Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

Donald Trump the Megathread part II - Mod Warning updated in OP 12/2/26

1101310141016101810191842

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,533 ✭✭✭scottser


    He's going to declare a national emergency and not call an election. It's pretty obvious - sending ICE in to violently arrest US citizens and taxpayers without due process, sending Federal officers into blue states and overriding the Governor's authority, commandeering National Guardsmen etc. He's just provoking and inviting riots, and as soon as one happens he'll use it as an excuse to initiate emergency powers to remove any dissent and establish a police state. You can already hear Democrat supporters hardening their language and talking about war, overthrowing tyranny etc. The US is properly fucked and we need to drop it like a hot snot.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,533 ✭✭✭scottser


    Are they not from the same stock? 'Hillbillies' were descended from Ulster-Scots, who were anti-establishment and supporters of King Billy. Likewise, 'Rednecks' were named after the red scarves Ulster-Scots covenanters wore in support of the war against English rule. Both terms carry the obvious connotations of isolated contrariness, impervious to reason, logic and understanding.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 15,536 ✭✭✭✭Igotadose


    He doesn't call an election. This isn't Europe. The Constitution mandates the election.

    And then, the States run it.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,533 ✭✭✭scottser


    That's my point. The scope of presidential emergency powers are huge and easily used against US citizens. Have a quick gander at this:

    What the President Could Do If He Declares a State of Emergency | Brennan Center for Justice

    'Protests erupt. On Twitter, Trump calls the protesters traitors and suggests (in capital letters) that they could use a good beating. When counterprotesters oblige, Trump blames the original protesters for sparking the violent confrontations and deploys the Insurrection Act to federalize the National Guard in several states. Using the Presidential Alert system first tested in October 2018, the president sends a text message to every American’s cellphone, warning that there is “a risk of violence at polling stations” and that “troops will be deployed as necessary” to keep order. Some members of opposition groups are frightened into staying home on Election Day; other people simply can’t find accurate information online about voting. With turnout at a historical low, a president who was facing impeachment just months earlier handily wins reelection — and marks his victory by renewing the state of emergency.'



  • Moderators, Politics Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 17,416 Mod ✭✭✭✭Quin_Dub


    I think he absolutely does those things to influence the Election for sure..

    Armed Federal officers at every polling station "to ensure Election integrity" along with all kinds of fear mongering about interference and risk of Terrorist attacks etc. etc.

    We'll get a good feel for it next November as they'll use that to test out all their ideas



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 26,210 ✭✭✭✭Timberrrrrrrr


    The land of the "free"

    Wasn't Vance recently claiming the UK was suppressing free speech?

    "effective immediately, officers will now consider whether an applicant has 'endorsed, promoted, supported, or otherwise espoused' anti-American, terrorist or antisemitic views"



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,343 ✭✭✭✭aloyisious


    A Walter Mitty with a desire for the Nobel medal as he brought peace to warring nations across the globe.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,043 ✭✭✭ceadaoin.


    You mean they won't grant the privilege of moving to their country to people who are actively posting about how much they hate America and everything they stand for? The absolute bastards!

    Pretty sure most countries would have similar vetting in place.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,044 ✭✭✭RickBlaine


    It's just more shameless hypocrisy. They complain about anti-American views and yet every week Trump and his administration does or says things that are contrary to the American constitution. That is the definition of anti-American.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,658 ✭✭✭eightieschewbaccy


    Most countries don't screen migrants for being critical of a government... Care to point to some countries that do? (You're gonna find that they tend to be antidemocratic) The reality is if a government/administration is highly controversial, people are gonna be critical of it.

    Also you're gonna find that many people will have an issue with the fact that the president of the USA is a rapist and convicted criminal. Should highlighting that be grounds to block a visa? Or being critical of illegal actions by the administration? All of this is generally stuff that free societies should value.

