Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

Dublin Airport New Runway/Infrastructure.

1342343345347348366

Comments

  • Moderators, Sports Moderators, Paid Member Posts: 32,765 Mod ✭✭✭✭Podge_irl


    you would know why that would matter if you were one of the many thousands of people across dublin from malahide to meath within earshot of the flightpaths and/or airport.

    You make a great deal of assumptions that people aren't from or living in the great vast swathes of North Dublin you erroneously claim are severely impacted by aircraft flight noise. We're just not all so hysterical about it.

    There simply is no fundamental difference between 700 or 800 or 900 plane movements for those few people actually impacted.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 224 ✭✭Pygmie


    It's not just North Dublin, it's parts of Meath also. And just because YOU feel you aren't impacted doesn't give you the right to speak for all those people who DO feel they are impacted. And to those people (and there are many), there is a huge difference between 700, 800, or 900 plane movements.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,556 ✭✭✭bennyineire


    The needs of the many outweigh the needs of the few, this is the most crucial and important piece of infrastructure on this island



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 224 ✭✭Pygmie


    Simply not true.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 333 ✭✭davebuck


    Well I've lived in Glasnevin,Santry and currently Meath all on flights paths one way or another for over 50 years and have seen and heard the airport grow along the years. I support the phased growth of Dublin airport due to the benefits it brings to the local areas in jobs and economic spin offs as well but also the proposed sustainability projects currently attached to the permissions. I also respect the right of affected people to appeal etc. over the various planning permissions submitted by the DAA but a balance needs to be struck and unfortunately it will be decided by the various court cases as local agreement will not be possible. Again everyone local is well aware of the location of the airport and the downside of being with 30-50 miles of such a major facility. As I mention a balance needs to be achieved and some of the areas that I feel could go a long way to address local concerns are the flight paths from the North runway 28R, the night time flights cap currently with ABP and dare I mention the long promised metro!. Not everyone will be happy with the outcome regardless of the decisions but its a national infrastructure and its not moving anywhere soon….



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 224 ✭✭Pygmie


    I largely agree with your post and don't deny the airport is an important resource. But I don't think it's too much to ask for anyone living within a 20 mile radius of the airport to not be troubled by noise, let alone a 30 to 50 mile radius. I mean how many people living within a 50 mile radius would we be asking to take it on the chin when it comes to noise due to future incompetence?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,556 ✭✭✭bennyineire


    What is your solution then rather than saying "simply not true" when someone counter points you?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 224 ✭✭Pygmie


    I was replying to the statement that Dublin airport "is the most crucial and important piece of infrastructure on this island". That's not true.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 41,040 ✭✭✭✭Hotblack Desiato


    The current two-runway setup was planned in the late 1960s (only difference was the runways were planned to be 3500m!) and the land required was acquired then, so Aer Rianta as it then was was very much planning ahead.

    They should have acquired all of the land between the two (present) runways back then too, could have done it very cheaply and rented it back to the famers and the pub. Wouldn't have those currently sitting on it hoping to extort the taxpayer.

    The vast vast majority of people living within any of those radii are not affected at all by aircraft noise and it's ridiculous to even think about implying otherwise. Most of Dublin city is within 20km radius of the airport, never mind 20 miles. I live around 15km away as the crow flies. Sometimes I can hear a plane, that's it. Living in a city there is going to be noise. I can hear the N7 if the window is open at night, and I can hear the Luas. It's not a problem. There will always be some noise coming from somewhere. Even in rural areas you have farm machinery and crow bangers…

    I'm partial to your abracadabra
    I'm raptured by the joy of it all



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,018 ✭✭✭BP_RS3813


    Whereabouts is the third terminal going to be built and whats the time frame?



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,556 ✭✭✭bennyineire


    Fair enough, but it can easily be argued to be the second most important piece of infrastructure after the electrical grid so therefore my actual point "The needs of the many outweigh the needs of the few", this is fact the airport is staying where it is and will absolutely grow, do you propose any solutions to this problem to the few it affects that does not disproportionately affect the vast majority of people on this island ?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 224 ✭✭Pygmie


    Well lucky you. You obviously aren't affected by it. But lots of other are. I live more than 20km from the airport and the noise is horrendous and every few minutes. But as long as you're ok, then screw anyone else, right?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 41,140 ✭✭✭✭Mellor


    You may be the type to plan for the future. But, respectively, making that plans for the airport is not your role. But it probaby is/was somebody's role. It's naïve to think that just because you have not been seen future plans, that no future plan exists. The design of the dual runway only most certainly considered hypothetical terminals to utilise it's capacity.

