Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Deposit return scheme (recycling) - Part 2

1140141142143144146»

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,649 ✭✭✭✭Ha Long Bay


    That's a lovely rant but back to the original comment how are customers being scammed?

    Buy item for €1 addition charge of 15c deposit. Bring item back and get the 15c back.

    Where is the scam?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,650 ✭✭✭jj880




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,649 ✭✭✭✭Ha Long Bay


    Poor reply. Not deflecting anything. You did not seem to read my previous posts on the topic.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 36,461 ✭✭✭✭odyssey06


    The scam is in charging for deposits when it was either not possible or very difficult to reclaim it:

    Home deliveries

    People with disabilities

    Areas without RVMs in walking distance

    Airports / Events

    During the changeover period, people were being charged deposits on items not in the scheme. The evidence is on the thread.

    Ireland created the largest exemption for retailers, during the consultation it actually significantly increased the exemption size meaning we have far more outlets selling in scope items that don't have to take them back.

    This is why Re-turn is sitting on tens of millions of unclaimed deposits.

    The scam is what is Re-turn doing with that money and its lack of transparency.

    Re-turn are also scamming consumers by lying that this is about meeting EU recycling targets when they are contradicted by the EU's own website clearly showing it was about increasing collection rates. So the entire scheme is being presented on a dishonest or deceptive basis i.e. a scam as per the dictionary definition.

    "To follow knowledge like a sinking star..." (Tennyson's Ulysses)



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,500 ✭✭✭✭astrofool


    Is the German system also a scam?

    Again, good points let down by hyperbole.

    The airport should have been solved long ago, events should have mobile DRS, the machines should be more accessible.

    Home delivery for the able bodied isn't a point.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,338 ✭✭✭✭kippy


    Any scheme that claims to be a net positive for the environment but actually isn't.

    It doesn't in any way reduce the amount of plastic in circulation. It's pure lip service designed to ensure the producers continue to amass significant profits without impacting on their supply chain or forcing them to do anything about the actual problem.

    You write all of the points made off very easily but ultimately these things haven't been sorted out more than a year in.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 36,461 ✭✭✭✭odyssey06


    How transparent is the German scheme on its rationale and the activities of its operator?
    I've demonstrated that Re-turn is dishonestly presenting the scheme to the public.
    It is also shielding itself from scrutiny to a degree which should not be acceptable in the sole body operating a state scheme.

    So I've outlined the reasonable basis on which to call the scheme a scam. You are of course free to disagree. I'm pretty sure the thread has had this 'scam' argument already, with the same posters making largely the same points.

    The purpose of the scheme is to increase collection rates, so home delivery is a point against the scheme, especially when combined with the exemption size & lack of council Re-turn outlets - that is on Government and councils.
    It is setup in such a way that Re-turn are funded by unclaimed deposits. The more they fail, the more money they accumulate. But Re-turn are limited in what they can do, but enough that they can allow Government and councils to dodge responsibility for the gaps and failings in the scheme.

    "To follow knowledge like a sinking star..." (Tennyson's Ulysses)



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 388 ✭✭pjdarcy


    I hope they move to these type of machines soon. So much better than having to insert each item individually



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 23,191 ✭✭✭✭dxhound2005


    None of that is true, except the bit about the bin surrounds.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 36,461 ✭✭✭✭odyssey06


    Over €54 million worth of plastic bottles and cans went unclaimed in the last year since the Deposit Return Scheme began, it has been revealed.

    https://www.newstalk.com/news/im-fed-up-e54m-in-bottles-and-cans-went-unclaimed-in-the-last-year-2139346

    "To follow knowledge like a sinking star..." (Tennyson's Ulysses)



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 23,191 ✭✭✭✭dxhound2005


    It can't be €54 million in February and still €54 million now. All those containers could have come back since. But I have some I bought last week still not opened.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,650 ✭✭✭jj880


    🤣🤣🤣. That did give me a laugh I'll give you that.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 36,461 ✭✭✭✭odyssey06


    It was €54 million in February which is far far higher than it should be and so forms a reasonable basis for the discussion. The idea that "all those containers could have come back since" is nonsense given that the target is 90% and there's absolutely zero evidence to suggest a 100% return rate. The ones that weren't returned during the absolute shambles of a rollout won't be coming back now that's for sure.

    So what's the figure now in tens of millions?

    Show us the figures from Re-turn demonstrating that it isn't true and what they've been doing with the unclaimed deposits.

    Otherwise, we'll stick with the figure quoted in the media, €54 million.

    "To follow knowledge like a sinking star..." (Tennyson's Ulysses)



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,650 ✭✭✭jj880


    RVMs are obviously more energy efficient than recycle wheelie bins. That extra fleet of Re-Turn lorries we now have must be solar powered.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 503 ✭✭✭sliabh 1956


    What a no brainer brilliant because there is only me and Mrs Sliabh our volume is quite small but going to the centre and see people with massive amounts to dispose of is areal turn off



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 23,191 ✭✭✭✭dxhound2005


    The big ones are a recent enough (2022 from memory) invention, and again from memory only offered by one RVM maker. They are not common anywhere compared to the "normal" ones. They will be installed if it makes economic sense for shops, who have to pay for them. It was discussed on the thread a few times before, mostly after the one in Newcastle Co Dublin was installed.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 36,461 ✭✭✭✭odyssey06


    The bulk machines should be installed at council sites. It would facilitate charity \ schools \ sports groups doing collections.

    Councils getting off scot free here in doing their part.

    Can be paid for out of those tens of millions Re-turn are sitting on.

    "To follow knowledge like a sinking star..." (Tennyson's Ulysses)



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,338 ✭✭✭✭kippy




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,201 ✭✭✭Ray Palmer


    The manufacturer aren't making many seems to be the biggest issue. They really haven't made many so far so how are you guying to buy many more? No doubt they cost more too.

    The council aren't in anyway responsible for the scheme so no part to play.

    Isn't there an existing plan for any money they make?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 36,461 ✭✭✭✭odyssey06


    They seem to operate ok in other jurisdictions. Sounds like we've over spec'd things as usual inhibiting ability to deliver actual service.

    The councils should have a part to play is the point. Green washing of responsibilities going on here.

    Is there a plan? All I've heard is aspirational guff so far, nothing concrete.

    "To follow knowledge like a sinking star..." (Tennyson's Ulysses)



  • Advertisement
Advertisement