Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
If we do not hit our goal we will be forced to close the site.

Current status: https://keepboardsalive.com/

Annual subs are best for most impact. If you are still undecided on going Ad Free - you can also donate using the Paypal Donate option. All contribution helps. Thank you.

Irish economy exceeding capacity to provide infrastructure , time to slow down?

  • 26-07-2025 03:46PM
    #1
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,690 ✭✭✭


    I heard a bit of David McWilliams on the radio this morning. McWilliams is a waffler, but sometimes he does provide clear insight. His basic premise was that Ireland should be run so as to not further aggravate the housing situation. So issuing tens of thousands of visas does not make sense when there are not enough houses. He noted that the immigration debate tended to be between those that don't want foreigners and those that see nothing wrong with foreigners, but there hasn't been a voice for those that see that there is nothing wrong with foreigners, but that there cannot be too many of them all the same.

    Ireland is like someone, a builder perhaps, who had been short of work in the past who now takes on every job offered regardless of how busy he is and who never gets to see his family. Perhaps we now need to choose and if something is lost then let that be a deliberate choice. There is coverage of an Amazon project that went elsewhere owing to an inability to get a power supply and that this would "lose jobs". But were those jobs needed, who would do them? Would any spare electrical capacity not be better used for houses or charging electric cars or something we want?

    In a way, I can see why the government does not try and slow things down. The economy is going gangbusters now, but with Trump and so on it may slow dramatically of its own accord and there is no advantage in slowing it a few months before that may happen anyway. Perhaps this will happen and postpone the issue, but it will still remain. A prosperous country can only increase GDP substantially more than other prosperous countries by increasing its workforce, and this is mostly immigration, and this greatly increases demand for housing and you need to deal with that or reduce the growth.

    Post edited by Charles Babbage on


«1

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 901 ✭✭✭Exiled Rebel


    Re Amazon no jobs were lost when we're already at full employment. The issue behind them moving elsewhere though is a serious concern and that's the lack of capacity in our grid. ESBN are really struggling to keep up with demand. Hopefully more and more renewable projects come online in the next 24 months along with the interconnector to France because the constraints are having are serious impact on projects around the country.

    The lack of power is one of the most critical challenges the state is facing and is partially responsible for the housing crisis which you mentioned.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 595 ✭✭✭CrookedJack


    I think you're possibly a bit confused as to what the term overheating means in respect to an economy. It is where a the economic growth is outrunning the workforce capacity, leading to spiking demand with cost and salary inflation. Basically not enough workers so salaries rise, so cost of goods rise, so salaries rise, and on, and on….

    This is the opposite of your point. the government importing more workers increases the capacity of the economy to support growth.

    Of course if your real point is just anti-immigration then that's another matter.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,690 ✭✭✭Charles Babbage


    I am not at all confused, the Irish economy has outrun its ability to provide enough houses and of course is one of the most expensive countries in Europe.

    And the barb about my "real point is just anti-immigration" is typical of this immaturity of this debate. Some people seem to imply that immigration is a good thing regardless of its effects on housing prices or anything else in the country. I do not have an problems with immigrants as individuals, and McWilliams does not, but I am rational to know that the number cannot be unlimited without adverse affects.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 35,804 ✭✭✭✭NIMAN


    Housing is our main problem in this country, not electricity supply.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,457 ✭✭✭✭Idbatterim


    There are many very good articles now, on how poorly ffg have been managing the economy and how reckless it is. Which is fact. Sign up to the sunday business post. The other wasters in the Dail will be as bad if not worse. If the **** hits the fan again and all the proper analysis starts pouring in, many will see this reckless last few years, as even more inexcusable than the celtic tiger...

    This time however, that cohort of waffling wasters ffg have been in bed together. No more excuses, it's delicious...

    As for housing, it's so so complex. Notice dublin just still littered with low rise new builds...



