Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

The Official Cavan GAA Discussion thread.

1445446447448449451»

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,325 ✭✭✭baconsarnie


    Who are the players knocking about with the right age profile who should be in there? Genuine question.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 166 ✭✭etuzyuk


    No point naming lads in there who won't hang about for long or have been in there and now zero interest in IC football. A more pertinent question is why persist with playing lads in important games who cannot train and are cruelly unfit? Even GMcK last Sunday. What is he doing on the bench? If he is not fit to play he should be nowhere near the bench. If he is fit enough to be on the bench we should have saw him in action.

    There's a general malaise in there and it's being going on for years and introducing young lads into that will turn most of them off. The Armagh championship game in Breffni couple of years ago is one that particularly burns in my mind. We started, off the top of my head, 7 or 8 half fit/injured players with limited game time from a good league campaign. Haven't seen head nor tail of some of the actual league performers since and why would I. Nothing says I think you're only a c**t more to a footballer than using them when desperate and dropping them for the first half fit player becomes available. And that's not an isolated incident, that's the culture that's in there for years now. If people think I'm deluded or off my head, I don't really care and have zero interest in debating. I know what I've seen with my own eyes and I've half lost interest in following Cavan TBH.

    So on who's available to play for Cavan in future? We'll see. In fairness to management we are lacking a couple good ball winning midfielders who can also track back. That's difficult to solve but playing lads with hard running in the legs is a must for everywhere else and there's no real excuses for not having that. Father time will soon force the hand anyway on the squad building front. And on that I think we should move away from anyone associated with the setup of the last 6 or 7 years. So probably an outside man. Difficult task because it takes a few years to build a proper squad while also getting respectable results in the short term. And getting players wanting to be part of a Cavan setup and prepared to fight hard for a jersey.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,325 ✭✭✭baconsarnie


    Great post, loads of things I would agree with, espcially the Armagh game under Mickey Graham.

    In terms of listing Gearoid, it's not unique to Cavan to have a dummy panel or team and try to bluff opposition management to plan for something you don't intend to do. Can't see the point in it myself. Sure McGuinness did the same, and he's a genius :0

    Your point about needing to remain competitive now and plan for the future is the problem. Our best players are proven and have done it (inconstantly, granted) and we definitely don't need to go back to 2012 when we started from scratch.

    I still am not sure there is loads of talent just waiting there. You mention Armagh but they are the outlier here. Almost all successful intercounty teams are based on waves of successufl u20 teams. Armagh have had the luxury / luck / foresight of consistent management with 100% player buy-in but uo to last year there were years of talk among Armagh supporters that McGeeny's time was well up (a friend of mine thought he was finished in 2019 when we beat them). He was given time that no other county will ever give a manager.

    Our only successes in the last 50 years have been based on success at underage level. Granted in 97 we had a good age profile but back to back Ulster titles in 2019 and 2020 was based on youth development.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,366 ✭✭✭Cavan_King


    Couldn’t agree more re lads being handed a jersey when not nearly fit. We’ve seen it countless times and that Armagh game was a prime example.

    These lads are being rushed back and are never given the chance to get themselves right. Look at McVeety last year. Going to and leaving games with his foot in a boot.

    Development is shocking in the county. Last year the minors had two good midfielders. Nwaneri from Blackwater & Clarke from Castlerahan. We’re crying out for good midfielders yet those two lads were just cut adrift this year with no input from county development. It’s disgraceful.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 166 ✭✭etuzyuk


    Agree with most of those two posts.

    I'll just say on the Armagh manager Baconsarnie, the outlier is they got lucky with a great manager, not that they stuck with a manager. Fans might have been getting frustrated but players were always 100% behind him which is a near impossible task for 99% of managers for that space of time. If they had stuck with Grimley they'd be nowhere today so you have to know when to move on managers too and go with a better option and move fast if they exist.

