Northern Ireland 2125?

That is a changeable feast.

The name of the place you, I and @downcow etc were born is ‘Ireland.

It is why my heritage and culture is the same as yours and his. Things you don’t like, don’t subscribe to or even hate being a part of that heritage and culture as much as things you like, subscribe to, are.
We are, by virtue of birth’place’ the Irish people. No temporary law is going to change that.

Nobody including me has ever disputed this.

Your need for a strawman argument must be high.

You labour under the delusion that Unionists can decide to set up a 'homeland' or 'satellite to the motherland' .
Are you ever going to elaborate on how you plan to get democratic approval for that?

Noticeable in the articles on a UI in today's papers that the focus is on the Irish government (or is that 'The island of Ireland Government?) and it's failure to progress a constitutionally approved aspiration. I think this will continue to ramp up.

*The second article contains a possible explanation for FF's sudden distaste for Eastwood and the SDLP and that things in FF - re: a UI,- could dramatically change with a change of leader.

Apart of course from one of FF's likely next leaders and the current Minister for Justice, Jim O'Callaghan.

Mr O’Callaghan has outlined a detailed plan for how a united Ireland could function with proposals for a new constitution and a bicameral parliamentary system with one house in Dublin and another in Belfast.

A united Ireland would be part of the EU and the Eurozone and the South’s current 12.5pc corporation tax rate would be adopted. Unionists would get a certain number of cabinet positions, according to Mr O’Callaghan’s paper which was delivered to an online audience at his alma mater, Sidney Sussex College in Cambridge, on Tuesday.

Your view of his chances are immaterial here BTW.

You are basically saying citizenship of a state is not important????? 

@blanch152 was plumbing the depths to try and salvage something from his expertly debunked (kudos @Peregrinus) argument.

So he proposes to extent the current 12.5% corporation tax area, when all other countries resent Ireland having 12.5% corporation tax and are hoping to have it increased? That should p*** off the US, UK, EU all right. And a few unionists getting one or two odd token seats in a cabinet would not last very long or be very workable.

O'Callaghan is Minister for Migration and many people perceive the country being in such a mess due to migration - which has damaged the availability of housing, in hotel accommodation in places where hotels are full of migrants etc - that he would be better off cleaning up his mess on migration in the country rather than looking to take over part of the UK and all the problems it would bring.

You can argue all you want with him.

The point made was

No politicians outside of Sinn Fein ever give it a moment's thought.

That is demonstratively wrong, one of the possible next leader's of FF has given it considerable thought and is out promoting his thoughts on it. He has also said:

Mr O’Callaghan told the audience: “It is likely within the 2020s that a Secretary of State for Northern Ireland will call a referendum”.

He isn't the only one either. Those who sat around in parliamentary committee have advised the government to 'begin preparations'. The current FF leader choses to ignore that.

RE: "Historically, leading members of your beloved PUL community would have referred to themselves as Irish."

My comment is not a criticism of your post but is a very important distinction that needs to be made, because the following salient point is always overlooked and not understood when Irish people like to claim the foreign ethnic British Unionists (census) as Irish.

The foreign ethnic British Unionists (census) have at times referred to themselves as Irish, but only in the context of living in Ireland and being "British Irish" as in being one of the same thing - as in being British, and Ireland being "one of the four" as in one of the "Four British Nations" of the so-called "British Isles" It is a claim, a misappropriation (see above).

The foreign ethnic British Unionists (census) never considered themselves at one with us native Irish people - they never intermarried with us native Irish. When they referred to themselves as Irish, they were not associating themselves with the actual Irish people, but as stated, only in the context of living in Ireland and being "British Irish" as in being one of the same thing - as in being British, and Ireland being "one of the four" as in one of the "Four British Nations" of the so-called "British Isles".

The foreign ethnic British Unionists (census) in historical fact wanted nothing to do with us native Irish, or being Irish, except to steal our land and oppress and suppress us, and claim our country Ireland in another country's name.

My comment means nearly en masse and in general - there are few exceptions which I do not mention but can if needed.

But the name if the island is "Ireland" its not called "island of Ireland"

Show me one atlas where it says "island of Ireland"

Notice the name of the link below. Its "ireland" not "island of Ireland"

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ireland

It you're from Down you're from Ireland. Complete horseshit again saying a person from Down is not from Ireland like you stated a few posts ago.