Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
If we do not hit our goal we will be forced to close the site.

Current status: https://keepboardsalive.com/

Annual subs are best for most impact. If you are still undecided on going Ad Free - you can also donate using the Paypal Donate option. All contribution helps. Thank you.

Hamas strike on Israel

1162016211623162516261668

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 850 ✭✭✭batman75


    Anyone following this thread knows my leanings so no point in going over old ground. That being said if you were pro Israeli how would you suggest it rehabs its reputation.

    The world is increasingly recognising the right of Palestinians to a state and hence confirming recognition of the Palestinian Territories. Whilst symbolic it does serve to pushback against the stated goals of Zionism.

    If your Israeli and your practical I think the first thing you have to do is publicly renounce Zionism and accept responsibility for the genocide warts and all. That then allows you to facilitate and contribute to feeding the people in Gaza. You can't undo the genocide but you can halt it and endeavour to save as many lives as possible. This help offers the best chance to retrieve those hostages still alive and permits you to show the world that you renounce barbarity of a previous regime. The active participation in feeding the Palestinians will likely cause the Houthis to stop firing at Israel which should help the port of Eilat to become active again.

    Another key part of rejecting Zionism would be to pull settlers from illegal settlements on occupied land. Look to rehouse them in Israel proper. It might be possible to allocate those housing to Palestinians who have lost their homes in Gaza. The Golan Heights would also have to be surrendered and returned to Syria.

    The apartheid system in Israel would have to be dismantled and the full integration of Palestinians into Israeli society would have to be worked on and they would have to be granted equal rights in law and practice.

    Reparations would have to be made to the Palestinians or in lieu Gaza would have to be rebuilt to a good standard and made a proper place for Palestinians to live in. Israel would need to genuinely commit to a two state solution.

    Bibi, IDF members involved in genocide and the extremists in the Israeli cabinet would have to be turned over to the Hague. Even doing all this doesn't guarantee rehabilitation in the eyes of the world but not doing guarantees Israel remains a pariah state.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 25,541 ✭✭✭✭My name is URL


    Watch this space re: Germany.

    I'm hearing there are moves being made. There's a lot of internal pressure to do something.. even just to save face. Rowing in behind others with a symbolic gesture seems easy all of a sudden



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,865 ✭✭✭✭nacho libre


    I doubt Nethanyu would listen( he has bascially told the UK and France to get stuffed over the recognition of Palestine)- Unless others offer him a way to stay in power he will do whatever the far right headbangers, who he is beholden to, want. It's quite clear they want to expel the Palestinians from Gaza. Bibi broke the ceasefire in March that could have led to all the hostages being released and an end to the war to appease them. The likes of Smotrich don't really want the war to end because it gives them the cover to continue with their aim to force Palestinians out of Gaza.

    I notice the pro Israelis on here keep ignoring that Nethanyu broke the ceasefire in March for some reason. Is it because it proves Nethanyu couldn't really give a toss about the Hostages?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 705 ✭✭✭sheepysheep


    What do you actually think is going to happen in Gaza?

    How is this extermination/elimination of 2 million Gazans actually going to unfold?

    Flown off to the congo in hot air balloons? Zapped with the famous Jewish dissappearing space lazers of a previous posters over-active imagination?

    Lay out a step by step plan of how the the ethnic cleansing of Gaza will actually occur, and why hasn't it happened already? What are they waiting for?

    It's simply not credible. There will be no annexation of Gaza by Israel, and no mass movement of 2 million people out of the area.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 705 ✭✭✭sheepysheep


    There were Jews in that region of the world every bit as long as Arabs existed beside them, so they absolutely have a historical right to a homeland there.

    Maybe Israel got an unequal sized share of the pie in 1948 when things were divided up, but there's no going back from that now.

    Arabs did have a say. Plenty of arabs stayed within Israels borders at the crunch moment. They made the correct decision.

    Jordan was also a part of Ottoman and British Mandatory Palestine. How come posters like you are never sore at them for seizing so much of Palestinian land. They, after all, not Israel invaded the West Bank in 48, and only abandoned their claim on the region in 1988.

