Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
If we do not hit our goal we will be forced to close the site.

Current status: https://keepboardsalive.com/

Annual subs are best for most impact. If you are still undecided on going Ad Free - you can also donate using the Paypal Donate option. All contribution helps. Thank you.

Russia-Ukraine War (continuing)

1517518520522523566

Comments

  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 17,124 Mod ✭✭✭✭Manic Moran


    I think you are giving the Western Europeans a bit too much credit in this and your previous post. It was neither a Russian nor American who said “si vic pacem, para bellum” and I don’t believe he’s been proven wrong yet.

    Nothing wrong with the “peace dividend.” Most NATO countries took advantage of it. Even the US dramatically downsized. There is, however, a difference between downsizing both forces and industry, and neutering them. I would also venture that yours isn’t a European perspective, but a Western European perspective brought about by pig-headed idealism (no to intend offense to you, but I can’t think of a better description) over reality. Not for nothing did the Eastern European nations leap into NATO, keep conscription, and retain their armaments industries even though the Cold War was apparently over. Compare for example Sweden’s military strength and production power to that of the UK, which now can’t even produce ammunition for its own tanks (which use unique ammo) and can barely field a division. Western Europe had the data, they had the Eastern countries constantly warning them (as many post-facto articles in 2022 and 2023 finally observed), but the economic powerhouses of Western Europe didn’t want to listen to the little, second-world countries which knew Russia best. Russia didn’t suddenly go and change the situation in 2022, or in 2014, or in 2008, at least, not if you ask a Lithuanian or Pole. It took 2022 before Western Europe finally copped on.

    https://www.politico.eu/article/western-europe-listen-to-the-baltic-countries-that-know-russia-best-ukraine-poland/

    ”The Western Europeans pooh-poohed and patronized us for these last 30 years,” said Radosław Sikorski, a former Polish foreign minister. “For years [they] were patronizing us about our attitude: ‘Oh, you know, you over-nervous, over-sensitive Central Europeans are prejudiced against Russia.'”

    Post edited by Manic Moran on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,112 ✭✭✭RoyalCelt


    Instead of Merkel and co trying to appease Putin by building nordstreams and making Russia richer they should have done in 2014 what they are doing now. Once Russia conquered Crimea the massive re-armourment of Europe should have began. And at the very least in 2022. Not in 2025 when Trump treatens to pull the plug. When you look at it like this they were a bunch of traitors or just brain-dead deluded idiots. Maybe Merkel was Krasnov after all.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,935 ✭✭✭Homelander


    Agreed. Trump might be a disaster in ten thousand different ways, but spurring Europe to rearm is one of the few positive things to come from the chaos he's sown.

    As Manic Moran outlined, it's telling that Eastern and Northern Europe is incomparably better equipped for war then Western Europe.

    Crazy that a few decades on from the Cold War, when West Germany was the dominant military force as a bulwark against the USSR/Warsaw Pact, and one of the finest militaries in the world, that the same country is now military crippled and Poland is the major military force.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,422 ✭✭✭joseywhales


    Well we are a bunch of democratic nations, it's understandably unpopular to spend money on defense that the population seems unnecessary and might even be fearful of because God knows I don't want to find myself crawling on my belly in wet and cold under shell fire with a respiratory infection and permanent PTSD.

    It's not just ideology. Only an idiot would want to go to war. It might have been wishful thinking that we could enrich the Russian middle class out of brain dead imperialism.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,313 ✭✭✭patnor1011


    That "massive re-armourment of Europe" is a con job which practically means massive contracts for military industrial complex since anything that comes off their factories will be more than 10x more expensive than what for example Russia is producing. It is a scam to shift money from taxpayer to the selected few.

    As for Poland and praising their commitment for purchasing arms and munitions well, joke is on us since Poland is the largest net beneficiary of EU funding right from when they joined until this day. Its easy for them to spend money they get for free. We are the ones essentially funding this enterprise.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,517 ✭✭✭thatsdaft


    whether you don’t want to go to war doesn’t mean others don’t want to start a war on you

    Ukraine was neutral and the only country to have willingly disarmed (including giving up nukes) only to be attacked by Russian imperialists

    Poland know what’s it like to be attacked from both directions (one of which was Russia)

    Its easy to be “edgy” when you are on opposite edge of Europe from maniacs who openly state their conquest aims for all of Europe



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,425 ✭✭✭fly_agaric


    Ultimately, a rearmament would be going on anyway if Harris was President and it would be easier to do if the US were more reliable. I see nothing positive for us about Donald Trump as President or the changes in the US Republicans' that will likely long outlast him, I just see no way to spin it, sorry.

