Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

Presidential Election 2025

Options
1175176178180181520

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 81,495 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    The route can only be blocked in circumstances such as this.

    If somebody is truly eligible if they are 'an Irish citizen and 35 or older' then there should be a route for everybody who is eligible.

    The constitution is not clear in other words. If you need to be politically aligned, the constitution should say that.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,401 ✭✭✭Bishop of hope


    She's a career politician. And as you say yourself, calm down. And a former Labour Councillor.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,618 ✭✭✭✭VinLieger


    Aww she showed up last minute and spouted right wing conspiracy nonsense as expected.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 81,495 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    And not remotely the type of candidate I am talking about.

    Excuse my French but jaysus how much clearer do I have to be.



  • Moderators, Sports Moderators, Paid Member Posts: 34,134 Mod ✭✭✭✭Podge_irl


    Should the Constitution also say you should be "politically aligned" to be Taoiseach? Cause it doesn't say that either.

    You are railing against something has happened 11 out of 14 times in Ireland as if it is a unique and unforeseen circumstance. You are acting as if the writers of the Constitution didn't know that political parties were in the councils. I assure you they were not that stupid. You are simply wrong.

    You want to campaign to change the Constitution, go nuts. I am not a big fan of the process myself. But stop pretending like this is an obscure, unforeseen outcome of the very clear constitutional process.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 81,495 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    I am not pretending.

    I am making a point on a discussion board.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 22,513 ✭✭✭✭gormdubhgorm


    SF haven't said anything of note at all, in fact it could be argued that while I don't agree with FG's stance on instructing councillors no longer backing independents it is at least "transparent". As there has been a clear statement.

    The last time I think SF have been "transparent" was O'Brádaigh v Adams, in their own Presidential contest!

    Guff about stuff, and stuff about guff.



  • Moderators, Sports Moderators, Paid Member Posts: 34,134 Mod ✭✭✭✭Podge_irl


    So at least make the point honestly. I have frequently posted here that I am not a fan of the Presidential nomination system. But claiming that this is not what was envisioned or is an aberration is simply not true. The main parties have significantly less power in the Dáil and on the councils then they did when the Constitution was written. The first ever Council nomination was in 1997. Mary Robinson was the second ever candidate not nominated by either FF or FG after McCartan in 1945.

    I would just prefer the discussion was couched in factual historical terms.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 81,495 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    I think the constitution intended the presidency to be open to those who are Irish citizens and 35 or over.

    It plainly isn't this time and at other times unless you politically align .



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,353 ✭✭✭✭Rjd2


    Its her life and she's entitled to do what she wants with it, but looking at her previous political results she hasn't done that well to say the least. I suppose the next step had to be run for president.😌

    https://www.irelandelection.com/candidate.php?candid=17946



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,508 ✭✭✭✭For Forks Sake




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,401 ✭✭✭Bishop of hope


    And that'd be something else of what type?

    A new way of selecting a candidate, like as Francie said, maybe like a Citizen's Assembly?

    Where do you draw a line, does this new body have the right to endorse the nomination of more than one candidate?

    Where's the democratic right of all the other maybe few hundred candidates?

    If you qualify as is now, be an Irish citizen of 35 years or older, why has this new body got the right to tell any candidate they think one or two of them have more rights than any other?

    When you sit down and think of it the only solution is to let everybody who qualifies to have the right to go forward for the election. There's so many people willing to see the problem but can't come up with a justifiable solution, as in all or most situations.



  • Moderators, Sports Moderators, Paid Member Posts: 34,134 Mod ✭✭✭✭Podge_irl


    It's been discussed a bit here, but I'd be fine with a total number of councillors instead of per council and, while it is complicated, I wouldn't be opposed to a (very high) citizen petition element. (I also think the age limitation is utterly absurd, but my fellow citizens disagree with me on that).

    However, I think the discussion needs to be grounded in the reality that the current nomination process is running exactly as nomination processes have run since the dawn of the state and is running exactly as originally intended.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 692 ✭✭✭rdwight


    Are you talking about McGuinness in the 2011 Presidential election? He got about 13% if I recall. The only way it could be described as "pretty well" is in comparison with the Ni Riadh debacle in 2018



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 692 ✭✭✭rdwight


    I smile when Shinners talk about playing "the longer game". It's about 15 or 20 years since I first heard them use this line to explain away some political misstep or electoral disaster.

