Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/

Interesting articles

16768697072

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 458 ✭✭Grassy Knoll


    Call it an intervention, but when several of our friends or states we enjoy good relationships with are pointing to the same issue, we know we have, or are a problem.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 25,918 ✭✭✭✭Larbre34


    I wasn't kidding. I would firmly believe that question was a plant. And a clumsy enough one.

    It makes zero sense for a far eastern country, particularly one with such a sense of ceremony and respect as Japan, to bring that issue up publicly and unprompted.

    I mean they aren't wrong, but imagine for a moment Ireland was hosting the likes of Malaysia, or the Philippines, for an official visit. And an Irish Minister said 'we are delighted to welcome X to Dublin, to deepen our relationship and further our common goals, but we do have serious concerns about the security of free passage in the South China Sea'

    It would be quite a jarring and perplexing thing to throw in there randomly. But if KL or Manila had said in advance, 'look we want the EU to keep up the message to Beijing that they won't be given free reign in that neck of the woods', it would make some sense at least.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,265 ✭✭✭jonnybigwallet


    I suppose it is an issue that they have concerns about on their own patch as well given the proximity of China..

    With Japan being a nation of several islands, no doubt they have subsea links to watch over as well



  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 17,067 Mod ✭✭✭✭Manic Moran


    I would assume that much of Japan's trade involves countries reliant upon the cables between North America and Europe. It's not quite that academic, any more than Irish goods may bee dependent upon effective shipping through the Straits of Malacca or the Suez Canal.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 25,918 ✭✭✭✭Larbre34


    I would agree, its not academic. But diplomatically, and especially from a country like Japan, I just cannot see it being raised spontaneously, by them, in public.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 25,918 ✭✭✭✭Larbre34


    Short video of the MV Matthew interdiction operation released jointly by the Navy, Customs, Coast Guard and AGS.

    Fine bit of work considering the scant resources.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,497 ✭✭✭sparky42


    Absolutely brilliant work, but lucky as well, but remember Martin as then Part Time saying that he wasn't going to be rushed buying equipment just because…

    A position that clearly persists.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,497 ✭✭✭sparky42


    Some more on the story:

    https://www.thejournal.ie/the-inside-story-of-the-raid-on-the-mv-matthew-6747937-Jul2025



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 25,918 ✭✭✭✭Larbre34


    Not a bit of it! Bomber Harris to the rescue! 🙄



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,391 ✭✭✭roadmaster


    when it comes to eqiupment they forgot to include in the video that the orginal 139 went out of service and they had to strip 112 and take it out of service to use for the mission.

    They mention that cover was provided within the 139 by a gunner and not a overhead helicopter like it should have.

    You really would think the penny would drop quicker on equipment.

    Considering all the issues that happened it shows how good the servicemen and women are that they could still pull of the mission.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 25,918 ✭✭✭✭Larbre34


    I have no doubt that the Matthew operation, in particular, contributed to the decision to buy the 4 x H145M with HForce tactical armaments system.

    As we know, the government always have to be embarrassed into plugging capability gaps, so hopefully these sort of situations keep arising, where they are.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,391 ✭✭✭roadmaster


    What will our Triple Lock Lovers say when if we have to leave Lebanon because of Israel & the US?

    https://www.irishexaminer.com/news/politics/arid-41664701.html



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,156 ✭✭✭✭banie01


    An interesting article on the impact of Iran's Ballistic Missile attacks and in particular the impact of the switch in missile types in the latter stages of the conflict.

    Iran’s 12-day barrage launched over 500 missiles and 1,100 drones at Israel, striking five military bases and a key intel hub while forcing the US to burn through two years of THAAD interceptors — all concealed by strict IDF censorship.

    In a revelation that has rocked Western intelligence and reignited anxieties in Middle Eastern defence circles, Iran’s relentless 12-day missile offensive did not just hammer Israeli civilian and industrial infrastructure but also dealt direct blows to at least five strategic military facilities, including a vital intelligence collection centre, as confirmed by The Telegraph.

    This dramatic insight, reconstructed through detailed radar signatures and high-resolution satellite imagery analysed by researchers at Oregon State University, underscores how far Iran’s missile force has evolved into an arsenal capable of challenging even the world’s most sophisticated multi-layered air defence systems.

    At the heart of this unprecedented strike package was Iran’s growing deployment of hypersonic glide vehicles (HGVs) and maneuverable re-entry vehicles (MaRVs) — next-generation systems engineered to pierce interception nets like Iron Dome, David’s Sling, Arrow, and even the US-supplied THAAD batteries.

    It reinforces the narrative that the impact of Iran's strikes were far in excess of what Israel expected. Israel is still keeping a very tight rein on any damage reports from military targets so any damage assessment, such as the one in this article are reliant on open source satellite imagery.

    It also highlights the expense involved in maintaining any effective prolonged Ballistic Missile Defence. There are reasons that the Soviets & US signed an ABM treaty and whilst modern technology has increased the effectiveness of BMD weapons, it hasn't yet managed to shift the arithmetic in favour of the defender. In a prolonged exchange, the attacker has an advantage of at least 3:1 in terms of cost versus the defender.

    A small economy, or indeed any economy apart from the US, China or the EU as a whole, cannot afford a sustained BMD programme based on missile interceptors. Perhaps as directed energy weapons become more efficient or even the holy grail of effective rail guns (Japan look like getting one in service soon) then it may shift the balance. But as it stands, in a prolonged exchange? The advantage still lies with the ballistic missiles IMO, particularly ones with MaRV or Hypersonic warheads.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,497 ✭✭✭sparky42


    Given their overlap with Tankies, they will blame the US and Israel (rightfully in this case), on the other hand I wonder would this be another situation where the government would force through the changes rather than lose the tasking?

