Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

Irish Property Market chat II - *read mod note post #1 before posting*

1928929931933934944

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,526 ✭✭✭Blut2


    The overall home ownership rate drop is both shocking but also pretty interesting for what it will do to our politics as a country. As things stand rising house prices still benefit the majority (even if its quite theoretical for most owner occupiers, they seem to like the idea of it), which is why our government is so deliberately ineffective at preventing them.

    But once we reach a stage where home owners are the minority policy will change quite radically. A country that's majority renters will introduce some pretty punitive taxes on home ownership.

    The retirement situation is also going to get rather interesting (problematic) as a result. If large %s of people at retirement don't own their own property the financials of that just aren't going to work out, its not possible to pay rent on most pensions. The state will probably be forced to build public retirement communities.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,879 ✭✭✭BlueSkyDreams


    I think the headline figures are probably the average rental price of all property, with Limerick recording mostly larger properties and a small sample size as you say.

    Galway, Cork and Dublin are all more expensive than Limerick, according to the DAFT report, when you compare like for like property types. 1 bed flats, 2 bed homes and so on.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,879 ✭✭✭BlueSkyDreams


    Home ownership in Ireland is still high and above the EU average.

    The pension timebomb for renters is a very real problem and it has been pointed out for years, but there seems to be no effort made to prepare for it by govt.

    I can only assume that private renters will seek social housing when they retire.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,568 ✭✭✭PokeHerKing


    The state should already be building retirement villages, infrastructure and amenities first and then gated communities for the houses.

    Im sure plenty would avail if they're built near golf courses and had community tennis courts/gyms etc.

    It would certainly give me a decision to make at retirement. Spain or Irish retirement village.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,879 ✭✭✭BlueSkyDreams


    Reports today that there is an increase in wealthy irish living in Spain and Portugal that are buying summer homes in ireland as its too hot where they live during the summer.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,568 ✭✭✭PokeHerKing


    Id be retiring to Galicia so heat wont be an issue. If it is then the world will be goosed and my retirement plans will be the least of my worries.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,918 ✭✭✭DataDude


    The only contradiction in this is recent history would suggest falling prices = falling home ownership rates

    2006 (peak boom/peak prices) - 75%

    2011 (market bottom) - 69%

    2022 - 66%

    In 5 years of rapidly decreasing prices the homeownership rate dropped 6ppt. In the subsequent 11 years it has only fallen 3ppt. Homeownership fell 4.4 times faster in the most affordable time imaginable than in the recent ‘boom’


    So for someone who truly cares about the homeownership rate, rooting for a housing crash would appear counterproductive.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,526 ✭✭✭Blut2


    They should absolutely, for multiple reasons. To reduce spending of tax payer euros on very expensive housing supports like HAP, to improve the quality of life for OAPs, and to help the housing market in general - imagine the amount of large houses that would free up if there was high quality, income:rent ratioed, housing communities for OAPs to move into it?

    Its something that will have to happen given the combination of demographics, lack of private pensions, and decreasing homeownership rates too. The maths are quite clear on it, and inescapable. So it would make sense to start planning for, and trialing in small numbers, sooner rather than later.

    But that sort of forward planning seems far beyond the capabilities of our governments in recent years. What will happen instead is nothing will happen until things reach a crisis point, and then wildly expensive to the tax payer temporary bandaid solutions will be used that don't solve the problem long term at all.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,526 ✭✭✭Blut2


    "High" is subjective (the figure used to be 80% very recently..), and the EU average is irrelevant, when it comes to government policy formation in the future.

    All that matters will be when renters outnumber homeowners as voters, which is something thats coming closer every year. When that happens housing policy will go from changing slowly to all at once.

    I completely expect extremely punitive taxes on my home as a homeowner to come in once this happens, in 15-20 years. Its just democracy. They'll likely be justified to pay for things like the public retirement communities discussed above.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,918 ✭✭✭DataDude


    Only thing is if recent trends continue. We’re (generously) still 50 years from owner occupied houses being less than 50% of homes.

    Also, one of the most high profile policies of the party which is BY FAR the most popular party amongst non-homeowners is to abolish the only (very meagre) tax we do have on property currently.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Subscribers, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,803 ✭✭✭hometruths


    Yep, this 100%. I've posted here on many times that all the data points to the key to solving the current problems is to redivert all the focus, tax breaks, subsidies, grants etc from helping FTBers and renters, and use those policies and funds to providing meaningful help to older existing property owners downsize - eg bridging finance, build age friendly apartments/houses, lifetime leases to name but a few.

    Basically identify what the all barriers are that are stopping the older generation who would like to downsize and throw money at the problem to remove the barriers. We could see an almost instantaneous improvement.

    It will never happen though because the people who would benefit most in the medium term - renters and FTBers - would go bananas in the short term at the idea that their handouts are being removed and given to rich old property owners. Politically it is a tough sell.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,046 ✭✭✭Villa05


    The state apparatus control what can be built where, service the sites, has the most undeveloped land in the EU, much of that land is utilised in sectors that require subsidisation to survive. Much of the property in our High density areas is underused or derelict.

