Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/

Hamas strike on Israel

1159916001602160416051640

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,451 ✭✭✭SafeSurfer


    So just to clarify. To support a claim that you have already made you are asking multiple questions with “no hiding” and a yes or no answer.

    You are so disingenuous it’s hard to take you seriously.

    Yes. I have always wanted hostages returned safely to their loved ones.

    Are you going to ask each individual poster or just admit that yet again you have been found out in making false claims to distract from a genocide you defend.

    Multo autem ad rem magis pertinet quallis tibi vide aris quam allis



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,451 ✭✭✭SafeSurfer


    Multo autem ad rem magis pertinet quallis tibi vide aris quam allis



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,218 ✭✭✭✭Tony EH


    it is more important to get the terminology correct (and by correct, I mean show Israel in the best possible light).

    Which is why trying to converse with liars is a complete waste of time. They aren't interested in discussion. Dissemination of lies is what's important to them.

    That is what is so depressing about this whole thing, both on boards and even within the wider media. People will trot out slogans, or political speak, refusing to fully call it out for what it is, argue over terminology and deflection and dance around in all kinds of circles and it is almost like the actual dying kids are secondary to that.

    What does that say about the people who are willing to lower themselves to such a level. They are willing to become the lowest of the low, and for what? A stupid, pig headed, political position?

    You'd have to question the intellectual capabilities, at the very least, of a person like that.

    There seems to be an almost immunity or war weariness from certain sections, that it does not shock some people any more.

    It doesn't have anything to do with weariness. These people are just fine with others being starved and murdered. They haven't the basic human ability to put themselves in the others shoes and try to imagine what it would be like to drag pieces of your dead child out of the rubble of your home and then to later watch your other child starving because the same people that destroyed everything else also restricts the influx of food to starvation levels.

    There are people on here and elsewhere that are rubbing their hands with glee at the sights that appal most people.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,218 ✭✭✭✭Tony EH


    The only reason any hostages are still with HAMAS is because Israel chose to break the ceasefire in the middle of them being handed back.

    Netanyahu and his criminals don't give a damn about the hostages, except when they can use them as an excuse to fuel their lies.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,218 ✭✭✭✭Tony EH


    When a poster has to follow up their lies with a complete fantasy that the "west" won't allow Israel to continue rolling over Gaza, you know you're not dealing with someone who's even remotely honest.

    There's no point in even responding to spoofers like that.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 11,875 ✭✭✭✭Cluedo Monopoly


    7th attempt since you are so verbose.

    Have Israel committed any war crimes in your opinion?

    ...and disappear

    Post edited by Cluedo Monopoly on

    What are they doing in the Hyacinth House?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 11,875 ✭✭✭✭Cluedo Monopoly


    There are people who will never ever ever criticise an Israeli action if there is even the remotest risk that it might impact them financially in the future (e.g. risk of losing some FDI). Their opinions are completely money oriented.

    What are they doing in the Hyacinth House?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,730 ✭✭✭Potatoeman


    The UN does not have a mandate to intervene in any conflict, they can only return fire if fired on. They were setup that way specifically as no country wanted them intervening in conflicts they were involved in. That’s why they were watching the Rwanda genocide happen directly outside their base and people were throwing their babies over the walls. Read “we did nothing” where the author talks to UN troops about different conflicts.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,730 ✭✭✭Potatoeman


    Don’t fire missiles across the border and expect no reaction. Look at what’s happening in Thailand and Cambodia right now.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,300 ✭✭✭Suckler


    Fire when fired upon was the question the poster posed - "What if Israel attacked the UN". Even having them in safe zones/food distribution zones etc. would be a welcome relief to allow aid to flow and prevent the pot shots from Israeli/mercenary soldiers.

    There could/should be other repercussions to avoid a Rwanda or Dutchbat scenario.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 8,644 ✭✭✭Odhinn


    It seems that what most saw as a condemnable over-reaction is in fact illegal -

    "The UK government’s ban on Palestine Action limits the rights and freedoms of people in the UK and is at odds with international law, the UN human rights chief has said.

    Volker Türk, the UN human rights commissioner, said ministers’ decision to designate the group a terrorist organisation was “disproportionate and unnecessary” and called on them to rescind it."

    https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2025/jul/25/uk-ban-palestine-action-odds-international-law-un-rights-volker-turk



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,136 ✭✭✭Spudmonkey


    I'm still baffled that two years on you could still be on here trying to say why killing kids is wrong but here we are.

    I've given up tbh, its like punching smoke, the goalposts move and the lies persist. I suppose people don't like to hear they're racist and they just dig their heels in.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,630 ✭✭✭✭markodaly


    That is right from the post-truth concept right there. Sure we can all make up stuff so.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 3,869 ✭✭✭dmcdona


    and a quarter of the aid "lost" was as a result of Israeli military actions:

    "The analysis found that at least 44 of the 156 incidents where aid supplies were reported stolen or lost were "either directly or indirectly" due to Israeli military actions, according to the briefing slides."



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,171 ✭✭✭Rocket_GD


    Oh we know the Israel and IDF defenders have been doing it consistently to try for some strange reason to justify the murder and starvation of innocent children for 2 years.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,630 ✭✭✭✭markodaly


    If Israel agree to end the war, hostages will be released, that much is clear

    From the reports I have read, that is not clear at all. Hamas want Israel to withdraw and leave them in power after the war ends. Neither of which are under remit of Hamas at the moment.
    If it were as simple as you state, the war would have been over much sooner.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,630 ✭✭✭✭markodaly


    I mean that in the general sense.

    This war will end, hopefully very, very soon. I would love for it to end tomorrow morning.

