Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
If we do not hit our goal we will be forced to close the site.

Current status: https://keepboardsalive.com/

Annual subs are best for most impact. If you are still undecided on going Ad Free - you can also donate using the Paypal Donate option. All contribution helps. Thank you.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.

Irish Property Market chat II - *read mod note post #1 before posting*

1926927928929931

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,464 ✭✭✭BlueSkyDreams


    Dublin rents are still a lot higher than Limerick City.

    3 Bed house in D2 and D4 is 3k a month, vs only 2k in Limerick City.

    A one bed apartment in D2 costs the same as a 3 bed house in Limerick City.

    The report does point out, as said plenty of times before, that the rent caps are ironically causing rent rises.

    Ireland's share of new rental investment across the UK/IRE dropping from 15% to only 4% last year.

    The rent caps need to go if we are ever going to build 50k homes per year.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,464 ✭✭✭BlueSkyDreams


    The 70% of the population that own property may not be so happy to see a crash.

    Who would have built more homes than FFG?

    We have one of the highest building rates per capita in Europe.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 313 ✭✭SpoonyMcSpoon


    There is no way 2/3 adults own their own home. That must include adults living with parents as well as the parents who own the home.

    Nonetheless, FFG and selfish property owners who cheer on rising house prices and rents should not be the only ones benefitting from the property market - it is pretty clear that there are winners and losers but no in betweeners. Renters are getting royally screwed with poor security of tenure, terrible quality family rentals and of course the crazy prices.


    Like a good car market, it should be possible for anyone to get something comfortable for themselves depending on their budget. I hope to see it crash hard, not that I am in Ireland anymore.



  • Registered Users, Subscribers, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,763 ✭✭✭hometruths


    I broadly agree with your sentiments towards selfish property owners, but why on earth are you doubting that 2/3 adults own their own home? Is there really no limit to what stat or data that can just be dismissed on a whim?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,704 ✭✭✭DataDude


    I could be wrong on this, but is there not some merit to this?

    I thought the stat was that 65-70% of homes are owner occupied. Does that not ‘conceal’ 30th somethings living with parents as ‘living in owner occupied homes’?



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Subscribers, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,763 ✭✭✭hometruths


    I could also be wrong but I think the % of ownership is falling due to the average age of ownership rising.

    That would very strongly suggest that the 2/3 does not include young adults living with their parents, as it seems unlikely both things can be true.

    I think it does "conceal" married couples though. i.e it includes two adults who own the same house.



  • Registered Users, Subscribers, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,763 ✭✭✭hometruths


    Just taken a quick look at CSO page, and I do take your point it specifically says "owner occupied" rather than % of adults own a house. So My understanding wasn't quite what I thought it was.

    • The proportion of owner occupied dwellings was 66% in 2022, down from 68% in 2016.

    Piqued my curiosity now, so am going to take a closer look at it. A bit sad I know!

    https://www.cso.ie/en/releasesandpublications/ep/p-cpp2/censusofpopulation2022profile2-housinginireland/homeownershipandrent/



  • Registered Users, Subscribers, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,763 ✭✭✭hometruths


    It's pretty hard how to work out from the census numbers how young adults living at home might influence the proportion of owner occupied dwellings.

    ESRI also have some data on homeownership, looking at tenure by age groups.

    Figures for over 40 vs under 40 are:

    Ireland has the fourth highest rate of homeownership for households aged 40+ (just under 80 per cent). However, Ireland has only the tenth highest rate of homeownership for households aged below 40 (34 per cent),

    In addition almost 90% of over 65s own their own house.

    Given an aging population 2/3 of adults owning a house doesn't seem out of whack at all to me, and I'd be fascinated if there is anything credible to cast doubt on it.

    I also think it is unlikely that large amounts of adults living at home is distorting these figures because the ESRI has this to say on the subject:

    In the 2012-2015 period, 21.1 per cent of young adults were living at home whereas 26.5 per cent were doing so in the 2016-2019 period, representing the largest percentage increase of all countries studied.
    It is important to recognise here that these figures are likely to be impacted by the stage of each country‘s economic cycle. Indeed, in Ireland the 2012-2015 period was associated with high levels of emigration during a period of economic
    recovery. Comparing the 2016-2019 period with the 2003-2007 boom period for. Ireland reveals an average of 26.5 per cent of young adults were living at home across both periods.

    And the home ownership rate fell from 74% to 66% since 2006.

    https://www.esri.ie/system/files/publications/RS164.pdf

    Post edited by hometruths on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,970 ✭✭✭Villa05


    Dublin rents are still a lot higher than Limerick City.