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 31,538 ✭✭✭✭Wanderer78


    you cant increase housing output without increasing infrastructure building, which includes power system expansion, i.e. we re stuck, housing output has stalled, and is gonna stay so until we start addressing our infrastructure capacity, so never basically…..



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,690 ✭✭✭Charles Babbage




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 31,538 ✭✭✭✭Wanderer78


    …and since we re gonna keep voting in the same government over and over, the same thinking is gonna remain, i.e. we re screwed in the long run, or more so your kids, grand kids, nieces and nephews are, which means we all are!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 595 ✭✭✭CrookedJack


    You say you're not confused but don't actually address that you're not talking about an overheated economy, you're talking about an undersupplied housing market. These are not the same thing.

    Regardless, ending immigration is not a solution for an overheated economy, it is the opposite, as it will increase the problem.

    To cool the economy the government would need to reduce the amount of money in circulation, by increasing taxes, encouraging savings, driving wages down, etc. I don't think you want any of these things do you?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,690 ✭✭✭Charles Babbage


    Why don't you engage with the substance of the point about housing and stop arguing about the exact definition of overheating?



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 26,212 ✭✭✭✭Larbre34


    He is an incorrigible blowhard, with an immense welcome for himself and for his own voice. And the one time a Minister of Finance listened to him, ie Brian Lenihan in 2008, a bad situation was made worse.

    Right now, there is no obvious strategy. Only contingency. And contingency is what we heard from the government during the week.

    A) There will be a reasonable US trade deal and we will be able to carry on, with a tariff rate of 10 or 15% naturally cooling things as we settle into a new paradigm.

    Or B) There will be no trade deal and a trade war begins with 30 to 200% tariffs and the EU goes into recession, especially the likes of Germany. In which case, the stimulus of the NDP's €275 Billion will be well needed, to be metered out over the next 10 years, washing through the economy like a cool beer, employing tens of thousands in building and manufacturing, returning 60% of all investment in VAT, PAYE and corporation taxes.

    The housing crisis is not a monetary or an economic crisis. And its definitely not linked to what happens between the US and EU. What it is, is a crisis of politics and of strategy.

    Successive governments have failed to face down meddling vested interests, whether objectors or lawyers or planners or judges.

    They have failed to put a large scale overarching ideology in place, which will see housing expanded in bad times, not stopped.

    Which would provide for fair effort rewarded with fair profit for developers, not incentivised with free exchequer top-ups.

    Which would see the State build 1 out of every 3 homes and keep them in ownership of the state in perpetuity for the benefit of those who will never have the resources to put down €150,000 of a deposit on a gaff, or who are economically disadvantaged through illness or advanced age.

    David McWilliams will never have the answers, because he doesn't exist enough in the real world, but rather in the world of the textbook and the desktop exercise.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,393 ✭✭✭✭Jim_Hodge


    I read the substantive point in the OP to be very much an overheating economy rather than housing. Maybe reword it for clarity and edit the thread title.

    EDIT. The thread has been renamed and the OP completely rewritten.

    Post edited by Jim_Hodge on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 31,679 ✭✭✭✭zell12




  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Computer Games Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 8,720 CMod ✭✭✭✭Sierra Oscar


    Goes hand in hand in fairness. There are multiple housing estates all over the country that cannot commence due to constraints with the electricity supply. Same with sewage and water infrastructure.

    Infrastructure is now one of the greatest bottlenecks in housing supply, not planning. There is planning approved for thousands of homes that cannot commence due to infrastructure constraints. That’s before you even consider transport infrastructure constraints.

