Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
If we do not hit our goal we will be forced to close the site.

Current status: https://keepboardsalive.com/

Annual subs are best for most impact. If you are still undecided on going Ad Free - you can also donate using the Paypal Donate option. All contribution helps. Thank you.

Why do people drive unnecessarily large cars (AKA "SUVS")?

1606163656678

Comments

  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Arts Moderators, Sports Moderators, Paid Member Posts: 53,842 CMod ✭✭✭✭magicbastarder


    My comment was slightly tongue in cheek, your lengthy response is appreciated though.

    But to summarise it, you are saying that there's no such thing as a car larger than necessary? I obviously can't respond to the other points you made refuting arguments put forward by others.



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Arts Moderators, Sports Moderators, Paid Member Posts: 53,842 CMod ✭✭✭✭magicbastarder


    FWIW my point was based on, having commented on the excessively large size of some vehicles, essentially being told 'but there are much larger artics on the road, so you can't complain about private cars being large'.

    And FWIW (and I've mentioned this multiple times) my usual benchmark is that if a private car is too tall for an average adult male to see over, it's too tall. Certain exceptions apply of course.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 32,863 ✭✭✭✭AndrewJRenko


    What kind of hiviz panels do you have on your car?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,393 ✭✭✭Suckler


    my usual benchmark is that if a private car is too tall for an average adult male to see over, it's too tall.

    It's not a 'benchmark' it's simply an opinion you've attempted to legitimise based on a very random measurement.

    The whole thread is attempts to make "I don't like them" seem more legitimate.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,152 ✭✭✭Yeah Right


    No, I'm saying there's zero evidence for anyone making the claim that a particular car is unnecessary.

    Posters saying 'there's no reason for anyone in Ranelagh to own one' is provably and demonstrably lacking the info to make that call. If you see someone doing the shopping in a Ranger Raptor, you've no idea if they need that car for other purposes. It might be unnecessarily large for a trip to Lidl, but you don't know how necessary it is for whatever else they get up to during the week.

    I collect my little one from creche in a Tucson. Yes, it's too big for that particular job in isolation, but I also use it for other stuff……bringing his bike and/or the dog in the boot so we can get a bit of activity in before bedtime and bringing his grandparents to do the shopping on the way home, for example. It also put the missus at ease when we first brought the wee lad home and started driving him around the place because she has a much, much higher driving position than the previous car.

    Anyone observing me in the car park of the creche simply does not have the required information to hand to determine how (un)necessary that vehicle is for my needs. That goes doubly so when you see a car parked on the side of the road and post a picture of it in this thread giving out yards about wankpanzers and chelsea tractors.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 32,863 ✭✭✭✭AndrewJRenko


    Just to clarify - are you saying that most people think the vehicles are tools or most people think the drivers are tools?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,152 ✭✭✭Yeah Right


    I mentioned the 'roads not being able' angle because I remember addressing it months ago. It was as stupid then as it is now. "Sure our roads aren't capable of handling such large vehicles" is hyperbolic nonsense, as are a lot of other claims in this thread (people talking about cars doubling in size, anyone?). So I felt it necessary to address that aspect (hard to tell what's satirical in text format, I suppose).

    I've yet to see anyone make the claim you're putting forward in this post, but I will agree that it is equally as ridiculous/stupid.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,776 ✭✭✭mulbot




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 32,863 ✭✭✭✭AndrewJRenko


    That's a different criteria though. Remember when you said "everything possible"?



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Arts Moderators, Sports Moderators, Paid Member Posts: 53,842 CMod ✭✭✭✭magicbastarder


    'that's just your opinion, man' is not really an argument, though? It's so trite as to be meaningless. Of course it's 'just' my opinion, it's not an immutable law of physics.

    However - it's not random. Being able to see over a vehicle (and be seen over one) is a fairly common sense metric to use in judging height from a safety point of view.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,776 ✭✭✭mulbot


    Do you remember your own question? You asked "do you do everything possible to ensure your own safety?". And I answered yes - there's no research or recommendations for such a stupid suggestion,however I follow all safety guidelines and laws to ensure my safety in a car, same as I do when I cycle. Why don't you?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,393 ✭✭✭Suckler


    'that's just your opinion, man' is not really an argument, though?

    It is when you're trying to portray your opinion as a legitimate fact.

    However - it's not random. Being able to see over a vehicle (and be seen over one) is a fairly common sense metric to use in judging height from a safety point of view.

    Being able to see over a vehicle whilst standing has little relevance to when the main argument has been drivers behind them in cars being able to see over them. It's a senseless start point that you've conjured to some how legitimise personal preference.



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Arts Moderators, Sports Moderators, Paid Member Posts: 53,842 CMod ✭✭✭✭magicbastarder


    You seem to be mistaking the argument being made. I am not judging particular, specific cars, or specific use cases.

    You seem to think that a specific case of a car being necessarily large renders all discussion of cars in general, moot. It does not. The argument that some people drive tall cars because of a bad back does not preclude us from discussing it because the majority of people who drive tall cars do not do it because of a bad back.

    And the very reason your wife likes the car is because it gives her better visibility - but by the same token she steals it from others!



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Arts Moderators, Sports Moderators, Paid Member Posts: 53,842 CMod ✭✭✭✭magicbastarder


    It is when you're trying to portray your opinion as a legitimate fact.

    I'm not. Not that point anyway.

    However, if you want established fact: taller vehicles are more dangerous. That's the fact. What counts at too tall: that's my opinion.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,393 ✭✭✭Suckler


    I'm not. Not that point anyway.

    You are: that was a "benchmark" you were attempting to pass off as some sort of half baked litmus test for what shall be acceptable.

