Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

Ireland Team Talk XII: Farrell's First Fifteen

1153215331535153715381849

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,363 ✭✭✭Paul Smeenus


    @FtD v2

    During Wood's career, Wales and Scotland were not the "usual suspects". Both won a 5 Nations while Wood was playing - Ireland's last win had been in the Sxities.

    Not trying to make a wider point about your discussion, but both teams were comfortably better than us and dismissing wins against them is just ignoring the context of the day.

    Post edited by Podge_irl on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,617 ✭✭✭joseywhales


    Basically every year in the 90s was "can we beat Wales this year?" The entire season depended on it. Scotland were well ahead.

    Post edited by Podge_irl on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,363 ✭✭✭Paul Smeenus


    I remember being utterly delighted that Italy were joining to make it the Six Nations, because then we might not get the wooden spoon every year.

    Post edited by Podge_irl on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,392 ✭✭✭FtD v2


    His wins against them came at the following times:

    His wins against Wales came in 1999 (Wales finished 3rd in 5 Nations, knocked on QF of RWC, beat no one of consequence), 2001 (Wales came 4th in the 6Ns, lost 2/3 that November) and 2003 (Wales came 6th in the 6Ns, knocked out in QF of RWC).

    His wins against Scotland came in 2000 (Scotland 5th in 6Ns, lost 2/3 in November) and 2003 (Scotland 4th in 6Ns, knocked out in QFs of RWC).

    Wales won a 5 Nations in 1994 (year after Wood made his debut) but didn't come close again during his international career to winning anything. Scotland won one in 1999, but were otherwise relatively middling during that period.

    Ireland's last win before then, FWIW, had been in 1985.

    Post edited by Podge_irl on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,363 ✭✭✭Paul Smeenus


    And where did Ireland come all those years, for context?

    In fact - I'll answer myself.

    When we beat Wales in 99, we came a spot below them, in fourth. France, a team against whom a win would count, came last. We came ahead of them on points difference. Wales was our only win.

    We were a "middling" team as well.

    Wales won a 5 Nations in 1994, Scotland won a 5 Nations in 1999.

    Ireland won zero. They wouldn't win a Six Nations until after Wood had retired, in 2009.

    I'd say during Wood's career, Ireland was consistently an also-ran against whom wins against Wales and Scotland counted for something.

    Post edited by Podge_irl on


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,690 ✭✭✭Yeah_Right


    Post edited by Podge_irl on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,392 ✭✭✭FtD v2


    Ireland had an abject run from 1994-1999, finishing 4th (1994 & 1995) and then 5th (1996-1998), and 4th again in 1999. Scotland & Wales finished ahead of us most of those years. Exceptions being: Wales finished 5th in 1995, Scotland finished 5th in 1994 etc.

    From 2000-2003 Ireland finished 2nd twice ('01 & '03) and 3rd twice ('00 and '02) - finishing ahead of Wales & Scotland in all of those years.

    This is all a sideshow though tbh, and distracting from my main point. I'm not disputing Ireland were utterly **** in this era. I'm not disputing, for the most part, that Scotland and Wales were better than us (for the beginning of Wood's era, they were worse by the latter half).

    The point originally made was:

    Wood carried a bad team to wins. Sheehan has never had to carry a team to a win.

    I don't think this is hugely relevant or true as it happens. As I pointed out, he didn't win very many games at all, and 60% of his wins came against USA, Japan, Tonga, Italy, Romania, Namibia, Samoa, Russia.

    Even his wins against Scotland and Wales came in the era where we were clearly the better side and comfortably finishing ahead of them year over year in the 6 Nations.

    Post edited by Podge_irl on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,392 ✭✭✭FtD v2


    😀 It's very true though!

    In 2009 O'Driscoll won a Grand Slam for Ireland, was joint top try scorer in that tournament with 4 tries (including crucial tries against England, France and Wales in the GS decider), and won a European Cup with Leinster (scoring 5 tries throughout the tournament).

    He was Player of the Tournament for the 6 Nations. He also was immense for the Lions that summer in South Africa.

    However, if he'd lost out to the incredible Fourie du Preez, who also won everything that year (Super Rugby title with the Bulls, Tri Nations with South Africa and a Lions series), I'd have been fine with that.

    But Richie McCaw in 2009 strained the medial ligament in his knee in March and missed a chunk of the Super Rugby season, and did another knee injury in May 2009 where he missed another chunk of time (missing summer test matches). It was a poor season for both the Crusaders and the All Blacks - NZ lost 3 games in the Tri Nations.

    It was daylight robbery that he won that award that year.

    Post edited by Podge_irl on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,363 ✭✭✭Paul Smeenus


    I said I'm not getting into the Wood/Sheehan thing. I just very much disagree that the wins against Wales and Scotland came during a period when "we were clearly the better side". You've mentioned five years there where we were very poor, and four years where we weren't.

    As you say, this debate is a sideshow, so we can leave it there, as I don't really care about the main argument or think it can be proven one way or another.

    Post edited by Podge_irl on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,392 ✭✭✭FtD v2


    Yeah, but to be clear - when they were clearly better we weren't winning against them, and all of his wins against them came in an era when we were clearly better than them and finishing 2nd or 3rd every season. There's no disputing they were better from 1994-1998, but his first wins against either of them only came post that era.

