt appear to have pissed off pretty much everyone recently (tarriffs, Ukraine etc).As has Israel. No-one wants to be shackled to a Genocidal State - it's not a good look as you say. Perhaps they see which side their bread is buttered on on the world stage?

    The world's public demands that the slaughter ends. Politicians and leaders are wising up rapidly - including the US. Those politicians don't need to wait 30 years to be replaced - the writing is on the wall. They can be replaced at the next election.

    I guess time will tell - you make good points.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,150 ✭✭✭Ardillaun



    Netanyahu still has serious influence with both political parties via major donors. Groups affiliated with AIPAC have primaried and removed multiple Democratic critics of Israel and bragged about it afterwards.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,161 ✭✭✭wildgreen


    A ship from the Gulf region is joining the flotilla to break the Israeli siege on Palestine.

    "The Gulf ship has finally set sail as part of the global Steadfastness flotilla after a long wait and many challenges," Bu Hazaa said. "We will move forward together to break the siege and raise the will of freedom above all restrictions."

    On board are men and women from Bahrain, Oman, Qatar and Kuwait, including doctors, engineers, activists, writers and human rights advocates. 



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,248 ✭✭✭✭Sand


    I agree, the idea of the US failing to veto a UNSC statement against israel is something that wouldnt have been thought possible 5 years ago. But in the context of what israel is doing in Gaza, and the US clampdown on any criticism of israel in the US it is very little. A real signal of a US breach would be for the US to interrupt military and economic aid to israel unless and until full access to food, medical and shelter was restored to Gazan civilians. That only sounds extreme because US political realities mean its impossible.

    I think a country like the US is like an oil tanker, in that it will take decades for changing views on israel to work their way through to actual policymaking turning. If you look at Trump himself, and his cabinet - they're entirely convinced zionists. Maybe in 30 years time the changes in US views will have worked their way through to policy making level, but for now I am very cynical about US maneuvers on this point.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 5,648 ✭✭✭dmcdona


    I would have thought being associated with an alleged war criminal and someone before the courts for corruption would be akin to being in the Jeffrey Epstein list. Especially if he's found guilty and is either rotting in an Israeli jail cell or rotting in The Hague.

    And then there's the ICJ case in January. If they find Israel has committed Genocide, I'd imagine those donations would evaporate.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,150 ✭✭✭Ardillaun




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 894 ✭✭✭no.8


    What are you on? You know nothing about me or my beliefs. How dare you imply i support the Israeli leadership's barbaric acts simply because i read JG's comment's differently.

    Most people would get that 'targets of value' means targets that are military or strategic, whatever the region. This is just a fact in military terms. It doesn't mean i believe they had any credible evidence of targets of value in the Gaza strip. I feel desperately helpless for the situation the civilians in Gaza find themselves in.

    Please step off your high horse and get your emotions in check. We can have civil debate without going down the road of wild assumptions. Shouting the loudest doesn't win you an argument.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,150 ✭✭✭Ardillaun


    Unfortunately, Netanyahu still has a dominant influence over pro-Israel lobbyists in the US at the moment and their power is huge.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 175 ✭✭StarryPlough01


    dmcdona, If it's a condemnation by US, alas, it's not actionable.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 175 ✭✭StarryPlough01


    dmcdona's BBC link

    https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c740kk7vxkdo

    Israel's representative, Danny Danon, defended the attack, telling the meeting: "This strike sends a message that should echo across this chamber. There is no sanctuary for terrorists, not in Gaza, not in Tehran, not in Doha.

    In past months, Israel has attacked:

    Lebanon,
    Syria,
    Iran (Beginning 13 June this year),
    Yemen, And

    Qatar (Precedent for Israel to attack a Gulf State)

    ‘A watershed moment: US-Gulf relations after Israel's attack on Doha’


    ‘Th
    e unprecedented Israeli attack on Doha will raise questions for Gulf states about the reliability of the US as a defence partner and security guarantor’
    Giorgio Cafiero,
    10 September, 2025


    https://www.newarab.com/analysis/israeli-attack-doha-watershed-moment-us-gulf-relations

    "In a move that stunned observers across the region, Israel targeted Hamas leaders in the Qatari capital, shattering longstanding assumptions that members of the Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) were off-limits for direct Israeli military aggression.

    Qatar was never an aggressor. So Danny Danon, isn't recognising Zionist coalition is a state terrorist…



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,928 ✭✭✭Ozymandius2011


    Irish aircraft leasing company Aercap to buy 20 planes from Israeli weapons supplier linked to Gaza war

    Troubling. IDA refusing to comment.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 5,648 ✭✭✭dmcdona


    I don't understand how the agreement is worth $400m and involves 20 aircraft. Each aircraft costs about $375m new. Even 20 x 15 year old aircraft is about $600m.

    However, if the IDA is providing funding, that should be disclosed. An FOI request perhaps?