    3 Bed house in D2 and D4 is 3k a month, vs only 2k in Limerick City.

    A one bed apartment in D2 costs the same as a 3 bed house in Limerick City

    The Daft national report must be wrong then. I understand that the Limerick figure may be distorted by the abysmal sample size of available properties, but i doubt the actual average asking rent price was calculated incorrectly.

    At current local rental inflation, with regard to the gap between Limerick and Dublin. Limerick will have the most expensive rentals by year end

    According to the latest Daft.ie Rental Report for Q2 2025, average rents in Irish cities and regions continued to rise, with Dublin at €2,583 (up 6.5% annually), Cork city at €2,241 (up 11.8%), Limerick city at €2,422 (up 14.9%), and Galway city at €2,295 (up 8.5%)



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,400 ✭✭✭Blut2


    The overall home ownership rate drop is both shocking but also pretty interesting for what it will do to our politics as a country. As things stand rising house prices still benefit the majority (even if its quite theoretical for most owner occupiers, they seem to like the idea of it), which is why our government is so deliberately ineffective at preventing them.

    But once we reach a stage where home owners are the minority policy will change quite radically. A country that's majority renters will introduce some pretty punitive taxes on home ownership.

    The retirement situation is also going to get rather interesting (problematic) as a result. If large %s of people at retirement don't own their own property the financials of that just aren't going to work out, its not possible to pay rent on most pensions. The state will probably be forced to build public retirement communities.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,464 ✭✭✭BlueSkyDreams


    I think the headline figures are probably the average rental price of all property, with Limerick recording mostly larger properties and a small sample size as you say.

    Galway, Cork and Dublin are all more expensive than Limerick, according to the DAFT report, when you compare like for like property types. 1 bed flats, 2 bed homes and so on.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,464 ✭✭✭BlueSkyDreams


    Home ownership in Ireland is still high and above the EU average.

    The pension timebomb for renters is a very real problem and it has been pointed out for years, but there seems to be no effort made to prepare for it by govt.

    I can only assume that private renters will seek social housing when they retire.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,085 ✭✭✭PokeHerKing


    The state should already be building retirement villages, infrastructure and amenities first and then gated communities for the houses.

    Im sure plenty would avail if they're built near golf courses and had community tennis courts/gyms etc.

    It would certainly give me a decision to make at retirement. Spain or Irish retirement village.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,464 ✭✭✭BlueSkyDreams


    Reports today that there is an increase in wealthy irish living in Spain and Portugal that are buying summer homes in ireland as its too hot where they live during the summer.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,085 ✭✭✭PokeHerKing


    Id be retiring to Galicia so heat wont be an issue. If it is then the world will be goosed and my retirement plans will be the least of my worries.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,704 ✭✭✭DataDude


    The only contradiction in this is recent history would suggest falling prices = falling home ownership rates

    2006 (peak boom/peak prices) - 75%

    2011 (market bottom) - 69%

    2022 - 66%

    In 5 years of rapidly decreasing prices the homeownership rate dropped 6ppt. In the subsequent 11 years it has only fallen 3ppt. Homeownership fell 4.4 times faster in the most affordable time imaginable than in the recent ‘boom’


    So for someone who truly cares about the homeownership rate, rooting for a housing crash would appear counterproductive.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,400 ✭✭✭Blut2


    They should absolutely, for multiple reasons. To reduce spending of tax payer euros on very expensive housing supports like HAP, to improve the quality of life for OAPs, and to help the housing market in general - imagine the amount of large houses that would free up if there was high quality, income:rent ratioed, housing communities for OAPs to move into it?

    Its something that will have to happen given the combination of demographics, lack of private pensions, and decreasing homeownership rates too. The maths are quite clear on it, and inescapable. So it would make sense to start planning for, and trialing in small numbers, sooner rather than later.

    But that sort of forward planning seems far beyond the capabilities of our governments in recent years. What will happen instead is nothing will happen until things reach a crisis point, and then wildly expensive to the tax payer temporary bandaid solutions will be used that don't solve the problem long term at all.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,400 ✭✭✭Blut2


    "High" is subjective (the figure used to be 80% very recently..), and the EU average is irrelevant, when it comes to government policy formation in the future.

    All that matters will be when renters outnumber homeowners as voters, which is something thats coming closer every year. When that happens housing policy will go from changing slowly to all at once.

    I completely expect extremely punitive taxes on my home as a homeowner to come in once this happens, in 15-20 years. Its just democracy. They'll likely be justified to pay for things like the public retirement communities discussed above.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,704 ✭✭✭DataDude


    Only thing is if recent trends continue. We’re (generously) still 50 years from owner occupied houses being less than 50% of homes.