    But the question is, what's next for the Palestinians and their leadership? Are they just going to row back into Hamas or some other form of Islamofascism? Or some kleptocratic group like Fatah or the PLA? Who is going to run Gaza after the war? Surely Hamas cannot stay, everyone is in agreement on that right? Right..?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,171 ✭✭✭Rocket_GD


    Surely Benjamin Netanyahu cannot stay and the IDF needs to be disbanded and organised into an actual army and not a psuedo terrorist group, everyone is in agreement on that right? Right..?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,630 ✭✭✭✭markodaly


    Sorry Marco, you don't think it is surprising that Israelis disregard the ethnic cleansing and warcrimes being committed against Palestinian civilians, men women and children, and the complete devastation in Gaza?

    Where is the evidence to suggest they are disregarding what is going on in Gaza? There is none.

    A poll result about a question that is not related doesn't mean they disregard the current situation in Gaza.

    I also note that those polls are inherently skewed to get a certain result. Note that they only ask Israelis who are Jewish, but disregard Israelis who are Arab, Christian or 'other'…

    If you want to say that Israeli Jews are bloodthirsty maniacs, just say it….



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,630 ✭✭✭✭markodaly


    Bibi will get his day at the next election, hopefully, and the IDF, well, they are the national army of a nation state, so good luck with that.

    But it's quite illuminating that you seem to have no issues with Hamas staying in power, given the cluster **** their regime has brought to the average Gazan. Not every retort has to be a 'whatabout'. Are you happy with a right-wing Islamofascist terrorist entity ruling over the lives of 2 million people, and whose leadership has brought them nothing but death, misery war?



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 31,506 ✭✭✭✭blanch152


    So now the word of a UN human rights commissioner makes something illegal?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,171 ✭✭✭Rocket_GD


    Where did I say that Hamas should stay in power? I didn't, you've just made that up.

    Your other IDF supporter refused to answer the question, let's see will you.

    Do you condemn Israel and IDF for there murderous actions over the past 2 years?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 31,506 ✭✭✭✭blanch152


    The West from day 1 has called for the immediate release of the hostages. To date, Hamas have defied that request. What makes you think the West will change their demands once their demand is met?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 494 ✭✭mvt


    No but it might make it immoral.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 8,644 ✭✭✭Odhinn


    He's qualified to have an opinion. The Brit courts will doubtless have to consider international law in their decision making.

    Do you think they should have been designated a "terror" group?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 31,506 ✭✭✭✭blanch152




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 8,644 ✭✭✭Odhinn




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,097 ✭✭✭Miniegg


    Marko, seriously - antismeitism accusations? Pathetic.

    The irony is that it is you and your ilk consistently conflate opposition to this conflict as antisemetic, which of course paints all the depravity and death we are witnessing as representative of Judaism.

    You and your buddies never see the damage you are doing to good Jewish people when you say this. Pointing your fingers and claiming hatred of Jews at those rightfully criticizing a nation that is committing genocide doesn't for a second lessen your antisemetic (and islamophobic) points of view. In my experience those who attempt this (not necessarily you I hope) just happen to hate Muslims a little bit more than they do Jews.

    Back to the topic at hand, the poll on the BBC article I sent you concluded 60% of Israelis were apathetic to IDF conduct Vs Gazans. When Jewish, this rose to 75%. That is not antisemetic, that is what the polls said.

    There are many polls like this. The most recent poll I sent showed that many Israelis support the ethnic cleansing of Gaza (removal of the population), and a v large minority support their genocide (removal and or murder). You said no poll existed showing this, and it does. And instead of maybe addressing your own ignorance in the matter, you instead claim me showing you this is antisemetic?

    This poll was conducted by Penn state in Hebrew, so yes Jewish people responded. Are we to believe that, along with groups like the UN, Amnesty, Medicines sans frontiers and the hundreds of others coming down hard on Israel, that Penn state are also antisemetic?

    I am not painting Jewish people as anything, I am refuting you saying that Israeli citizens would ensure the war would end should the IDF begin a process of exterminating Gazans.

    You have absolutely no way of knowing this wouldn't happen given IDF conduct so far, and your ascertarion that Israelis would stop this are not convincing in any way

    When you say that hostages be released and this will be over, you are either incredibly gullible, stupid, or tacitly supporting putting 2 million Gazans at risk of extermination, for the lives of 20 people.

    Post edited by Miniegg on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,097 ✭✭✭Miniegg


    The only civilians Hamas are a risk to are those 20 hostages.

    They are a defeated, pathetic organisation, the only reason they are still around is due to them being propped up by Israel to show some veneer of fighting an enemy whilst they commit genocide against the civilian population of Gaza.

    The IDF on the other hand, are a risk to millions.

    I don't hold the lives of 20 innocent people to be above the lives of 2 million equally innocent people.

    Answer my question.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 705 ✭✭✭sheepysheep


    So, just to be clear, on OCT 7th 2023 when the Islamic Jihadist terrorist organisation Hamas streamed across the border with murderous intent you were all hung-ho for that incursion up to the point that they started killing civilians?

    Were you under the impression that Hamas were chivalrous knights of the round table and would scorn any opportunity to kill Jews? Resistance, is it? Not terrorists. That's the fig leaf you're hiding behind.

    You posted on OCT 7th Fair play to Hamas for stepping up to the mark.

    Only Hamas supporters expresss such support for Hamas. No one else.

    Everything else is just the same endless word games adopted by numerous posters to dog whistle their fellow travellers, to find a formula of words to say what they mean without openly expressing it, always implied, never forthrightly stated.

    You're hoist on your own petard here. They're your words. To any honest reader, the meaning is unequivocal.



Advertisement