    It seems it's not direct support - though that doesn't make it right or acceptable. I'd be livid if any of my paid taxes are being used to support the Israeli terrorist regime.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,567 ✭✭✭✭nacho libre


    By the way did you know Iran has highly regarded scientists in various medical fields?



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 14,078 ✭✭✭✭Cluedo Monopoly


    Last year I told you that Israel had plans to annex some or all of Gaza. You asked me for a link to the plan which I had to explain wasn't actually published by Israel. You got that one utterly wrong even though it was extremely obvious. Now you are being sarcastic when asked to produce any proof to your proclamation that Iran will immediately nuke Israel as soon as they get nuclear weapons? Double standards. It's just your opinion.

    What are they doing in the Hyacinth house?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,567 ✭✭✭✭nacho libre


    Am I? Did you know the Ayatollah issued a fatwa against having Nuclear Weapons? So that would seemingly contradict your assertion it's their duty to have them for Jihad. Did you also know that back during the Iran- Iraq war the Iranians refused to develop Chemical Weapons as they viewed them as unislamic. As we know Saddam had no problem using US supplied Chemical weapons.

    As regards Iran being the biggest destabilier in the region, the Qataris might disagree. How many countries has Israel bombed compared to Iran in the last 12 months? Israel , just like Iran, has funded islamic proxies when it suits a strategic aim. Be consistent condemn both.

    Post edited by nacho libre on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,567 ✭✭✭✭nacho libre


    Sean doesn't like the idea his fellow travellers could be critical of Israel so he needs to persist with the canard that criticism of Israel is exclusive to one side of the political spectrum. You may also have noticed a reccuring theme with him of repeating the same talking points no matter how many times they have been debunked.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 5,648 ✭✭✭dmcdona


    Indeed - constant whataboutery, repetition and a one-sided narrative is tiresome from that poster. But that's not exclusive - they all do it.

    And I just don't understand how there is simply no room for concessions on their part - every single critisism of Israel is defended to the hilt - including what any normal human being would consider indefensible.

    It's as if any acceptance of wrongdoing by Israel is a weakness. And that they must only exclusively promote Israeli strengths and righteousness. And that reflects the Hasbara perfectly - no concessions, no weakness and all criticism is antisemitic.

    They believe Israel is perfect in every single way and can do no wrong and all atrocities by Israel on Israeli soil, illegally occupied land and even other States is fully justified in furthering the expansion of Israel.

    But even the staunchest of pro-Palestinians have regularly and frequently conceded that all terrorist actions are condemnable.

    Pro-Israelis are incapable of doing the same. Even Israelis criticising Israel is ignored, condemned or just waved away.

    But, it will all be repeatedly called out until they do what they always do - run away back to the shadows.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,798 ✭✭✭Frank Grimes


    And I just don't understand how there is simply no room for concessions on their part - every single critisism of Israel is defended to the hilt - including what any normal human being would consider indefensible.

    Those types of posts make me think about the sort of hyperbolic statements people make about politicians at times 'well, he/she could kill a baby and people would still vote for them'. Well, Israeli is killing 10s of thousands of babies and children and people still defend them no matter what.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 5,648 ✭✭✭dmcdona


    I'd imagine at least some Israelis are nervous.

    Looks like their neighbours are sick to death of their continuous warmongering and Genocide in the region. Unsurprisingly…


    "The de facto Saudi ruler, Mohammed bin Salman, has informed Qatar that he will make all the kingdom's resources available to defend it.

    The ruler of the United Arab Emirates, Mohammed bin Zayed, made a swift solidarity visit to Qatar and dropped a threat about the future of the peace agreement with Israel, and Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian and the Qatari ruler held a supportive conversation.

    All these reactions create a sense of solidarity with Arab countries in which Iran is seen as an equal member. After all, it's no longer the only country in the region to have been attacked by Israel"

    Zvi Bar'el



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,161 ✭✭✭wildgreen


    Mary Robinson putting it succintly:

    Former Irish President Mary Robinson said she feels “ashamed” of the EU’s response to Israel’s war in Gaza, criticizing the bloc for failing to suspend its trade agreement with Israel despite calls to do so, Anadolu reports.

    “I feel a bit ashamed as an EU citizen that the EU that speaks about human rights, that talks the talk cannot bring itself,” she told RTE’s The Late Late Show late Friday. “It is quite disturbing at this stage.”



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,928 ✭✭✭Ozymandius2011


    Ex UK Labour leader (1983-92) Lord Neil Kinnock is condemning the ban on Palestine Action.

    20250913_183035.jpg


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,672 ✭✭✭Straight Talker


    The only appropriate response to a pro Palestine/pro Hamas march really. All credit to the Northern Ireland fans i say.

    Mod - warned for trolling

    Post edited by Leg End Reject on

    Cork 1990 All Ireland Senior Hurling and Football Champions



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 5,648 ✭✭✭dmcdona


    I see you have high standards… classy lads eh?



Advertisement
Advertisement