    Why can't they grant the Palestinians a Gaza sized piece of real estate on the other side of the Jordan and sort the problem out?



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 705 ✭✭✭sheepysheep


    Release the hostages, disarm, surrender.

    It's hardly an unreasonable set of demands to a entity that has lost a war, basically an unconditional surrender.

    There is a lot of pressure on Bibi so some sort of deal is probably imminent where the hostages are released in some sort of phased arrangement, so there is some room for negotition, but, Hamas have to agree to go. Hamas in Doha recognise this, Hamas in Gaza not so much.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 705 ✭✭✭sheepysheep


    In this situation no political leader will make hostages the number 1 priority. That's the realpolitik of the situation.

    Publically, hostages will be number 1. Behind closed doors, in the war room, it's the elimination of the terrorist organisation that launched an attack on that country's citizens that is the primary objective. No military leader would allow their objectives to be compromised by the welfare of some of it's own citizens, because if they did, they any terriorist organisation can hold any country to ransom at any given moment. That's the harsh reality of it.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 850 ✭✭✭batman75


    You do realise Israel is committing genocide in Gaza. On that basis alone it has lost the moral ground and has no right to demand anything from the Palestinians. Also it's not a war it's ethnic cleansing.

    Maybe you wholeheartedly support Israel. Maybe you embrace Zionism who knows. Either way Bibi has put the very existence of Israel in danger. Very hard to see how Israel repairs it's damaged reputation. Interesting times ahead.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 705 ✭✭✭sheepysheep


    It's not a genocide. It's not ethnic cleansing. Doesn't matter how often you repeat your mantra, it won't make it so.

    It is a war. Israel formally declared war a few days after Oct 7th. That war can end any moment Hamas chooses to accept defeat, and put the welfare of their own people above their own nilhistic desires.

    The danger to the existance of Israel is a figment of your imagination. Those 27 foreign ministers who signed the document critical of Israel are all allies, and will continue to be long after the war ends, which it will, very soon. The Arabs nations continue to move forward with normalishing relations with Israel. They recognise, like Egypt and Jordan before them, that Israel is going nowhere, and that peaceful trading conditions are far more benificial to everyone in the region.

    For a lot of people around the world, the USA and Europe, Israels right to defend itself from endless assults from demented jihadists hell-bent of erasing it off the face of the earth is well understood.

    Hamas are Islamic jihadists. Islamic Jihadists have been launcing terror attacks on Europe for a long time now, remember The Bataclan, the Manchester Ariana Grande attack? For a lot of people those events and the Oct 7th attacks are inextricably linked.

    Just because a vocal group in Ireland are very publically pro-palestinian doesn't mean that Isreal isn't supported too.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 705 ✭✭✭sheepysheep


    More endless boll***s from Hamas.

    Demanding the release of living terrorists in exchange for the bodies of dead hostages.

    https://www.yahoo.com/news/articles/israel-rejects-hamass-demand-release-205007646.html



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 705 ✭✭✭sheepysheep


    The future reality for Hamas.

    Hamas could be forced into exile by Arab states

    Qatar and Turkey, two of the group’s main patrons, have thrown their weight behind a French and Saudi peace initiative that sharply increases pressure on Hamas to disarm, surrender power and accept exile.

    https://www.yahoo.com/news/articles/hamas-could-forced-exile-arab-182140925.html.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 25,541 ✭✭✭✭My name is URL


    It's not a genocide. It's not ethnic cleansing. Doesn't matter how often you repeat your mantra, it won't make it so.

    You are a nasty person. It's no wonder that you quote other nasty people to make the points you are failing to make.

    Getting late here. Have a nice breakfast



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,865 ✭✭✭✭nacho libre


    Unfortunately for you it's not just a vocal group in Ireland that are critical of Israel

    Israeli human right groups and Jewish organisations in America have stated that Israel is committing genoicide. Also the fact that staunch allies of Israel have now spoken out against Israel indicates they know Israel has done despicable things in Gaza

    You are burying your head in the sand because you spent time in Israel and have friends there. I don't get this at all. If Ireland was doing what Israel is currently doing I would condemn it. You could learn something from the likes of Gideon Levy who refuses to turn a blind eye.

