Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
If we do not hit our goal we will be forced to close the site.

Current status: https://keepboardsalive.com/

Annual subs are best for most impact. If you are still undecided on going Ad Free - you can also donate using the Paypal Donate option. All contribution helps. Thank you.

Nurse suspended for objecting to a male doctor in changing room

124

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 42,586 ✭✭✭✭Boggles


    Do you think it is just a complete coincidence she is a hate mongering racist transphobe?

    Gee, what are the chances?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,187 ✭✭✭✭volchitsa


    Hmm. I see you and Andrew Renko are no believers in the old “Innocent until proven guilty” principle. Do you jump to conclusions of guilt about anyone who appears in court, or only women who claim to be victims of a crime? “She was asking for it” - right? We’ve seen that attitude often enough before.

    In this instance, Sandie Peggie has been shown to be the victim of evidence fabricated against her, and yet you’re so eager to blame the victim that you take as gospel allegations that are unevidenced, as well as a few off colour jokes made in a private WhatsApp chat group by a bunch of medical staff. God forbid you ever come across a private chat group of student doctors!

    But here’s the real point: Sandie Peggie could have goose stepped up to the witness stand and asked to take her oath on a copy of Mein Kampf, and she would STILL be entitled to have a single sex changing room at her place of work.

    It doesn’t matter what her opinions are, and the only reason you’re talking about them at all is because you are participating in the character assassination of a woman with a 30-year unblemished record.

    Maybe she was a nasty homophobic bitch all those years (although her lesbian daughter, still living at home, says otherwise but clearly you think you know better - TBF her daughter is only a woman too, mind) but it’s odd that the woman who said this went on holiday with her for SEVEN years before suddenly finding her unbearable. Just when evidence began to be fabricated against her too - now that really is a coincidence.

    But you keep on being you, and blaming the victim in this. Given your own eagerness to judge, should we judge you by that? I think it’s telling anyway.

    "If a woman cannot stand in a public space and say, without fear of consequences, that men cannot be women, then women have no rights at all." Helen Joyce



  • Moderators, Sports Moderators, Paid Member Posts: 30,390 Mod ✭✭✭✭Podge_irl


    This is like people trudging through George Floyd's criminal history to make excuses…

    If Sandie Peggie is brought before a tribunal and it is adjudged that she should be fired based on them then fine. It is wildly irrelevant to the point at hand. Upton is lucky they aren't facing termination for keeping a diary of all the times women refused to change in front of them, cause that's weird as hell.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,778 ✭✭✭Hamsterchops


    Tribunal due to restart in September, summing up by both sides etc …

    So I'm told

    also, let's not surrender our pronouns to the ideology



  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 18,387 Mod ✭✭✭✭CatFromHue


    Dark humour in private is a thing. When it moves beyond private then you could say it's bigotry.

    As for transphobes, all phobia's are irrational. Objecting to a male with a penis in a women's changing room is not irrational. It's perfectly rational as that's why there's a women's changing room in the first place. The only people being irrational here are the ones who think there's something wrong with a woman pointing out that a women's space is for women.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,259 ✭✭✭Mr.Wemmick


    Yep. Makes me laugh.. you always get the troll knee-jerk misogynists who spit out the word transphobe like a free for all, but have nothing else to say. Never any consideration about safe places for women, other than to insult and demean them for wanting their basic rights as written in law.

    Troll arguments empty of content. What else is new, lol.

    ““Half the world is composed of people who have something to say and can't, and the other half who have nothing to say and keep on saying it.” - Robert Frost



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 42,586 ✭✭✭✭Boggles


    Dark humour in private is a thing. When it moves beyond private then you could say it's bigotry.

    So racism isn't racism if it is a "private thing"?

    You sure?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 42,586 ✭✭✭✭Boggles


    Again, this is an internet forum not a tribunal.

    She is a keen racist and transphobe, this is backed up by what she has self published and what people know her have said.

    It's just pure coincidence this bully has became the hero for the transphobic community. What are the chances?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,897 ✭✭✭Former Former Former


    Dark humour in private is a thing. When it moves beyond private then you could say it's bigotry.

    Sorry?

    A person's character can only be judged on what they say in public? And if something said in private becomes public, then that's inadmissible?

    As noted above, this woman may or may not be right about dressing rooms but she's an awful human being and the lengths people are going to defend her is incredible.

    It's not misogyny to say that laughing at dead Pakistanis is not a great look. I'm genuinely dismayed at how many people condone this.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,259 ✭✭✭Mr.Wemmick


    The laughs are coming in thick & fast this evening. It’s like a stand up show.

    Women who want their basics rights to safe spaces as is written in law are just a transphobic community. That’s a wrap. All been sorted.

    A misogynist spitting out insults.. lol.