    https://www.thetimes.com/world/ireland-world/article/housing-target-put-at-risk-by-slowdown-in-electricity-connection-h0h3bq5gq

    https://www.thejournal.ie/portlaoise-houses-esb-connection-6758012-Jul2025/

    https://www.irishtimes.com/business/2025/07/01/esb-networks-seeks-increase-to-aid-cost-of-home-connections/

    https://www.irishtimes.com/ireland/housing-planning/2025/05/05/new-homes-delayed-due-to-electricity-access-say-builders/

    https://www.newstalk.com/news/lack-of-water-infrastructure-putting-housing-targets-at-risk-expert-2168081

    https://www.rte.ie/news/2025/0512/1512440-ue-water-infrastructure/

    https://www.businesspost.ie/property/cairn-told-it-cant-build-640-home-swords-estate-until-metrolink-is-running/



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 667 ✭✭✭BP_RS3813


    Infrastructure will never be planned though. Governments work in 4/5 year cycles - what matters is getting voted in, not doing the right job.

    You would need a government full of people who are actively looking towards the next 50 years not just the next few years. That will never happen to due to human nature prioritising short term greed/survival over actually planning for the future.

    Whilst immigration, housing and infrastructure are all linked - a simple bit of foresight and future planning would have fixed all of these issues had the governments in power from 1990-2010 been looking towards the 2020's and onwards.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,690 ✭✭✭Charles Babbage


    McWilliams provided one suggestion, stop issuing tens of thousands of visas when we cannot house those already here. Do you agree?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,860 ✭✭✭standardg60


    In a word, no. Anyone issued a visa comes here to contribute to the economy, they're a net profit. The vast majority who cannot be housed here are reliant on those arriving to provide the tax to do so.

    This isn't rocket science, so as mentioned above I would wonder if it's just an anti immigration stance. And yes McWilliams is a waffler, plenty foresaw the crash before he claimed he was the first.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,690 ✭✭✭Charles Babbage


    Every person arriving, other than builders, reduces the supply of housing for those who are already here. Most of these do not need the taxpayer to support them, they only need houses at a reasonable price.

    This is not rocket science, but some people prefer to put forward nonsense about an anti immigration stance.

    You can only improve things by

    A. building more houses, thst takes time at best no matter ho much money you spend

    B. Encouraging more emigration, which is not a proper objective for a government elected by Irish people

    C. Reducing immigration.

    Which one do you choose?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 667 ✭✭✭BP_RS3813


    Option D (what should have been started 20/30 years ago): Plan ahead for the increased immigration and growing population accordingly via expanding infrastructure (Elec/Water) and the amount of housing.

    However option D is a bit too late unfortunatly. However your options ideally never should have been needed.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,393 ✭✭✭✭Jim_Hodge


    I'm not exactly disagreeing with you but I would point out that within the past 20 years we had a surplus of housing and "ghost estates" scattered around the country.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 550 ✭✭✭itsacoolday


    Ireland slow down building infrastructure? The Chinese build more in an hour than we build in a decade. Most of our infrastructure like railways, harbours, lighthouses, historic buildings / public buildings of architectural merit, canals, etc were built by the British, and most of our motorways built by the EEC / EU. We have littered the countryside with bungalow bliss and have decaying town and village centers, and our brightest leaving for foreign shores like Australia.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 667 ✭✭✭BP_RS3813


    Whilst true they havn't exactly been put to use have they?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 31,538 ✭✭✭✭Wanderer78


    mcwilliams is whats called a heterodox economist, hes a serial critic of mainstream economics, i.e. neoclassical, which is whats mainly thought in academia, and the fundamental basis of policy thinking, and surprise surprise, it fails time and time again, its not our reality at all, as one of my favorite economist says, 'its neat, plausible, but actually wrong'!

    its extremely disturbing to think a finance minister would consult such a person, effectively a journalist, in the midst of one of the most serious economic crisis, i.e. lenihan had lost faith in his advisors, and turned to mcwilliams, which is beyond disturbing to realise, as most economic advisors are primarily neoclassically trained, and still is the case. lenihan was thrown under the bus, and by his own party, the pressure rapidly accelerated his illness, and ultimately lead to his death, so thats the kinna lads you re dealing with in parties such as ff!