    It's not only development Cavan_King. There's so many small little things that add up to a general disconnect between clubs and county. Hopefully a new chairman will improve things. Yes I've heard plenty complaints of very negative experience in the development area for young players. This sours their view early of playing for Cavan and that can be infectious. Then when they do come into the senior setup, some have been treated poorly. Go back to their clubs dejected, their club form suffers for a bit afterwards too and it takes a bit of work to get their confidence back. There's also some bullying that has gone on in there with young players. Then scheduling county finals in home ground or the pulling the bit of a fast one on clubs when it comes to club fundraiser monies. Even when you go looking for money now for a club some people are very wary and suspicious of where the money is going and that it's not 100% what it says on the tin. All this adds up to a club first mentality for a lot of people. And I'm not saying Breffni development is not important or it could be a great thing, but you have to be wary at what cost.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,366 ✭✭✭Cavan_King


    The Cavan minors have three of the best underage forwards we’ve seen in a good few years due to all start tomorrow - Brady, Quigley & now Graham joining them.

    Let’s hope that they throw off the shackles a bit and play like a team has three top forwards.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 54,412 ✭✭✭✭tayto lover


    Genuine question. How did they only score 1 point in the second half against Tyrone if they're that good?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 37 hatefulrory


    Good players don't always play well all the time. Tyrone were excellent and had us pinned in our own half for most of the second half.

    It will be very interesting to see how they get on against a non-Ulster side. The lads are battle hardened at this stage where as Kerry haven't really been tested.

    Hopefully we can put in a spiteful Ulster performance and frustrate Kerry.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,366 ✭✭✭Cavan_King


    This should tell us a lot about the quality of Cavan juvenile football because these three lads have been tearing it up for years now.

    As another poster said above, we struggled against Tyrone in the second half to even get the ball up the pitch but it’s a valid question : were Tyrone very good or are these lads over rated?

    I think we have a good overall club game. There’s probably a bit of a gap after them but Gowna and Crosserlough would be a match for the champions from any other county IMO.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,191 ✭✭✭cavan4sam


    Best of luck to the minors today as Rory posted let's hope they throw off the shackles and see where it goes

    Should be some great games over the weekend

    I think cork will ask real questions of Tyrone and mayo and Roscommon wil both make semis



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 37 hatefulrory


    We were second best for a lot of that game but still could have won it. I felt there were at least 2 frees not given to us at the end, the ref bottled both.

    Still, couldn't say Kerry didn't deserve it. A very odd Cavan side, playing in bursts but drifting out of games and making lots of unforced errors. Possibly the athleticism isn't as high as their skill level and that gets exposed against sides who have both.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,191 ✭✭✭cavan4sam


    Definitely a game we could have got something out of . As U said so many unforced errors and poor shot selections but they gave it a shot and remember these are mostly 16 year olds

    Let's hope that a year's break from a county scene that they'll have been part of for the last 4 years between development squads etc will do them no harm before they come back as under 20s as I don't believe straight into u20s with no break benefits anyone



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,366 ✭✭✭Cavan_King


    So you think you should put three or four years development into lads and then just release a promising player away from the setup for a year?

    Would it not be better to keep a group of lads like that together and get them to push each other on?

    They haven’t exactly been flogged in development panels. U15 & U16 panels are one session a week.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,191 ✭✭✭cavan4sam


    I don't necessarily mean release them but I think for lads that have potential to be on next year's squad it's just a long time to be involved in county squads if they are going to progress to seniors etc ... Yes have them on s &c programmes or whatever works , most of them will be leaving cert too

    I read somewhere recently that mayo don't allow lads into under 20s on 1st year of senior football it could be bs but it might explain why Kobe mc Donald wasn't playing this year

    Not too many u15 or u16 squads doing one session a week either



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,366 ✭✭✭Cavan_King


    What U15 and U16 development panels are you on about? The Cavan U15 & U16 development panels do one session a week on Saturday morning.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,191 ✭✭✭cavan4sam


    So no s&c midweek??



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,366 ✭✭✭Cavan_King


    Not regularly for the 15s & 16s panels. They might the odd time but it’s rare. Other counties, even Fermanagh, do extra over school holidays, like Halloween week, but Cavan don’t tend to.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,736 ✭✭✭celt262




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 499 ✭✭TsuDhoNimh


    I read somewhere recently that mayo don't allow lads into under 20s on 1st year of senior football it could be bs but it might explain why Kobe mc Donald wasn't playing this year

    Not sure where you read that, but it's incorrect.

