Donald Trump the Megathread part II

Reducing something by 1000% means they would be paying the consumer.

Either he knows his base doesn't care that this is bollOx or he knows they don't care.

Not one single word uttered out of his mouth should be considered factual.

In fact, every single word should be considered a blatant lie unless proven to be otherwise.

He seems incapable of telling the truth. Everything has to be an exaggeration. It's exhausting.

I wonder why his businesses failed? 🙄

So Maxwell- is this a chance for her to “cut a deal”? This article suggests that’s possible

“Typically, cooperating witnesses receive certain benefits for working with the government, including visas, reduced sentences and, at times, government protection”

But…
“Some lawmakers have called for Maxwell to testify before Congress about her dealings with Epstein, a move that leading House Republicans have resisted.”

Why are “leading Republicans’ resisting this?

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2025/jul/22/ghislaine-maxwell-doj-trump-epstein

Shirley Maxwell testifying to congress is an “out” for Trump? He’s giving the “people” what they want- why the resistance? Will we see Trump “discrediting” Maxwell in the coming weeks? A difficult task to do considering how close she was to Epstein - there’s likely very little she didn’t know about when it came to matters of a sexual nature

is there any possibility that there is nothing in the files implicating any wrong doing by Trump. But Trump is using the files - by not releasing them- to deflect the media. Away from other ‘things ‘ that he is doing/wants to get done. Anything thing/any strategy goes in the US

T

I am trying to figure this 1000% out. I’ll use an example. Say, a product costs €10 and the cost is reduced by %50 , the price is then €5. Now if it is reduced by 100% then it is free .now , if the price is reduced by 1000% then the ‘seller’ gives the ‘purchaser’ €100 along with the product . So to clarify the above the purchaser is out of pocket by €10 before any reductions were implemented. But when the 1000% reduction was put in place he was better off by €100

Am I ‘off the head’ or what with the above interpretation?

Apparently some goons from DOJ are in the process of meeting with her - I reckon what she says will dictate whether she gets to take the stand or is moved to a max security prison - there’s no way DOJ is impartial at this point and if there’s even a whiff of scandal against Trump, she’ll likely meet a similar end to Epstein

Maybe the U.S. should put Trump in as the numerator at the vote tally after U.S. national election day. He would obviously be an outstanding teller, the best so far.

With the amount of knowledge that Ghislaine Maxwell has, will they fly her in to testify and will that Boeing jet make it?

Yeah I mean that’s a totally fair summary of how this might roll, given what this administration have done since January.which in itself is bizzare- we’re now totally attuned to what the new “normal” is for this crowd- we’re not in the least shockable anymore - if we can think of the daftest thing that could happen, we’re probably not far off what will happen 😀

Let's say an item costs a hundred euro. And its cost drops 1000%. Are you telling me the hundred euro item is still above zero? What number is it at exactly? Methinks you're struggling with the maths. 😂