Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
If we do not hit our goal we will be forced to close the site.

Current status: https://keepboardsalive.com/

Annual subs are best for most impact. If you are still undecided on going Ad Free - you can also donate using the Paypal Donate option. All contribution helps. Thank you.

Hamas strike on Israel

1159615971599160116021672

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,105 ✭✭✭RoyalCelt


    Ironic that since you've resorted to patrolling grammar.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 850 ✭✭✭batman75


    Seeing reports on X that the Houthis are asking Arab countries to let their soldiers march across to get to Israel and Gaza to engage in a ground offensive. Puts the likes of Jordan and Saudi Arabia in a tricky spot.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,105 ✭✭✭RoyalCelt


    I fully agree with your military analysis and that he took advantage to pursue his extremist personal goals. However I just can't see how Israel isn't going to exist. It's wishful thinking imo. I could be wrong I just don't see it.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,697 ✭✭✭Frank Grimes




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,697 ✭✭✭Frank Grimes




  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,105 ✭✭✭RoyalCelt


    How'd you think that'd go marching across the desert at Israel? If their commander in chief gives the go ahead he's on the Israeli payroll. Talk about fish in a barrel.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,105 ✭✭✭RoyalCelt


    You're free to not reply then or hit the ignore button. Like I said look who's talking.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 850 ✭✭✭batman75


    The attack by Hamas on October7th shattered Israeli perceptions of military invincibility. Once you feel vulnerable to being attacked your sense of security is gone. Iran went on to cause damage to key infrastructure like the port in Haifa again reinforcing vulnerability.

    The second reason is diplomatically Israel is a pariah state. The world will never forget or forgive the genocide it is carrying out in Gaza.

    Thirdly the Israeli economy is on it's knees. Eilat is out of commission. Haifa is badly damaged. Israel as an economic party is damaged goods and trading with it will be frowned upon.

    Settler colonial projects which is essentially what Israel is can only succeed once people want to move there and live there. People are fleeing Israel. Just ask the Cypriots. Their will never be peace in the middle east as long as Israel continues to exist. The existence of Israel required the Jews to subjugate the Palestinians which was a recipe for disaster from the get go. The whole project was built on quicksand.

    I have no wish to see Jews or Israeli forcibly moved from what is now called Israel. If they are willing to live in peace alongside the natives of the land as equals in lets say a country called Palestine great. Can we expect the Palestinians to accept having Jews living in a free Palestine well that's not for me to say?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,697 ✭✭✭Frank Grimes


    It's not trolling to point out someone who claims to be an Irish Gaeilgeoir (a) uses the word Éire and (b) can't use a fada is probably being insincere with their post. But given your posts are consistently insincere I'm not surprised with what you are trying, and failing to do. Accuse me of trolling again or whatever you want, I honestly couldn't care less what you think.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 850 ✭✭✭batman75


    I'm only relaying what I see on X. In theory yes in a desert against air power they'd be easy pick off. All that being said the feeling is the IDF are stretched to the limit, tired and demoralised.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,115 ✭✭✭Miniegg


    But the Israeli voters are polling as showing an almost complete apathy to mass warcrimes being committed on Gazans! Will you not even address this? Look it up for yourself.

    Israeli voters want hostages returned. That is the pressure being put on Netenyahu. Most protesters are out on the streets because of this (and because of the corruption allegations against Netenyahu).

    As polls show - the appalling treatment of Gazans by the IDF is not of primary concern to 60% of Israelis / 75% of Jewish Israelis, who are well aware of mass warcrimes. I don't know much about the differences between Israel and Russia, but that is staggering, is it not?

    Does that, to you, sound like a populace who will rise up and oust a government (already accused by almost all scholars specialising in genocide as committing that act) if they decide to finish their plan once hostages are released?

    What I am saying doesn't need to be "born out of fact", nobody can read the future - but you have the pairing of a clearly genocidal government and a clearly apathetic population. With this mix, you have absolutely no idea what will happen if those hostages are released. To flippantly say "release the hostages and this will end" is playing with the lives of millions of Gazans.

    Post edited by Miniegg on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,105 ✭✭✭RoyalCelt


    Nobody is invincible. I don't think your analysis reflects reality. A quick Google would reveal Haifa port is back fully operational. It was indeed hit but it's a huge port and hitting it with a missile was never going to affect it for long.

    I guess time will tell on the economics side. My gut feeling is they'll not crumble. I can't see the Jewish population declining after the war is over. It'll continue to increase from high birth rates and inward migration from other Jews.

