Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
If we do not hit our goal we will be forced to close the site.

Current status: https://keepboardsalive.com/

Annual subs are best for most impact. If you are still undecided on going Ad Free - you can also donate using the Paypal Donate option. All contribution helps. Thank you.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.

Immigration and Ireland - MEGATHREAD *Mod Note Added 02/09/25*

1332333335337338347

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,086 ✭✭✭PokeHerKing


    Nobody forced you to emigrate, take it up with your friends and family if none of them gave a crap when you left.

    The irish people dont owe you a collective "feeling".



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,389 ✭✭✭lmao10


    Japan is hardly a good example. It has korean and chinese minorities and its economy now quietly relies on foreign workers from places like Vietnam and the Philippines. It's got a shrinking population and labour shortages and some big problems ahead. Keep in mind Japan has been given 15+ billion dollars by the US since world war 2 and paid back something like 500 million. The US saw it as a critical ally to have considering the China/Russia alliance and cold war ahead. Plus they didn't want Japanese revenge coming their way years later. That money is primarily the reason Japan grew economically and otherwise. Nigeria is also a bad example since it's got about 200+ different ethnic groups with many having different languages even. It's not a united ethnostate whatsoever. You only have to open up wikipedia and read a bit about these things before posting.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,837 ✭✭✭✭Thelonious Monk


    japan was always isolated geographically and culturally anyway, it's not really something you can compare a european country to that is interwoven with many other countries for a long time. the millioins of migrants from africa and middle east every year will have some of them trickle through to ireland, people go where they see opportunity.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,170 ✭✭✭bilbot79




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,086 ✭✭✭PokeHerKing


    98% of Japan is ethically Japanese. Nigeria is close to 100% black.

    You should probably try read the post and not wikipedia.

    Similar to your Japanese rant. I could list a dozen reasons external to Ireland for our wealth. British territorial protection. English speaking. EU membership. US MNCs etc.

    I could then point to the explosion of immigration and state how theres dark days ahead because of it.

    One thing is guaranteed about Japan and the Japanese. Theyre rabidly pro Japanese and they will not suffer any sort of replacement in their own country.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,074 ✭✭✭InAtFullBack


    Hence why I asked that if it's okay that Nigeria was full of Black people and Japan full of Asian people! One of the biggest divisions though in Nigeria isn't along tribal lines - its along the lines of Islam and Christianity. Strange that, isn't it.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,074 ✭✭✭InAtFullBack


    Ireland is isolated geographically, to similar extents that Japan is, that is until sub-€100 flights came along.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 474 ✭✭redunited


    Having a land border to the UK dosent help either.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,074 ✭✭✭InAtFullBack


    Agreed, and that land border wouldn't be there only for unwanted mass-migration in the past. Something that should resonate deeply with every Irish person on this island as to how it has played out.

    You would think there would be 'lessons learned' to coin a popular phrase from our student union political class that rule here.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 639 ✭✭✭DrPsychia


    I asked a clear question which you avoid answering. What foreign ethnicities would you like to stop coming here? Sub-Saharan Africans? Middle Easterns? Indonesians? Koreans? Filipinos?Chinese? Nationalities from South America? What about white south Africans?

    You're deliberately polarising with a false premise. Who is pro mass uncontrolled migration? I gather that those people are in a small minority.

    It's posters like yourself that are pushing the narrative that 'progressives' or pro immigration people are somehow anti-irish or anti-white and what Irish heritage to be cleansed.

    Japan for example is regularly criticised for its hostility to immigrants and for how it treats foreign workers. Gulf states are majority expat in many cities yet are condemned for denying equal rights. The idea that only white-majority places face scrutiny is a lie.

    If an Irish man or woman living in Ireland procreates with a non-white person, say south Asian or east asian, south American or African, do you believe they are supporting an anti-white/irish 'agenda'? Or betraying their Irish heritage by race mixing?

    If your point is about policy, then talk policy. Controlled borders, clear asylum rules, fast processing, firm enforcement, investment in housing and services, language support, pathways to citizenship. The "Globalists want to replace us" is pure conspiracy nonsense. If you cannot do that without slipping back into racial prejudices then you have proven my point about veiled racist pseudo-intellectual babble.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 90 ✭✭Repro212


    I agree with your point that there are lots of factors that impact to some degree on sense of community - increasing car ownership being one of the earliest I remember, when more people began travelling from A to B inside their own bubble.

    However, those aspects pale in comparison to having more and more of those around you choosing not to speak the same language, adhering strictly to a belief system that flies in the face of our own hard won freedoms and values and dressing in a way that screams 'DON'T COME NEAR ME.'

    That kind of thing drives a coach and horses through community cohesion.

    Post edited by Repro212 on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,136 ✭✭✭Sunny Disposition


    I don’t like getting into arguments, tbh.
    I wouldn’t be for a blanket ban of any race or nationality. But generally I would like the numbers coming here to be far smaller than they have been in recent years.


