Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

Northern Ireland 2125?

Options
16791112188

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 12,424 ✭✭✭✭downcow


    Few are really addressing the question as to whether there is a recognition in the Republic that, in the hypothetical situation that a border pool would be won, a simple unification where Belfast is the same as Dublin is simply ridiculous and fantasy land.  There is a middle ground, that is expanding further and further into both nationalist and unionist communities, who refer to themselves as northern Irish and love Northern Ireland.    This of course is a fairly comfortable position also for almost all of those who refer to themselves as British, but an extremely uncomfortable position for those who are in extreme Republican positions.   

    I fiercely oppose a fully (francie model)  united Ireland, and would do anything reasonable on my part to resist it, and if that resistance failed then I would have to move.  

    Probably the interesting fact for those in the Republic to consider is that, if I am really honest (and not being agitated by Republicans) I could consider a united Ireland that operates like the United Kingdom i.e. Northern Ireland as a distinct region/country/whatever within it.  I think we all as a people in Northern Ireland (except potentially the romantic dinosaur Republicans) could negotiate some very sensible identity compromises e.g. That all of us respect the Irish language in return for maintaining the monarchy.  Let Northern Ireland continue its deeprooted and respected contribution to NATO and the British forces - maybe in return Britain pays for NI pensions, win-win for everyone.  

    That’s just some thoughts of the top of my head for discussion rather than putting down without thought.  

    Any thoughts?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,889 ✭✭✭tinytobe


    The answer is very simple: The Republic of Ireland has a long history of refusing to propperly fund military. An air force with fighter jets doesn't exist, as a matter of fact the job is done by the RAF from Scotland ( NATO most notabley ) and out of several navy ships, only two are actively doing the job, the rest in in for repair.

    Fact is: The Republic of Ireland has no real defences. The Republic of Ireland refuses to believe that there could be some form of enemy in the first place. The world famous "who would ever attack Ireland?" is rampant especially in very republican circles.

    Also NI is part of NATO. Unionism, GFA or not, leaving NATO in return to a armed forces as currently in the Republic of Ireland is more than a joke. Being a catholic or not, I'd be very very much against leaving NATO.

    Als long as the RAF is doing the job, there is no real Irish neutrality, it's a joke.

    So either the Republic would have a military and at least an air force the likes of Switzerland, or if not join NATO.

    There are some reports however that the Republic of Ireland has some kind of interest to at least purchase fighter jets for the Irish Air Corps as well as a state of the art radar system. However it's unclear if that's ever going to happen.

    Except for Switzerland the sheer concept of neutrality is always a problem. One side sees it as a form of identity, the other side doesn't see it that way, sees it only an excuse for underfunding military and defence.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 81,371 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    There is a middle ground, that is expanding further and further into both nationalist and unionist communities, who refer to themselves as northern Irish and love Northern Ireland.    This of course is a fairly comfortable position also for almost all of those who refer to themselves as British, but an extremely uncomfortable position for those who are in extreme Republican positions.  

    What percentage of these people choosing to call themselves 'Irish', are looking for continued partition? Who is representing them politically?

    That all of us respect the Irish language in return for maintaining the monarchy.  Let Northern Ireland continue its deeprooted and respected contribution to NATO and the British forces - maybe in return Britain pays for NI pensions, win-win for everyone.  

    And seriously, nobody I know is interested in swapping like you suggest.

    You either respect the Irish language or you don't.

    Nobody would care if Mary from Clare or Gavin from Down didn't like the Irish language. If a majority want something, as they do in the Dáil and The Executive in NI, so be it.

    There will be no veto's for anyone, no special treatment, as it should be in a republic.

    What I envisage happening is that when a plan emerges here, in it will be a menu of what a UI will look like, and commitments to hold a series of referendums once we are a UI.

    The period in which these referendums are held will be the 'transition' period where the UK would presumably ensure that the referendums are legal and fair on behalf of Unionists.

    Like everywhere in Europe Irish people and those who identify as British would have the same rights as everyone and be protected by the new Constitution and the ECHR etc.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 81,371 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    as a matter of fact the job is done by the RAF from Scotland ( NATO most notabley ) and out of several navy ships, only two are actively doing the job, the rest in in for repair.

    This is slanted and factually wrong.

    The RAF request access to our air space to defend the UK, not us.

    We grant them that access.
    If the Russians attacked Galway we would need to request help to defend it. The UK or any other force would not be able to act until we give them permission to.

    Nobody but the British themselves has shown any interest in attacking Galway or anywhere else here.

    Yes, successive governments have underfunded the defence forces and that needs rectifying.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,996 ✭✭✭csirl


    The idea that the RAF is defending Ireland is a myth. The RAF acts in UK interests full stop.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,996 ✭✭✭csirl


    There is no sceario in which Irish taxpayers will be paying the pensions of UK public service pensioners in NI. Pensions are an accrued benefit that are paid by the former employer. Uk public service pensioners have a legal entitlement to receive pensions from the scheme they paid into all their working lives. UK public service pensioners in NI will be no different to the many existing UK public service pensioners who live elsewhere in Ireland or places like Spain etc.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,889 ✭✭✭tinytobe


    I don't see it that way.