    It could become an adapt & overcome or die crisis for Europe/the EU and we might end up better off if we get through it successfully, but suffering through that kind of thing is not pleasant at all!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,833 ✭✭✭✭AndyBoBandy


    Russian meat about to get cooked in whole new imaginative ways….

    IMG_6427.jpeg 49e19b3e-d5a0-41c7-a29c-3698de702d12.png


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,425 ✭✭✭fly_agaric


    I don't think you have any evidence it is a "con job", do you? It also seems like we need a robust "MIC", the way the world is going to hell, doesn't it? Of course the stuff will be more expensive than in Russia. We are richer, our living standards are better, and citizens of EU countries generally have more options. Companies (and their employees) will have to be compensated well to produce these weapons.

    It is all a bit funny from the person who has praised Russia's economic resilience (against sanctions) + ability to wage war to expand its own territory on thread (like a corporate M&A at the nation level I think you said), and contrasted its reliance on primary sector and heavy industry (mostly the making of…weapons!) favourably with our own economies.🤡

    edit: Also, EU structural funding and other supports to E. Europe (and indeed to other formerly poor countries like this one) have been a good thing and generally a huge success story. It is not a zero sum game or a "scam" of the contributing member states, we all benefit from it in the end if the resources are used well. You have a one eyed narrow minded view of it. If at the moment it is also helping Poland to have budget resources available to rearm rapidly, that is also good for all of us in the EU IMO.

    Post edited by fly_agaric on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,112 ✭✭✭RoyalCelt


    Personally I think Harris would have been better at sending Ukraine American weapons but she would have been laughed out of the room by the NATO members. Never forget how they reacted to Trump in his first term and this was after the Crimean invasion.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,112 ✭✭✭RoyalCelt


    You gotta love democracy! Unlucky Moscow Marge.

    The US House of Representatives voted (353–76) to continue military aid to Ukraine. Amendment No. 116 by Marjorie Taylor Greene, which aimed to strip funding for Ukraine from the 2026 defense appropriations bill, was rejected.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,425 ✭✭✭fly_agaric


    Just have to disagree so. It's > 3 years, none of them have been "laughing" since Feb. 2022.

    If several of them still haven't been acting quickly enough/spending enough to rearm (agree they haven't) it is because of a combination of their electorates and domestic budget priorities and distance of their own country from Ukraine, rather than a lack of pressure to do so coming from the US president. I mean look at this country and continuing state of the Defence forces here! The reasons for that continuing and lack of urgency to do anything are all rooted in domestic politics.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,237 ✭✭✭Jinglejangle69


    MTG, if ever I wanted karma to catch up on a woman, she is number one candidate.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 14,867 ✭✭✭✭Igotadose


    She and the vatniks here should go join up like this moron:https://euromaidanpress.com/2025/07/16/texas-man-joins-russian-army-to-earn-respect-gets-lied-to-as-he-is-sent-to-front-line-instead-of-welding-job/



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,112 ✭✭✭RoyalCelt


    Don't worry I'm well aware if any NATO member Europeans were reading my posts as an Irish man they'd spit out their coffee. We're wasting billions on IPAS scammers but won't throw a couple of hundred million into air defence funds and the like for Ukraine.

    We did good by taking in a lot of Ukrainians but did the EU cover a lot of that cost? And it's becoming clear now our government will want the hard working Ukrainians to stay which harms Ukraine post war and they've just used them as a gateway to creating a massive international protection racket of non Ukrainians.

    I'm still of the belief NATO members should have urgently upped their spending to 3/4% the year Russia fully invaded Ukraine and they should have all been hitting their 2% target post 2014.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 4,913 ✭✭✭Rawr


    Could you imagine putting Marge 3-Names in a room with Wallace and Daly?

    Actually, come to think of it, there would be carnage. They’d rip each other to bits. Self-interested bell-ends like this can’t stand sharing any spotlight. Even their fielty to Russia is just a disingenuous angle for them to get some personal clout for f*ck-all effort.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,283 ✭✭✭eightieschewbaccy


    Aren't you one of the people who blames the West for Russia invading Ukraine? So you pretty much are already pretending that Russia is somehow harmless.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 4,913 ✭✭✭Rawr


    This is an angle that I feel is forgotten when we talk about F16s or Tanks or other weapons systems being sent to Ukraine. Yes…they are expensive…but what makes an especially good weapons product is battlefield knowledge of it in use. Only then can you get the real world kinks out of the design and consider new features or other improvements.