    ““Half the world is composed of people who have something to say and can't, and the other half who have nothing to say and keep on saying it.” - Robert Frost



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,415 ✭✭✭✭A Dub in Glasgo


    You keep saying that but then you also say that you do not know if the employment tribunal panel will take her views on other matters into account when adjudicating on the reasons for the tribunal. Why do you think the panel will take into account her other views?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,415 ✭✭✭✭A Dub in Glasgo


    Do you think she has no rights because of her views?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,187 ✭✭✭✭volchitsa


    You seem to think Sandie Peggie is on trial here. She's not. NHS-Fife and Dr Upton are accused of refusing her her legal rights, and her opinion about anything, including the events of which Upton and NHS Fife are accused, are of little or no relevance. Her character is of no relevance whatsoever.

    Either NHS-Fife refused her her legal rights or they did not. As I said above, she could be a goose-stepping fan of Adolf Hitler and that would still be entirely irrelevant to the case.

    "If a woman cannot stand in a public space and say, without fear of consequences, that men cannot be women, then women have no rights at all." Helen Joyce



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,166 ✭✭✭Bogey Lowenstein
    That must be Nigel with the brie...


    It isn't a trans thread it is a womens' rights thread.



  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 18,387 Mod ✭✭✭✭CatFromHue


    You take a random friend's Whatsapp group that exists for a few years and start scrolling through it. You're going to find some stupid comments in there.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,778 ✭✭✭Hamsterchops


    We're going round and round in circles at this stage. Even I have admitted that some of Sandies language & distasteful ideas may be from the 1970s, but I'll tell ya something that hasn't changed since the 1970s, and that's human evolution. Men still have man bits, and women have lady parts, which is why we still have separate changing facilities for men & women.

    Sandie Peggie is a female nurse, a woman with a thirty year unblemished record in nursing, and Dr Upton, a blow-in, who by all accounts is not a woman, but rather "identifies" as one !!

    He then somehow identifies himself into the female nurses changing room, and you know the rest ……

    People can post all night long about how awful Mrs Peggie is, with her vile racist ideas and her language about illegal immigrants, but why was Upton allowed to change in the women's changing room?

    NHS Fife and Upton will pay for their mistake, and the public will foot the bill.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,897 ✭✭✭Former Former Former


    Where did I say that?

    She's getting a tribunal to have her rights defended, and getting an extremely public platform for her views in the process. Seems like her rights are just fine.

    I'm just baffled at how blithely posters here - who presumably don't think of themselves as racist - can brush these things off.

    I've been in a lot of work group chats in my career and never once have I said anything close to what she has, nor would I tolerate it from any co-worker.

    Does it matter? That depends on your perspective. For me, it's hard to square all these comments with her preferred image of herself as a respectful colleague. That she can be so hateful in private but as soon as she clocks in, she's a different woman?

    Has anyone seen Severance on Apple TV? Maybe NHS Fife has something similar in operation.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,897 ✭✭✭Former Former Former


    Again, revelling in thousands of deaths is not "a stupid comment", it's not "dark humour", it's vile and racist, even if they are Asians, Muslims or whatever makes them sub-human from your point of view.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,415 ✭✭✭✭A Dub in Glasgo


    So if you think a person with questionable views still has equality and employment rights, what is the relevance of those views to the tribunal under discussion? Supporting a person in asserting their rights is not supporting the persons views on other matters, why do you say it is?



  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 18,387 Mod ✭✭✭✭CatFromHue


    Revelling, as in celebrate wildly? I dunno about that now.

    One of the reasons why we're not talking these comments seriously, in your opinion, is that multiple accusations made against her by NHS Fife have no evidence behind them. Someone heard someone else say but couldn't remember who that was or actions that the Doctor claimed happened which were very serious but no one else remembers happening. So there is a clear pattern by NHS Fife to drag her name through the mud on things that have nothing to do with the case. No one had a problem with her until this case and remember her daughter and her daughter's girlfriend have made public statements saying what NHS Fife said were wrong.

    You can claim the moral high ground here if you like but people do say stupid stuff in private and dark humour does exist. Maybe there's more to it or maybe there isn't and in the future she may or may not turn out to be whatever but we'll cross that bridge when we get there.



  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Sports Moderators, Paid Member Posts: 30,390 Mod ✭✭✭✭Podge_irl


    I think this is mostly fine. I don't care for lionising people in general on any side of a debate. It is asking for hypocrisy and disappointment.

    But she's also clearly in the right in almost every aspect in this case which is the more relevant point right now. And she has had to face massive institutional pressure against her to reach this point, institutional pressure which was more certainly illegal.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,648 ✭✭✭monseiur


    As the NHS continues to tie itself up in knots trying to defend the undefendable and top notch lawyers laughing all the way to the bank …….the eventual cost to the NHS / taxpayer will be, to say the least, eye watering. If the NHS (in their madness) have a policy of employing these trans folk perhaps they should consider providing two extra changing rooms specifically for them………that is if they can afford the extra cost 😂😂😂



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,259 ✭✭✭Mr.Wemmick


    Racism! Where to start on the cherry-picking.. and the over emotional wringing of hands. Its brain withering..

