Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

Fighter jets for the Air Corps?

1190191193195196217

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,789 ✭✭✭roadmaster




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 27,807 ✭✭✭✭Larbre34


    Ah come on now Roadie, I'm a realist. And I think most of us are here.

    Although I will say, if you told me 5 years ago we'd be where we are in terms of reorganisation and level of ambition, I wouldn't have believed it, so maybe Harris will yet deliver on his fighter interceptor squadron, at least with some sort of bi-lateral agreement with the French and an increase in pilot officers being recruited and going into advanced training.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,098 ✭✭✭blindsider




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,167 ✭✭✭sparky42


    Austria is also looking at actual fighter procurement in the competition of the Rafale and Typhoon.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 4,925 ✭✭✭thomil


    Funny that this should pop up now. Just yesterday, I stumbled across an article in the Standard, one of Austria’s major newspapers. The story was par for the course, reporting on how an internal watchdog the Austrian department of defence raised the concern that the country might be overpaying and how the list of requirements seemed tailored to favour the M-346, including a complaint about excluding US bidders. Standard stuff for Austrian defence matters, really.

    The comment section was the really interesting part. Now, the Austrian public has made trash talking the Bundesheer into a national pastime, and you can generally expect any news story dealing with the armed forces to be torn to shreds by the commentariat, with a level of vitriol that makes comparative Irish comment sections seem tame by comparison. Not with the M-346 story though, oh no. I’ve never seen any public debate in any Austrian news source fall in so completely behind the decision to go with that type.

    Good luck trying to figure me out. I haven't managed that myself yet!



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 27,807 ✭✭✭✭Larbre34


    You'll always get public opprobrium about defence acquisitions, especially in neutral countries, but good government is about doing something because it is right, not because it is popular.

    And Austria are going about this exactly the correct way.

    Its important to note, the Luftstreitkräfte still retains a dozen PC-7s and a handful of native DA40 Diamond Stars for basic training. So the M-346 will perform the dual roles of Lead In Fighter Trainer and Light Strike fighter, which is just as important to a landlocked, mountainous territory like Austria, where a small, nimble ground attack plane, that can operate very effectively at slow speed, would back up the land component.

    In fact, I'd hold up the Austrian Air Force as an absolute model for what the Irish Air Force should be, at least when it comes to the fixed wing element. Obviously our large maritime responsibilities do need a different approach to rotary and MPA, which we are already addressing.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,409 ✭✭✭jonnybigwallet


    Are u suggestions the 346 is fit for purpose as an interceptor?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,332 ✭✭✭Notmything


    Only in your head.

    They said "Fighter Trainer and Light Strike fighter". Neither of which are interceptor.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 690 ✭✭✭michael-henry-mcivor


    Waste of money fighter jets-

    We are going to fight no one-

    And no one is going to fight us-



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,332 ✭✭✭Notmything


    Wasted all that time and effort to create a troll account more like



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 690 ✭✭✭michael-henry-mcivor


    Your the one not using Your own name-



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,167 ✭✭✭sparky42


    And sure there was no need to spend on defence in the 1930s either, there weren’t any international issues then… Not like it left us vulnerable or anything….

    Given the state of global affairs and the likely future issues, it’s pretty amazing that you can predict what will and won’t be needed, maybe you should offer your services to the all the other nations ramping up their defence spending.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 690 ✭✭✭michael-henry-mcivor


    The nazis were growing in the 30s- they had took over parts of other countries then 🇨🇿 got took over- but Ireland was safe-

    Who is safe- nobody as a military deterrent like America- did not stop the civilian jets taking down the twin towers- then America had to run out of Afghanistan after the brits-

    Billions spend on weapons only to run from the taliban- no thank U-

    Others sh1te themselves, so Ireland has to spend more on military toys-?-Ireland has to follow- no thank U-

    FF FG looking big future jobs in the UN Nato so our future can die in foreign wars- no thank U-

    We have lasted this long- we will last into the future without billionaire military jets etc-



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 4,925 ✭✭✭thomil


    Ugh, trolls are not even trying anymore these days… 🙄🙄🙄

    Good luck trying to figure me out. I haven't managed that myself yet!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,167 ✭✭✭sparky42


    I mean, they don’t even know history let alone current events, or just ignore reality and substitute their own.



  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 17,653 Mod ✭✭✭✭Manic Moran


    [MOD] Post constructively, or not at all, please. Feel free to debate the merits of Ireland’s defense policy over on the appropriate threads, mainly in Politics. (Odd place for policy discussions, really, the politics forum, no?][/MOD]



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,767 ✭✭✭✭cnocbui


    Thailand just got an unbelievable package deal on buying 12 Gripens, which they accepted. It included the source code, manufacturing and technology transfers, training - all for $500m.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,022 ✭✭✭✭banie01


    Do you have a link to that Cnocbui? The articles I've read re: Thailand buying more Gripens are a 4 jet buy for €500 million. There is an ambition to buy 12 over next 10yrs to replace F16A/B but no order for additional 8 as yet and certainly nothing I can find regarding buying 12 for €500 million.

    Thailand are also acquiring Meteor & upgrading their SAAB 340 as part of their fleet renewal.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 27,807 ✭✭✭✭Larbre34


    There's no question of getting even 12 new build bare planes for half a billion dollars.

    The current sticker price, on the showroom floor, is $85 million.

    A comprehensive armaments and support package would be at least $150 million per unit equivalent.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,767 ✭✭✭✭cnocbui


    Returning to the case of Thailand, it is necessary to emphasize that the compensation package offered by the Swedish government was decisive in Thailand's decision to purchase 12 Gripen E/F fighter jets.