    The damage suffered by Iran was ridiculously higher. Their entire command decimated, air defence wiped out and strike capability degraded. Not to mention the damage to the nuclear program. If Israel wanted they could have neutralised it's ability to produce oil and gas as well. They had them by the balls. And the have America by the balls so they'll never truly run out of military equipment. You be assured they've largely restocked.

    As for your last paragraph what would you propose? A single state of Palestine with free movement for everyone whether Jew or Muslim? Who'd control the military?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,105 ✭✭✭RoyalCelt


    Classic bad faith argument. Constantly accuse me of trolling and now you're on the defense with that after i tell you to look in the mirror.

    I'm also fluent in English. You could apply that same broken logic every time I leave out an apostrophe or make another grammatical error.

    I type fast and there's a red line under errors so if not corrected it shows how much I care about grammar police like you. As they say you've lost the argument when you go down that route.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 850 ✭✭✭batman75


    I saw today that unless Haifa port is repaired Israel will experience fuel shortages. Again with the lack of clear information coming out of Israel it's hard to know what's true or not. That also speaks to how much damage either Iran or Israel suffered. Both nations surpressed information for both morale purposes and security.

    A single state of Palestine for sure with free movement. The two keys stumbling blocks would be could the Palestinians be prepared to live alongside those that supported their genocide. Secondly would the Israeli's who chose to remain denounce Zionism. The military would have to be based on ethnic percent of population. The only hope Israel had to survive as a state in perpetuity was to be truly egalitarian. But that was never the intention of the Zionists who see Palestinians as the Nazi's saw Jews. A truly tragic lack of self reflection.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,229 ✭✭✭bobbysands81


    You want to explain that post cos the way I’m reading it is that it sounds pretty sick.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,229 ✭✭✭bobbysands81


    Oh yeah, as soon as the hostages are handed back Israel is just going to retreat, walk away and rebuild Palestine.

    Israel is as evil as it gets, stop believing their propaganda.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,105 ✭✭✭RoyalCelt


    There's visual evidence after the missile hit the port and it's not that bad. I'm pretty sure there's a website where you can track all international shipping. You could check the logs and see the activity for that port and the type of ships like cargo or tankers. I haven't checked but I suspect it's fully operational.

    An army based on ethnic percentage would give the Jews control so at least on that issue they'd be more willing to agree. Would the state be democratic? Democracy to be fair has a lot of trouble lasting in that region.

    You bring up a fair point would the Palestinians be prepared to live alongside? Some would for sure but a lot will be against it. But you didn't ask the question would the Jews be willing to live alongside the Palestinians? Again some would some wouldn't. It's making this ideal single state very difficult. We've still not managed that on our own island. Still occupied by the United Kingdom.

    In our lifetimes I can't see it. A major stumbling block is the location is home to the holiest Jewish sites (about 3,000 years old) and some pretty holy Islamic sites too (over 1000 year). As long as people hold these religions above all else it's not going to be easy. Islam comes before a nation and I'm not sure about Judaism on that matter but I'm pretty sure they believe in a homeland, promised land etc etc. It's like an immovable object meets and unstoppable force when these two people's are indoctrinated with these books from such a young age.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 850 ✭✭✭batman75


    The Palestinians are far more sinned against in the M/East by Israel than vice versa so for me whether Jews could live alongside Palestinians is a mute point. Your asking that question would suggest you see it as a 50:50 blame game. That's ok difference of opinions are healthy once argued respectfully.

    I don't think Israel was ever truly democratic due to the Zionist ideology that underpinned it's existence since 1948.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,093 ✭✭✭✭Strazdas


    If Netanyahu had responded to October 7th in a limited and targeted way, he would have had the moral high ground and could nearly have been able to portray Israel as the 'good guys' in the conflict with Hamas. But instead he started recklessly bombing Gaza and within two or three weeks, thousands of innocent Gazan civilians were already dead.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,105 ✭✭✭RoyalCelt


    No it's truly democratic for only Jewish people in Israel so by our standards it's not truly democratic.

    In terms of blame game if you go off deaths and injuries alone Israel will get the lions share of it. But in these wars the loser will often suffer a lot more. If HAMAS etc were the superior force they'd have less losses than the Israeli's.

    It's better to look at these situations from an ideological point of view. There's no denying Jews have been far more sinned against overall by the European powers mainly Germany and by Muslims if you want to talk absolute numbers. You hardly expect putting them under the control of Palestinians would work out well for them? History suggests it doesn't.

    There's only two realistic options here a 2 state solution or a 1 state solution. It didn't go too well in Lebanon between Muslims and Christians I can't see a 1 state attempt going well in reality with Israeli's and Palestinians having a lot more bad blood then in Lebanon.

