Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

Munster Team Talk Thread - Beirne After Reading

1107310741076107810791098

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,064 ✭✭✭oppiuy


    Gonna have to dig out some old copies to read that and I see MCmillan has said he feels we are light in a few positions. Well that's the headline anyway



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 26,513 ✭✭✭✭phog


    Both Nankivell and Farrell played 40 mins last week, Crowley along with Diarmuid Barron, Beirne, EdEd, Kleyn, Nash and Salanoa are the only players form the senior squad who will have no minutes in the preseason friendlies. I don't see it being an issue for Crowley.



  • Moderators, Sports Moderators, Paid Member Posts: 31,633 Mod ✭✭✭✭Podge_irl


    Are we even expecting Crowley to be available for the Scarlets match? Internationals basically never play pre-season games.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,774 ✭✭✭Pepp1989


    Casey ahern milne etc all playing tomorrow.

    I would very much hope we see Crowley v Scarlets.



  • Moderators, Sports Moderators, Paid Member Posts: 31,633 Mod ✭✭✭✭Podge_irl


    That'll learn me to pay more attention to what is posted.

    I guess the Lions may have muddied up the schedule somewhat, but it is weird to see internationals play before game 3 or 4.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 26,513 ✭✭✭✭phog


    If the IRFU are managing the time players play for Munster I'd much rather have Crowley available later in the season than a preseason friendly



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,232 ✭✭✭Former Former Former


    I don’t think the comments about Rowntree are particularly surprising, it was well publicised that he’d completely fallen out with the senior players. Maybe the question is why/how he got the job in the first place.

    It’s interesting to Murray talking about the signings being rubbish, you don’t often hear players talking about other players like that, even if he doesn’t name anyone specific.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,774 ✭✭✭Pepp1989


    The GR criticism isn't surprising. The criticism of his rugby knowledge was a bit low I felt. Not a good look for Murray.

    GR won a URC with us despite all the failings Murray pointed out. Hardly done in spite of the head coach. Particularly considering whats happened before or since.

    Starting to look like Murray doesn't have a club lined up for the season? Well in Europe anyway. Maybe he is heading south?



  • Moderators, Sports Moderators, Paid Member Posts: 31,633 Mod ✭✭✭✭Podge_irl


    Munster were not particularly good the season they won, and indeed at the halfway mark looked like they might even miss out on the playoffs/European places. They basically put together an excellent run of 5 matches to end the season which is almost entirely the kind of thing you expect to see from a team who are winning in spite of their coach rather than because of him.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,281 ✭✭✭✭aloooof


    Except that wasn’t a once off either. IIRC Podge, you were calling Munster an average team at both the halfway point the season they won the URC and the following season when they finished 1st in the table.

    You could equally argue that’s a team who is being coached to peak at the right time of the season.

    They can’t have been that bad or average…



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,193 ✭✭✭mun1


    As a leinster man , it really grinds your gears that we won the URC. “Not particularly good the season they won”, “basically put together an excellent run” & “winning in spite of their coach”

    With the same coach We placed 1st the following season, but is that “not particularly good ” or “winning in spite of their coach”. ?

    At least you’re consistent .



  • Moderators, Sports Moderators, Paid Member Posts: 31,633 Mod ✭✭✭✭Podge_irl


    You could equally argue that’s a team who is being coached to peak at the right time of the season.

    You certainly could. But Murray's comments (and Rowntree's eventual ignominious departure) would suggest that is not the case.

    I don't recall calling them average, but I would stand by it if I did. At the halfway point of the season they won they had lost 6 of 10 matches. They do have an insanely good record in SA oddly enough.



  • Moderators, Sports Moderators, Paid Member Posts: 31,633 Mod ✭✭✭✭Podge_irl


    It's the Munster stalworth who is basically calling the coach ****, not me.

    As much as you can judge a coach from outside I thought he was ok (albeit the rumours were hanging around for a while). Someone suggested it wasn't possible they won a championship in spite of the coach, all I'm saying is that the manner in which they won makes it possible.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,281 ✭✭✭✭aloooof


    "eventual" seems a pretty important part of the context there, tho. It could easily be the case that he did a pretty good job in the first and second season but things deteriorated. The results would suggest that, imo.

    And the results at the halfway point were in large part as a result of our poor start where we lost 5 from the first 7. In the context of a new coaching ticket, and a massive shift in our style of play, I think that's to be expected to a point.

    But from there on in things were massively encouraging. The SA game was a turning point. We were brilliant in the group stages of Europe that season against Toulouse and Northampton. And were superb in that final run-in, in all away matches.

    If we're doing all that in spite of the coach, we must be even better than I thought we were…



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,723 ✭✭✭theVersatile


    Maybe the question is why/how he got the job in the first place

    Not quite sure I buy that line of questioning. Rowntree wasn't parachuted in out of nowhere as head coach - he had been with Munster for the previous three years under JVG and clearly had built a reputation as a great forwards coach.

    I have no doubt that Rowntree's straight talking rubbed some players the wrong way - that sounds in character - and I'd also agree that not all great positional coaches make great head coaches - but nobody at the time questioned the Rowntree appointment. Ultimately, he won a URC - so it was hardly a poor coaching appointment regardless of how it finished.

    I honestly believe Wig was in the wrong place at the wrong time - a team with some of its ageing greats phasing out, that's always going to cause a bit of grief.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,774 ✭✭✭Pepp1989


    Saying that we won the URC and topped the league the following year in spite of the Head Coach is just not credible imo.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,281 ✭✭✭✭aloooof


    Totally agree with this with regards the Rowntree appointment. Munster were actually getting criticism at the time for taking to long to make the appointment, but there wasn't a Munster fan I knew who was disappointed when he got the job. This is spot on, imo:

    Ultimately, he won a URC - so it was hardly a poor coaching appointment regardless of how it finished.