    Thus, the economic and technological elements included in the offer helped the Saab Gripen to beat the American competitor F-16 Block 70/72.

    When the final bids were submitted in August last year, an analysis by Defense News recalls that Saab promised: "The Swedish proposal will ensure the best return on investment for Thailand, exceeding the value of the contract, through a well-structured, long-term plan covering key areas of critical technologies and national capabilities for Thailand."

    The compensation package offered by Saab, equivalent to about 155% of the program's value, has proven particularly appealing to Thailand, a nation eager to develop its aerospace industry and technological autonomy.

    A key element of Sweden's proposal is Link-T, a data transmission system developed by Saab specifically for Thailand. Currently, only a few Thai aircraft and a few warships are equipped with this system.

    Bangkok will now obtain the intellectual property rights for the unlimited use and expansion of Link-T. "Saab will transfer the Link-T development capabilities to the Royal Thai Air Force and the local defense industry," the Swedish company said.

    Link-T will improve Thailand's ability to conduct multi-domain operations. Given that the U.S. maintains strict control over its own communications systems, Lockheed Martin's F-16 bid could not compete in this regard.

    Also, the two Saab 340 early warning aircraft already owned by Thailand will be modernized, with local participation. A local maintenance, repair and overhaul centre for the Gripen will also be set up.

    Moreover, Thai companies will enter the supply chain of the Gripen program, having the opportunity to manufacture components such as tires, bearings, clamps and parts for the aircraft structure.

    https://www.defenseromania.ro/care-a-fost-factorul-decisiv-care-a-adus-intr-un-final-victoria-avioanelor-gripen-in-fata-f-16-viper-dupa-10-ani-de-infrangeri-pe-linie_634077.html

    My bad, I was distracted by the package extras and mislead by the way the article was constructed.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 690 ✭✭✭michael-henry-mcivor




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,409 ✭✭✭jonnybigwallet


    On the subject of fast jets…if we were looking at gettin (say) Gripens or Rafales....don't you think an initial buy of say 4 LIFT aircraft might be needed. Say Hurjet or them Italian 345's? Ya can't expect the lads to jump from a PC9 to a gen 4.5 in one leap?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 4,925 ✭✭✭thomil


    My understanding when this story originally bubbled up was that conversion training from the PC-9 to the actual fast jet in question was going to happen with the air force of the country Ireland would be buying from, i.E. the Armee de l'air or the Flygvapnet. Personally, I believe that this is the best way to go, at least for standing up a fast jet capability in the first place.

    In general I agree that it would be good to have an LIFT/light attack capability "in-house" eventually, akin to what Austria is re-establishing with their purchase of the M346, but given what I've seen and heard about Irish military procurement in the twelve plus years I've lived here, it seem essential to me to get the fast jet squadron up and running in the first place. If we go for LIFTs first, we could well be stuck with them, leaving us in the same situation as we're in right now, just with slightly more impressive aircraft.

    Good luck trying to figure me out. I haven't managed that myself yet!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 27,807 ✭✭✭✭Larbre34


    I agree. If urgency is the primary motivation (which it may become, but isn't now) then you buy the fast jets and you train your pilot officers abroad in an existing LIFT setup, just as we have done in the UK, US and Australia.

    We will replace the PC-9 anyway, because its the entry level for all aircraft types, but the jet project needs to be treated as a separate end-to-end process.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,789 ✭✭✭roadmaster




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,409 ✭✭✭jonnybigwallet


    Looks pretty affordable....we could probably make do with 18 units.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 27,807 ✭✭✭✭Larbre34


    Interesting indeed.

    This is the key paragraph of the piece

    "Estimates place the Gripen's unit cost between $110 million and $120 million, whereas the Rafale and F-16 were reportedly priced between $170 million and $240 million per aircraft. Saab’s estimated delivery time is 24 months from contract signature, compared to 60 months for the other offers. Peru has requested delivery of at least two aircraft by July 23, 2026..."



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,087 ✭✭✭Markcheese


    That's for gripen e/f , not the older ,smaller c/ d

    Slava ukraini 🇺🇦



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,022 ✭✭✭✭banie01


    Given the current order backlogs on Rafale & F16, the cost of Eurofighter and the scramble around the world for even second hand fighters, Kuwaiti F18s to Malaysia, Danish F16s to Argentina, Greek Mirage 2000s to India and so on?

    I'd hazard that the capacity of SAAB to deliver an advanced and capable airframe without a 5yr wait is a big advantage too. Couple that with Brazil operating a full Gripen production & full MRO facility as part of their original purchase deal and the Gripen becomes a very attractive proposition for South American AFs.

    The current lack of free capacity within the western fighter producing countries does lead me to think that India might well be between a rock and a hard place if it sticks with Rafale for it's very urgent need for fighters. The MRFA proposal calling for 114 aircraft, is already a rehash of the MMRCA cancelled in 2015. Leads me to think that India may well end up with converting it's HAL SU30-MKI production line into an SU-57 one.

    That's despite India pulling out of the original FGFA programme due to Russian bollock acting. I think if India can get Russia to accept installation of Uttam radar, full source code access and an export license? That they will go with it, despite the IAF wanting to stick with more adoption of Western tech.

    One of the stumbling blocks of the original MMRCA, that Rafale won. Was the refusal of Dassault to stand over quality of Indian production line. That still appears to be an issue.

    Lockheed Martin & SAAB have both offered local production of F16 & Gripen E/F and I think that SAAB having already stood up production in Brazil, will be better placed to do same for India.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,409 ✭✭✭jonnybigwallet


    Pc9 replacement due now. This looks the part

    https://youtu.be/s2eKoD9kaKA?si=J1ODThktkX_K7n6d



Advertisement
Advertisement