Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
If we do not hit our goal we will be forced to close the site.

Current status: https://keepboardsalive.com/

Annual subs are best for most impact. If you are still undecided on going Ad Free - you can also donate using the Paypal Donate option. All contribution helps. Thank you.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

Immigration and Ireland - MEGATHREAD *Mod Note Added 02/09/25*

1348349351353354390

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,328 ✭✭✭prunudo


    If the government stopped viewing people as nothing more than a cell on a spreadsheet, it would be a start. They see people, both Irish and immigrants as nothing more than a revenue stream. But I'm sick saying it, there are agenda's at play, and the sole objective is to destroy western nations. Ireland will be lost some time between 2030-2040.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 42,958 ✭✭✭✭Boggles


    Income and material poverty rates are more acute in people living in social housing.

    More than 250% higher.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 42,958 ✭✭✭✭Boggles


    FF and FG sole objective is to destroy Western Nations?

    You sure?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,328 ✭✭✭prunudo


    They just do what they're told, but they're complicit in flooding the country with mass immigration, which, if it goes as reported, will mean Ireland will be irreversibly changed by 2040 at the latest.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,604 ✭✭✭Viscount Aggro


    What is being destroyed is, the Irish environment.

    Environmental health of rivers, lakes, coasts.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 42,958 ✭✭✭✭Boggles


    Oh right, who is actually telling them and why would they be going along with it?

    Also have you a link to the report that "Ireland will be irreversibly changed by 2040 at the latest"?

    Also could you define it please?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,328 ✭✭✭prunudo


    It will be when the rising population overwhelms the already stretched infrastructure.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,345 ✭✭✭Jack Daw


    You've clearly decided to ignore what I said and just pretend I said something else.

    No point wasting my time with you anymore.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,166 ✭✭✭✭nullzero
    °°°°°


    RTE radio 1 at lunch time stating we will see a minimum of 58,000 per annum immigration until the 2060's is sobering.

    Our housing output is falling short of the very modest targets being set by government each year, we're headed for a humanitarian disaster in Ireland.

    Eventually we're going to be seeing shanty towns and tent cities popping up if we meet those projected numbers. Perhaps lack of accommodation could stem the flow when it becomes apparent there's nowhere for new arrivals to live when they get here.

    Whatever happens, on the path we're currently on we're headed for a catastrophic situation so it's high time we got our house in order and grasped this nettle.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,218 ✭✭✭jackboy


    I've said it before that we need to get over this idea of housing for all. Unless immigration levels crash we will never be able to provide enough houses. We need to start creating large scale trailer parks like they have in the US. This is the only realistic solution.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 42,958 ✭✭✭✭Boggles


    I haven't ignored what you said, you are blaming immigration for our declining birth rate and you cited your friend unable to have more than 2 children.

    It's absolutely ludicrous commentary.

    This whole thread is starting to read like Brenton Tarrant's manifesto.

    Which opened with the line "It's the birthrates. It's the birthrates. It's the birthrates."



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 2,910 ✭✭✭nachouser


    Admittedly, I did not listen to the broadcast, but applying a bit of common sense would suggest it is incredibly unlikely that those suggested numbers are realistic. For example, a person planning to move to a new country to take up a new job would need to secure accommodation in order to be paid. How would that work after year two of the scenario suggested? Never mind year thirty five.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 42,958 ✭✭✭✭Boggles


    There were 3 scenarios given.

    • In the analysis’ medium scenario, where net migration shifts from c.40,000 to c.35,000 per annum over the next forty years, Ireland’s population would reach 6.77 million people in 2065, with labour force growth sustained until 2047.
    • In the High scenario, where net migration shifts from c.58,000 to c.53,000 per annum over the time horizon, labour force growth is sustained over the same period with the population potentially reaching 7.59 million by 2065.
    • In a Low scenario (net migration falls to c.18,500 per annum by 2065), Ireland’s population could reach 6 million in 2065 with the labour force contracting from 2041 onwards.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 42,958 ✭✭✭✭Boggles


    RTE radio 1 at lunch time stating we will see a minimum of 58,000 per annum immigration until the 2060's is sobering.

    Unless they had Mystic Meg on they clearly couldn't have.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,131 ✭✭✭✭Thelonious Monk


    Most of them would know someone from their own country here so they'd use their address? That's what I did when moved to London, used mates address to open bank and put on CVs etc. The more people move here the more contacts immigrants will have, an ever expanding network.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 2,910 ✭✭✭nachouser


    Yeah, that's not really going to happen if there are, apparently, 58k new people expected to arrive every year for the next 35 years.

    Edit: I'm not even considering the AML consequences of trying to use different bank accounts nowadays.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,568 ✭✭✭dublin49


    This is what i envisage may happen in near future,AI,Trump tariffs and the cyclical nature of boom and bust economics will leave us in an almighty economic mess that will be hard to take or solve.

    By then we will have 100s of 1000s of mostly but not exclusively Indians who have used our 3rd Level educational system and others using language schools to gain residency and repartriate family members who will all require Welfare assistance when the IT bubble bursts.

    Secondly there will be massive resentment when the Apple Money is gone and the corporation Tax is reduced dramatically and the Irish people realise just how much immigration is costing us,especially when tax rates go up and pensions are reduced or delayed so we can feed and house the many economic migrants we are currently struggling to cope with and it is only increasing as far I can see.

