Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
If we do not hit our goal we will be forced to close the site.

Current status: https://keepboardsalive.com/

Annual subs are best for most impact. If you are still undecided on going Ad Free - you can also donate using the Paypal Donate option. All contribution helps. Thank you.

Irish Property Market chat II - *read mod note post #1 before posting*

1918919921923924930

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,934 ✭✭✭✭Red Silurian


    As I have said many times before, this housing crisis we are living through is the result of govt action on a number of issues. There are many prongs to the crisis and there's no one silver bullet to fix it.

    Allowing people in nursing homes to rent their homes out will help, but not on its own.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 355 ✭✭Lofidelity


    My point on public services is that they have not improved despite an increasing tax take.

    The country cannot cope with the fast pace of economic growth and subsequent population growth; and is scrambling to catch up in every area, housing, water, sewage, transport, electricity generation and distribution grid etc. Adding more people is only making the problems worse. The only solution is to gradually slow growth.

    Tech workers from overseas are generally on an above average salary so are going straight into the middle class and adding to the competition buying property, especially in new estates around 450 -500k. Yes they are paying tax but they are adding to demand.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,300 ✭✭✭Ray Palmer


    Are you sure public services haven't improved? There are a lot more services available now from when I was a child. Standards are very different now too. Care for the elderly and children have definitely improved.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 37,004 ✭✭✭✭o1s1n
    Master of the Universe


    There could be universal free private healthcare, hand collected refuse collection direct from the bins in your kitchen, chauffeur driven commutes for all and some folks would still complain that the 'public service hasn't improved'.

    If someone can't see a vast improvement in this country over the last 30 years, funded by sources eternal to the country (like MNCs) then I don't know what to say really.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,445 ✭✭✭BlueSkyDreams


    The MNC workers add a small element of housing demand, while at the same time paying for all our services.

    If we want to cut immigration, we can look at other areas which dont contribute financially to the state coffers, student visas, IPAs, non-skilled workers and so forth, but attempting to put a lid on MNC growth is a sure-fie way to push those companies out of ireland.

    The MNCs need to be able to grow headcount in line with business demand.

    If they cant do that here, they will move somewhere that allows them to run a successful business, talking all of the existing jobs in Ireland with them.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,966 ✭✭✭Villa05


    What most knew,

    Interesting read “Mazars, the consultant employed to evaluate Help to Buy, found it unfit for purpose and recommended its withdrawal in 2024. Instead the Government doubled down and extended it for five years



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,445 ✭✭✭BlueSkyDreams


    Behind a paywall, but if the article is saying that the scheme inflates prices, well everybody knows that.

    The value of the scheme is that it enables young people to buy their first home, when otherwise they could not have afforded to do so.

    As a first time buyer, I would prefer a home at 450k that I can afford with FTB support than a 400k home I cannot afford to buy without the supplement.

    Without the scheme, more young people would leave the country as they cant put down roots and buy a home and more existing property owners would snap up those 400k properties instead.

    I am not saying the scheme is perfect, but if you're stuck in Dublin paying 2.5k a month rent, it's very difficult to save a mortgage deposit.

    This scheme helps bridge that deposit gap and enables young working people to stay in Ireland, through the attainment of home ownership.

    I'd say inflating property values by 5% or 10% or so is fair price to pay for allowing our youth to remain in Ireland.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,300 ✭✭✭Ray Palmer


    I agree with the sentiment but I don't think it will let the youth buy. It look like you need an income of 130k to buy the average property in Dublin. Not many young people earn that money and I suspect it is people in their mid 30s. The young people I work with in an MNC certainly aren't with the odd exception and that is in a couple not an individual.

    If there is no viable alternative I think it is the best that can be done. It would be nice if there was an investment fund that was building housing for cheap rentals



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,966 ✭✭✭Villa05


    Then reduce deposit requirements for FTB and use savings to provide water and electricity to help increase supply

    Win win



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,445 ✭✭✭BlueSkyDreams


    It would be great if they did that, but the banks are still very risk averse and have a buyers market on their hands.

