Israel Launches strike against Irans Nuclear Programme

no one is criminalising the right to protest. Protests take place regularly across all of the UK. What they are doing is criminalising a group that regularly takes part in criminal activities. If you break in to private property and cause damage to it and threaten the people that work there, that is criminal, is it not?

It is absolutely criminalising protest - it is a deliberate strategy by the UK government to undermine the movement on Palestine/Gaza. Loads of people 'break into property and cause damge' for many reasons - are they all terrorists?

They suspended 29 licences and left 200+ more in place and while Lammy talked about 'goggles and helmets', bombs, torpedos and grenades. The F35 supply chain has remained intact too and laughably is lawful while the UK criminalise protest!

Another walking miracle been spotted. Senior advisor to Iran's leader was spotted yesterday at a funeral after reports he died in attacks on 13th June. Amazing how the media are so quick to believe everything the Israeli's say as being true after all this time.

Again, I'll ask where is the evidence Iran has an active weapons program?
Both the IAEA and US intel stated that Iran does not have an active weapons program.

It's the same spiel as Iraq and their WMD (although at least there was some fabricated evidence)

I have never said Iran having nukes is a good thing, I'm simply stating that according to all the evidence (or lack thereof) and intel community, Iran was not pursuing a bomb. However in light of the attacks by Israel and the US on Iran, I would highly suspect they are presuming one quite rapidly now.

In short if you believe that Iran wants to destroy the west etc…. the chances of that happening post attack is higher than before it. Meaning the world is less safe today than prior to the attacks.

breaking into private property and causing damage along with threatening and abusing the people who work there is criminal. It isn’t protesting.

I condemn Putin and Netenyahu and both of their illegal attacks on other countries and occupation of the land of other countries and I condemn all killing of civilians and the destruction of medical equipment by soldiers whether by the Russian or Israeli army.

Can you say the same thatsdaft?

if you arent going to have a conversation why bother replying at all ??

Simple fact that PA is a violent criminal organisation engaged in terrorist activities in support of Putins war .

they even video and publicise their crimes as proof ,

Idiotic and misguided Narcissistic extremists who dont care what the case is , they just want the attention ,

For sure, but this is normally known as "direct action" and certainly not terrorism. Such direct action has been around since the late 19th century, often taking the form of ordinary workers or citizens acting in protest against what they perceived to be 'the state' or the 'establishment'.

I know what it is called and to be honest, I think classing PAG alongside MMC and RIM is massive overkill, but their actions are getting increasingly more serious, to the point where it is difficult to feel any sympathy for them. The fact that they are just randomly finding targets because of some perceived moral indignation makes it even more unpalatable.

just because you support someone’s cause, doesn’t mean you have to support their actions. Plenty of people believe in Irish unity, but who in their right mind supports bombing a shopping centre?

I've no issue with them being labelled criminals or even being sent to jail, but to try and decribe an anti-war movement as "terrorists" is clearly a huge overreaction. They are not trying to terrorise anyone, merely to disrupt the war machine, even if one accepts that such disruption is generally regarded as criminal activity.

What are they lying to the IAEA about?

I never answered the question as my concern is not about enrichment levels, it's about Iran actively developing a nuclear weapon (which based on all intel they are not). There has been zero evidence produced that Iran has a current weapons program. Both the IAEA and US intel have stated this but people on here believe they are. Every time Iran has upped their enrichment was in response to either US sanctions, Israeli attacks or the US pulling out of the Iran agreement.

Using the 60% figure is just nonsense. You believe Iran have an active weapons program based on 60% enrichment, correct?
What if that figure was 50%? How about 30%, 20% maybe? What's your cut off % that in your eyes means a country is pursuing a nuke?

So Iran tell you they are not pursuing a nuke and you don't believe them, Iran then tell you they have moved the enriched uranium to a secret site and now you believe them. You kinda just believe what you want to believe.

Trump made a right mess didn't he Wolfey ? Don't forget the Europeans involved in the deal never helped much either by not giving sanctions relief when they agreed to after Trump stormed out of the deal.

There's a dozen non nuclear armed countries with highly enriched uranium above 20%. Are they all building nukes?

Even more have uranium over 4% as it's used for medical purposes.

Germany has had weapons grade uranium for decades and still no nuke. So no, I won't base solely a countries enrichment level on their intent. Now if the IAEA or Intelligence agencies suggests otherwise, I'd change my opinion.

It's Iraq and WMD's all over again IMO.