    As displayed by other often subsidised sectors, we have access to a worldwide Labour Market. We have never had so much money yet capital to build is still costed in the high teens%

    Here is our current system, it would be extremely difficult to deliver less given the opportunities listed

    The housing crisis is a choice



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,046 ✭✭✭Villa05


    2006 is a statistical anomaly. Loosest lending the history of the world. Those that did not partake in the madness had to pay the highest price and continue to do so, hence the continued decline in home ownership rate



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,918 ✭✭✭DataDude


    Not really.

    1991 79%
    2002 77%
    2006 75%
    2011 69%
    2016 68%
    2022 66%

    So we have a clear very slowly meandering downward trend over 30+ years. There is one exception to that where the ownership rates dropped like a stone…when houses got really cheap.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,526 ✭✭✭Blut2


    77% in 2002 to 66% in 2022, and the fall only accelerating in recent years, would suggest 50 years is an extremely optimistic assessment to hit 49%.

    Especially when you consider the current state of the housing market, the projections of completions for the next 5 years, and our continuing out of control population growth (CSO figures released today showed in the 12 months to April 2025 we had another 125,300 immigrants arrive. 'It was the fourth successive 12-month period where more than 100,000 people immigrated to the State.').

    The youth home employment rate is the canary in the coal mine here -
    "The home ownership rate among those aged 25-39, once considered a prime homeowning age, has dwindled to just 7 per cent [in 2025]. This is less than a third of the rate recorded in 2011 (22 per cent)."

    Thats going to bleed upwards as older homeowners die off.

    Post edited by Blut2 on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 358 ✭✭SpoonyMcSpoon


    Don't worry, it also piqued my curiosity when you stated it and did the boring digging as well (though ChatGPT helped to short cut it - owner occupied is what it relates to which does not tell the whole picture of course)!



  • Registered Users, Subscribers, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,803 ✭✭✭hometruths


    And after digging are you still of the belief there is no way 2/3 of adults own their home?

    When I looked into it further I had more confidence of the stat rather than less. Certainly I didn't see anything to cast doubt on it.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,918 ✭✭✭DataDude


    But per my post a few above, it hasn’t accelerated. It’s slowed down due to the explosion in first time buyer numbers. Only down 3% in owner occupied homes in the last 11 years. The big drop was during the last housing downturn.
    Sure if there was another global financial crisis it could lead to another big drop off like 07-11 I guess.


    I’m less negative on the numbers. Big drop in net migration vs prior year. Hopefully a new trend.

    78k population growth. At current household size of 2.74, we need 28k houses to keep pace with that which we’ll exceed. Obsolesce supposedly trending down too per recent publication.

    Of course we’re told household size needs to drop but that’s slowing down too.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 6,585 ✭✭✭straight




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,568 ✭✭✭PokeHerKing




  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,046 ✭✭✭Villa05


    Is this an observation or a thesis?

    As you are well aware the property market has been dysfunctional for well over 3 decades.

    The damage from 07 to 11 was a direct result of inflationary housing policies during the previous 12 years that eventually bankrupted the country

    We have a government that claimed to be the parties of homeownership

    These figures not only prove they are not but also continously pursue policies that reduce home ownership and lead to large crashes that accelerate reductions in homeownership rates

    With regard to the data, do you know where the data is pulled from.

    The 2011 figure would coincide with peak negative equity. If the data is from the census do you declare your a homeowner if your underwater by upto 50%



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,526 ✭✭✭Blut2


    It slowed down from 2011-2016 because housing was actually cheap here during the recovery, but from 2016-2022 it dropped by 2.5% in 6 years, and by all accounts has been dropping even faster since the housing crisis got even worse post-covid.

    The household size is dropping each year, and is also much smaller for immigrants (they've got a much higher percentage of single adults without children than the general population). So our 78k population growth would essentially eat every single house built in those 12 months. Its completely unsustainable for housing alone, nevermind other infrastructure or integration issues.

    As far as housing goes thats also nevermind the 10k-15k homes needed yearly for obsolesence. And nevermind the 200k odd deficit of homes we need to make some sort of reduction in to remedy the housing crisis.

    We need to be building in excess of 60k housing units a year (according to estimates from the CIF, Housing Commission and others) to account for all of this. Instead we're struggling to hit 30k a year, and will be for the forseeable future.

    Thats why the housing crisis is only getting worse, and why home ownership rates will continue, and accelerate, their fall. The data is very clear that we're building tens of thousands too few homes a year.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,918 ✭✭✭DataDude


    There has been lots of cases in this thread of people just unable to accept data that contradicts their view of the world. But this is getting to egregious levels.

    It is blatantly clear that owner occupier rates fell off a cliff when prices were dropping faster than almost any country in history. The fall slowed dramatically as soon as prices started rising. The ‘thesis’ behind this is obvious. We stopped building homes when prices were falling because there was no confidence in what they’d be worth when built. FTB numbers plummeted because banks wouldn’t lend on rapidly depreciating assets.