    Post edited by Podge_irl on


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,997 ✭✭✭✭aloooof


    Not a hill I'm going to die on, but we beat Wales in 99 and they still managed to finish ahead of us... And one man's "knocked on QF of RWC, beat no one of consequence" is another man's "beaten by the eventual winners", depends how you want to frame things.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 14,650 ✭✭✭✭AbusesToilets


    Genuinely would be raging if I was VdF, Farrell telling him he's the worst backrow player on tour, besides a 1 cap Pollock. **** all the way off. Be hard to have any faith in him after that in a green shirt.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,581 ✭✭✭OldRio


    Be hard to have any faith in him after that in a green shirt.


    Can you explain that please?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 14,650 ✭✭✭✭AbusesToilets


    Farrell said he'd pick on form. Josh was one of the best performing players in the warm ups, and gets zero caps. A mediocrity like Earl makes the bench ahead of him. Fairly massive rebuke for Josh



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,581 ✭✭✭OldRio


    OK. I get that but what do you mean by Be hard to have any faith in him after that in a green shirt.
    ?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,392 ✭✭✭FtD v2


    TBF to Farrell, most of his big selection calls have been fully vindicated.

    There was plenty of consternation about the flankers selected for the first test but both produced stellar performances.

    He backed Joe McCarthy to start the first test and he produced a great performance.

    All of the bench players introduced last week brought good impact.

    I'd love to have seen Josh win some test caps, but it's hard to argue with a winning tour.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 14,650 ✭✭✭✭AbusesToilets


    Faith in Farrell's word, faith that he can get treated fairly. Obviously it's a perspective from the outside, but I can't see the justification based on performances on the pitch



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 14,650 ✭✭✭✭AbusesToilets


    For sure, the lions won, which is all Farrell will care about ultimately. I think Josh would have been able to deliver a similar or better performance than Curry or Morgan.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,581 ✭✭✭OldRio


    Well I think JvDF is a bigger man than that.

    I would have picked him but.........



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,071 ✭✭✭Former Former Former


    Curry has completely vindicated Farrell with his performances, and clearly he was doing something to earn the selection in the first place, so I'm not sure what the beef is.

    VDF is 32 years old, he's not going to take his ball and go home.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,392 ✭✭✭FtD v2


    I don't necessarily read it as a negative reflection on Josh, just the three of them have slightly different skillsets. Curry brings the most physicality of the three, Morgan is the best on the deck generally, and Josh is the better link player in wide channels and brings good carrying.

    I think for the sort of challenge Australia were presenting, and the gameplan Farrell wanted to put in place I think he saw Curry as the best fit.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 14,650 ✭✭✭✭AbusesToilets


    Certainly seems Farrell had Curry picked in his team from the jump, because it certainly couldn't have been based on his efforts in the warm ups. Why even bring Josh, if he felt he didn't suit the game he wanted the Lions to play.

    Overreacting probably, but I think it's a pretty stunning snub of one of the best backrow players in the game



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,690 ✭✭✭Yeah_Right


    TBH I actually thought FDP should have won it in 2009. Easily best player in the world.

    I think BOD being on the losing end of the 2 Lions tests he played possibly counted against him and he didn't stand out that much in those games. Good but not great. In one of the AB losses to Aus that year, Richie was head and shoulders above every player on the field despite losing.

    Also, club matches aren't counted for the WPOTY.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,392 ✭✭✭FtD v2


    Yeah, but i think that's pretty silly about club games not being a factor.

    I'm not taking anything away from McCaw, he's one of the very best to ever play the game (second only to Dan Carter in my estimation), but he didn't deserve that award in 2009. He had a fairly modest year by his standards in an All Blacks side that had a poor year by their standards.

    It's a highly flawed award though in other ways, with a little bit too much subjectivity in judging. The fact that no prop has ever even been nominated out of the 117 players nominated over the past 24 years says a lot.



  • Moderators, Sports Moderators, Paid Member Posts: 33,886 Mod ✭✭✭✭Podge_irl


    I think BOD being on the losing end of the 2 Lions tests he played possibly counted against him and he didn't stand out that much in those games

    That isn't my memory of those games? Him and Roberts were an outstanding centre partnership on that tour no?

    Would be typical if playing with ROG counted against him though 😁



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,690 ✭✭✭Yeah_Right


    Agreed. Except I'd have McCaw ahead of Carter. Forwards are better than backs 🤣

    Its disgraceful that no prop has ever won!! Justice for Tony Woodcock!! I think PSDT was the first blindside to win it. Has a midfielder ever won it?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,106 ✭✭✭shootermacg


    I don't think Farrell is in the business of handing out pity caps. I guess cohesion picks isn't enough to swing it this time..



  • Moderators, Arts Moderators Posts: 36,493 Mod ✭✭✭✭pickarooney




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 14,650 ✭✭✭✭AbusesToilets


    Keith Earls' hundredth cap or Healy getting the record would suggest otherwise. Guess he just doesn't like the cut of Josh's jib



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,106 ✭✭✭shootermacg


    Maybe Josh was late to training or something. I'm sure the story will come out in a few years..



Advertisement
Advertisement