Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
If we do not hit our goal we will be forced to close the site.

Current status: https://keepboardsalive.com/

Annual subs are best for most impact. If you are still undecided on going Ad Free - you can also donate using the Paypal Donate option. All contribution helps. Thank you.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

Israel/Palestine Thread

1162916301632163416351873

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,797 ✭✭✭Frank Grimes


    What is it with your constant childish replies? You have demonstrated you don't understand how it is determined whether genocide has taken place or not.

    Did you even read the article you are linking to?

    As these widespread, horrendous acts appear to have been carried out with an “intent to destroy, in whole or in part” a national group – Israelis – a goal explicitly declared by Hamas, they most probably constitute an international crime of genocide, proscribed by the Genocide Convention and the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court.

    They're qualifying the statement because the burden of proof is very high when it comes to determining whether genocide has taken place or not, probably something else you don't know.

    Also from the article

    Crimes Against Humanity

    Crimes against humanity refers to acts conducted as part of a “widespread or systematic attack directed against a civilian population”. The acts that may constitute crimes against humanity include, among others, enforced disappearances, torture, sexual violence and persecution. The abduction of people without provision of information regarding their whereabouts constitutes the crime of enforced disappearances. Furthermore, available information indicates that many abductees were tortured by their captors.  These acts were multiply committed by Hamas towards the hostages in execution of its policy to attack civilians, and thus constitute crimes against humanity, for which perpetrators must bear full accountability

    I assume you are going to tell us none of that applies to Israel?

    I know you won't address anything honestly, but go ahead with another childish reply and accuse me of supporting Hamas or whatever.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 33,195 ✭✭✭✭blanch152


    Why is it infuriating to listen to the "Hamas should surrender, release the hostages and it all ends" brigade?

    Hamas are committing war crimes holding onto the hostages. Nobody should ever want that to continue. Even the Arabs are calling for the hostages to be released.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 857 ✭✭✭sheepysheep


    I didn't generalise about a population of 5.5 million people based on twitter posts.

    I pointed out that twitter, and other social media including Facebook, are the great research hubs of our time, and that they have access to vast data mining capabilities analysing the greatest treasure trove of personal data in human history.

    A 'regular person' can't, obviously, match that kind of data processing capability .

    However, what I did do was point out that if you actually bother researching these, and other platforms, any normal person can readily spot trends, especially in a country as small as Ireland.

    Sixty minutes on Mick Wallace's twitter feed would tell you all you ever need to know about him, his personality, and where he stands, and will stand, on issues, past, present and future.

    I pointed out that there are multiple 'irish Personalities' online who tailor their content - rabidly antisemitic content -, to a willing consumer. There is a reason for this. Money for the 'Influence', 'The Product' for consumption by the follower. The market though, has to be there, and the market for this kind of toxic, virulant, rasist and antisemitism rethoric is growing by the day.

    I can also point out that any such amateur research will be matched by all the data coming from the big players. Maybe you're not aware of the phenomonen of 'Online Radicalisation' but I certianly am. Is is one of the reasons that such pressure is being brought to bear to curb the power of these big Social Media companies.

    If you had the intellectual curiosity to persue some of this freely available information and engage with the 'cesspool' of twitter you would be aware of what is actually going on in both the online are real world.

    When you match that kind of research with current voter patterns you can see very definite trends emerging not just in Ireland, but right across Europe.

    It is of absolutely no surprise to me the emergence of antisemitism in Ireland, it was entirely predictable based on recent trends.

    What is bizarre, is that Miniegg can produced a survey that claims that 20% of Irish Adults indulge in antisemite tropes, and no one on this thread bats an eyelid. I would make a case that it is much higher, btw, much higher.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,068 ✭✭✭✭markodaly


    I am not against your proposal per se, I just think it's pure fantasy for a few reasons.

    First of all, the US and Russians will never allow it, given that their allies in the region (Israel and Iran) don't want more international forces. Israel has always argued against UN troops in the WB and Gaza, so why do you think this will happen with a Trump White House?