    However, if you want established fact: taller vehicles are more dangerous. That's the fact. What counts at too tall: that's my opinion.

    More dangerous than some others, less dangerous than others. There are a number of more pertinent factors/variables that would also have an affect on the outcome.

    Given that an average person standing would be able to see over your average SUV - Tuscon/Qashqai/Rav/sportage etc. so your 'benchmark' is already out the window.



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Arts Moderators, Sports Moderators, Paid Member Posts: 53,842 CMod ✭✭✭✭magicbastarder


    an average person would not be able to see over a tuscon. the tuscon is over 5'5" tall; the average height of an irish male, according to a quick google, is 5'9.5" - and the eyes are usually five or six inches below the top of the head. and the average irish woman is shorter than the tuscon in absolute terms.

    now that's a fact, not an opinion.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,393 ✭✭✭Suckler


    Now that's laughable.

    You've dodged away from the entire relevance of your "benchmark" in an attempt to make it somehow legitimate.

    The whole premise of the benchmark is opinion….it doesn't magically make it a face by twisting an argument to suit your end goal.



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Arts Moderators, Sports Moderators, Paid Member Posts: 53,842 CMod ✭✭✭✭magicbastarder


    https://www.hagerty.co.uk/articles/automotive-history/supermarket-car-park-better-1980s/

    walking out of that supermarket, the average bloke would be able to see clear across that car park. now, not a chance.



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Arts Moderators, Sports Moderators, Paid Member Posts: 53,842 CMod ✭✭✭✭magicbastarder


    i'll be honest with you - it's hard to take you seriously when you claim opinion is fact, when it's not, and then make statements without actually knowing whether they're correct or not.

    for future reference, when i state 'my usual benchmark is…' it means it's a benchmark that exists in my head and does not have independent reality, which makes it an opinion.

    anyway, i'll leave it at that because this has become tedious for anyone watching.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 675 ✭✭✭BP_RS3813


    "she has a much, much higher driving position than the previous car."

    I wonder what the cost of that is - could it be other drivers visibility perhaps? Increased risk to pedestrians also?



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,152 ✭✭✭Yeah Right


    One of us is getting the wrong end of the stick, alright. You seem to be misunderstanding me, whether that's deliberate or not is unclear.

    I never made any claims about your judgement, specifically. I'm well aware that, yes, there are some people who drive cars that are too large for their particular needs. To use your example, I have a huge issue with someone taking a photo of a car, posting it to boards and going "look at the size of this thing, there's no way he has a bad back". Because that's what has happened, multiple times, by multiple users. Not you, for the avoidance of doubt, but others have. And plenty of others have also chimed in with similar claims….there are loads of "nobody in Ireland needs to drive an X" or "they're obviously making up for their small penis/ego/bank balance" type posts on this thread and every single one of those posters hasn't the first fcuking idea if the owners do need a car that size. Not one. Including you.

    63 pages into a thread on unnecessarily large cars and we've yet to see a single case of an unnecessarily large car. Why is that? Spoiler alert: It's because nobody knows what is or isn't necessary.

    You seem to think that a specific case of a car being necessarily large renders all discussion of cars in general, moot

    No, I don't, that's your interpretation and it is wide of the mark. I think anyone casting aspersions on someone because of the type of vehicle they're driving needs to mind their own fcuking business because they've no idea what anyone's particular needs might be. And I've been saying it for months at this stage.

    Some folks just don't like 'em, rightly or wrongly. But framing that dislike as faux-concern/outrage at the lack of necessity because the drivers aren't off-roading 24/7 is intellectually dishonest and downright deceitful. It's almost as bad as parading dead kids around the place to browbeat others into submission. Almost.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,393 ✭✭✭Suckler


    Not a chance eh?…… Damn slighlty higher cars ruiinng our views of …car parks. God be with the days we'd all sit and take in the view clear across the car parks in the 80's. Those were the days.

    image.png


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,393 ✭✭✭Suckler


    So yeah, like I said opinions being dressed up in any manner to equate personal opinion to fact.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,926 ✭✭✭✭Red Silurian


    The people who drive them without needing them.

    The vehicles themselves are also tools,, that is to say, part of a range of equipment that many farmers and builders etc need to do their work effectively. The kind of people you can't expect to drive around in a yaris



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 32,863 ✭✭✭✭AndrewJRenko


    Yes, I remember the question clearly, it was about the "everything possible" standard that you set for cyclists, not about safety guidelines or laws.

    You see that emergency services and many commercial vehicles use hiviz on their cars. It's certainly possible to put hiviz markings on your car at negligible cost.

    Are you too cool to use hiviz on your car?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,776 ✭✭✭mulbot


    His viz on emergency vehicles aren't to ensure the safety of those inside the vehicles-absolutely nonsense retort.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,311 ✭✭✭extra-ordinary_


    These are completely separate arguments to the one that was put forward previously by that poster.

    If "that poster" you mean is me, then please quote this other argument I was making. You can harp on all you like as to why you have an SUV, but that doesn't take away from the point I made that there are many drivers driving large SUVs that are simply not able to handle their size and you can see this readily in action if you're a regular roads user. SUVs also obscure the road for other road users and are far more numerous than buses or skip lorries. How did we ever bring Timmy and his bike to the park before we ever had SUVs?…ffs



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 32,863 ✭✭✭✭AndrewJRenko




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,393 ✭✭✭Suckler


    You’re at least consistent in your ability to misrepresent posts but you’re a joke shop of arguments.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,776 ✭✭✭mulbot


    To alert other road users to their presence, and surely I don't need to point out why thats important. Now, why don't you do what is recommended for people cycling as a way of personally reducing YOUR risk?



Advertisement