    Of all the ships the Republic has only two are able to do their job, the rest in in for repair. Due to lack of funding nothing happens.

    Take a look at Spain. They really look after their waters and what's going on. If you're sailing towards Spain, you will with utter certainty meet the Spanish coast guard. In Ireland, you can basically come and go as you please, you don't even have to have luck.

    If the Russians are getting close to Irish airspace the RAF from Scotland will come. It's been "tested" by the Russians several times. Currently The ROI doesn't even have propper radar systems. The Pilatus planes are maybe a modern-day Spitfire with modern navigation. The ROI would at least need Swedish SAAB planes or Eurofighters-Typhoon at best. 8 to 10 planes the minimum.

    The problem isn't so much unionism or loyalism, it's about leaving the protection of NATO and a world class military to join something clearly inferior and underfunded with an attitude "Who would ever attack us?". I think that's something which would be utterly unacceptable for somebody currently in NI.

    The matter would be entirely different, if say, the Republc had an air force like Switzerland, and a coast guard like the Spanish.

    If this is supposed to work, neutrality or not, the ROI would have to invest massively in military and defence and refrain from that idiotic attitude "who would attack us?".



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,996 ✭✭✭csirl


    The GFA does not provide for this scenario so it wont happen. Unification means what it says. There will be one country where everyone has equal rights. The notion that you'd have an unequal society in one part of the country (maintaining monarchy) and an equal society elsewhere is a non runner.

    As for NATO - the GFA allows NI people to maintain their British identity, so there is no issue with them jloining UK Nato forces. But there will not be a scenario where those battalions of the Irish army based in NI will report to UK/Nato. How could such a strange scenario even work?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 81,371 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    I have no issue with properly funding our defence forces nor would most people here.

    Again, the RAF 'request' access to our airspace to defend themselves not us.
    The RAF or anyone else is not coming to defend us from an invasion without permission from us as a sovereign country.
    The question of NATO membership and spending the amount of our budget that NATO requires is one for all the citizens of here or for the citizens of a UI.
    If a majority want to join - so be it, as a democrat I have to accept that and whatever else majorities decided in a UI.
    I'd expect anyone else calling themselves democrats to do the same.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 12,424 ✭✭✭✭downcow


    so show me where in the gfa a devolved Northern Ireland is prohibited from existing following a ui vote.
    surely Ireland can govern itself as it wishes.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 81,371 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    The GFA does not provide for this scenario so it wont happen.

    The question of how does he plan to get the GFA shelved or changed has been asked, but as yet, no answer.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,585 ✭✭✭SupaCat95


    The NATO thing is very very real, they have a vested interest in Ireland. They want Northern Approaches cover for Submarine bases. So I am guessing that means Bases at Lough Foyle/Swilly and use of facilities in Limerick and Cork. Their reasoning is vested interests in oil rigs, deep sea cabling and anti-submarine warfare. That will be slipped into hand over agreement conditions. Military spending will double from 1% to at least 2%, no joy for PDF members they are still going to be on hard tac.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,889 ✭✭✭tinytobe


    I see NATO membership very much like EU membership. Why go it alone, why not tap into the skills and capabilities together with others? NATO membership also doesn't mean that Ireland would be dragged into every conflict. EU is economic and NATO is military. Interestingly there are also military agreements with EU membership which would put any form of neutrality into the debate as well.

    True neutrality for Ireland wouldn't only mean having a strong air force and strong naval and coast guarding capabilites, but would also require a certain amount of own and home grown military and defence companies. Switzerland does have that without a doubt. Oerlikon or Pilatus and the likes. Austria has Steyr arms and the Steyr AUG is apparently also used in Ireland? Ireland has no such industry. I believe in the North there are a good few defence companies in Belfast.

    What I am saying is that even in the event of contunied Irish neutrality, Ireland wouldn't only have to invest in military and defence, Ireland would have to offer something as well in terms of defence industry and if push came to shove be able to offer something in return to receiving.

    With Bablock International, Qinetiq, Serco, BAE Systems and Rolls Royce the UK has something to offer to the military and defence community, something the likes of Donald Trump does accept and takes serious as he knows the US depends on that. At the moment NI is tapping into that as well.

    Ireland, albeit small, would have to have something as well and build something up as well, - that's what I am saying.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 81,371 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    With the greatest respect in the world, all that is for you to convince the majority on.
    I am happy to be militarily neutral. No argument put forward so far convinces me that needs changing.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,889 ✭✭✭tinytobe


    You'd have to convince the voter in NI on that as well……

    Also why unite something so desperately if opinions would stay split?

    A good co-existence between NI and the ROI with a transparent border is also a good solution.

    I am not per se against Irish unification, however I am aware of the cost and the attitude towards military and defence in the ROI.