    What they really mean by the "long game", whether they know it or not, is waiting for demographics in NI to deliver a United Ireland, which is their only political real political goal.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 81,495 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    Growth of the party north and south, First Minister/largest party in the Executive they were never supposed to get by partition’s design, begs to differ.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 692 ✭✭✭rdwight


    I'd agree with you on this.

    Also, much as I find lots of youth annoying, I can't see why restricted to 35 and over. And maybe we should allow anyone to can gather 20,000 signatures to run. If that opens the arena to the likes of McGregor, so be it.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 23,064 ✭✭✭✭Strazdas


    A lot of these candidates seem to completely misunderstand the role of President. If they want to get involved in politics, they should join a political party or simply run for election as an independent in the local elections. Trying to go from being an absolute nobody to head of state is obviously deluded.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 81,495 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    Yes, I think 35 is odd but then the constitution was written in a very sexist, patriarchial and conservative era.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 28,134 ✭✭✭✭Larbre34


    Of course there shouldn't. It would be effing chaos, and you know it would.

    The clearest demonstration of that is the basket of ego-driven deplorables that have come forward this time, and the last few times, whining that they should be considered, despite having no history of public or political service, no legal or diplomatic expertise, or no culture changing impact on the country and its people.

    The Constitution, in its most general sense, is a codified set of guardrails, and in the case of Article 12.4 in particular, its to ensure that the representatives WHO THE PEOPLE HAVE ALREADY ELECTED get to keep some measure of control on buffoons like Conor McGregor or Nick Delehanty or Joanna Donnelly from making a mockery of the contest to elect a worthy Head of State.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,401 ✭✭✭Bishop of hope




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 18,755 ✭✭✭✭Goldengirl


    Why ? Really people on all sides are making more of this than it is . It's no big deal if a party does not nominate or actively encourage support for someone for president.

    It happens and it doesn't impact the progress in a GE as we have seen before .

    As we have seen MDH has not had much impact on left leaning parties' overall support over the 2 terms .



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 81,495 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    That’s just fake arrogance tbh.

    Why would you think a loon is any more likely to get past a selection committee made up of non political party members?

    Nobody is talking about a free for all.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 18,755 ✭✭✭✭Goldengirl


    Agree.

    The other poster suggests 20,000 signature petitions ...of who ?

    I am sure there are people looking for election who could pay 20k to sign a position , or 'encourage' them in some other way that would not be open and visible .

    At least with councillors there is a public forum with elected representatives of the people deciding who they view to be suitable as a candidate for head of state .

    On the question of those particular loons I think many people would actually turn off the election coverage and maybe even the election if they saw their names on the ballot paper .



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 23,064 ✭✭✭✭Strazdas


    SF have the power to nominate their own candidate and put them on the ballot paper. It would seem a bit nuts to let that chance slip and leave the two government parties to probably fight out the election (assuming Connolly is not going to win).



  • Site Banned Posts: 4,164 ✭✭✭Oíche Na Gaoithe Móire




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 28,134 ✭✭✭✭Larbre34


    Oh really? So what are you talking about? Describe the model of in-between that you are thinking of?

    Who is this selection committee? Who selects the selection committee? How do you ensure it isn't corrupted, that it doesn't become a clientelist, politicised, rotten entity?

    Why would their subjective opinion of who gets to stand have any more validity that the system the Constitution provides for?

    Its a recipe for disaster, and I think you know it is, and you're just spoofing for the sake of being contrary.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,882 ✭✭✭intellectual dosser


    There was a referendum in 2015 to amend the age to 21 and it didn’t pass



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,401 ✭✭✭Bishop of hope


    I was reading the list of speakers at the kerry CoCo meeting and an outline of their speeches. They all had a list of different things they wanted to affect if elected. The president can't really in any way affect most of the changes they are talking about anyway.

    Outside of that, there is a route for anybody that wants to get elected to represent the people of Ireland. They pick a constituency, pay their deposit and put themselves forward for Dail Eireann. There's no blocker to anyone who wants to have their right to represent the people, only the votes of the people they claim to want to represent. But it is open to everybody with an interest.

    Even at local level there's Co Councils. FFs there's no blocker to trying to get elected to represent people, just contrarians who claim there is for the sake of argument.



Advertisement
Advertisement