    Also, one of the most high profile policies of the party which is BY FAR the most popular party amongst non-homeowners is to abolish the only (very meagre) tax we do have on property currently.



  • Registered Users, Subscribers, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,763 ✭✭✭hometruths


    Yep, this 100%. I've posted here on many times that all the data points to the key to solving the current problems is to redivert all the focus, tax breaks, subsidies, grants etc from helping FTBers and renters, and use those policies and funds to providing meaningful help to older existing property owners downsize - eg bridging finance, build age friendly apartments/houses, lifetime leases to name but a few.

    Basically identify what the all barriers are that are stopping the older generation who would like to downsize and throw money at the problem to remove the barriers. We could see an almost instantaneous improvement.

    It will never happen though because the people who would benefit most in the medium term - renters and FTBers - would go bananas in the short term at the idea that their handouts are being removed and given to rich old property owners. Politically it is a tough sell.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,970 ✭✭✭Villa05


    The state apparatus control what can be built where, service the sites, has the most undeveloped land in the EU, much of that land is utilised in sectors that require subsidisation to survive. Much of the property in our High density areas is underused or derelict.

    As displayed by other often subsidised sectors, we have access to a worldwide Labour Market. We have never had so much money yet capital to build is still costed in the high teens%

    Here is our current system, it would be extremely difficult to deliver less given the opportunities listed

    The housing crisis is a choice



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,970 ✭✭✭Villa05


    2006 is a statistical anomaly. Loosest lending the history of the world. Those that did not partake in the madness had to pay the highest price and continue to do so, hence the continued decline in home ownership rate



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,704 ✭✭✭DataDude


    Not really.

    1991 79%
    2002 77%
    2006 75%
    2011 69%
    2016 68%
    2022 66%

    So we have a clear very slowly meandering downward trend over 30+ years. There is one exception to that where the ownership rates dropped like a stone…when houses got really cheap.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,400 ✭✭✭Blut2


    77% in 2002 to 66% in 2022, and the fall only accelerating in recent years, would suggest 50 years is an extremely optimistic assessment to hit 49%.

    Especially when you consider the current state of the housing market, the projections of completions for the next 5 years, and our continuing out of control population growth (CSO figures released today showed in the 12 months to April 2025 we had another 125,300 immigrants arrive. 'It was the fourth successive 12-month period where more than 100,000 people immigrated to the State.').

    The youth home employment rate is the canary in the coal mine here -
    "The home ownership rate among those aged 25-39, once considered a prime homeowning age, has dwindled to just 7 per cent [in 2025]. This is less than a third of the rate recorded in 2011 (22 per cent)."

    Thats going to bleed upwards as older homeowners die off.

    Post edited by Blut2 on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 313 ✭✭SpoonyMcSpoon


    Don't worry, it also piqued my curiosity when you stated it and did the boring digging as well (though ChatGPT helped to short cut it - owner occupied is what it relates to which does not tell the whole picture of course)!



  • Registered Users, Subscribers, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,763 ✭✭✭hometruths


    And after digging are you still of the belief there is no way 2/3 of adults own their home?

    When I looked into it further I had more confidence of the stat rather than less. Certainly I didn't see anything to cast doubt on it.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,704 ✭✭✭DataDude


    But per my post a few above, it hasn’t accelerated. It’s slowed down due to the explosion in first time buyer numbers. Only down 3% in owner occupied homes in the last 11 years. The big drop was during the last housing downturn.
    Sure if there was another global financial crisis it could lead to another big drop off like 07-11 I guess.


    I’m less negative on the numbers. Big drop in net migration vs prior year. Hopefully a new trend.

    78k population growth. At current household size of 2.74, we need 28k houses to keep pace with that which we’ll exceed. Obsolesce supposedly trending down too per recent publication.

    Of course we’re told household size needs to drop but that’s slowing down too.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,946 ✭✭✭straight




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,085 ✭✭✭PokeHerKing




  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,970 ✭✭✭Villa05


    Is this an observation or a thesis?

    As you are well aware the property market has been dysfunctional for well over 3 decades.

    The damage from 07 to 11 was a direct result of inflationary housing policies during the previous 12 years that eventually bankrupted the country

    We have a government that claimed to be the parties of homeownership

    These figures not only prove they are not but also continously pursue policies that reduce home ownership and lead to large crashes that accelerate reductions in homeownership rates

    With regard to the data, do you know where the data is pulled from.

    The 2011 figure would coincide with peak negative equity. If the data is from the census do you declare your a homeowner if your underwater by upto 50%



Advertisement