    It should also be noted that there’s concerns over Russia vetoing the Bosnia mission and the Libya one.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 25,918 ✭✭✭✭Larbre34


    They'll find some way to twist the circumstances to support their argument, valid or not. But honestly, I don't think tankies in the Oireachtas will ever recover from the savaging they got from the retired brass at Committee last week.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,497 ✭✭✭sparky42


    nah, water off a ducks back to them, all those warmongers are wrong no matter what. Our PANA and Tankie wing will never change, or learn.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 25,918 ✭✭✭✭Larbre34


    The new DCoS Support is Colm Ó'Luasa.

    Although a veteran Cav officer, his most recent gig is head of the Transformation Office, which now falls vacant again until another officer gets up to speed.

    1000036523.jpg 1000036524.jpg


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,497 ✭✭✭sparky42


    Bit more on the General:

    https://www.thejournal.ie/government-appoints-former-senior-army-ranger-wing-officer-to-deputy-chief-of-staff-post-6756558-Jul2025



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,391 ✭✭✭roadmaster


    The Mowag replacement should be interesting so.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,497 ✭✭✭sparky42


    At this stage any of the replacement programs should be interesting, but I do wonder if he's only being appointed now, where do the programs stand in terms of anything being ready for the Summer Statement?



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 25,918 ✭✭✭✭Larbre34


    I don't think any connection can be derived from the two occurrences.

    If he was on the project group for armour, he will have had an influence. If he wasn't, he won't.

    His appt now to DCoS Spt will have no bearing on where various procurements are at.



  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 17,067 Mod ✭✭✭✭Manic Moran


    From watching the recent oireachtas committee meeting with the anti-removal folks, that seems to be the most sensible part of their position. They believe that with no UN mandate, the Irish have no reason to be overseas.

    The problem is that they refuse to look at Chapter 8 of the charter, which encourages regional organizations (EU, NATO, AU etc) to take care of things, and follow under whatever mandate those organizations come up with.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,391 ✭✭✭roadmaster


    Hard to belive DOD still have made no attempt to transfer the barracks in Mullingar.

    https://www.westmeathexaminer.ie/2025/07/09/council-moves-to-revive-columb-barrack/



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,497 ✭✭✭sparky42


    Those folks see only what they want to see, no matter how divorced from reality it actually is.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,156 ✭✭✭✭banie01


    Interesting developments in the Far East and in particular towards countering China. The Japanese are exploring the possibility of transferring Abukuma class destroyer escorts to the Philippines navy.

    Whilst these are an old design, they are very much optimised for ASW and SSW roles. For the Philippines, the lack of any credible air defence on board would quickly become an issue if any conflict were to break out. Deck space means retrofit of anything bigger than a MANPADs is unlikely, despite having a fairly decent air search radar capable of target illumination.

    The pressure being placed on Island nations to at least have credible ability to monitor and police their EEZ in the face of potential threat is continuing to grow. Moreso in the Pacific but we must surely read the room and accept that we need to look beyond the Sonar buy here in Ireland.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,156 ✭✭✭✭banie01


    In other Pacific centric news...

    AUKUS may well be sunk due to Trump admins reassessment and jacking the prices.

    A very strange change of tack from the US given their effort to become Pacific focused and needing bases closer to South China Sea than Guam.

    https://www.news.com.au/national/politics/donald-trumps-review-into-aukus-deal-could-send-price-of-submarines-soaring-with-a-worrying-new-china-clause/news-story/5b1c94ceb70a1a38d84a9c501e61d1e9

    Along with Eldridge Colby getting tetchy because of the UK CSG deploying to the Far East.

    When the British defense team came to the Pentagon in June and spoke about the U.K.’s decision to send an aircraft carrier to Asia on a routine deployment, Colby interjected with a brusque comment.

    “He basically asked them, ‘Is it too late to call it back?’” said the person familiar with Trump administration dynamics. “Because we don’t want you there.” A second person familiar with the meeting confirmed this account.

    https://www.politico.com/news/2025/07/08/elbridge-colby-trump-administration-frustrations-00443337?nid=0000014f-1646-d88f-a1cf-5f46b7bd0000&nname=playbook&nrid=994bd008-d0c8-4fd3-b4b6-abf8bfda1688

    Bridges are being burned even within the 5 eyes. Cui bono?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,391 ✭✭✭roadmaster


    With triple lock still in place and the USA been advised by israel i can see Irish Troops heading home in september.

    https://www.thejournal.ie/south-lebanon-unifil-simon-harris-peacekeeping-mission-renewal-talks-italy-6767358-Jul2025/



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 25,918 ✭✭✭✭Larbre34


    Good. Get them out.

    With absolutely no appetite for real peace on either side (Israel, Iran), they are just stooges at this stage. Very expensive stooges. Why should Ireland or Poland or Bangladesh put their men in harm's way for 40 years with absolutely no serious effort by the principals to resolve a worsening situation.

    It between them it is.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,242 ✭✭✭Notmything


    Wait till the far left and anti everything howl in rage without a hint of irony



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,948 ✭✭✭Markcheese


    Yeah but ..

    The Irish and UN peacekeepers have never been there to protect either Iranian backed militias or Israeli military ( or their militas )

    The UN peacekeepers are there to defend and protect Lebanese civilians,

    Slava ukraini 🇺🇦



Advertisement