    My fear is that if there is no limit (reasonable - not the stupid one we have in place now) in place then there will be unrestricted growth.

    That's not how planning law works. Even if the cap and any future caps were removed. The airport still needs to apply to a planning authority for permission to develop. It's not an carte blanche to unrestricted development.

    I agree. But it was on the DDA to start the process, and they carry the bulk of the blame. I've said multiple times that they should have started this 5 years ago. Maybe they had a reason, maybe it was simply apprehension with Covid affecting air travel so significantly.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 224 ✭✭Pygmie


    I propose fixing people's legitimate issues regarding noise before further expansion. I acknowledge that expansion will be necessary (at some stage - I'm not convinced it is now), but not at the expense of people who bought in towns and villages over 20 kms away with a reasonable expectation of noise control.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 19,601 ✭✭✭✭LXFlyer


    The long term plan is for satellite terminals to be developed between the two runways to the west, linked to the central complex by people movers.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 555 ✭✭✭dublin12367


    106 people complained in April, 150 in May. June numbers not yet available. This isn’t as big of an issue as you make it out to be. It sounds like a you problem and not a reason to not expand the airport. What needs to happen before you’ll be convinced now is the time for expansion? As of today, there’s talk of US Officials flying into Ireland to discuss cap concerns and there will be consequences if cap remains. Airlines from China to America, including Middle Eastern carriers, European carriers and our home grown carriers Ryanair and Aerlingus have all said they want to expand here and the demand is there for it, but “Pygmie” on boards isn’t convinced…



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 224 ✭✭Pygmie


    I don't care about the airlines and their profits. Most of them (including the ones you mention) aren't even Irish airlines. And the US officials coming over to discuss the cap can do one. We can see where your sympathies lie anyway.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,516 ✭✭✭Blut2


    And for some additional context 3.25million people transited Dublin airport in May. So its the question of the needs of 150 people vs 3.25million people.

    Nevermind the economic/financial considerations of the people who's income depends on the airport, aviation sector, or tourism sector - who go on top of those 3.25million passengers.

    Thats why DUB is only going to grow as we move forward.

    Pygmie either needs to accept that or move, because thats the reality of the situation. When it comes to core infrastructure the needs of the many, and the country, outweigh the few.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 555 ✭✭✭dublin12367


    That’s an excellent point. Most of them aren’t Irish airlines yet they are doing their best to get into Ireland and/ or expand here… because there’s demand. They could go anywhere else in the world.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,600 ✭✭✭bikeman1


    The mad thing about it is, many of those who complain, will still head down the road and hop on a plane to wherever they are going. They probably even say, "sure it's dead handy being so close to the airport" or "it's great getting away" while not realising the double standards.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 224 ✭✭Pygmie


    The 150 people only being affected is a facile argument. Not everyone that is affected will download an app, and sign up to make a complaint, with a lot more preferring to complain to their local TDs, which they've done. Indeed "A report by the aircraft noise regulator published last year found that the number of people living near Dublin Airport exposed to potentially harmful levels of aircraft noise at night-time is up 10pc to almost 1,700 since 2019.

    The report by the Aircraft Noise Competent Authority also revealed that more than 21,000 people living on flight paths used by aircraft taking off and landing at Dublin Airport suffered high levels of sleep disturbance."

    But sure who cares about locals when there is money to be made to line the pockets of the airlines and the DAA cronies?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,914 ✭✭✭WishUWereHere


    I fully concur with You Mellor, it IS a discussion thread.

    But how can one conduct with someone who

    A)doesn’t answer questions

    B) distorts data furnished to further their own cause &

    C) says they are not going to contribute further to the thread & then 2/3 days later carries on with their agenda.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 555 ✭✭✭dublin12367


    This is getting very silly.


    150 people made complaints in May. That’s a fact. Like it or not it’s a fact. There’s multiple ways to make complaints too. Phone, email or the website.


    New builds in Portmarnock are the reason for the increase since 2019. That’s therefore null and void as that runway is 36 years in operation. These people willingly moved there. And most of them to be fair probably pay no attention to the noise! No additional night flights have been granted since the north runway has come into operation in summer of 22.


    But sure who cares about locals when there is money to be made to line the pockets of the airlines and the DAA cronies?

