Donald Trump the Megathread part II - Mod Warning updated in OP 12/2/26

Guess you'll have to put a lot of posters on ignore since it's a limited sum that actually agree with you.

Yeah Im not blind its the standard both sides drivel to throw some blame on Ukraine. Always more critical of Ukraine than of Russia. Always more critical of Trumps critics than of Trump. Reveals where your preferences lies. You wanted Trump to win over the Democrats. You want Russia to win in Ukraine. You excuse their crimes. There is no unprompted criticism from you of their atrocities or of Trumps lies and conduct.

Are you blind? Well it is laughable the number of blind spots you have about Trump. Where is one single post in this, the Trump thread, for politicising anti semitism to go after his political enemies. Yet you use weasel words to try to accuse me of similar conduct.
When Trump has engaged in the actual conduct you pretend to be concerned about, and you've given him a free pass. See no evil, hear no evil, speak no evil - when it comes to Trump. Accuse his critics of every slur imaginable.
https://www.theguardian.com/news/2025/apr/24/trump-antisemitism-universities-democrats-letter

Deflect deflect deflect? From someone who defended Trump saying "I dont see any kids" then when presented with such photographs deflect by accusing posters of being paid shills.

You have no credibility. Your posts are met with open derision on the thread as you are openly defending a rapist and a child sex pervert.

You cant defend Trump with any credibility so all you do is cast aspersions on the motivations of those critical of Trump. Having to bring in Feedback threads ffs. Desperate drivel.

Imagine thinking someone would have to be paid to be critical of a vile and dangerous politician like Trump. Laughable stuff.

This is the guy you have hundreds of posts defending and excusing.

A child sex pervert.

I have posts defending Biden. Even an aging slowing Biden would be ten times safer a President than Trump who is dismantling US checks and balances.

You even posted an article to this thread trying to defend Trump against accusations of being a fascist - it was obvious you hadn't read it except the headline. It included expert commentary putting forth credible arguments as to how he was a fascist, before concluding that he was a clear and present danger to democracy in America.

That's who you are defending. A rapist, up to his neck in a child sex ring, bringing fascism to America.

I have no regrets about which side I support and defend.

It is justifying the invasion though. You can spin it however you want but your agenda is incredibly obvious.

Poked the bear🤣🤣

Grow up ffs.

Your posts did imply you want Russia to win, because your posts thus far have clearly been more critical of Ukraine and the West's part in the conflict than of Russia.
And you never corrected the record. So it is an entirely legitimate opinion to form based on the content of your posts.
Where have you expressed public support for the independence, sovereignty and territorial integrity of Ukraine?
Even now, when you are challenged on your position… zero actual criticism of Russia, zero support for Ukraine, zero support for Russia to lose either. So yes, you can be clearer.

Trump's a child sex pervert, the details are all here and Trump didn't sue Rolling Stone... Trump entered the Miss Teen USA changing room where girls as young as 15 were in various states of undress.

https://www.rollingstone.com/politics/politics-features/a-timeline-of-donald-trumps-creepiness-while-he-owned-miss-universe-191860/

Numerous very creepy photos of Trump with underage girls have been posted to the thread also - triggered by your defence of Trump with a claim of "I don't see any kids". So spare us any faux outrage of about it being dumped on the thread. Your post triggered such a response.

Readers can review the Guardian article for themselves. If you read the article that's even worse, because it means you deceptively misrepresented its contents by leaving out such damning statements as:
Trump … "is a real and present danger to the American republic and the wider world."

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2024/sep/21/is-donald-trump-a-fascist

It includes expert commentary on why Trump is a fascist here:
Robert O Paxton, an authority on the historical definition of fascism, argued in 2017 that, despite many overlaps, Trump did not ultimately fit the bill: he was too much of a poser, too lacking in a coherent political programme and too much of a plutocrat. Hitler expropriated the wealthy; Trump sucks up to them. But after the events of 6 January 2021, Paxton changed his mind. In Newsweek a few days afterwards he wrote, “Trump’s incitement of the invasion of the Capitol … removes my objection to the fascist label. His open encouragement of civic violence to overturn an election crosses a red line.” Trump’s time in office, by implication, had not revealed him to be a fascist (he had, after all, failed to deliver on his promise to jail his main political rival, as he had failed to deliver on many of his promises). It was the manner of his refusal to leave office that had moved the dial.

So even an article you cite in defence of Trump states such things, and while there is are academic dispute as to whether he meets the exact definition of fascism - concludes that Trump could be one of the enablers of fascism in America.
You cited the article, so we must assume you accept the bona fides of the experts cited and author.
So which is it, Trump a fascist? A fascist enabler? A real and present danger to the American republic and the wider world?
Those are the options presented in the article. If you reject all of them, then it is clear you presented the article in bad faith.
If you refuse to answer it is therefore reasonable to conclude you are posting in defence of someone you know to be a clear and present danger to the American republic.

I'd rather be on a site where the vile and dangerous conduct of Trump is called out for what it is.
Than allow it to be overrun with defences of a rapist, a child sex pervert and "a clear and present" danger to democracy in America and spew spurious excuses for such conduct. Such posts amount to a position of absolute moral and political bankruptcy.

You haven't expressed any concern that Trump appears to be burying any further potential in terms of investigating associates of Epstein. In fact, you seem to be labeling anyone highlighting it as NGO agents.

You are a massive fan of his. I think everyone will remember how you actively attempted to smear his rape victim meanwhile at the same time you claimed that Kamala Harris slept her way to the top and would be controlled by nefarious powers.

You keep returning to this thread but there's a reason why repeatedly saying you're not a supporter of Trump is no longer plausible to most of us. You've been caught out far too many times at this stage.

You casted aspersions on the motives of ALL posters critical of Trump with conspiracy theory BS like this post from you only 24 hours ago:

"We also have desperate NGO employees who pretend to be objective posters trying to twist the narrative."

Thereby highlighting that anyone on the thread critical of Trump could be such an agent.

You have also used the phrase "twist" directly against posters, thereby tying the two together.

You're the one casting aspersions with weasel word accusations.

Plenty have simply disappeared, Trump is president but he's an incredibly **** president in the scheme of things. You're not particularly capable of defending any of his decisions. You are uncomfortable going near his controversial decisions cause they're impossible to defend unless you want to be viewed as a defender of fascists. I was reading the Wikipedia of Ingmar Bergman recently and the similarity to Trump fans sort of stands out. The weirder part is that Trump fans seem likely to celebrate as people start to die in his concentration camps

Also let's remember all those fans are backing a rapist... Which doesn't say anything positive about them.

What I want to know is why he lodged the papers in Florida. On the face of it, it's probably because his private home is there, as distinct from his president's home in Washington, instead of lodging them in New York where the WSJ is published from. I do know that Judge Eileen Cannon is a Florida born and raised judge appointed by Trump and she sits in court there.

and was debating whether to pardon her as well, apparently