    I am very pessimistic about the future and hope I am wrong but I feel we are probably the last European country to wake up to the reality that what is happening is economically unsustainable and we were cursed to have the Apple Money /Allied to record Corporation Tax that allowed our Government to procrasinate when others like Denmark were putting the indigenous population first rather than our gang bending over backwards to be best in class little Europeans while totally ignoring the views of the ordinary folk on the ground.

    Of course if I am right the NGOs and woke politicans will blame everyone but themselves so we wont even have the satisfaction of telling them "we told ye"

    We are about to have a presidential election,a good opportunity to gauge public support for the Goverments handling of this massive issue.Any chance a candidate that might properly discuss this issue on the campaign like Nick Delahanty getting on ther ballot,

    Don't think so



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,166 ✭✭✭✭nullzero
    °°°°°


    https://www.irishexaminer.com/news/arid-41702873.html

    The story in the linked article was the topic of discussion.

    These are projections made by the department of finance.

    Mystic Meg he damned. This was discussed on RTE radio 1 at lunch time yesterday. There's no need for dismissive snark, I'm not pulling this out of thin air.

    Do you have an opinion on these projected numbers? Are they sustainable in your opinion?

    They discuss inward migration as the only way to save the potentially shrinking workforce in years to come, but fail to answer the question of where all these people will be able to live? How can we attract new arrivals and have and fair and equitable society with insufficient housing?

    As much as some may like to pretend these issues aren't linked, in reality they are intertwined.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,655 ✭✭✭Mr. teddywinkles


    See construction sector has contracted over last couple of months too.

    Mod Edit: Warned for breaching threadban

    Post edited by Necro on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,328 ✭✭✭prunudo


    You're right to be pessimistic, we're in the 2008 period of the current bubble. There will be a lot of pain in the years ahead, as they say, buckle up, we're in for a bumpy ride. It remains to be seen how the immigrants will handle a downturn but no doubt, it will be the productive ones that pack up and leave.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,849 ✭✭✭riddles


    We haven't had a Government in the traditional sense here for a couple of decades. Run the place on auto pilot, implementing EU dictates and upholding our global obligations. Throw money into departmental black holes where sqandermania abounds. I can think of four if not five topics that in any functioning democracy would be framed with and dealt with as crisis. The tiktok man will join his FFFG cronies with his snout in the NGO trough.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 42,958 ✭✭✭✭Boggles


    RTE radio 1 at lunch time stating we will see a minimum of 58,000 per annum immigration until the 2060's is sobering.

    Ireland's population could reach over 7.5m by 2065, report suggests

    Even your own link disagrees with your claim.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,733 ✭✭✭crusd


    If Ireland had the same population density as the Netherlands we would have a population of 35million.

    Of course 7.5million is sustainable, with proper planning. We don't however like to do proper planning. We prefer pandering to asset price hawks.

    In a zero immigration scenario using the assumptions on population in the report by 2065 we would be at about 5.0million. Of this about 1/3 would be over 65. To maintain the current level of supports for the elderly, overall tax take would need to increase by at least 15%.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,166 ✭✭✭✭nullzero
    °°°°°


    Go listen back to the RTE broadcast from yesterday.

    You're offering nothing to the actual discussion, just looking for ways to take pot shots at people.

    What's your opinion on this level of immigration in light of of inability to build sufficient accommodation for people?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,733 ✭✭✭crusd


    why only discuss the upper case scenario and not the middle and lower case?

    Why not also discuss the no increase scenario and the consequences of that on the ability of the country to support an aging population and / or the massive increase in the tax burden on those who will be working required to support said aging population?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 42,958 ✭✭✭✭Boggles


    You posted a false claim which you debunked with your own link and you are accusing me of offering nothing to discussion?

    There were 2 replies to your claim. One stating the actual scenarios laid out and another explaining the implausibly of the numbers, neither of which you replied to.

    But it's every one else that offers nothing to discussion, right?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 42,958 ✭✭✭✭Boggles


    So now we are on the verge of negative net migration like the last crash?

    What happened to the report you saw that claims we will be irreversibly changed by 2040 at the latest



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,600 ✭✭✭ShagNastii


    It is something I’ve never investigated much before, but if there is a colossal need for more people in certain places where do governments sit re: looking at “Driving birthrates VS bringing in people”.


    Surely a large push on embracing greater families is a much easier sell for governments.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 662 ✭✭✭Marcos


    Certain posters on here, have nothing to offer other than calling the "morally unpure" unlike them, names, and trying to take potshots as you say. Expecting them to answer "problematic" questions is akin to expecting a Legion of Mary member from the 1950's to say that papal infallibility is false.

    Mod Edit: Warned for baiting

    When most of us say "social justice" we mean equality under the law opposition to prejudice, discrimination and equal opportunities for all. When Social Justice Activists say "social justice" they mean an emphasis on group identity over the rights of the individual, a rejection of social liberalism, and the assumption that unequal outcomes are always evidence of structural inequalities.

    Andrew Doyle, The New Puritans.



  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Business & Finance Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators, Sports Moderators, Paid Member Posts: 58,102 Mod ✭✭✭✭Necro


    Mod: @Marcos don't post in this thread again



Advertisement