Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

Price of a pint !

1232426282950

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,540 ✭✭✭✭rob316




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 535 ✭✭✭Banzai600


    yeah i can see that re tourists, still plenty coming in which is great. some ppl i know - they own businesses both north and south cc, they see the rises and falls with seasons, and one of them was telling me about three hotels beside them, that are recently new-ish. I couldnt believe it.

    the booze industry wont survive on using tourists alone, but i agree, ppl have no issue it seems paying the nuts prices being charged. but with the prices they are charging they seem happy to gamble. id like to see them have a warning shot wakeup call , might get them back to reality. but i think the greed and seething sloth of ripping ppl off is too great a taste.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 3,237 ✭✭✭hold my beer


    People will reduce the amount they go out at the prices they're at now. We've substantially reduced our visits to our local, a short walk away. They do food now, and if they didn't, I'd say they'd be in serious trouble.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 535 ✭✭✭Banzai600


    thats us, the route we went. we'd only go for the beers now and then. its not as weekly as it used to be, by miles. And we're not the only ones, friends the same.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,732 ✭✭✭brokenbad


    €6.90 for a pint of Carslberg in Bridge House Tullamore 



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,071 ✭✭✭crusd


    Contrary to what many say the cost associated with the beer itself is not the only driver of the price of the pint. Staff wages and overheads per pint are higher than the cost per pint from Diaego etc which for a Guinness is about 2.10 plus excise of about 0.55c I believe. With scale the mass producers you would imagine be able to produce for less than they do but they are not going to turn a 6.50 pint into a 5 euro pint. But pubs could definitely get some deals for customers if they were willing to take other products and drinkers were willing to change their drink also.

    Weatherspoons are using their purchasing power to get cheaper deals but there is no way there is profit on a 2.05 pint. If everyone went in a drank Abbot Ale for example they would lose money. But its a loss leader enticing people in the door. One person in a group may have it, but others will take different options where there will be some profit, order food etc. What Weatherspoon's do however is focus relentlessly on wages and overhead which leave the overall cost base lower that your regular bar

    The big difference I see from say 30 years ago in the pub business is than in many cases the owner/operator of the bar and their family often filled many of the shifts in a bar. This was always more common in rural areas and is part of the reason for pints being cheaper outside the cities where often bars have managers and staff at all hours and high rentals rather than being owner operated with lower rental and wage costs. There are bars now starting to run offers during low footfall times which probably use the lower staff requirements at these times to facilitate offering a lower pint. Offers like the below. But the key is getting numbers through the doors consistently as the fixed costs are not going to change but the more pints you sell the lower the fixed cost per pint, which is another thing that helps Weatherspoons with their model to get people through and consuming pints / food as soon as possible to serve as much as possible.

    We will hopefully see pubs with offers like the below trying to address this

    image.png


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,265 ✭✭✭✭tom1ie


    What non Diageo/heineken products are there that are widely available for cheaper than Guinness or Heineken?
    There just isn’t any alternative.

    I walk 10m in either direction of the house and I’ll bump into a pub selling Guinness at over €6.50 and Heineken more expensive again.
    Beamish is not on tap.
    Carlsberg is as expensive as Heineken.
    Perroni, beera moretti, five lamps on tap- you may as well take out a mortgage to fund your drinking!

    Glass of wine for €10!!

    €20 for a beef burger and chips.

    It’s crazy but the pubs are still packed!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,879 ✭✭✭BlueSkyDreams




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,057 ✭✭✭✭Geuze


    I don't know about widely available, but the Blue Note pub in Galway sells White Hag Darkness stout for 5.00.

    As Diageo increase costs, White Hag approached this pub, according to the staff I spoke to, and offered them this stout, which they sell at 5.00.

    Bear in mind that White Hag aren't tiny, but aren't huge either. They can produce stout in Sligo, and it can be sold profitably in Galway for 5.00.

    Down the street, Guinness is 6.00 to 6.40.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,057 ✭✭✭✭Geuze


    +100%, good point.

    My two points are:

    (1) pubs complain about costs, including excise duty, but never blame Diageo + Heineken

    (2) people complain about prices, but won't switch

    The three Spoons outside Dublin closed. If consumers changed their behaviour, that should not have happened.

    I should see more Beamish and the likes of White Hag Darkness at €5, but I don't.

    The Auld Triangle on Dorset street should be thronged - maybe it is, I don't live in Dublin

    The Lark Inn on Meath street should be busy - to be fair, it usually is when I visit



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 33,687 ✭✭✭✭breezy1985


    I have tried to point alternatives out to people. For instance Diagio got so expensive Treaty Brewery is sometimes now cheaper.

    But in my experience the ones who have a habit of complaining loudly about the price are also the most likely to be a self proclaimed"Guinness man" or "Heineken man".



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,071 ✭✭✭crusd


    Blue Note would be a relatively low overhead bar I would imagine which is likely the reason they can charge 5euro. Once overheads and wages are factored in there is no way White Hag supply the beer at a low enough cost to make the differential between 5euro and 6.40 per pint. Would need to supply at under 1 euro per pint plus excise. They would however have lower staff costs Id imagine being a small pub serving no food and also if they own the premises would have no rent. Being there 25 years I assume they own it?? So lower overall overheads is likely what allows them to charge 5 euro

    Which given they were approached by the brewery leads me to think that Diageo and the vintners may collude to set the price of a pint at what the market will bare as if there is profit in a 5 euro craft beer pint in the blue note, other smaller, owner ran pubs in the area should be also able to provide 5 euro pints of Guinness and still turn a profit.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 33,687 ✭✭✭✭breezy1985


    Most owner run pubs are owned by grumpy old dinosaurs who are more hostile to that "fancy craft beer stuff" than their customers are. Reverse snobbery has an absolutely massive part to play in the Irish pub scene.