    I don’t think that’s an unreasonable position and I think the vast majority of people would agree with it, although influential business groups and NGOs might not.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,169 ✭✭✭RoyalCelt


    Chilling analysis here on the effects refugees have on sexual assaults in the Netherlands. It should be everyone's responsibility to know the effects refugees from certain countries will have. We can't live in a world where only the good news stories are promoted by the national bodies.

    Each post has a translate feature but I'll post a few snippets.

    "Men from typical asylum countries commit sexual offenses 4 to 20 times more often than native men".

    "Statistics Netherlands (CBS) stopped publishing figures on sexual offenses by migration background in 2022 and made the old figures difficult to find on their website.These figures show that non-Western men (aged 12–45) are two to five times more likely to be suspected than native Dutch men."

    Apart from the fact it's disgraceful western EU nations try to hide these stats it should be noted that the problem doesn't just magically go away with second and 3rd generation citizens descended from these refugees. There's often a narrative peddled by left leaning commentators that once the refugee has children or grandchildren they become as native as the rest of us and there's nothing to worry about. The culture of a nation is formed over much more then 3 generations and it takes a lot more generations then that to change the culture of certain less compatible immigrants.

    "The nationality figures from tweet 1/ are obviously highly distorted, as many people acquire Dutch citizenship sooner or later, especially among the first and especially the second generation born in the Netherlands. Nevertheless, there is a huge overrepresentation."



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,169 ✭✭✭RoyalCelt


    To follow up on my point about taking more then 3 generations and culture we now live in an era particularly with Islamic immigrants/refugees where our culture is just as likely to be changed for them then their culture for ours.

    I was reading about how an Austrian court has ruled aspects of Sharia in relation to property claims will be considered legally binding. Another step in a very dark direction for Europe brought on by immigration from outside Europe.

    You couldn't make it up but as I read breaking news pops up how English councils are now removing English flags. Again an example of culture of the natives being changed.

    Our government are like a shadow of the Brits and usually only 1 step behind with this modern woke nonsense. Will they follow and start removing tricolours which have started popping up all over our nation?

    Screenshot_20250823-184434.png


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 19,132 ✭✭✭✭nullzero
    °°°°°


    Anyone claiming to be a liberal who doesn't have a huge problem with the introduction of Sharia law in any shape or form in Europe is an absolute basket case.

    All the progress made in the West in the last century will be thrown out the window if this gains traction.

    Women's rights, LGBT rights and all manner of aspects of living in a liberal democracy will be wiped out in a couple of decades.

    Who wants to live in a world where antiquated middle Eastern beliefs become the norm?

    Being a modern lefty means you'll scream the place down if someone says they're a Christian, somehow all Christians are seen as the same as the westboro baptist church, Jews are tarnished by Israeli policy in Palestine but Islam is beyond reproach for some reason. It's time to get real before this goes much further.

    Glazers Out!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,169 ✭✭✭RoyalCelt


    Ultimately it'll just end in a segregated and divided society. Pro Sharia people will congregate and those free of those ideologies will live elsewhere.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 19,132 ✭✭✭✭nullzero
    °°°°°


    In other countries where similar changes happened the results were a lot less peaceful. The problem with fundamentalists is they don't understand the notion of live and let live.

    Glazers Out!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 639 ✭✭✭DrPsychia



    Seriously lads, do you always take rage bait headlines at face value? It's embarrassing.

    What the Vienna court ACTUALLY decided is that the two businessmen had agreed in writing to use a private arbitral tribunal to settle a commercial disputed that would decide by making reference to Islamic law.

    The losing businessman later tried to overturn the award in the vienna court for civil matters because he didn't like the outcome. The court refused because the result of the award did not clash with Austrian fundamental values. A judge publicly reminded people that the 'ordre public clause' is the reason why they didn't overturn it. So if foreign rule or a non state rule would produce an outcome against Austria’s core values, an Austrian court will not apply or uphold it.

    In Austrian law, commercial claims are arbitrable whereas the likes of family law is excluded

    What would have contravened Austrian fundamental values would be outcomes that discriminate on grounds such as sex, deny due process, or undermine equality before the law. Austrian courts would have refused to recognise or enforce the award if it contravened any of those values.

    Sorry to let the facts get in the way of your poorly informed outrage lads. Not.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 19,132 ✭✭✭✭nullzero
    °°°°°


    Sharia courts are popping up in the UK as it happens. 85 and counting.

    Nice rebuttal. Not.

    Post edited by nullzero on

    Glazers Out!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 639 ✭✭✭DrPsychia


    You must be a daily GBnews reader, and it shows.