    Secondly, UN Troops are not a security backstop. You misunderstand what the mandate of UN Peacekeepers are. They are not defence forces or security forces in that sense. You want proof? I present you with Rwanda in 95 and the Balkans. UN peacekeepers on the ground, but they didnt do anything to prevent Genocide or Ethnic Cleansing. The latter war, it took NATO to use its air power as ordered by Bill Clinton to stop the march of Serbian forces in Bosnia.

    But even if the above happens, in some miracle and Trump and Putin allow it, it would take years to get all the pieces into place. Essentially, you are saying that the hostages have to stay put in Gaza until all the i's are dotted and t's are crossed, just in case…

    And then what? As soon as the hostages are released, Israel could enact their 'masterplan' and go on their your own predicted killing rampage… The UN won't stop them, because they cant, so who would stop them? Who would be the security backstop in Gaza to prevent the IDF from having its way?
    NATO? The Russians? Some Arab League? The EU? Ireland??

    One needs to live in the real world, and live in the world of Realpolitic.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,728 ✭✭✭SafeSurfer


    I’ll deal with your last point first.

    Israel’s surprise attack on Iran was supposed to ensure Iran could not develop a nuclear weapon. It then attempted to initiate regime change.
    Neither of these have been achieved.

    It would be really helpful if you could include the links you provide in a format that that be clicked on in post rather than being copy and pasted and searched for. It just takes a couple of seconds.

    16 IDF soldiers were killed in Gaza in July. Over 200 wounded. Hamas has not been militarily defeated.

    Mao controlled less than 1% of China following the long march. The communists were not militarily defeated.

    As I have said. Israel has not ended Hamas control in Gaza. Despite a 20 month bombing campaign, starvation, AI killer drones, arming criminal gangs etc. Hamas remain ensconced in Gaza.

    Hamas retains hostages despite massive rewards available to starving people to betray their captors.

    It may be inconceivable for you to acknowledge this Israeli defeat but it is a defeat nonetheless. If Israel had succeeded in their war aims and this resulted in former allies recognising a Palestinian state that would be one thing. But Israel now have the worst of both worlds. Failure to achieve their war aims AND their allies recognising Palestinian statehood and status as an international pariah.

    Multo autem ad rem magis pertinet quallis tibi vide aris quam allis



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,910 ✭✭✭brickster69


    Bulgaria, Hungary, Czechia against, Germany and Italy need more time to figure out that a genocide and forced starvation of 2 million people is real or not.

    “Wars begin when you want them to, but they don’t end when you ask them to.”- Niccolò Machiavelli



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,797 ✭✭✭Frank Grimes


    I didn't generalise about a population of 5.5 million people based on twitter posts.

    You did, you claimed Ireland is one of the most anti-Semitic countries in the world based on Tweets and replies you've read. I couldn't be bothered responding to anything else in this post, you clearly aren't posting in good faith so it's a waste of time.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,805 ✭✭✭✭Supercell


    The one thing i really struggle to understand in all of this is why Israel chose genocide instead of annexation and weeding out Hamas and driving it out of society there over time. The current approach is just breeding new Hamas fighters for the future when it eventually ends which it must , rinse and repeat in 20 years time.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 857 ✭✭✭sheepysheep


    There is a case that it was, as this statement from some law experts asserts.

    https://archive.ph/2023.10.19-000330/https://docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAIpQLSd4lrsDRg3HbJqoAf0BlAe7BHJuzpQB_Le27Iureq9vpCoBkw/viewform

    I can equally saw that what is happening in Gaza is not, because it doesn't meet the legal definition.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,702 ✭✭✭✭Strazdas


    What happens to the 2m people in Gaza after the surrender and the release of the hostages? The people saying the 'release the hostages' slogan are clearly not bothered about their future - a large concentration camp, ethnic cleansing of the entire population or whatever (but are distressed about the 25 remaining hostages, nearly all of of whom are young men who were serving members of the IDF when captured).



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,068 ✭✭✭✭markodaly


    On the contrary - you're suggesting that civilian deaths from bombings in WWII is the same as the IDF killing two little girls. They are not the same.