    All things being right it should but it won't. That leaves a 2 state solution and for the sake of humanity I hope it happens.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 25,948 ✭✭✭✭Timberrrrrrrr


    Would you prefer the term murdered?

    How About

    Gunned down in cold blood?

    If 3 people are walking towards you clearly naked wearing nothing but underpants with hands in the air and holding white flags and you proceed to shoot them dead, you can definitely say that they were executed.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,697 ✭✭✭Frank Grimes




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,697 ✭✭✭Frank Grimes


    Like I said earlier, they got in the way of the bullets. The poor defenseless IDF soldiers were probably terrified by these semi-naked people waving a white flag.

    Post edited by Frank Grimes on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,635 ✭✭✭brickster69


    This is the fourth time Macron has announced he would recognize Palestine this year Starmer giving strong words because the media is now covering forced starvation and voters are getting upset.

    As the strongly worded letter was released the spy plane was on it's way to Gaza as it does everyday and last weekend the head of Israel's air force was being wined and dined by the RAF at an air show.

    "if you get on the wrong train, get off at the nearest station, the longer it takes you to get off, the more expensive the return trip will be."



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 600 ✭✭✭Lawlesz


    Yes but this is what happens. How long has that poster been arguing over the semantics of what to call it? Almost no mention of the three innocents who were killed, it is more important to get the terminology correct (and by correct, I mean show Israel in the best possible light).

    That is what is so depressing about this whole thing, both on boards and even within the wider media. People will trot out slogans, or political speak, refusing to fully call it out for what it is, argue over terminology and deflection and dance around in all kinds of circles and it is almost like the actual dying kids are secondary to that.

    There seems to be an almost immunity or war weariness from certain sections, that it does not shock some people any more. But thankfully, their numbers seem to be getting fewer rapidly, with more and more of the world and the worlds media finally waking up to this and calling the Israeli government and IDF and their supporters out for what they are.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,155 ✭✭✭Spudmonkey


    https://x.com/NizMhani/status/1948361095842082928?t=5IjVbW2qKib4mGBYjyPocg&s=19

    122 International aid organisations say that Israel is purposely starving Gazans (including at least one Israeli also)

    The only one to say Israel isn't...... Israel...

    Hmmm, I wonder who is lying....



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,462 ✭✭✭SafeSurfer


    Hezbollah let's not forget wasn't going to be easy for Israel especially when they could just fall back into parts of Lebanon where Israel couldn't reach.”

    Israel has bombed the absolute sh1t out of Lebanon over the years.
    What parts of Lebanon can Israel not reach?

    Multo autem ad rem magis pertinet quallis tibi vide aris quam allis



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 4,071 ✭✭✭dmcdona


    Its remarkable that the IDF who, according to some are the most moral army in world, best equipped and knowledgable force, not to be messed with etc. have so many "unfortunate accidents".

    The three hostages executed, scores of Israelis fleeing the music festival executed, 15 medics executed, 3 killed at the Holy Family Church, civilians carrying white flags executed, children selectively sniped - different body areas chosen depending on the day of the week.

    Videos of their atrocities have been posted here - gloating over their own War Crimes.

    But "might is right". And there are some who get "really excited" when the IDF commit another Crime - assuming they can peel themselves away from Call of Duty.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 4,071 ✭✭✭dmcdona


    Israel have never been able to respond to anything in a "limited" way.

    Just listening this morning to the Israelis going ballistic over France about to recognise the State of Palestine at the UN. That 147 of 193 UN members already recognise the State of Palestine is entirely lost on them.

    So far, in two years, Israel has attacked Gaza, East Jerusalem, the West Bank, Lebanon, Syria, Yemen and Golan. A load of Israeli football fans went nuts in Amsterdam - one fan lost a tooth in that particular "pogrom".

    As we're told here, "might is right". Israel is acting like the classic school bully - all it seems to understand is aggression, violence and conflict. It keeps whining on and on about how it is under "existential threat" whilst sat in their F17s, attack helicopters and battle tanks or their Tel Aviv bunker controlling swarms of drones.

    Then they whine on even more that "no-one likes us and they're all antisemitic wah, wah, wah" - quelle surprise…

    There are plenty of Israelis who see exactly this and are trying to change a mindset of aggression and bullying (quintessentially demonstrated by the settlers) - I hope they do and I hope the rest of the world backs them up and supports them to root out those who give Israel the Pariah status it currently deserves.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 4,071 ✭✭✭dmcdona


    It's an accurate accusation shared by many others.



Advertisement