    Fwiw, I think Murray's criticism of the coaching turnover is misplaced as well tbh. Penney was offered a 3rd season (heavily rumoured he wanted 2 years). Rassie left, exercising a cause in his contract for his dream job. I think JVG was our 2nd longest ever serving coach? And what happened with Axel…

    Ironically, the Rowntree appoint was at least trying to bring some continuity, appointing from within.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 26,513 ✭✭✭✭phog


    If it is, what does it say about the other teams in the URC



  • Moderators, Sports Moderators, Paid Member Posts: 31,633 Mod ✭✭✭✭Podge_irl


    Well I guess this season will tell a lot, given the new coach is very highly rated.

    Looking back at the results, I imagine my opinion is coloured somewhat by the fact that I see less of Munster than you and while I tend to always watch the interpros they haven't been great in those the last few years. They basically ran the table with the Welsh and SA teams though.

    There were also plenty of rumours floating around that something was not right even in the season they topped the table. They might still be nonsense of course and we're unlikely to hear Rowntree's side of the story any time soon.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 5,512 ✭✭✭ionadnapóca


    I find it surprising because it’s unheard of in Irish rugby to criticise coaches, past or present, and especially to criticise players.

    I welcome the noise but not the way Murray went about it.

    If he felt that strongly he should just stand on his two feet and say it to camera, press, whatever.

    To put it in a book! Smacks of cheap money making for a bit of dirt.

    And I like Murray.

    My reading of it is Rowntree was starting to prefer Casey (e.g. Murray dropped from Squad v Northampton 2023) and was ‘hesitant’ over contracts with Murray (&POM). Murray didn’t like that.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,232 ✭✭✭Former Former Former


    Not quite sure I buy that line of questioning. 

    Again, and this is absolutely critical, it's not my line of questioning.

    This is Conor Murray who, by my count, played under seven Munster head coaches, plus Joe Schmidt, Andy Farrell and Warren Gatland:

    "I didn't rate him at all and in his last season, even the more younger, innocent players were starting to see through him. Personally, I didn't see a lot of rugby knowledge there".

    That’s pretty damning, no matter how you slice it.

    but nobody at the time questioned the Rowntree appointment

    I'm not sure about that either. There was a lot of chat about other candidates and the end result seemed to be that Rowntree was the only one interested rather than the best man for the job. Considering they lost Larkham and JVG in the space of a month, it was odd that they took four months to lock Rowntree down as head coach.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,117 ✭✭✭StormForce13


    The POM contract saga involved a lot more participants than just Wiggy. I'd say that his long-running "injury" that cleared up just in time for the 6 Nations tournament must have really infuriated GR.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,860 ✭✭✭typhoony


    Well if he's criticising some of the signings and their performances he might want to look closer to home and be honest about some of the munster stalwarts performances. In the later stages of his career before JGP took over i thought murray's performances for munster were not on a par with his ireland performances



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,281 ✭✭✭✭aloooof


    Let me get this straight.

    You’re criticising Munster for “why/ how he got the job in the first place” but also criticising them for taking “4 months to lock Rowntree down” as they explored other candidates?

    If thats your stance, you’ll never find anything but criticism.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 595 ✭✭✭darkened_scrum


    The "I didn't see a lot of rugby knowledge there" comment is especially interesting given Rowntree was an internal appointment/promotion. He'd already done ~3 seasons as forwards coach before taking over the top job. He was a known quantity at Munster, his rugby knowledge (or lack thereof) should have been very evident when they gave him the role.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 5,512 ✭✭✭ionadnapóca


    Very much so.

    Whatever we now hear and read about Rowntree I think it needs to be held up against what Keith Earls had said about him previously.

    "Graham has got a phenomenal relationship with all of us. He's a great man."

    "He's come from a club that is quite like Munster, in Leicester, he knows what Munster is about. He's played against them for years. He knows what the supporters are about."

    "Since he has come over, he's indulged himself in Limerick culture, Munster culture. He loves it, he loves the people and the people love him as well. He's a humble, passionate lad as well."

    I remember he also left Earls out of that squad for 2023 Northampton game.

    After the win in the 2023 semi-final v Leinster. It was clear there was allot of respect between those two men.

    Post match interview:

    As for how long he actually has left in the game, Earls, said he knew in his head, “But it’s kind of open-ended.”

    To which Rowntree added: “Four more years”.

    Earlsy didnt have any dirt in his book!

    And that is a book I would recommend before anyone is even considering certain other autobiographies.



  • Moderators, Sports Moderators, Paid Member Posts: 31,633 Mod ✭✭✭✭Podge_irl


    I mean, it is also possible Murray is just lashing out in his book.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,889 ✭✭✭✭Red Silurian


    Rowntree was always very critical of the team when they played poorly, this likely had a big effect, especially on the more senior players. They managed to silence their biggest critic by getting rid of him and then continued to play a very poor quality of rugby. They did this right up until the absolute embarrassment towards the end of last season when we were 40 minutes away from almost losing out on Champions Cup rugby for the first time ever

    I wonder if there's anything in Murrays book about those frankly embarrassing performances…



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,281 ✭✭✭✭aloooof


    Are you trying to argue his "rugby knowledge (or lack thereof) being evident before they gave him the role" means he was a poor appointment?

    There isn't a Munster fan I know who at the time, or in retrospect, thinks it was a poor appointment (even given how it ended up). His results back that up.

    Post edited by aloooof on


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,774 ✭✭✭Pepp1989


    Murray is retiring also. Confirmed it to the Examiner.



Advertisement