    Why sheepysheep are you persisting in defending a country that kills people queuing for food and deliberately starves them. Oh of course you deny these things happened because it would force you to examine your consicence. You can continue to bluff and bluster- which you are skillfull at- but the truth is you are an apologist for a state committing war crimes.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 355 ✭✭Iecrawfc


    Great to see the western world media and government slowly come to the realisation that most normal people came to 6 months ago, if I were an Israeli I'd have to think nethenyahu and his extremists have driven Israel's existence to a very precarious place since Oct attacks, most of the western world's people, apart from the US, despises them and their actions will go down in history as a stain on humanity akin to the nazis. Most electorates in Europe will not allow their gov to lift a finger in defence of Israel in the future.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,987 ✭✭✭✭Grayson


    No one has a historic right to a homeland. That's not a thing. No-one has ever been given a country because people lived there 2000 years ago. countries are formed out of the people who live there at the time the country was formed. The population of jewish people there was minimal until the migrations started in the 20th century.

    In 1948 they didn't have a right to a country either. They were a minority. They had the right to participate in whatever country was formed.

    And palestinians didn't have a choice in 1948. IT's well documented that there were massacres and arabs were fleeing known violence. They were also expelled. In haifa there were mass expulsions and the remaining arabs were forced into a ghetto.

    About 700-800k arabs were expelled or fled. that's 80% of the arabs in what is now Israel. Israel was ethnically cleansed, we just didn't have that phrase back then.

    As for the UN created borders. That was a colonial project created by colonial powers. The majority of the UN were european powers. There were pretty much no countries that were former colonies. Africa wasn't represented at all. 3 of the 5 permanent security council members were colonial powers that still had colonies.

    BTW, jordan is the third most water poor country in the world. they literally don't have enough water to support a larger population. Any sizeable refugee influx would destabilise the country so much that the government would probably fall. That's why jordan has said that if Israel forces the refugees into Jordan, it will be an act of war. Jordan would lose, and they know it, but what other choice do they have. Same goes for Egypt.

    What Israel need to do is give the gazans a gaza sized slice of land. Thankfully there's one there called Gaza already. They need to withdraw completely from the westbank. They need to dismantle every single settlement. We need to see an end to religious extremism in Israel. We need to see their holy war to capture arab lands ending.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 4,048 ✭✭✭dmcdona


    Seems you're desperately holding onto a rapidly dwindling viewpoint.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,375 ✭✭✭dePeatrick




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,760 ✭✭✭circadian


    Hamas. Jihad. Ah yes, that all excuses completely flattening one of the most densely populated places on earth, killing tens of thousands, the majority being women and children, and creating a man made famine that everyone can see.

    Sure, why didn't the UK completely flatten Ireland because of the IRA?

    Completely flawed logic, maybe take a look at your bias and see the Israeli actions for what they are. Regardless of the abhorrent behaviour of Hamas, Israel still has a duty to ensure civilian impact is kept to a minimum.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 850 ✭✭✭batman75


    Any poster denying that genocide is taking place in Gaza is not to be taken seriously. It is probably the most recorded mass murder in history. Committed by people whose very descendants died in the Holocaust in the 1940s. Whose very state is owed to World guilt over same Holocaust.

    The denial of the genocide feeds into the narrative of Palestinian lives having no value much as the Nazi's saw Jews as sub human etc. Apparently, viewing those your genociding as animals etc permits the oppressor to commit the genocide and bring their population with them on the journey.

    Nothing has done more for the recognition of a Palestinian state than this genocide. It is having the very opposite effect than Israel intended. It is a minute crumb of comfort in the horror we're witnessing. Indeed it has brought into the mainstream discussions about Israel's very survival as a state. That is how catastrophic this is by Israel. The lack of collective self awareness is both stunning and disturbing. As we see with posters on here the level of denial is comical.