    Her Majesty’s Government is racist for starters, jet planes organised to fly brown people off to Rwanda.. Brexit won based on those nasty immigrant boats.. Farage running around like royalty. The majority of the country has xenophobia bred in the bone via popular culture, media and political polarisation re poor brown people are all evil, so let’s just hate them en masse. Decades of it! Kids raised on that stuff. Ireland is in close second.

    So let’s be clear, no one who is a nasty racist is due any legal rights! That’s half the country and most of the politicians.. oh hell, even the Royal Family are at it.

    But a working class Nurse is a racist? Goodness, I’m shocked! Who’d have thought it.. she being English ‘n’ all.

    Most of us in the thread are here for Female Rights under the law.

    Let me say it again for those of you at the back a bit hard of hearing.

    This is about women’s rights.

    All women’s rights.. even the racists ones.

    Females witches too.. because we are not allow to burn those heretics at the stake anymore, so yeah.. their rights too. All the ugly horrible nasty bits of humanity if they are female, they have rights.

    Just like the Trans folk who want to burn murder kill women written on placards. The Trans criminals and rapists, yep they all have rights too.

    That’s how it works.

    Post edited by Mr.Wemmick on

    ““Half the world is composed of people who have something to say and can't, and the other half who have nothing to say and keep on saying it.” - Robert Frost



  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 18,387 Mod ✭✭✭✭CatFromHue


    We don't know the full contents of the Whatsapp accounts or Facebook posts. We only have some cherry picked comments from NHS Fife. Maybe there's loads more from Peggie or maybe they've just highlighted the ones that make Peggie look bad. Either way it's not an independent review of the comments but one with a bias.

    Now if I were in a Whatsapp group with someone who I thought was being serious with comments like that or making a number of comments like that I wouldn't be staying in the group. NHS Fife didn't list the number of people who left the group or banned Peggie on social media.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,187 ✭✭✭✭volchitsa


    That’s easy: we know it’s cherry-picked because the witness (Lindsey Nicoll) was asked whether it was fair to judge someone’s character on a single poor taste joke from 6000 pages spread over 7 years, replied that there were four such jokes and that she didn’t know why the defence had only submitted one of them.

    So FOUR poor taste jokes over seven years. Given many other, worse, comments made in the group by people other than Sandie Peggie, and that Lindsey N herself had made at least one such in the chat, which she had remained in for all that time (and had even committed professional misconduct in it - it will be interesting to see whether NHS Fife are as keen to protect their patients from their star witness, after this trial) I think we can confidently say “cherry picked” for the written comments, and exaggerated, out of context or just plain made up for most of the spoken ones.

    "If a woman cannot stand in a public space and say, without fear of consequences, that men cannot be women, then women have no rights at all." Helen Joyce



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,000 ✭✭✭✭Grayson


    yeah yeah.

    It's anti trans. In the title the poster won't even refer to a trans person as trans.

    I know that now I'm going to have a hoard of people shrieking at me that no, it's pro woman. The same way racists never say they're anti black, just pro white.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,415 ✭✭✭✭A Dub in Glasgo




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,187 ✭✭✭✭volchitsa


    The title refers to a male doctor because it’s the truth: the nurse objected to Upton’s presence as a male, not because he was trans. She’d have had no objection to sharing the space with a trans identifying female (trans man).

    And it’s only “anti trans” to the extent that transgender activists want to remove women’s legal rights to single sex spaces. If you think women shouldn’t have those rights then you can argue to change the law and explain why, but currently that’s the law.

    IMO it’s perfectly reasonable for women to have single sex toilets and changing rooms, and it’s unreasonable to remove those rights. Comparing that to racism is frankly bizarre.

    "If a woman cannot stand in a public space and say, without fear of consequences, that men cannot be women, then women have no rights at all." Helen Joyce



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,259 ✭✭✭Mr.Wemmick


    Yeah yeah all about anti-trans..

    So why isn’t anyone b!tching about trans then? There is none going on in here, except the misogynists throwing around insults re: transphobia.

    Always the weak comments: yeah but it’s transphobia with a huge leap over the real issues to get there.

    A nurse’s legal right to a single sex safe place to undress. The right to ask and the right not to lose her job, livihood because of lies and manufactured accusations that are running into the criminal. She isn’t a criminal, but Upton and the NHS are by the evidence to date.

    ““Half the world is composed of people who have something to say and can't, and the other half who have nothing to say and keep on saying it.” - Robert Frost



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 42,586 ✭✭✭✭Boggles


    except the misogynists throwing around insults re: transphobia.

    Complains about throwing around insults whilst throwing around insults. 🤔

    She isn’t a criminal, but Upton and the NHS are by the evidence to date.

    Which crimes have they committed exactly, please be specific?



Advertisement