    What the Russians are doing is providing the West a testing ground for all these Euro-American weapons, so that if they ever got to the stage of trying to push West; they would be met with a Europe armed with a far more mature & battle-ready suite of weapons.

    Turkey sort of set the stage of this before 2022 with their support for Azerbaijan in their pen-ultimate war on Nagorno-Karabakh. In that conflict we saw Armenians armed with Soviet-vintage weapons up against Azeris armed with Turkish drones and NATO-quality kit. The Karabakh Armenians had very little chance, and the Azeris nearly retook all of Karabakh in that conflict. Beyond the military aims of the Azeris, the conflict did give a rare glimps of what happens when NATO kit goes up against legacy Warsaw Pack kit. It was a premonition of what would happen soon thereafter in Ukraine.

    That insight is extremely valuable weapons technology development, and frankly Lockheed, BAE Systems, Rheinmetall etc…should be queueing to supply weapons in order to get that insight from the war. Seems like a no-brainer that shouldn’t require the need for the Ukrainains to advertise to them.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,251 ✭✭✭ilkhanid


    In the absence of Karma, I'd settle for Necrotising fasciitis, Cotard's Syndrome and Hutchinson-Gilford Syndrome…all at the same time, preferably.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,097 ✭✭✭Polar101


    Latvia are doing this as well. They're buying Patria APC's for their own use, but also buying them for Ukraine so that they can see how they perform in battle conditions (while supporting Ukraine).

    https://thedefensepost.com/2025/07/16/ukraine-patria-vehicles-latvia/



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,315 ✭✭✭Large bottle small glass


    What would the world have thought if smartphones and social media were around when the Khmer Rouge were killing 25% of their own population in the late 70s, or in Rwanda in the the mid 90s.

    As bad as Gaza and Ukraine are they are not in the same ballpark of many regimes we learnt about in history class.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,315 ✭✭✭Large bottle small glass


    Can you name a single resilient civilization which survived for any length without spending on Defence/military?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,117 ✭✭✭Patrick2010


    none of this defence spending would be needed if only Russia would agree to stay in their own borders



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,517 ✭✭✭thatsdaft


    Start reading here

    Russia as my post illustrated so clear is in a league of its own when it comes to murdering their neighbours and their own



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,130 ✭✭✭✭cnocbui


    You are right, I made a mistake on the pricing. But now I'm seeing supposed costs of $2.5 billion a pop when the Swiss contract was $6.5 billion for 5 systems, each with 3 launchers instead of 4, plus 2 spares. I make that $1.3 billion per system:

    Defense Express reminds that, in 2021, Switzerland contracted five Patriot fire units (batteries/full systems) alongside 36 F-35A multirole fighters for a total $6.5 billion. First Patriots were to arrive in 2026.

    https://en.defence-ua.com/news/17_patriots_for_ukraine_now_explained_by_redirected_switzerland_order-15174.html

    I said 5 batteries without a sufficient supply of missiles would be pointless. I think that's a reasonable comment. The purpose of a battery is to intercept and down aerial threats, without missiles, it could not do that and would be pointless. The Swiss deal included 170 missiles, so I was expressing the hope that the missiles would be included.

    While its great that the Germans will be making missiles, there's going to be a lot less of Kyiv by then if it can't get enough missiles in the interim.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,130 ✭✭✭✭cnocbui


    The video is likely several weeks old, but nice to see.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,637 ✭✭✭brickster69


    Looks like the 2 month attempt to encircle the Tetkino metropolis in Sumy has been repelled from the region and Russians have took one settlement and have entered another one across the border.

    Totally obsessed with trying to invade Russia while the whole front is collapsing in multiple areas.

    Ryzhivka.jpg

    "if you get on the wrong train, get off at the nearest station, the longer it takes you to get off, the more expensive the return trip will be."



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,788 ✭✭✭weisses


    How are Russian tactics playing out since the start of the 3 day war ?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,788 ✭✭✭weisses


    Europe needs to re-arm using European developed and produced hardware, its a win win … getting stronger and boosting out own economies. phase out the dependence on the US… they are becoming more and more unreliable



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,112 ✭✭✭RoyalCelt


    Moscow Marge, Kremlin Clare and Moscow Mick in a room. I'd pay to see that!



Advertisement