    For the record, I view plenty of parts of the US to be good. I equally think Trump and how his administration behaves is abhorrent. That doesn't amount to hating the US... I equally have plenty of US relatives that entirely agree with my sentiments, do they also hate the US?



  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Politics Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 17,416 Mod ✭✭✭✭Quin_Dub


    They are looking for people being critical of Trump not "America".

    We're not talking about people posting about Jihad here , we're talking about people saying that Trump is a twat getting hauled over the coals by Immigration officials.

    If Boards.ie was on their list of accounts they ask to see most of the posters in this thread would get grief from them..

    And no , outside of Dictatorships other countries do not have "similar vetting" in place..



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 14,104 ✭✭✭✭kowloon


    What happens if a person has no social media accounts?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 26,210 ✭✭✭✭Timberrrrrrrr


    NNo

    I mean if youre visiting the US they will demand access to your phone, if you have been critical of Trump or posted anything negative about Israel you may be banned from.ebtering the US.

    Vance was accusing the UK of suppressing free speech last week, kinda hypocritical No?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 22,539 ✭✭✭✭Tony EH


    Pffft. More mindless shilling for a prick that wouldn't piss on you if you were on fire.

    The issue here is A. they're screening people's PRIVATE material and B. they're screening for remarks about Donald Trump

    None of that is a normal part of any democracy or immigration check.

    And I guarantee this, if it were the Democrats in power and they were doing this, you'd be singing a very different song.



  • Moderators, Politics Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 17,416 Mod ✭✭✭✭Quin_Dub


    They've actually said that a lack of Social Media accounts or indeed a lack of activity on those accounts is to be viewed as "suspicious"



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,043 ✭✭✭ceadaoin.


    Youre talking as if its a certainty that your phone will be screened when its actually extremely unlikely. I'm in the US now, just returned last week. No one demanded access to my phone or anyone else's either during the visa approval process or the immigration check on the way back. Its always been a possibility that they could ask for your phone, trump or no trump. Its never happened to me however in over 10 years of travelling back and forth now. They've been asking for social media accounts on the visa forms for many years now, it's not new.

    The hysteria around this from people who aren't in the US and have no intention of even going there is ridiculous.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 27,817 ✭✭✭✭pjohnson


    Christ thats slurping up some amount of Trump Aid to claim "most countries would have similar vetting in place"



  • Moderators, Politics Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 17,416 Mod ✭✭✭✭Quin_Dub


    You must be one of the lucky ones then because multiple colleagues of mine that have travelled for work to the US in the last couple of months have ALL had their phones checked and they specifically looked at Facebook , Instagram and LinkedIn (none of them had Twitter accounts).

    All have been travelling to the US for 20 years plus and these trips are the very first time this has happened.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 14,104 ✭✭✭✭kowloon


    I'm guessing they won't screen you at all unless you're looking for a work visa or something involving a longer stay. The workload would be too much if they had to spend 15 minutes examining every phone for even a basic cross-section of their posting history.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,043 ✭✭✭ceadaoin.


    I've never heard of it happening. Friends of ours returned the week before us and it didn't happen to them, nor any of the multiple sets of visitors we get every year. Work colleagues of my husband regularly come here from the UK and Australia, some are here this week and its never happened. Your colleagues must be very unlucky alright.



  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Sports Moderators, Paid Member Posts: 33,104 Mod ✭✭✭✭Podge_irl


    You were presumably on a visa waiver. This is aimed at actual visas.



  • Moderators, Sports Moderators, Paid Member Posts: 33,104 Mod ✭✭✭✭Podge_irl


    We need to keep this in the realm of realistic though. I was there 3 weeks ago and not a single person anywhere near me had anything on their phone checked. Like hundreds of people.

    They do this in the embassies when you apply for a visa. Not at border control for the vast vast majority.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,043 ✭✭✭ceadaoin.


    No, we have visas. They dont do it at the embassy either as stated above because your phone isn't allowed in.