    Since the recovery in prices, FTBer numbers have exploded. From less than 10,000 in 2011 when prices were on the floor, to 32,000 over the last 12 months. Growing every year. Despite higher and higher prices.

    If you want to go with mass census fraud instead because the above conflicts with your world view, cool.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,085 ✭✭✭Rocket_GD


    Ignore statistics and figures, they don't matter, as some posters "know and see things" that don't align with the evidence so they cannot be true.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,879 ✭✭✭BlueSkyDreams


    The majority of new homes are to rent, rather than to buy. This must skew the home ownership stats.

    There must be a lot of renters happy and capable of buying, but there is literally nothing available for them to buy.

    Forced renters.



  • Registered Users, Subscribers, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,803 ✭✭✭hometruths


    The household size is dropping each year, and is also much smaller for immigrants (they've got a much higher percentage of single adults without children than the general population). 

    Where are you getting this from? Sounds a bit counterintuitive.

    Edit to add:

    Just googled it, and ESRI research suggests you're taking total nonsense.

    • Over half (56 per cent) of all migrants were living in private rented housing in 2016, compared to 13 per cent of Irish-born. 75 per cent of Polish migrants - one of the largest migrant groups in Ireland - lived in private rented accommodation.
    • 8 per cent of Irish-born individuals lived in overcrowded accommodation in 2016, a relatively low proportion when compared internationally. In contrast, almost 20 per cent of migrants in Ireland lived in overcrowded accommodation. Overcrowding rates were particularly high among some non-EEA migrants, including migrants from the Middle East and North Africa (MENA) (37 per cent), Sub-Saharan and Other Africa  (39 per cent), South Asia (41 per cent) and East Asia (37 per cent).

    Overcrowded accommodation doesn't scream smaller household size. These are 2016 figures and stands to reason that it hasn't got any better since, particularly when you consider the current higher proportion of immigration from the regions with particularly high overcrowding.

    https://www.esri.ie/news/migrants-face-greater-challenges-in-the-irish-housing-market-than-irish-born



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,351 ✭✭✭Ray Palmer


    High and mighty on personal insults here but they ignore yours to me that are still going on. Living rent free in your head it seems



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,085 ✭✭✭Rocket_GD


    Never once personally insulted you, please point out where I did?

    My point was backing up DataDudes post that "There has been lots of cases in this thread of people just unable to accept data that contradicts their view of the world."

    Multiple posters ignore the data, not just yourself.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,526 ✭✭✭Blut2


    "In September, arrivals included 621 ­single men, 169 single females, 66 couples and 375 families. In October, arrivals included 690 single men, 231 single females, 76 couples and 385 families. In November, arrivals included 593 single men, 192 single females, 120 couples and 472 families."

    https://www.independent.ie/irish-news/ireland-and-immigration-the-facts-how-many-men-women-and-children-where-are-they-coming-from-and-which-counties-are-housing-them/a1317067915.html

    Those are a few select months, but the figures are fairly consistent over the years.

    Single people, or non-child having couples, vastly outweigh family units arriving in the country. Both of those categories bring down the average household size from 2.74 once they have their own accomodation.

    And for non-EU student visas its not possible to bring a family with you - you're a single person, on a single visa - "non-EEA students coming to Ireland have no right to bring their family with them. Spouses, partners and children of non-EEA nationals can apply to enter and live in Ireland in their own right, but they cannot apply on the basis of their relationship to a non-EEA student. "

    https://www.citizensinformation.ie/en/moving-country/moving-to-ireland/studying-in-ireland/immigration-nonEEA-students/

    Your figures on overcrowding do nothing to suggest immigrants to Ireland live in larger household sizes, particularly given your own figures state 80% of them do not live in overcrowded housing.

    In general, the vast majority of people who live in above average (2.74+) household sizes in Ireland long term are family units with children.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Subscribers, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,803 ✭✭✭hometruths


    Interesting take. Mine would be slightly different.

    I would have thought it is highly unlikely that 621 single men coming here for whether it's claiming asylum or for economic reasons are suddenly renting one bed apartments living on their own.

    I'd also be a bit skeptical that students of any ilk, not just the non-EU, are driving down the household size by living alone.

    I would have thought both of the above demographics are exactly the most likely types of people to be found 2 or 3 to a bedroom in a four bed house.

    And whilst no doubt there is currently very high immigration, but even if every single non family immigrant did end up living alone, the volume is nothing near the sheer weight of numbers required to meaningfully drive down the average household size in a country with about 5.4m people and 2.2m houses.

    In general, the vast majority of people who live in above average (2.74+) household sizes in Ireland long term are family units with children.

    Totally agree with this. It's the main reason that we're not inevitably headed for avg household size of 2.0 anytime soon, despite what the Housing Commission tell you.



Advertisement
Advertisement