Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
If we do not hit our goal we will be forced to close the site.

Current status: https://keepboardsalive.com/

Annual subs are best for most impact. If you are still undecided on going Ad Free - you can also donate using the Paypal Donate option. All contribution helps. Thank you.

Donald Trump the Megathread part II

19589599619639641021

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 239 ✭✭Maxface


    From where I’m sitting, it’s hard to see much of a win for the US in this deal. If I’m a consumer, my car and my shopping basket just got more expensive. For American exporters, there’s no new market access to speak of. Meanwhile, EU importers are now facing higher costs in some sectors, which could make them less competitive—depending on what they sell. So who actually gains? Possibly the US financial sector: steadier markets, more inward income, maybe even a chance to chip away at that staggering national debt. But is this real economic gain, or just fiscal sleight of hand—shuffling money from one pot to another and calling it progress? Has Donald pulled a fast one on everyone, including himself?



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    This thread is about Donald Trump, just because it doesn’t align to your version of Trump doesn’t mean posters with opposite views to your aren’t welcome to post freely.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 25,564 ✭✭✭✭My name is URL


    I never told you to stop posting. The more noise you create the easier it is to tune into what is worth reading



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,176 ✭✭✭newhouse87


    https://x.com/RnaudBertrand/status/1949578088712712651

    Absolute Joke, trump must be laughing his hole off that the EU agreed to give so much I return for nothing, literally nothing.

    Below what a French journalist thinks of it.

    "Disturbing to see a New York Times journalist burst into my kitchen at 8 AM to make himself scrambled eggs, then kiss my wife before rushing off to work, but well, it's provided for in the agreement signed by von der Leyen. Everyone wins."



  • Moderators, Politics Moderators, Paid Member Posts: 43,831 Mod ✭✭✭✭Seth Brundle




  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,176 ✭✭✭newhouse87


    Purchasing 750 billion of expensive LNG. Purchasing hundreds of billions in military equipment. 0% tarriffs on American imports while EU has 15% on their exports. That's just a few points. Name one thing the EU got from this deal/framework.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 1,381 ✭✭✭Dr Robert


    Companies are already looking elsewhere for vendors. China will boom out of this. The EU will be fine. Trump making China great again, that will be his legacy.

    That, and rape, and who knows yet with the kiddie fiddling friend story.

    Save boards.ie by subscribing:



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,539 ✭✭✭thatsdaft


    The US doesn’t produce never mind have the facilities to export 250bn$ of LNG per year

    That’s before you get to more obvious point that EU can’t force companies where they buy gas from, hell they can’t even prevent companies buying Russian gas



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 2,823 ✭✭✭nachouser


    It'll cost American consumers about an extra 90bn dollars a year, if EU produced goods can't be sourced internally with alternatives. So much winning.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,540 ✭✭✭badabing106


    Unless your living under a rock. This was not a good deal for the EU



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,479 ✭✭✭✭Frank Bullitt


    Trump is playing chess while these stooges in the Eu are playing tiddlywinks

    I love the delusion here. Trump has been played like a clown again, he got a framework, not an agreement and he sees it as a victory, as do his idiot supporters.

    Even at that, this all falls onto the US consumer yet again.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,540 ✭✭✭badabing106




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,479 ✭✭✭✭Frank Bullitt


    Seeing as Donald didn't give us the details, maybe you can?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,540 ✭✭✭badabing106


    He gave the exact details if you watch the video



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,479 ✭✭✭✭Frank Bullitt


    Maybe you haven't watched the video then. He hasn't given details, because it is not a full trade deal, it is a framework.

    You know the difference, right?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,540 ✭✭✭badabing106


    So its just a framework and doesn't mean anything?. Is that the way you want to spin it?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,479 ✭✭✭✭Frank Bullitt


    A framework is not a trade deal, sweetheart. There has been no mention of dates, timelines, all of it. All you have is a statement read out to the press, nothing was formally released with details of the trade deal…as there is no trade deal.

    So yes, it is more likely that the EU have pulled the wool over Trumps eyes, which isn't hard due to him being a dunce.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,518 ✭✭✭✭everlast75


    The EU Fooled the Trump?

    You sound surprised. You do know he's so clever he thought about nuking a hurricane?

    Elect a clown... Expect a circus



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,169 ✭✭✭✭retalivity


    Would not be surprised if in a weeks time, trump decided to raise the tarriff to 50% as Macron called him a bad name, so any deal with that clown's administration isn't worth the paper its written on. Van der Leyen treated him like the toddler he is - give him a lollipop to shut him up, and the adults will do the proper work in the background.