    In one sense you are right. Millions upon millions more civilians died in WWII. Approx 55 million by some accounts. Gaza is a teddy bears picnic compared to WWII.


    Presumably you also believe the Nazis were a superior fighting force given their efficient extermination of 6 million civilian Jews plus millions more of what they called "undesirables".

    Again, conflating things. The Wermacht were indeed a force to be reckoned with, especially in the early stages of the war, but they were ground down by Russian blood, and American money and ultimately defeated, so they were no actually superior, if we are talking about military terms. You seem to conflate the killing of civilians with military strength. though as if there is a direct correlation.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,359 ✭✭✭Miniegg


    You may think that sounds insightful Blanche, or even profound.

    But tbh, a poster who has been unable to denounce one specific crime or action by a country who has been butchering tens of thousands of men, women and children before your very eyes for two years and is now starving them - trying to insinuate terror support against a poster who has multiple times denounced specific crimes of Hamas and terror, and has tried to advocate for the safety of civilians (who you characterize as boorish savages), may not have the desired effect you think it will.

    It is incredibly transparent you are trying to mis characterize and discredit what is, I think, a reasonable viewpoint - given we are talking about a regime run by wanted war criminals carrying out genocide - albeit one I hope I am wrong in holding. I'm sure the majority of people here disagree with me and that is fine. But it is a fear I can't shake, and I've given a rationale for it.

    The thing I don't understand is - why do you mischaracterise?

    Why not address the points, why not answer the difficult questions if you are so sure you are right?

    I try my best not to dodge a single question.

    What have you got to hide?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 4,907 ✭✭✭dmcdona


    The ICJ would beg to differ with you - tey found the case of Genocide perpetrated by Israel as plausible"

    But sure, if you think you have a superior legal mind to the ICJ panel, work away.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 55,701 ✭✭✭✭tayto lover


    Both have lost. Hamas will lose power and be banished for it and Israel will be ostracised. Their genocide has been called out from every angle and Israel is now considered a Pariah state.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 55,701 ✭✭✭✭tayto lover


    To many a refusal to condemn is to accept or justify.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 857 ✭✭✭sheepysheep


    The 'Hamas should surrender, release the hostages, and it all ends' brigade, would be opinion of every Arab nation and Western power working to bring this war to and end.

    You just ignore that.

    As you also ignore that numerous plans have been proposed for a post conflict Gaza by those very powers. The French - Saudi initative has been posted twice by me an another poster and is completly ignored by you.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 33,195 ✭✭✭✭blanch152


    Haven't you listened to Macron and Starmer? There will be a two-state solution.

    Now, I know the Palestinians are only relatively recent converts to a two-state solution, and Hamas have yet to get there, but a Palestinian state is now within reach once Hamas surrender and release the hostages.

    Carney is another one

    https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/ceqyx35d9x2o

    "Carney said the move depended on democratic reforms, including the Palestinian Authority holding elections next year without Hamas."

    Listen to what's happening out there, the major powers are offering ordinary Palestinians a path to safety and security. All that has to be done is for Hamas to surrender and release the hostages.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 4,907 ✭✭✭dmcdona


    You believe the IDF are a superior fighting force regardless of who they kill and how they do it - executing two little girls, the 15 medics, executing civilians trying to get food.

    They are murderers, cowards, liars and war criminals.

    That you are in awe of them for killing children as well as characterising the Genocide of Gaza as a "teddy bear's picnic" is abhorrent but true to form in your posting style.

    They wouldn't be everyone's poster boys but I guess you're just different.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 55,701 ✭✭✭✭tayto lover


    That was a hard watch. Terrible what has been done to these people. Anyone backing that is sick.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 33,195 ✭✭✭✭blanch152


    Let us be clear about one difference between my posts and yours.

    I have never called for any party in this conflict to commit war crimes, nor have I supported any war crimes.

    You have supported the committing of war crimes by Hamas.