    Paul Gilmore & David Dolan from this years 20s side both played u20 all 3 years they were eligible. Next year we'll have another 5 lads in that boat (Coghill, McGreal, Mortimer, Beirne & Lydon). With Daithí Butler playing this year, who'd have been part of '24 minor panel with the potential to be another 3-year 20. No rules or selection criteria that rule out lads playing. With lots of the u18 lads that might have been close (though not one specifically mentioned) featuring for the u19 dev panel & getting a few games along with some comparable development coaching to the u19s that were playing 20s this year.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,366 ✭✭✭Cavan_King


    Usually only one session a week for the U15 and U16 panels. 2 to 2.5 hours on a Saturday morning. 1 hour S&C and then gym work. Some weeks, if playing a game, it’s the game they have on the Saturday so no training.

    Then it’s nearly overkill when they join the actual minor panel as they’ve six months of 3-4 sessions a week. IMO trying to jam in all the work they didn’t do previously. Then we wonder why Tyrone are physically superior to us.

    And then what? It appears at present nothing. Just told off yas go lads to your clubs and we might see you on the U20 panel at some stage in a few years.

    The issue in Cavan appears to be Breffni to me. Everything is being cut, cut, cut in headquarters so that we can stick a load of money into a stadium we can’t actually fill.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 166 ✭✭etuzyuk


    Edge of the seat finale yesterday. Played in spurts. At times we looked like we'd get overrun but hung in. When we were on top we looked very good. Very disappointed in the end not to get something out of the game. Opportunity was there to punish them. Probably should have got a free or two but there were other opportunities had we showed a little more composure.

    But overall have to be very happy. You'd imagine it's between Kerry and Tyrone now. We competed well with both even though playing at a huge physical disadvantage. Some of our lads look to have big futures. Power and ability up the middle to midfield. GK is a talent. Forwards hadn't their best day but there is clearly talent there. Was a tough assignment for the smaller lads but they showed skill and bottle, and once they gain in size loads of potential there.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,366 ✭✭✭Cavan_King


    Discipline cost us unfortunately. Kerry got a valuable 2 pointer when one of our players was stopped for travelling and threw the ball away. A free halfway down the pitch moved up 50 yards to a score-able position and it was punished.

    The players also should have known the rule re a 3 up breach when a player mistakenly carries or runs over the halfway line for the ball - it’s a free from midfield mark. It did already happen after all in their Donegal game. I hadn’t known it myself prior to that I admit.

    We coughed up possession thinking it was a 13 yard free when a decent break was on.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 166 ✭✭etuzyuk


    Yeah there were lots of frustrations in the game had me pulling my hair out but that's football. They had ample opportunity to throw in the towel too which we've seen from many Cavan teams before. But they stuck at it and stayed swinging till the end. Overall you'd have to feel positive with that group.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,868 ✭✭✭DJIMI TRARORE


    Unfortunately a lack of scoring players probably cost, despite what everyone was saying about the "quality" of the full forward line, 1 pt in 2nd half v Tyrone and 5 scores in each half v Kerry, abysmal really. It's one thing dominating and "looking class"at club level in cavan to actually transferring it to county



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 166 ✭✭etuzyuk


    Certainly from what I've seen in the two games it's the spine of the team up to midfield you'd be crediting with our progress this year plus the GK. That's no bad thing. Plus we were playing 2 very very good teams so you have to give defenders credit too. If I were a Tyrone scout looking at the second game yesterday, I wouldn't be getting too excited over Kerr either from the 45 minutes I saw. Conditions were tough on top. Days like yesterday are a huge learning experience and build character if the attitude is right.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,366 ✭✭✭Cavan_King


    Did our system suit the forwards? I’d argue it didn’t. The ball was not moved quickly. I said here Friday evening it’d be great to see the shackles off but it didn’t happen.

    Very hard for a forward, no matter how good they are, if they are receiving the ball when the opposition have had adequate time to arrange their defence.

    I raised here after other games that you’d Quigley one on one in games but the ball wasn’t delivered. A player looked to with a sideline ball in one game and was ordered not to at even the thought of a direct ball being put into the mixer.

    When they did actually let the ball in against Donegal, with two men on Quigley at the time, it wasn’t a particularly good pass but the two backs panicked and the ball ended up in the net.

    Post edited by Cavan_King at


Advertisement