    You can't even accept the facts of a case when it's clearly explained to you. There's no debating the likes of you because you're outraged by anything that aligns with your personal beliefs.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,074 ✭✭✭InAtFullBack


    You're deliberately polarising with a false premise. Who is pro mass uncontrolled migration? I gather that those people are in a small minority.

    You'll find there are plenty of people who are pro mass uncontrolled migration. Some even post in this thread and often use throwaway tropes like far-right, racist and bigots to shut down opposing views.

    It's posters like yourself that are pushing the narrative that 'progressives' or pro immigration people are somehow anti-irish or anti-white and what Irish heritage to be cleansed.

    Again, in this discussion topic we have seen some say 'who cares' if Irish people become a minority on this island, so no - it's not me pushing any narrative when some on here are well capable of espousing those views all by themselves.

    Japan for example is regularly criticised for its hostility to immigrants and for how it treats foreign workers. Gulf states are majority expat in many cities yet are condemned for denying equal rights. The idea that only white-majority places face scrutiny is a lie.

    The only time I've ever seen media commentary about how countries treats foreign workers was in the run up to the Qatar World Cup Soccer Finals, hardly a peep before or since - and that commentary was usually along side criticism of Qatar's legal stance on LGBT issues, which was more awful than exploitation of workers in any commentary I recall reading.

    If an Irish man or woman living in Ireland procreates with a non-white person, say south Asian or east asian, south American or African, do you believe they are supporting an anti-white/irish 'agenda'? Or betraying their Irish heritage by race mixing?

    No, why would they? What a strange question to ask.

    If your point is about policy, then talk policy. Controlled borders, clear asylum rules, fast processing, firm enforcement, investment in housing and services, language support, pathways to citizenship.

    Plenty of discussion and good ideas put forward on all of the above throughout this thread. If you haven't read those and just joined in on this discussion thread 10,000+ posts in, I highly recommend you go back through some of the previous posts. While on this point, there are little or no solutions coming from the pro open/lax borders side.

    The "Globalists want to replace us" is pure conspiracy nonsense.

    Really, have you done your homework on this? Or do you just dismiss anything that goes against globalism without a second thought? Conspiracy nonsense it is not, here is an alarming study fresh out in the UK:

    End “disaster” of one million workless youngsters, says CSJ - The Centre for Social Justice

    Two key take-away points from the study:

    • Almost one million young people idle as UK payroll data reveals 315 per cent increase in employed non-EU migrants under 25.
    • One in eight 16 to 24 year olds are now not in education, employment or training. Economic inactivity among 16 to 24 year olds, excluding students, has risen by 23 per cent. In the last year alone, under 25s on payroll plummeted by 119,000.

    So - yes there is 'replacement' going on and its sickening to see. One million British young adults idle is a tinderbox waiting to ignite. This is the result of mass-immigration and those responsible for it need to now reverse course.

    If you cannot do that without slipping back into racial prejudices then you have proven my point about veiled racist pseudo-intellectual babble.

    Ah, was waiting for the usual tropes about racism. Call me a big bad racist all you like, it's lost all meaning - just another dog whistle to shut down any opposing views. Student union politics in action - no wonder the country is going down the gutter.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 639 ✭✭✭DrPsychia


    Almost one million young people idle as UK payroll data reveals 315 per cent increase in employed non-EU migrants under 25

    what takeaways do you have from this?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 19,132 ✭✭✭✭nullzero
    °°°°°


    I never made direct reference to the Austrian case. Maybe get your facts straight before you start slinging mud.

    Never been on the GB website in my life as it happens.

    You must enjoy making ridiculous generalisations.

    Glazers Out!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,106 ✭✭✭Jack Daw


    Is the Guardian an acceptable source for you:

    https://www.theguardian.com/law/2017/mar/01/inside-britains-sharia-councils-hardline-and-anti-women-or-a-dignified-way-to-divorce

    The phrase sharia court and sharia council refer to the same thing BTW in case you try to use those type of semantics to weasel your way out.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,350 ✭✭✭Elmer Blooker


    there wasn’t ‘plenty’ of hate and bigotry towards Poles when they arrived and you know it.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,169 ✭✭✭RoyalCelt




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 19,132 ✭✭✭✭nullzero
    °°°°°


    Glazers Out!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 892 ✭✭✭Joe 90


    If someone wants to live in Ireland and they're not happy with the Irish flag then the problem is theirs. Similarly, if someone wants to live in Zambia and doesn't like the Zambian flag the problem is theirs.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,074 ✭✭✭InAtFullBack


    image.png

    Uproar in England over one type of pedestrian crossing. The uproar is from the self-declared 'tolerant and inclusive' cohort. Similar to the cohort here who think flying the Irish tri-colour is offensive.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,645 ✭✭✭Mr. teddywinkles


    Meanwhile the rest of us slaved here and stayed on being payed shite money if we could find employment. What a load of toss to be honest from that poster



Advertisement