    I've said it before. But I'll say it again. The greatest threat to Israel is Zionism. Not Hezbollah, Hamas, Houthis or Iran.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 31,590 ✭✭✭✭blanch152


    https://news.un.org/en/story/2024/12/1158171

    Are you saying that my belief in Iran's hijab laws is based on my "prejudice"?

    I think it is the other way around, your prejudice against Israel blinds you to the oppression of women in Arab countries. Am I imagining that oppression?



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 31,590 ✭✭✭✭blanch152


    No, I am not asking you to trust Israel.

    https://www.rte.ie/news/world/2025/0731/1526226-canada-middle-east/

    I am asking you to trust the likes of Canada.

    "Mr Carney also said it was also predicated on Mr Abbas's pledge to "hold general elections in 2026 in which Hamas can play no part, and to demilitarise the Palestinian state"."

    The refusal of Hamas to stand down is now the major block to intervention by the major Western states.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,089 ✭✭✭Sudden Valley


    There is a thread on Iran. It's obsessive to constantly refer to a third country in the hamas/Israel thread when so much is happening in Gaza and internationally against Israel at the moment.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,462 ✭✭✭SafeSurfer


    Multo autem ad rem magis pertinet quallis tibi vide aris quam allis



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 31,590 ✭✭✭✭blanch152


    As I suspected, you are trivialising the oppression of women in the Middle East for whatever strange reason. I will leave it there.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 4,048 ✭✭✭dmcdona


    If being revolted by the actions of Israel, who are without compunction in the indiscriminate murder of civilians by use of heavy weapons, starvation and withholding of medical care, is indicative of prejudice against them, I'd have no problem being characterised as such. Though I'd argue it's not prejudice, just simple humanity.

    Comparing what Israel is doing to "hijab laws" or denying women the right to drive is a false equivalence.

    It's also disgusting.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,760 ✭✭✭circadian


    Some Muslim countries enforce Hijabs or women can't drive.

    Let's level Gaza and annex the West Bank, that'll show them!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,462 ✭✭✭SafeSurfer


    You care not one jot for women in the Middle East if they are denied rights or killed by Israel. You only are concerned for women’s rights if you can use them to defend genocidal Israel.

    You got caught out making things up and instead of apologising and correcting yourself, you are doubling down.
    We all make mistakes Blanch. Even Gods chosen people can make mistakes.

    Multo autem ad rem magis pertinet quallis tibi vide aris quam allis



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 518 ✭✭✭freebritney


    You must have really got the short end of the stick in the Hasbara office having to come onto an Irish discussion site and defend the genocide in Gaza. Did you get caught stealing the managers lunch or something?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,987 ✭✭✭✭Grayson


    That's the thing. Someone is conducting a holy war, and it's Israel. Israeli officials have routinely quoted the torah to motivate the troops.

    https://www.livemint.com/news/world/pm-netanyahu-invokes-amalek-theory-to-justify-gaza-killings-what-is-this-hebrew-bible-nation-11698555324918.html

    We have settler groups terrorising Palestinians with the aim of getting land that they say their God promised them. And they're supported/protected by the government.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 599 ✭✭✭Lawlesz


    It's not a genocide.

    By most definitions, it is.

    It's not ethnic cleansing.

    By most definitions, it is.

    Doesn't matter how often you repeat your mantra, it won't make it so.

    Maybe try take your own advice on that.

    It is a war.

    The fact that you argue in favour of forced mass starvation, the mass displacement of civilians, and collective punishment says more about you than anything else. Your attempts to justify these actions are becoming increasingly absurd. A year ago, there may have been some excuse, maybe of being misinformed or something. But with the mounting evidence we now see daily right before our eyes, continuing to defend this shows that you are acting out of some weird loyalty to a cause rather than some kind of objective analysis.

    There is simply no way any right minded individual could attempt to justify this without having an agenda.



Advertisement