    people such as mcwilliams have spent their lives heavily criticising the mainstream, which in itself is far removed from reality, it is just all theory, but is radically and dangerously wrong, but successive governments after governments keep defaulting to its thinking, on both the left and right, we re basically now fcuked from such thinking, and its not changing, even after one of the most serious global crashes in human history, and it has become deeply embedded in our critical institutions, which are refusing to change.

    mcwilliams was actually one of the first irish commentators to speak about how the previous boom was just a scam, and was gonna pop, no his was not the first person on the planet to speak up and realise so, but he was one of the first irish commentators to call it out, he was clearly right, and nothing has changed since, here we are again, in yet another property bubble, but in a far worse state!

    our governments and our major state bodies are simply out of ideas, the ideologies that have been embraced globally, for the last few decades, are now rapidly failing, yet we dont seem to be able to realise this, and pivot, our governments seem to think, its business as usual, but its not, theyre quickly losing the people, and their faith in resolving this critical issues, we re going rogue, its not gonna be pretty!

    yes, increasing state involvement in critical sectors such as housing is actually the only way to try resolve such issues, but its not gonna happen, and for a very long time, as this is fundamental no no under modern political and economic ideology, preferring more fire sector, financialised approaches, which only yields hyper inflated prices, chronic supply problems and extreme market dysfunction, our policy makers are still hardwired to think, it ll eventually work, but it wont!

    funnily enough, we were actually starting to experience supply issues during the height of the previous crash, when we were all talking of ghost estates, i.e. the houses were in the wrong places, dublin was starting to experience supply shortages at the time, another failure of the financialised model, whereby the priority becomes wealth extraction, i.e. rent seeking, rather than actually whats needed, in this case, houses where theyre actually needed, its a major failure, and our governments and states are not equipped to deal with it at all, and in fact, keep exasperating the problem



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,085 ✭✭✭✭Del2005


    It's easy to build when you don't have to consider the local population or environment.

    I always have a laugh when people say that are brightest are going to Australia. That's got the same housing problems but it's economy is in trouble because of its reliance on China, they also hate economic immigration.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 31,538 ✭✭✭✭Wanderer78


    theyve also been waiting for a major housing crash, which has yet to happen, nobody has a real understanding of such dynamics, what truly causes such situations, as its simply extremely complex, but we certainly have a better understanding of why, particularly since 08



  • Moderators, Sports Moderators, Paid Member Posts: 30,384 Mod ✭✭✭✭Podge_irl


    While true, the very existence of the ghost estates dozens of miles from any economic centre is another result of our terrible planning policies over the last 40 years that favoured car dependent low density housing in the middle of nowhere over dense infill cause some old people will get upset and go to receptive media.

    Still we can't go back in time. Simply stopping immigration (or severely curtailing it) isn't going to be some panacea though.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,299 ✭✭✭Emblematic


    I don't think anyone is talking about stopping immigration altogether, certainly not McWilliams who has said that immigration is needed.

    What is needed is a refocusing of immigration policy towards the needs of the people rather than against the needs of the people. This may mean a significant reduction in overall numbers, but this reduction would also make the country more attractive for those specific immigrants the country needs to come here.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 31,538 ✭✭✭✭Wanderer78


    probably wont be a significant reduction, whos here is here, but the doors are definitely gonna be tightened, which means we further embrace other critical issues such as aging demographics, which brings its own set of problems, particularly in the long term



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,299 ✭✭✭Emblematic


    I don't think anyone, either, is asking to deport those already permanently resident in the country.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 31,538 ✭✭✭✭Wanderer78


    immigration is a mess though, it was never gonna work, just opening the doors, with little or no effective plans on what to do with those people, little or no public investment, what a disaster. we ve clearly needed to rapidly expand the infrastructure needed to do so, but completely failed to direct the whole thing, we should have been directing immigrants more so towards critical sectors such as construction, but we just opened the doors, and walked away!



Advertisement