    This is a very silly sentence and demonstrates clearly your lack of knowledge on the subject. Airlines aren’t flying into Dublin empty or for the fun of it. They are flying here because they can fill the seats. It’s the 5m +people in this country, including us locals, including Dubliners in the greater Dublin area, including those living across Leinster, Munster, Connacht and Ulster that the airport will be expanded for and cap lifted. It benefits us all. Not the daa and not the airlines. The airlines also bring tourists in, tourists who support the hotels, restaurants and attractions the length and breath of the county. The benefits are endless. If Delta for example can’t add more flights, they’ll go to Rome instead, while also complaining to the US government who in turn will limit Aerlingus access to the US. daa will still make their fortune off their airport charges while not having to build infrastructure, the airlines will make their money elsewhere flying different routes, meanwhile it’s the Irish who pay the price.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,516 ✭✭✭Blut2


    The 150 people who complained are the only ones who were affected enough to complain, obviously. But even if we take the figure of 1,700 you do realise thats a yearly figure, and still a minuscule number compared to the 35 million people who use Dublin airport every year. And the hundreds of thousands of jobs in aviation and tourism that depend on it. And every one of those 1,700 people has decided voluntarily to live nearby to Dublin airport, given its been in existence for 80 years.

    How many people had their houses CPO'd for the construction of the M50? How many thousands, of tens of thousands, of people do you think are impacted by the road noise from the M50?

    How many people had their houses CPO'd for the construction of the LUAS? How many thousands, of tens of thousands, of people do you think are impacted by the noise from the LUAS?

    Modern infrastructure requires states to prioritise the needs of the many over the few. If you don't like it, you're free to move to a different locality. Just as people who lived on, or nearby, to the paths of the M50 or LUAS or countless other large infrastructure projects.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 117 ✭✭Paul2019


    I live less than 20 metres from the DART railway line - an increasingly frequent mix of speeding DART and louder Diesel trains thunder past at all hours of the day and night. Sometimes they go by more slowly or even - horror of horrors - they stop altogether and commuters can look down on me to see what I'm up to in my own back garden or kitchen.

    Do you think I have a case for a DART passenger cap? I knew full well there was a train line there when I moved in - I even guessed that train frequencies might increase in the future - but still and all. It just feels so unfair and oppressive!

    I wonder could I get the media to take an interest in my plight? Must talk to the neighbours…



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,018 ✭✭✭BP_RS3813


    I think a lot of people complain because they are afraid of no cap rather then an increased cap.

    'Give an inch, take a mile' attitude if that makes sense. Some of recent replies has shown me that people are aware that has to be some cap at some point and that honestly settles my nerves.

    However when big business and american multinational airlines who are known to put profits before ethics or any human cost for that matter argue against a cap, talk about growth and investors etc it can scare people. It certainly scares me.

    If the people arguing against a cap noted in their arguement that a cap will eventually be reached naturally via infrastructure capacity and locals houses won't be CPO'd to satisfy more demand then I think that would put peoples mind at a little ease.

    Now that may be me just being optimistic but from my point of view, those are some of my thoughts when I hear people argueing for more growth, no cap etc.



  • Moderators, Sports Moderators, Paid Member Posts: 32,765 Mod ✭✭✭✭Podge_irl


    What local houses? In terms of Terminal infrastructure the only things at risk are some really underutilised farmland. Heathrow has about 80M passengers per year - that is more of less the limit of a two runway airport.

    I mean, if the argument is "Will they CPO the south reaches of Swords to build a third runway" I'm pretty sure the answer is no but none of us actually know that. It won't be a live issue for about 60 years at least so who cares.

    An artificial cap makes no sense. But there will be untold number of natural caps, just from population demand to size constraints to future technologies and who knows what else.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,018 ✭✭✭BP_RS3813


    I agree with you that it needs to be expanded. Was simply explaining a possible point of view of those who are against current expansion.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 224 ✭✭Pygmie


    What has the DART got to do with Dublin Airport infrastructure? If you have a noise issue with the DART, maybe take it to a different thread?



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 224 ✭✭Pygmie


    Your username gives away your self-interest in everything going through Dublin, but if passengers from the U.S want to come to Ireland and can't get here through Dublin, they can book to fly to Shannon instead. They are not going to suddenly decide to go to Rome instead. U.S tourists certainly spend some time in Dublin while they are in Ireland but spend more outside it. Not everything has to come through Dublin. Which has been explained to you many times at this stage.



Advertisement
Advertisement