    Also, I dont have any social media and its never been viewed as 'suspicious' as someone else claimed, as far as I know anyway. Nothing was ever said about it. Surely if it was then they would have checked my phone to make sure and that's never happened.



  • Moderators, Sports Moderators, Paid Member Posts: 33,104 Mod ✭✭✭✭Podge_irl


    By "at the embassies" i mean they review your social media without you there as part of the process. You have to provide social media handles for a visa. It is merely suggested for a visa waiver.

    The case of them literally taking your phone and looking through it seem rare and based on them taking you into interrogation for some other reason.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,658 ✭✭✭eightieschewbaccy


    Can you point to which countries restrict access the country based on being critical of a sitting administration? You've implied that being critical of Trump or the behavior of the administration is equivalent to hating the US. Honestly sounds like a pretty embarrassing state of affairs for a democracy.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,044 ✭✭✭RickBlaine


    Hundreds of people fly from Ireland to America every day. If American officials in Ireland were checking tourists' phones at the airport, and denying them entry for social media posts, it would be a much bigger news story here. People taking a trip to America for work purposes is different because that entails more thorough scrutiny.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,092 ✭✭✭✭castletownman


    Jesus lads, looking at the 2008 Reeling in the Years episode, and it ends with the absolute hope and optimism after Obama won the election. Jesse Jackson crying in the crowd. Goose-bumps.

    Say what you want about him, and partisan views will obviously obscure it among the usual suspects here, but at least Obama exuded the air of a president. And looking back, Dubya was a nice sort of fella as well at the back of it.

    Genuinely can't believe how bad it's become with that Orange Buffoon in charge.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 395 ✭✭Slava_Ukraine


    Even for an ESTA (VWP) you must fill in all social media details (completely optional if you want to disclose). I've never had an issue and have travelled at least 3 times a year for a while now - partly work partly vacation.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,044 ✭✭✭RickBlaine


    Of all the things Trump has done, I think the thing that future historians will be particularly scathing about is his numerous statements that Ukraine initiated the war with Russia. That goes beyond messing up his own country and instead slanders another country by accusing it of the very thing its invaders are doing. It is factually and morally wrong in every possible way. Imagine if Roosevelt had accused Poland of starting WW2! I expect Trump's name to be dragged through the mud for that alone in future history books, and hopefully his dimwitted MAGA goons won't be around any longer to ban them.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,746 ✭✭✭20silkcut


    he’s blaming Ukraine for fighting back. He thinks they should not have put up any resistance and just let the Russians in like they did in crimea in 2014. That’s what he means when he says this war would never have happened. Russia is 10 times the size of Ukraine that’s his understanding. Might is right. He would have forced Ukraine to accept the Russian occupation in 2022. Would have given away Kiev and odessa as well and probably just left a rump Ukraine in the far west. No or minimal sanctions against Russia. No weapons sent to aid Ukraine. It would have been business as usual by April 2022. No war. That’s what Trump would have done. Since Trump has started looking like coming to power since mid 2024 everything has been a slow creeping retreat for Ukraine . And a complete loss of the Kursk pocket immediately after his election. That’s what his influence on this war has been. A complete defeatist attitude towards any suggestion of Ukranian victory. Blames Biden for encouraging Ukraine. Biden not without fault either. His slow calibrated drip feeding of aid to Ukraine was ultimately a failed policy and should have foreseen what was coming down the tracks as regards Trump and given the Ukrainians a stronger hand before Trump arrived on the scene. He may stop the war and may get a Nobel peace prize but it will all be obliterated into irrelevance when Putin makes his next move westward into the baltics or makes smithereeens of whatever flimsy peace line ends up being agreed on in the coming weeks. That’s when history will bite Trump on the ass. Cause Russia does not want peace and will never want until they are back to their 1989 borders. Every geopolitical analyst going agrees on that point that getting to the Carpathian Mountains and the Baltic Sea is the ultimate motivation for starting this war

    Post edited by 20silkcut on


Advertisement
Advertisement