    I won't take lectures on morality in that context.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 527 ✭✭✭freebritney


    There is one small but very important stumbling block to the two state solution, Israel. Mileikowski and the entire Likud party have explicitly stated they will never allow a two state solution. This combined with 3 out of 4 Israeli's opposed to a state for Palestine means it's nothing more than a talking point or distraction tool for the likes of yourself.

    https://www.wsj.com/world/middle-east/gen-z-palestinians-israel-relationship-c627cea1?utm_source=chatgpt.com



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,359 ✭✭✭Miniegg


    In fairness don't want to get to go this again, but you would have to see how this compares to our islamophobia (which I'd argue is much higher than 20%), our % of people against Indians coming in, Ukrainians etc.

    Nobody is arguing a good part of our population aren't ignorant (I love Ireland but come on) - you argued we are justifiably the most antisemetic country in the world, that is patently untrue. We are well into the top half of the EU for low rates of antisemetism.

    When looking at twitter, look at it as a metric of not how people really think, but how nefarious forces want to influence us to think like. It's full of bots and cant be believed.

    Even so, you are seeing I would imagine a huge uptick in anger towards Israel. This is because most people, unlike you, see them as carrying out genocide on people who, rightly or wrongly, Irish people identify with.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 33,195 ✭✭✭✭blanch152


    When did "plausible" become "guilty beyond a reasonable doubt".

    The gardai once called to my door to ask me about my whereabouts for a particular crime. Why? Because it was plausible that I was involved because I had the same make, model and year of car as one captured on CCTV and also of the type owned by the main suspect. Two and a half minutes later, it was no longer plausible that I had been involved, and I never heard about it again.

    It is a long, long way from plausible to proven beyond a reasonable doubt.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 857 ✭✭✭sheepysheep


    I said that Ireland has a well deserved repudation as one of the most antisemitic countries in the world and that evidence for that could be seen on Twitter.

    I never said that I drew this conclusion from Twitter alone, which is where you are lying.

    I did also point out that Twitter based research is as valid as any other data source, but you for some reason object to that, even thought, as I point out, social media data is the driver for huge swathes of research these days.

    You're only husterical arguement in repsonse was 'Twitter is a cesspool.' Not very scientific at all.

    At least you're conceeding you've lost the arguement.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 33,195 ✭✭✭✭blanch152


    It is only since October 7, 2023 that the Knesset has passed a motion opposing a two-state solution. I would see that as understandable kneejerk reaction to the events of October 7th rather than evidence of a longer-term change.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,797 ✭✭✭Frank Grimes


    Look you're just twisting words at this stage and blatantly lying, I couldn't be bothered engaging with you and your nonsense any further.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,359 ✭✭✭Miniegg


    I have not. I fully denounce the taking of hostages. Hamas should have been shot before they took them, and a warcrime prevented.

    My fear is releasing them now, given Israel's mass murder and the genocidal threats of the war criminals leading her government, will result in a far graver warcrimes.

    But it's easy for you to discount all this when you couldn't give a fiddlers about the people they are currently starving.

    And the difference between our posts is, I have denounced brutality all sides.

    You have only denounced one, which is astonishing given all you have seen.

    Why?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 857 ✭✭✭sheepysheep


    I'm only offering my opinion. I'm content to wait and see the verdict.

    Do you agree that both sides can equally make an arguement for and against, for both Oct7th and Gaza?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 527 ✭✭✭freebritney


    Likud stated in 1999 that it would never accept a two state solution and Mileikowsky campaigned on the pledge in 2015.

    The two state solution is like the magician's assistant, it's providing a distraction to the world while Israel occupies, terrorises and subjegates the Palestinian people.

    Israel understands that to exist in 100 years they have to eradicate or remove the Palestinian people, history has shown them this is the only way for a colonisation to be successful, they don't want to be another Rhodesia.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,862 ✭✭✭circadian


    A single article, and a quick google of the top listed authors show many of them being linked to Israeli Universities or Media. One that stood out was Kai Ambos who also wrote this damning report of the Israeli behaviour in Gaza

    Anyway, back to the point at hand. You use a single article, to claim that October 7th was a genocidal action, even though that article doesn't explicitly state that and on the other hand completely ignore the multiple reports by human rights agencies, experts and an ICJ investigation that Israel is not conducting a genocide.

    Welcome to my block list, you are not posting in good faith.



Advertisement