    We've seen this performative nonsense before with brexit



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,176 ✭✭✭Flex


    With regard the EU-US trade deal, I was very disappointed with the headline summaries. However, I think much of it is just a concession to let Trump look like hes got a great deal

    • $600b of investment in the US by the EU looks like a huge headline. However,
      • none of that money will come from the EU budget, it will only be from private firms.
      • Currently EU firms invest $2.5t in the US, so this would be a 20% increase, which was forecasted to increase naturally.
      • The EU has been clear they cant and wont compell EU businesses to invest there,
      • so its just a nice PR headline for Trump

    • Similar the $750b of energy purchase from the USA was planned and in motion from the RePower EU plan in 2022 to pivot from Russian energy to Norway/Mid East/USA.
      • If anything its just accelerating what was already planned, not new demand.
      • Further, the US supplies about $60b of enery to the EU a year now, I amnt familiar with that industry or their infrastructure, but I think the US will struggle to quadruple their output to meet demand,
      • so I suspect this is just another headline number

    • The 15% tariff will include a lot of 'zero-for-zero' industries and sectors,
      • Ive read sectors identified account fo around 40% of EU exports.
      • Very simple maths here, but if successful, that would leave the other 60% of exports with a 15% tariff,
      • so weighted average means a total effective tariff rate of around ~9%.

    No public money committed, no structural shift in energy or investment policy, and real tariffs softened through exemptions.

    Still unhappy with this as it gives a dangerous and shameless regime a nice PR win, however to me this demonstrates that the EU’s greatest weakness its lack of deep political union. When negotiating with a single, centralised power like the US lead by an unstable dangerous narcessist and his lackeys, the EU’s need to balance the needs and wants of 27 members (some wanting a firm line, others to avoid trade wars at all costs, others to keep the US sweet so they dont abandon NATO yet, and others being stooges of Trumps acting like a Trojan horse to **** up and slow things down), its Parliament, and its Commission, means it need s to spend more time and energy just trying to establish a cohesive stable base and an actual set of concise objectives, unlike Trump and co.

    As the EU exists today it will have economic power but lack the political union and integration to be able to effectively stand toe to toe with the likes of the USA, China, BRICS nations soon…. We need deeper union in my view, and sooner rather than later



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,176 ✭✭✭newhouse87


    Top Class post. We will wait and see I suppose.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,540 ✭✭✭badabing106


    Did tou watch the video? Trump in front of Von der Leyden outlined their agreement on camera ( unless you think von der leyden is going to renage on this face to face agreement)

    The Eu agrred to purchase $750 billion worth of U.S. energy, including liquefied natural gas (LNG), oil, and nuclear fuels, over three years (approximately $250 billion annually through 2028).

    The EU pledged to invest $600 billion in the U.S. by 2028, above existing commitments. These investments are expected to target sectors like infrastructure, technology, and manufacturing, potentially creating jobs and economic growth in the U.S.


    Military Equipment Purchases: The EU committed to buying “hundreds of billions of dollars” worth of U.S. military equipment, though specific amounts and timelines were not detailed in the announcements. This could include weapons, defense systems, or related technologies, strengthening U.S. defense industries.


    Market Access for U.S. Goods: The EU agreed to open its markets to U.S. manufacturers, with Trump stating that EU countries will accept U.S. imports at zero tariffs.


    Acceptance of 15% U.S. Tariff: The EU conceded to a 15% U.S. tariff on ~70% of its exports to the U.S. (e.g., cars, semiconductors, pharmaceuticals), down from a threatened 30% but up from 2024’s 1.2% average. This represents a compromise to maintain market access, with exemptions for certain goods (e.g., aircraft, some chemicals, generic drugs).



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,479 ✭✭✭✭Frank Bullitt


    My friend, none of this is a trade agreement. There are no dates, nothing.

    It is a framework, trade deals have extremely important amounts of details involved of them. This is a few paragraphs that were read out after they talked after his round of golf.

    You are struggling with reality here.



  • Moderators, Sports Moderators, Paid Member Posts: 30,410 Mod ✭✭✭✭Podge_irl


    maybe even a chance to chip away at that staggering national debt

    lol?

    The man is overseeing a record, off the charts increase in the national debt.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 902 ✭✭✭xl500




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,540 ✭✭✭badabing106


    The U.S. initiated the tariff threat, forcing the EU to negotiate on its terms. The deal reflects U.S. priorities (e.g., energy exports, deficit reduction) more than EU ones.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 422 ✭✭bluedex


    As has been clearly pointed out numerous times, there is no deal. Just an agreement on very broad principles of a framework, within which a number of trade deals will be negotiated, over the next few years most likely.

    However, I don't expect this to sink in with people who've cherry picked the most negative opinion they can find and stated it as unequivocal fact, they've already made their mind up.

    Never argue with an idiot. They will only bring you down to their level and beat you with experience.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 3,072 ✭✭✭Glaceon


    My wife showed me one of these yesterday. Some MAGA head saying that he obeys the constitution as it was originally written. So the other lad says something along the lines of “give me your guns then”. He had to explain what the Second Amendment was, an amendment!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,614 ✭✭✭francois




  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,479 ✭✭✭✭Frank Bullitt


    This just proves, AGAIN, that Trump was made a fool of.



Advertisement