    Dublin would have to foot the bill for unification and Dublin will have to spend way more on milary and defence. Otherwise NI would be joining something inferior and that'll be a tough sell to the voter in NI.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 81,371 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    You'd have to convince the voter in NI on that as well……

    No problem. I look forward to the challenge.

    Opinions in NI are already split, on NATO membership and other things.

    It's a peculiar approach to democracy you have - because a majority in NI favour NATO membership, that's fine but if a majority in a UI decide not to join it, that should be ignored to appease a minority.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,585 ✭✭✭SupaCat95


    Those are Lala land economics. Those are massive pensions. How many people in Northern Ireland are in the UK Public service (NHS, civil service)? there must be 50,000 (UK outsources much of its public service to NI to save money). How are we going to absorb them into the Irish civils service? The PSNI will quietly resume duties as Irish Police Service. London is not footing the bill for Northern Ireland. The only thing "Special" about Northern Ireland is its Northern Approaches. Is the nearest submarine base Scarpa Flow? There isnt a lot of meat on the bone so to speak for the Republic. There has been brain drain on Northern Ireland for well over 100 years. Constant declining industry and the conflict being the main culprits. Also with new Government any agreements you had with London will be gone like water charges and these massive investments with low returns.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,889 ✭✭✭tinytobe


    If say the ROI hat a decent military with an attitude like Switzerland it's certainly worth considering neutrality. However with the current attitude in Dublin that's a clear no go, and not only for me. Nobody in the North wants to fall back to something inferior with the attitude "this is how WE do it on our small island with small minds". Currently NATO membership is very very valuable as the ROI offers no decent alternative.

    The North has been in industrial decline way before the Troubles. The Troubles only strengthened a brain drain which would have happened anyway, but only slower. The North would have to build up new industries. Banking seems stronger in the North, as they fully tap into the British banking system.

    Back in 1916 the area what is now the ROI was totally poor farmland. Now you have pharmaceutial and US IT mulitinationals as strong economic sectors. The ROI also plays a top role in international aircraft leasing.

    If Ireland was united a clear economic strategy would have to be followed for the North.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 81,371 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    If say the ROI hat a decent military with an attitude like Switzerland it's certainly worth considering neutrality. However with the current attitude in Dublin that's a clear no go, and not only for me.

    So what have the electorate said about this? Far as I can see, they re-elected the government implementing the current policy.

    Who is it a 'no-go' with?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,889 ✭✭✭tinytobe


    As far as I know currently there is no majority for a referendum in the North, not even a majority of Irish unification. Even though catholics are in the majority.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 81,371 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    What has that to do with with the question I asked?

    Nobody in the north has a say on our neutrality. Neither have they a say in the north, as it happens, that is decided in Westminster regardless of feelings in the north. Same as what happened with the sea border.





  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,585 ✭✭✭SupaCat95


    Yep its like I am telling them, with United Ireland all those things like tax breaks, free water and the NHS are all swept by the wayside. Anything that Martin McGuinness and Ian Paisley got from London are gone in one fell swoop. Imagine the inconvenience of having to pay taxes.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 81,371 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    Disagree.
    I think both governments, the EU etc will want a UI to succeed. It's in nobodies interest that it fails.

    Transition periods to alleviate the pressure points on a new arrangement are all good sense moves. And I think that's what will happen. Public Service dependency will be wound down, tax breaks to attract FDI and investment etc



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 690 ✭✭✭michael-henry-mcivor


    No we have them- they have been caught and realise they no longer have brit army / UDR / RIR protection-

    Our peace-process works for us-



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,585 ✭✭✭SupaCat95


    I didnt say it wont succeed but it is going to come with a very heavy price tag for the UI tax payer. Oh it will happen but it will not be the Utopia that will be promised.

    What big investments worked out in Northern Ireland that werent government backed? H&F? DMC? Business is not suited to Northern Ireland beyond call centers.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 690 ✭✭✭michael-henry-mcivor


    Then there would be another vote for a United Ireland 7 years after a failed referendum- and so on till we get our result-

    ( not that it actually matters has we have already removed the brit laws that used to own the six-)-

    West Belfast rocked last night- we are having the time of our lives-



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 690 ✭✭✭michael-henry-mcivor


    A asshole here saying the foreign invader English was a good thing-



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 12,424 ✭✭✭✭downcow


    although the protection by the Irish state will continue - for militant Republicans only of course

    cbad75d8-3683-47df-94c7-c5feb11962ad.jpeg


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 690 ✭✭✭michael-henry-mcivor


    The UFF handed their weapons over to the police when they decommissioned-

    They might have a few shorts / shotguns left but the Irish army / Garda would walk over them in a day-



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,585 ✭✭✭SupaCat95


    The Peace process only works for you because you are on the financial teat from London. Any time there is trouble, fresh round of investments from London and its back to being on the pigs back again. You are going to wake up one March morning, the fire will have gone out, the coffee will be cold and the bacon gone. There will be a terrible realisation that you have little or no private industry.



Advertisement
Advertisement