    The govt would need to put a lot of pressure on them to offer products with minimal deposits, maybe even 100% mortgages to FTBs only.

    Would be good if it happened, I agree.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,445 ✭✭✭BlueSkyDreams


    True, but outside of the Dublin region, which is still where most people live, the salary requirements are a lot lower.

    I do know plenty of twenty somethings earning 60k+ in Dublin and a good amount of couples earning a 130k household income in the same age bracket.

    Though as you say, the FTBs will generally be in their 30s and of course even more likely to be on 130k housiehold income.

    Median age is 35 for an FTB in Dublin.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,693 ✭✭✭timmyntc


    Banks are only restricted by regulations upon them. They would lend to anyone if they could, but they are limited by LTI and LTV limits imposed on them.

    Relax those and they would be gung ho throwing money at anyone again (not that it is a good thing)



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,966 ✭✭✭Villa05


    FTB didn't cause the crash last time out, they may have been some victims but certainly not the cause.

    Its perfectly rational and justified to reduce deposit requirements in an environment where rent is often double mortgage repayments

    One could argue that such a measure would deflate a bubble rather than cause one as you can still put a limit on price through LTI limits



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 309 ✭✭SpoonyMcSpoon


    Ah, but then demand for rentals would be removed and there are some powerful vested interests that would protest any demand reduction for rentals! Imagine losing a good chunk of people paying €2.5k+ for 2 bed apartments each month just in rent; that would be a big blow to those poor apartment owners. I strongly believe that the deposit rule exists to protect rental owners, rather than to protect the housing market turning into a bubble. Leverage is what causes a bubble, not deposit rules.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,300 ✭✭✭Ray Palmer


    That is a paranoid belief. It is much simpler to see that it is to prevent people going into negative equity. I know plenty of people who are landlords and nobody consulted them about bank lending rules. If you look back at all the changes made to landlords and bank rules very few favoured landlords but were at their cost



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 309 ✭✭SpoonyMcSpoon


    It’s a safe bet that after a year or two the value of the property will increase by an amount greater than the minimum deposit required for FTBs to buy a property. Let’s say €40-50k deposit to buy a €4-500k house; with 5% YoY price increases that alone absorbs the deposit after two years. There is no justification to the deposit as the reasons for helping protect buyers don’t actually make sense.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,966 ✭✭✭Villa05


    The aim of such a measure would be to cool house price inflation by removing ftb grant and use savings to provide the water/electricity infrastructure to increase supply.

    5% inflation is much more manegable, but you need a catch up period to restore affordability for ftbs.

    I know of no other investment that continually rises without some correction period. The forces that prevent corrections need to be removed



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,445 ✭✭✭BlueSkyDreams




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,693 ✭✭✭timmyntc


    negative equity is not the end of the world.

    The real reason we have such stringent lending rules is because banks cannot repossess non paying loans. 90% LTV Max is to protect banks not consumers



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,445 ✭✭✭BlueSkyDreams


    Indeed, but the poster was saying its a safe bet that prices will go up by more than the deposit value, over a year or twp.

    That is not true.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,218 ✭✭✭Mervyn Skidmore


    Sorry if this has been discussed recently but is there a bit of a change in the market recently? I'm in Galway city and seeing an increase in the amount of property for sale over the last month or so. I've also viewed two houses that were advertised 2 weeks ago that are in good locations and one has had just one bid of the asking price and the other has had no offers yet. I feel like 6 months ago they would be sale agreed at least 50k over asking.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 717 ✭✭✭GalwayGaillimh


    Its still active just summer time lull auctioneers away on holidays squandering there fees...

    Love to know "2Pacs" thoughts he used to be on the property pin forum he had great insight into the Galway Market.