    They are lazy and uninspired amateurs who then blame everyone and everything else when it's going wrong. They are I bit like the unemployed for 40 years lads who are blaming the immigrants or the government for their feklessness.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,265 ✭✭✭✭tom1ie


    I’ve never seen it in Dublin to be honest.
    Im heading dub laoghaire direction on Sunday and I think there’s a Wetherspoons that direction that I’ll have to look at.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 3,237 ✭✭✭hold my beer




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 19,340 ✭✭✭✭elperello


    You're a bit out of date.

    While there are some pubs that are still like that they are very much in the minority.

    By the way there is no valid comparison between someone who has been running a pub for 40 years and someone unemployed.

    Running a pub is a tough job with long hours.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 33,687 ✭✭✭✭breezy1985


    You just totally misread the meaning of the analogy. You don't need to be telling me how hard running a pub is.

    And no that is still the vast majority of pubs. Very few still have a craft offering.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 19,340 ✭✭✭✭elperello


    Well the least you could do is explain your analogy.

    There is more to a good pub than the presence or absence of craft beer.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 33,687 ✭✭✭✭breezy1985


    This is a thread about the rising price of pints. It was pointed out that you can now get craft cheaper than mark but the publicans and a large cohort of customers have a snobbery or aversion to anything different even if it is cheaper.

    So in the context of the thread yes very much yes does the presence of cheaper craft beer make the pub better and said publicans and customers showing they won't take the rip off from the macros by buying craft will make pubs better.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 19,340 ✭✭✭✭elperello


    They aren't going to the pub to drink something they don't like because it's cheaper.

    They go to the pub because they know it has what they want IE. a good pint of stout, a nice cold draught lager etc.

    They are drinkers not campaigners.

    I still don't get where you were going with your analogy.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 75,489 ✭✭✭✭L1011


    The snobbery thing with lager in particularly is absolutely baffling.

    The lager that's "in" changes every few years and very rapidly, the people who only drink the "in" lager move to it and get snobbish about the one they drank before. Harp was huge, then considered muck. Carling was huge, then considered muck. Budweiser. Carlsberg. Miller. Coors. Rockshore seems to be the big one now, but the "Italian" and "Spanish" (UK or Irish brewed) ones are possibly taking over - and at a super premium price point. Heineken has always maintained some baffling snobby image above all that at least.

    They all taste pretty much the exact same, if the product is shifting and the lines are maintained.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,071 ✭✭✭crusd


    if there was demand there would be the offering. What they don’t want is barrels sitting half full for weeks which is why they carry what sells on tap and if they offer craft beer on bottle only.

    Good beer at reasonable prices is what people look for. Craft or otherwise. In fact I think many places missed a trick by pitching locally sourced beer a premium product. In most countries what comes from the local brewery is actually cheaper. The new breweries should focus on building a market. Good quality local beer supplied to local pubs at a reasonable prices. That’s the way it used to be until Guinness started buying up all the local breweries and shutting them down.

    My ideal pub has a stout, an ale and a lager on tap, sourced locally, with a “special tap” for one offs and seasonals and a guest tap for good deals or beers from other areas.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 41,282 ✭✭✭✭Hotblack Desiato


    Most of the time they're convinced they don't like it even though they've never f**king tried it.

    I'm partial to your abracadabra
    I'm raptured by the joy of it all



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,650 ✭✭✭✭TheValeyard


    Is it more of a popularity thing?

    I'm old enough to remember when everyone was mad into Budweiser.

    Now it's the local beers, IPAs, etc.

    Looks like I picked the wrong week to quit sniffing glue



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 75,489 ✭✭✭✭L1011


    Its entirely a popularity thing, but what replaced Budweiser was another global lager, and what will replace Moretti etc will be another global lager. And the bulk of drinkers of those will act as if they never drank anything else, and never could drink anything else.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,085 ✭✭✭Rocket_GD


    "Rockshore seems to be the big one now"

    Next to nobody drinks Rockshore unless they're forced to as a festival/event that only have it on tap. The marketing for it is massive but absilutely everyone I know or have spoken with about it describe it as píss.

    Moretti and Madri are the "hipster" lagers these days.

    I'd disagree that they all pretty much taste the same, I wouldn't drink a Budweiser or Miller if they were free, I drink Carlsberg 99% of the time, so no one would consider me a lager hipster.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 545 ✭✭✭pjdarcy


    https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058241084/price-of-a-pint

    How in the name of god did you manage to multiply 90 x 9 and get 1800 OP??



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 41,282 ✭✭✭✭Hotblack Desiato


    Before Unweiser it was Furstenburg, and before that I think it was Steiger (although I was too young to drink for that)

    I'm partial to your abracadabra
    I'm raptured by the joy of it all



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 19,340 ✭✭✭✭elperello


    Not always the case.

    If it was we'd still have just Guinness, Harp and Smithwicks taps in every pub.

    Lager drinkers are definitely open to trying something new hence the continuing churn in that sector as outlined by other posters.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 672 ✭✭✭Marcos


    Furstenberg, that's one I haven't heard of in a while.

    When most of us say "social justice" we mean equality under the law opposition to prejudice, discrimination and equal opportunities for all. When Social Justice Activists say "social justice" they mean an emphasis on group identity over the rights of the individual, a rejection of social liberalism, and the assumption that unequal outcomes are always evidence of structural inequalities.

    Andrew Doyle, The New Puritans.



Advertisement
Advertisement