    Si Deus Nobiscum Qui Contra Nos



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,966 ✭✭✭Villa05


    That maybe, but the liklihood of the mortgage holder returning the keys to re-enter the rental market would be very slim

    Replace the 10% deposit requirement with the state the guarantor for the 10%

    Again the Loan to income limits are the highest risk to mortgage default. The deposit requirement is far less risky in the ftb segment



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 309 ✭✭SpoonyMcSpoon


    In Ireland, at what point do we say that house prices increasing each year by 5% is standard considering how often it has happened over the last 30 years?

    Year

    % Change*

    Year

    % Change*

    1995

    11%

    2010

    -10%

    1996

    10%

    2011

    -14%

    1997

    12%

    2012

    -13%

    1998

    18%

    2013

    2%

    1999

    13%

    2014

    15%

    2000

    21%

    2015

    7%

    2001

    21%

    2016

    7%

    2002

    14%

    2017

    11%

    2003

    13%

    2018

    6%

    2004

    10%

    2019

    2%

    2005

    9%

    2020

    2%

    2006

    12%

    2021

    14%

    2007

    6%

    2022

    7%

    2008

    -8%

    2023

    4%

    2009

    -18%

    2024 (est.)

    6%

    Again, while the official line remains focused on protecting the market, it is true that a thriving rental sector benefits landlords, institutional investors and developers (as well as older home owners who enjoy watching their house prices increase on paper - rental yields is the tide lifting all boats) all of whom have a stake in maintaining such rental market demand. It is not necessarily nefarious but purely the consequence of powerful interests being over-represented in policy-making considerations.

    At the same time, given the difference in rents and mortgage repayments, it is very questionable whether the deposit rule works in 2025 (or even as far back as 2020) as it did 10 years ago, when it is locking out so many high earners and families from home ownership.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,300 ✭✭✭Ray Palmer


    Using those figure from 2010 it would take 9 years to get out of negative equity and 10 years to get 5% increase you are talking about. During that time rents dropped and people did walk away from property and go back to renting. This was very noticeable on the help to buy program from the government.

    Rents are restricted to a 2% in high demand areas so rent does not rise for those who already invested. The negative equity wasn't equal either so national figures distort things.

    The belief vested interests are controlling things is paranoid. If you start with the belief you will find things to back it up by pointing to results you don't like. Actual evidence will not be found. As I said look back and see the legislation has rarely been a good thing for landlords



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 309 ✭✭SpoonyMcSpoon


    It's not paranoid at all - you should realise that it may not be nefarious but quite simply just the relevant groups speaking about their own interests and then being given more of the government's ear than other interest groups (such as home buyers and renters).

    Property lobbyists to dominate government housing conference

    Though the conference was called in response to yet more record homelessness figures, property groups like Irish Institutional Property, the Construction Industry Federation and Property Industry Ireland will enjoy an outsize influence at the event.

    Keen build-to-rent proponent Ronan Lyons from Daft.ie, chief economist at the embattled stockbroker Davy Conall Mac Coille and Irish Mortgage Brokers’ Karl Deeter are among the seven academics set to attend. Tenants’ group Community Action Tenants Union and Maynooth University academic Rory Hearne are two of the high-profile snubs.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,966 ✭✭✭Villa05


    Ladies and gentlemen: your Sunday morning puzzle

    How many occurrences of complete and utter state dysfunction can you identify in this story



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,966 ✭✭✭Villa05


    More Sunday puzzles

    This is a city with almost 0 rentals for the workers that pay for this. I'm hearing BARRINGTONS hospital site is the latest to be surrendered to ipas

    Meanwhile the beneficiaries of these ipas contracts seem to be extremely well vetted

    20250713_180907.jpg


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,966 ✭✭✭Villa05


    And we're being sued over the million euro social homes

    20250713_192304.jpg


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,966 ✭✭✭Villa05


    Yet they continually get voted back in

    Everybody should be preparing there children for a future outside an FF/FG run country



Advertisement